“Sentences rendues à Lachine,” La Presse. March 10, 1933. Page 9.
----
(Du correspondant de la PRESSE)
Lachine, 10 - Le juge J.-A. Robillard, siégeant en Cour du recorder, hier soir, a condamné à $20 d'amende, à $18 de frais, ou à 2 mois de prison. Charles Leclair, pour s'être porté à des voies de fait sur un ami dans un restaurant de notre ville,
Aimé Provencher et Josaphat Shank ont été condamnés au temps e fait en prison, pour avoir troublé la paix et ivresse.
1 note
·
View note
road trip. you hand me a bottle. “we’ll drive until it’s empty then stop for more,” you say.
so you drive and drive and drive and I drink and drink and drink and sometimes you stop the car so I can wobble out to the woods by the road to pee and by the time the bottle is empty you pull into the parking lot of a liquor store.
you go in while I am left to stagger around outside, leaning on the car and giggling and hiccuping to myself. by the time you come back out, I’ve both peed in and removed my pants and underwear and am sitting in the passenger seat with my legs spread.
you pet my wet, drunk pussy and hand me a new bottle. “drink up,” you say, “when you’re done we’ll stop for more.”
and when we stop for the night and you carry me over your shoulder into our hotel room, you hand me one last bottle and make me cum until it’s empty.
414 notes
·
View notes
Like genuinely. He was putting his hand on her waist after an hour of reciprocated cuddling. He should have asked for explicit consent but instead read her non verbal cues wrong. Ok that’s on him!! But when she explicitly showed disinterest towards doing anything with him he walked away no bother.
Idk this whole thing has been blown up far too much. Sexual predator, rapist, pedophile … come on to fuck this is so unnecessary 😭 his initial statement was bad which yeah he deserves some lashings for but not doxxing, death threats and reporting him to immigration, losing longterm friends like what the fuck are we doing here. Do these people realise people like Adin Ross and Mizkif are happily raking it in streaming every day?
agree with you 100% anon. his biggest mistake is not getting verbal consent. yes non-verbal consent exists and that’s probably what he was going off of but verbal consent is a must with people you barely know or it ends up like this. though again, he was drunk. and it’s interesting to me how being drunk only seems to matter to people when its her and not him, they were both drunk. two adults who were drunk.
the most important thing to me is that when she showed very clear disinterest by not going with him to his room, he backed off. it makes me feel less crazy to think if she had said she was uncomfortable (if he had freaking asked) he would’ve stopped.
67 notes
·
View notes
wip wednesday: damian inherits bruce’s adoption issues au! (wip: one-shot) (1k/3k)
“Damian,” Bruce starts, gently. “How many cats do you have?”
Damian sniffs. Captain Alfred shifts unhappily in his arms, so he readjusts his one-armed hold. “Don’t be foolish, Father. Alfred is known to be the only cat here.”
Behind his back, he used his free hand to signal Return to Base to Silly Alfred. Unfortunately, direct scrutiny limits Damian’s movement and confuses the hand sign. Double unfortunately, Silly Alfred is a master of charisma, not obedience. He continues to bat at the coiled door stopper as if he’s not about to compromise his entire squad.
“That’s a sentence with one too many clauses,” Jason pokes.
“This concerns you, how, Todd?” Damian snaps. “You don’t even live here!”
“Ooh, and there’s a sentence with a few too many claws-es!” Jason’s smirk stretches wide, almost into a proper smile. Clearly, he is enjoying the idea of Damian getting caught. Does he not understand what is at stake?
“Bruce?” comes a tired voice. Tim, the fool, stumbles into the room, apparently done with his weekend-long casework bender. “The computer’s running some numbers— can you make sure nobody touches the program ‘til I wake up?”
In his arms is Friendly Alfred. Hungry Alfred trots after his heels.
Bruce, for all his mastery of deceit and the fine-tuned control of expression that entails, freezes.
76 notes
·
View notes
“Ask For 4 Months, Cadi Grants Favor,” Toronto Star. December 8, 1932. Page 2.
