Tumgik
#and maybe like shakespeare - idk
flowersforfrancis · 11 months
Text
Why is blood kinda, fucking, ...Beautiful?
74 notes · View notes
whatkindofnameisella · 7 months
Text
average experience watching a clip of andrew scott's hamlet
Tumblr media
48 notes · View notes
sailforvalinor · 2 years
Text
My literature professor: “When Benedick says, ‘Peace! I will stop your mouth’ and kisses Beatrice, Beatrice has no further lines in the play, she’s completely silent, symbolizing how by marrying Benedick she is surrendering all of her power. In being silent she is submitting to patriarchal values of—“
Me: “—ma’am, there are 29 lines left in the play.”
88 notes · View notes
dockaspbrak · 3 months
Text
you know, i dont know a single other person i could tell about this dmitri thing except my girlfriend and i basically just reeled her to opera after a lot of "no no its ok its not that serious its just pretty soap opera plotlines its nice its silly dont take it that seriously" for awhile ughguhtorroijg honestly its a shame im sorry if it seems pretentious i assure you its really not something im proud of liking i just think its silly and fun. like games youd play as a kid but if theres x100 the drama and a soundtrack made just for it. affairs and murders....i wish it was less held up as fancy and unreachable literally anyone could like it you dont need a degree or anything
4 notes · View notes
burinazar · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
i’ve not linked the Ganja squad server on here recently for The Usual Reasons but i currently have a free trial of fancy nitro so i boosted the thing and, by member request, immediately added a completely irresponsible amount of new emojis that will most likely perish in a few weeks. if you like the gang weeders ganja squad characters join us and use our ((checks)) …S I X DIFFERENT Despairing Belaf emojis while we have em. (link) (note: please be 18 or older!)
13 notes · View notes
crazyw3irdo · 1 month
Text
been asked if i’ll make a hamlet version of my uquiz and truly like i get why you’d want me to do that but why would i do that when rosencrantz & guildenstern are dead exists
6 notes · View notes
britneyshakespeare · 4 months
Text
You know what. Despite it being against my doctor's orders I think I should rewatch Jane Howell's Wars of the Roses tetralogy
#the extent to which i enjoy shakespeare's history plays is condemnable.#especially the henry vi plays. ppl talk about those plays like they're the lowest thing shakespeare ever wrote#can't say i agree with that at all tbh. they're messy yes but they're GREAT#they are riotously entertaining and the conflicts are very engaging.#I JUST LIKE IT WHEN THEY KILL EACH OTHER WITH SWORDS!!!#SWORDS!!! SWORDS!!!!! KILLING!!!!!!! HEADS ON PIKES!!!!!!!!#like that's good old fashion entertainment to be honest. i can totally picture myself as an elizabethan commoner#losing my absolute marbles watching one of these in london#tales from diana#jane howell has so much power over me#i am so obsessed w her having directed the wars of the roses tetralogy AND titus andronicus.#some of the most patriarchal plays in shakespeare's oeuvre or at least the least-discussed-by-feminists.#im not really sure why when it comes to the wars of the roses plays tho. the female characters are so fascinating to me#joan of arc. margaret of anjou. anne neville. elizabeth woodville#altho i guess in terms of the real history those women tend not to be discussed as much as the men around them#(excluding joan of arc whose image is often stripped of historical context)#but shakespeare's treatment of them is well well well worth discussing more. idk#maybe it's just the problem of ppl's degradation of those plays! idk idk#me why me i can never be accused of not loving the wars of the roses tetralogy enough#me diana britneyshakespeare tumblr's no. 1 wars of the roses tetralogy stan#i also love circus (2008) most of all of britney's albums. im ok disagreeing w other ppl's fan favorites
3 notes · View notes
macroglossus · 1 year
Text
one-off movies/single season tv shows of classic lit are always sooo. like not to be pretentious but sometimes it feels like they didnt read the novel and just read a sparknotes? it gives made4english class
11 notes · View notes
musical-chick-13 · 2 years
Text
The existence of this Rosaline movie makes me so MAD, because SHE WAS NEVER IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH ROMEO. SHE TOOK A VOW OF CHASTITY, AND SAID THAT SHE WAS JUST GONNA NOT BE IN LOVE.
SHE. REJECTED. HIM.
SHE WAS NEVER INTERESTED IN BEING WITH HIM AT ALL.
And then they just...make a whole movie from her supposed perspective (which is loosely based on a book which...hoo boy we’ll get to that in a second), where the premise is that she’s jealous and wants to break him and Juliet up? That she’s so in love that she has to win him over again? (Also, how do they justify her knowing that they’re together? The entire point is that no one knows Romeo and Juliet are in love?? I know this is an adaptation, but Jesus Christ.)
WHY DID YOU PICK THIS CHARACTER. TO HAVE THIS STORY WITH. THE WHOLE POINT OF HER CHARACTER IS THAT SHE CHOOSES NOT TO BE WITH HIM. THAT’S WHAT OPENS THE DOOR TO HIM MEETING JULIET. IF ROSALINE IS DEEPLY INTO ROMEO, THE ENTIRE PLAY DOESN’T WORK.
Are we saying that she was just “““playing hard to get”””? That she was toying with his heart for fun? That when she told him no, she really meant “yes”?? I THOUGHT WE LEFT THAT BEHIND OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST DECADE, I THOUGHT WE DECIDED THAT WAS BAD???!!?
Don’t even get me started on the book this is based on, where that general premise is that Rosaline is just an Innocent Average Girl, and her cousin who is Beautiful™ and vOLaTiLeLY uNsTAbLe and cRaZy comes and “takes” her poor unsuspecting boyfriend who is completely blameless for his own terrible behavior away from her while being called a “slut” the whole time. (I doubt much of this carried over into the actual movie, because that’s being billed as an ironic rom-com, and I highly doubt ANYONE would try to make that genre work while keeping this premise 100% intact.)
