SCARY QUEER PERSON!!!
Feels good to be back 😈 and I’m DONE CENSORING MYSELF. LONG LIVE QUEER FREEDOM AND JOY!! ☀️☀️☀️
24 notes
·
View notes
every time queer discourse surges on this site everyone is so quick to jump to “it was actually the evil lesbians who divided us” because y’all heard the term “political lesbian” and never bothered to figure out what that meant
3K notes
·
View notes
listen im ace and im pro kink at pride and whatever, but the way some of yall are wording your posts in response to the backlash against it is uh. really taking me back to the ace shitcourse era.
yall know theres nothing wrong with being a "virgin", right? that its not inherently shameful to have not had sex, to never have sex, even if youre not ace, even if you do want to have sex someday, like, its fine that you haven't had sex?
maybe if your problem is that theyre trying to police your behavior and shame you for expressing your sexuality, you can say that? instead of resorting to "haha stupid virgin gets no bitches" like my god. do you not hear how fucking regressive that attitude is? i know, i know, youre "joking".
get a better joke
1K notes
·
View notes
just saw someone on a self shipping post say to not use the word "obsessed" to describe their feelings for their f/o bc it's harmful to those with ocd and as someone with severe ocd please shut the fuck up and go outside oh my god
244 notes
·
View notes
I will never be a content creator. The microscope those people live under is insane. It’s like nobody is ever allowed to mess up.
I was just reading this thread started by a leftist content creator asking people about a time when they felt let down by a creator they liked, and the comments were such a mixed bag. There was a lot of genuine criticism but then you’d also get comments like “ABC said this one kinda questionable thing one time, it shocked me so much and I lost all my respect for them. I couldn’t in good conscience keep supporting them after they had one questionable take.”
Fuck the alt-right pipeline and creators who never learn from their mistakes but progressives also need to stop being so fucking judgmental. People are going to mess up, you need to let them learn and grow instead of demanding perfection at all times.
226 notes
·
View notes
By @desnos
132 notes
·
View notes
Someone just equated fucking your friends to incest to me
Friends aren't biologically related to you!
It is literally not incest!
96 notes
·
View notes
Numbers that don't define your worth:
The number of people you have or haven't slept with.
The number on the scale.
The height of your heels.
The length of your dress, pants, shorts, or skirt.
The depth of your neckline.
The width of your waistline.
The measurements of various body parts.
Your BMI.
Your fasting glucose, cholesterol, A1C, or any other labs.
The number of children you've had.
How many of those children are boys.
How many relationships you've been in.
How many times you've been married.
How many days you've been sober.
The number of trophies on your shelf.
Your income.
Your credit score.
How many extracurriculars you're involved in.
The number of likes you have on whatever content you post.
The number of followers you have on social media.
The number of friends you have in real life.
How many parties you get invited to.
Your age.
How much weight you can lift bench press.
How many push-ups, sit-ups, chin-ups, etc. you can do.
Your height.
The numbers on your clothing tags.
The number of degrees and certificates you have.
The number of houses you own.
The number of hours you work each week.
Your GPA.
515 notes
·
View notes
"I don't care about shipcourse, I touch grass hurr durr"
But you do realize that antis are part of a far right push towards wider censorship policies in actual real life. Of actual real art. Right? Right??????
You touch grass but do you ever want to touch a piece of non-corporate-approved not cookie cutter white christian media again? You ever read a book that has been banned and think "well jeez it would suck if I lived in a time when I would get arrested for this."
THE TIME IS HERE. THE PUSH IS NOW. ARTISTS OF ALL SORTS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH FANFICTION OR SHIPPING HAVE BEEN SPEAKING OUT AND WARNING YOU ABOUT THIS FOR AGES. IT IS NOT A "CHRONICALLY ONLINE" STANCE TO THINK CENSORSHIP IS BAD AND ACTIVELY DANGEROUS TO EVERY SINGLE PERSON WHO CANNOT BUY THEIR WAY OUT OF JAIL. THE NAZIS HAD A WHOLE THING ABOUT "GOOD MORALLY PURE ART" AND "BAD MORALLY DEGENERATE ART" TOO. THEY BURNED RECORDS OF QUEER CLINICS. THEY CENSORED ANY NEWS THAT WASN'T WITH THEIR AGENDA. DOES THAT REMIND YOU OF ANYTHING DOES IT.
133 notes
·
View notes
Stop fucking saying CP. 'Child porn' is not a thing. That's a harmful, outdated term that implies a child can consent. A child cannot consent. Sexually explicit material that exploits REAL children is CSEM (child sexual exploitation material) or CSAM (child sexual abuse material).
Sexually explicit FICTION is not CSEM or CSAM -- it does not exploit real people of any age to create. That's because it's fiction. Reading it also does not exploit a real person, of any age. It might affect the person that chose to read it, in an emotional/distressing way, and that may feel like harm. But it is not the same as the creator causing you harm maliciously. Dealing with coming across things that distress us is something we all have to learn when we grow up.