----
Court Recommends Burwash for Musehuk – Drunk Damaged New Police Station
---
‘Thomas Clarke, charged with being drunk,’ read out P.C. Collins in early men’s court to-day.
‘He died last night,’ stated Fred Sherriffs, J.P. ‘He passed away in number three police station.’
Deceased, 29, born in Canada, was charged with being intoxicated on Bathurst St.
A McDonald, charged with being drunk and with doing malicious damage to property, was remanded for a week on his own bail, in the care of Capt. Mason of the church army.
Police alleged that he had been drinking native wine and charged that he entered the new and beautiful No. 12 police station on north Yonge ST. and did $50 worth of damage. For creating a fuss in the lion’s den, he was promptly arrested on two charges.
Orie Thompson was convicted of drunkenness by Magistrate Tinker and was fined $10 or fifteen days.
Steve Museliuk, charged with vagrancy, asked for four months. He got his wish.
‘I am committing you to jail for four months and recommending Burwash,’ said Magistrate Tinker.
Robbery Is ChargeCharged with shopbreaking, Joseph Schwab, 28, of Lippincott, St., and Alfred Currie, 32, of Augusta Ave., were remanded by Magistrate Jones in men’s court to-day until December 14. Bail was $1,000 for each man.
One was arrested by motorcycle officers while he was alleged to have been trying to sell some leather goods belonging to an east-end dealer. The other was arrested by Detectives Butler and Harris.
Police alleged that the arrests solve the theft of 148 dozen pairs of leather soles from the warehouse of Zeomon Enchin, of 19 Grenadier Rd., on Tuesday night. The initial arrest was made by Motorcycle Officers Jerry and Craig from information received.
Appearing for sentence on a charge of stealing a gold watch, John Zone was given 30 days.
Earns $5 a Week‘She told me she worked from 7 in the morning until 9 at night for $5 a week,’ said P.C. Robb in testifying against Rosie Leisiltz, Queen St., charged with a breach of the Liquor Control Act. ‘The restaurant she works in is beneath the single room where she live with a crippled husband and two children. Here were three men drinking beer out of a jug.’
Beer was exhibited and P.C. Colson said that the woman had told him all her trouble. He said he had been the paralyzed husband sitting in a chair.
The crown pointed out that accused was working long hours for little money to support her husband and family, rather than go on city relief.
Found guilty, she was remanded for sentenced until Dec. 21 on a bond of $200.
Limit on the LiquorMary Smith, Queen St. E., charged with having liquor contrary to the Liquor Control Act, pleaded not guilty and denied any knowledge of a half-full jug of wine which was found in her room.
Plainclothesmen Crawford and McKay said they found liquor for which there was no provision made on her permit. It was also disclosed that a limit had been set on the quantity of liquor she was allowed to purchase each month.
She was not allowed to buy more than 48 bottles of beer, two bottles of spirits and 12 bottles of wine.
‘That’s not much of a limit,’ remarked the bench.
Accused was fined $10 and costs or 30 days, her permit was cancelled and her house declared a public place.
Betting Slips in YiddishCounsel Austin Ross, appearing for Louis Binder, charged with recording bets, a plea of not guilty.
Plainclothesmen Mckay and Crawford said they entered a Queen St. W. house and found accused with $44 worth of betting slips.
‘He had racing forms and the slips were written in Yiddish,’ they said.
Mr. Ross then changed the plea to guilty and accused was fined $50 and costs or 30 days.
0 notes
everyday i hear people publically say stuff like "sorry repeat that again i have adhd i have trouble consintrating"
but i dont feel safe saying "sorry repeat that again im schizophrenic i have trouble consintrating"
like yes being able to talk about some mental illnesses publically is a huge step forward and im happy for you
but i literally dont feel safe telling people publically that im schizophrenic due to the decades or longer of stigma
widespread mental health awareness completely ignores us schizophrenics when were the ones with horrible stigma and a long history of medical abuse
if you have a mental illness that is getting public awknoledgement congratulations, now do your part and stick up for the hidden side of the community
641 notes
·
View notes