WHY WOULD YOU EXPAND THIS CHARACTER LIKE THIS. WHY. WE STUDY THIS PLAY IN SCHOOL AS AN EXAMPLE OF LITERARY STRUCTURE AND POETIC LANGUAGE AND FORESHADOWING AND HOW TO WRITE A TRAGIC NARRATIVE AND FOR WHAT. FOR PEOPLE TO NOT TAKE AWAY ANY OF THE INTENDED MEANING FROM THIS PLAY???!?!?!? I AM SCREAMING SO HARD I WILL BREAK THE EARTH’S CRUST UNTIL I AM SUBSUMED INTO HELL.
If you’re going to adapt something, you’ve gotta make it clear that you have some significant understanding of the original work. Retellings are fine! They can even have different functions or deconstruct tropes or be unexpectedly edgy! But it’s 1000% obvious when you don’t have any knowledge or engagement with the source material, and that is a problem. It’s ignorant, it’s lazy, and everyone involved deserves better.
29 notes · View notes
welcometoteyvat · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
me @ a kaeya hamlet au
11 notes · View notes
jackgoodfellow · 2 years
Text
When I die, I am going to have my skull removed and made up for Hamlet productions (jaw optional)
And it will be free to rent but with the one requirement being that I must have a bio in the program with the other actors. With a headshot from when I was alive. Crediting me as Yorick. With no mention of my death. Just a typical list of credits that get further and further into the past with each passing year.
Tumblr media
I know this is supposed to be a reaction meme but this IS what my internal monologue looks and feels like. It is past midnight. Sell my bones on the internet.
[ID: the meme of a guy in sunglasses casually speaking to a horrified McDonald's employee at a drive-thru, drawn in a simple cartoon style. There is a speech bubble that makes it look like the guy in the car is speaking the text above the image]
23 notes · View notes
sparklyslug · 1 year
Text
I have come to the conclusion that Cordelia only really makes sense in Lear if she is every bit as petty and prideful as her father
3 notes · View notes
ghoul-haunted · 1 year
Text
huh. should I move shakespeare over to my main art blog or keep it to apmabinis. hm >:(
4 notes · View notes
nostalgia-tblr · 1 year
Note
tom's show the night manager is getting seasons 2 and 3!
one of the reasons i sometimes don't fit in that well in fandoms is that i don't usually care enough about actors to follow their projects :( Except for that period where I decided to watch every Will Smith film and insist on his genius as proved by his choice of such seminal movies as Hancock, I Am Legend With The Wrong Ending And Therefore Without The Moral Which Was The Entire Point Of The Story, and indeed pretty much anything he has starred in since roughly the year 2000. but i wasn't actually in any fandom related to a Will Smith project so does that even count?
(i *was* a bit tempted to find and watch High Rise because i like the works of JG Ballard BUT after obtaining a copy of the book i found that I couldn't actually bring myself to ruin my perfect state of knowing that particular Ballard novel only as "the one that [1987 Doctor Who story] was based on" and it turns out that this extends to any film version as well.)
but i hope you enjoy getting more of a thing you liked, Anon :)
5 notes · View notes
britneyshakespeare · 4 months
Text
i didn't like the roaring girl by middleton and dekker as much as i was expecting to. i have the feeling it's just one of those you-have-to-watch-it plays but as someone who has read a lot of elizabethan-to-restoration era comedy this year, there are other have-to-watch-it plays that still fare as better entertainment in a reading. basically the selling point to me moll cutpurse as the main character herself, and on that front she didn't disappoint, but every other character in the play had minimal interest to me, or if they did, they only had a little bit of time on the stage. having already known that the plot is that she saves other women from dishonor and remains a single woman by choice, yes, that's still cool—the gender fluidity inspired by the real moll cutpurse is cool. i enjoyed reading about that. but the whole action and plot around it. lackluster.
#im also a bit partial to thinking maybe i just didnt like the editing in my edition?#but i read it in oxford world classics 'the roaring girl and other city comedies'#and that's the first play ive read in that collection but i just. idk i cant tell#when i read something else in that edition ill let you know. but i own other oxford world classics edition of english plays#and i usually like them.#i kinda enjoyed the other middleton comedy i read a few months ago a chaste maid in cheapside#not that that was really groundbreaking but i did find it funnier and the trickery of the plot was more entertaining.#the contrivances were better. and the side characters were waaaay funnier. that guy and his tutor OH my god#tales from diana#yeah if you're interested in the real historical moll cutpurse or any fiction inspired by her? i hate to say it but roaring girl's a skip#or at least it's not the first thing you need to read (it's the first thing i read)#(there must be better work though)#i also havent read enough middleton or dekker to tell whose voice is whose within the writing#but i dont find either of their styles of prose OR verse to be as elegant as shakespeare's.#i found a chaste maid in cheapside to be very modern-friendly in its language and the roaring girl i found. much less so.#i wonder if that has to do with dekker? or maybe just the vocabulary made necessary by the plot was different#hard to know! im not an expert. dont think i have any authority to discern here.#i have to read one of middleton's tragedies sometime. i still havent read women beware women
3 notes · View notes
grendelsmilf · 1 year
Note
What’s your opinion on the novel 1984?
idk i read it a couple times as a kid but i haven’t read it since i was like 15? i think i remember thinking that orwell isn’t a very compelling fiction writer and should’ve just stuck to essays. like the part where rats (almost) eat his face is literally the only part of the book that feels like reading a novel instead of just wishing that he’d written an essay.
6 notes · View notes