Reading or writing underage sexually explicit fiction doesn't make a person a pedophile or a predator. (A lot of you don't seem to actually KNOW what a pedophile is, at that. Frustrating. Words MEAN THINGS.) It's not evidence of being one, or having these desires, either. Yes, I mean even when the fiction portrays things that are horrific IRL. Yes, I mean even when something that would be horrible IRL is treated as romantic and consensual in fiction. And yes, I mean even the stuff that squicks you personally.
When you (general) throw terms like this around incorrectly, loosely, or vengefully, you actually do harm by watering down the meaning of words that describe actual, exploitative, illegal, and terrible real life actions. You do harm by making undue accusations and wasting time and resources that should've been spent elsewhere. You affect real people.
Sometimes people write from their own childhood experiences. Some people just have a fucking imagination for how a situation might play out under certain circumstances. Some people look at two characters and their history and fill in the blanks with all the twists and turns they see lurking in the shadows. Some people have a really fucked up idea they want to explore IN FICTION.
People can have their own squicks and boundaries about it, and that's fine. There's certainly fictional underage material that squicks me, even though I write and read tons of underage fiction. This is what tags, summaries, the back button, and the delete from history button are for.
Thought crime is not a thing. Quit equating it with real life.
961 notes
·
View notes
What if Alastor’s deal, the one that Husk was talking about, is with Charlie. Maybe it’s not even a real deal? What if they met when he was human and they both became obsessed with each other. After he died, he tried to find an in with his princess and she assumed he went to Heaven.
There is a leash, a metaphorical one, that binds him to her. One he loves and adores, that he uses to follow her around. He always knows where she is and what she’s feeling. He is always there, waiting for her to see him properly, to actually take his soul in a deal.
Anyway, I’m writing a fanfic about this, so keep an eye out.
76 notes
·
View notes
Kink discourse is so fucking wacky to me. It is just roleplay. It’s a game. It’s make believe. Please calm down. People who play dnd don’t actually want to kill other people with swords, either, since this is apparently hard to distinguish. People who watch horror movies are not secretly serial killers waiting to strike. Watching game of thrones didn’t make people fuck their siblings. Are you listening to me.
188 notes
·
View notes
being a sexual person isn't a bad thing. having sex isn't a bad thing. having sex frequently isn't a bad thing. if you genuinely think someone engaging in a lot of sexual behavior/activity whether it's watching porn or actually having sex is this debased activity that has an impact on someone's logical functioning ("horny brainrot" or whatever you wanna call it), you're espousing reactionary beliefs around sexuality oft endorsed by the likes of conservative catholics. that's it. that's what you're doing.
3K notes
·
View notes
My fucking confession to that fucking blog I won't waste my time submitting bc really what's even the point of talking to someone who doesn't want to open their minds and understand is that y'all came out of reading and experiencing svsss not having learnt anything.
When written within the bounds of the original genre, this kind of character was extremely difficult to handle. You could say he was scum, but he was also pitiful. But if you tried to acknowledge his pathos, his ruthlessness was real too. Characters that were both scummy and tragic always drew aggro, and they were a hotbed for wank, leading comments sections to devolve into massive flame wars. Better to hack him down into a formulaic asshole and let the protagonist step on him. Easier to write, and the readers would find it satisfying as well. (Chapter 19: Shen Jiu)
this is why writers can't write complex villains, bc you all with your moral purity takes can't handle it. bravo, you've proved mxtx right.
some of you get soooooo twisted trying to defend SJ you flatten his character and make him into a parody of himself.
some of you are so wrapped in the pity contest of "who suffered the most" to determine who has the moral highground that you don't get that you can't pit a character's pain against another character's pain. abuse is abuse is abuse. QJL was abusive for three years, SJ killed him. SJ was abusive for aprox. 5-7 years, Bingge tortured him AND killed him. And killed everyone associated to him. Somewhere down the line, I bet that in real PIDW verse someone will try to take out Bingge for all the suffering he caused. the point is that they BOTH did SHITTY THINGS, they were BOTH abusive because they DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY LOVE IN THEIR LIVES after they were abandoned. both shen jiu and bingge are scummy and tragic. BOTH OF THEM. and because of the abuse and trauma they suffered, they both had awful coping mechanisms that entailed taking out their pain on people who didn't deserve it.
and that's the whole fucking point!!! they're deliciously complex characters. they were born from the fucked-up union between the cycle of abuse and toxic masculinity. they are simultaneously constructions and deconstructions of the Villain Character. they are profoundly human as well, because they showcase the darkness of the human experience, what happens when a person transforms their pain into a weapon to hurt others.
and y'all are arguing over who is innocent? get out.
155 notes
·
View notes
yknow some ppl really need to stop pretending that they’re better than others because they can acknowledge nonsexual qualities abt someone. sexual attraction isn’t a bad thing. it doesn’t make you a bad person. like cmon dude.
991 notes
·
View notes
I saw someone on twitter claim that lolicon/shotacon and other adjacent type tropes only exist because pedophiles know they can't rape children, so they just draw it instead.
And I am not even remotely joking when I ask, if that were 100% factual and not a blatant strawman; how is that a bad thing?
How is someone with a mental illness choosing to cope with their desires through artwork instead of going out and raping a real, living child a bad thing?
Look me in the eyes and explain it like I'm 5 how intentionally going out of your way to avoid hurting a person because you know it would be wrong is bad.
50 notes
·
View notes