My literature professor: “When Benedick says, ‘Peace! I will stop your mouth’ and kisses Beatrice, Beatrice has no further lines in the play, she’s completely silent, symbolizing how by marrying Benedick she is surrendering all of her power. In being silent she is submitting to patriarchal values of—“
Me: “—ma’am, there are 29 lines left in the play.”
88 notes
·
View notes
you know, i dont know a single other person i could tell about this dmitri thing except my girlfriend and i basically just reeled her to opera after a lot of "no no its ok its not that serious its just pretty soap opera plotlines its nice its silly dont take it that seriously" for awhile
ughguhtorroijg honestly its a shame im sorry if it seems pretentious i assure you its really not something im proud of liking i just think its silly and fun. like games youd play as a kid but if theres x100 the drama and a soundtrack made just for it. affairs and murders....i wish it was less held up as fancy and unreachable literally anyone could like it you dont need a degree or anything
4 notes
·
View notes
i’ve not linked the Ganja squad server on here recently for The Usual Reasons but i currently have a free trial of fancy nitro so i boosted the thing and, by member request, immediately added a completely irresponsible amount of new emojis that will most likely perish in a few weeks. if you like the gang weeders ganja squad characters join us and use our ((checks)) …S I X DIFFERENT Despairing Belaf emojis while we have em. (link) (note: please be 18 or older!)
13 notes
·
View notes
The existence of this Rosaline movie makes me so MAD, because SHE WAS NEVER IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH ROMEO. SHE TOOK A VOW OF CHASTITY, AND SAID THAT SHE WAS JUST GONNA NOT BE IN LOVE.
SHE. REJECTED. HIM.
SHE WAS NEVER INTERESTED IN BEING WITH HIM AT ALL.
And then they just...make a whole movie from her supposed perspective (which is loosely based on a book which...hoo boy we’ll get to that in a second), where the premise is that she’s jealous and wants to break him and Juliet up? That she’s so in love that she has to win him over again? (Also, how do they justify her knowing that they’re together? The entire point is that no one knows Romeo and Juliet are in love?? I know this is an adaptation, but Jesus Christ.)
WHY DID YOU PICK THIS CHARACTER. TO HAVE THIS STORY WITH. THE WHOLE POINT OF HER CHARACTER IS THAT SHE CHOOSES NOT TO BE WITH HIM. THAT’S WHAT OPENS THE DOOR TO HIM MEETING JULIET. IF ROSALINE IS DEEPLY INTO ROMEO, THE ENTIRE PLAY DOESN’T WORK.
Are we saying that she was just “““playing hard to get”””? That she was toying with his heart for fun? That when she told him no, she really meant “yes”?? I THOUGHT WE LEFT THAT BEHIND OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST DECADE, I THOUGHT WE DECIDED THAT WAS BAD???!!?
Don’t even get me started on the book this is based on, where that general premise is that Rosaline is just an Innocent Average Girl, and her cousin who is Beautiful™ and vOLaTiLeLY uNsTAbLe and cRaZy comes and “takes” her poor unsuspecting boyfriend who is completely blameless for his own terrible behavior away from her while being called a “slut” the whole time. (I doubt much of this carried over into the actual movie, because that’s being billed as an ironic rom-com, and I highly doubt ANYONE would try to make that genre work while keeping this premise 100% intact.)
WHY WOULD YOU EXPAND THIS CHARACTER LIKE THIS. WHY. WE STUDY THIS PLAY IN SCHOOL AS AN EXAMPLE OF LITERARY STRUCTURE AND POETIC LANGUAGE AND FORESHADOWING AND HOW TO WRITE A TRAGIC NARRATIVE AND FOR WHAT. FOR PEOPLE TO NOT TAKE AWAY ANY OF THE INTENDED MEANING FROM THIS PLAY???!?!?!? I AM SCREAMING SO HARD I WILL BREAK THE EARTH’S CRUST UNTIL I AM SUBSUMED INTO HELL.
If you’re going to adapt something, you’ve gotta make it clear that you have some significant understanding of the original work. Retellings are fine! They can even have different functions or deconstruct tropes or be unexpectedly edgy! But it’s 1000% obvious when you don’t have any knowledge or engagement with the source material, and that is a problem. It’s ignorant, it’s lazy, and everyone involved deserves better.
29 notes
·
View notes
When I die, I am going to have my skull removed and made up for Hamlet productions (jaw optional)
And it will be free to rent but with the one requirement being that I must have a bio in the program with the other actors. With a headshot from when I was alive. Crediting me as Yorick. With no mention of my death. Just a typical list of credits that get further and further into the past with each passing year.
I know this is supposed to be a reaction meme but this IS what my internal monologue looks and feels like. It is past midnight. Sell my bones on the internet.
[ID: the meme of a guy in sunglasses casually speaking to a horrified McDonald's employee at a drive-thru, drawn in a simple cartoon style. There is a speech bubble that makes it look like the guy in the car is speaking the text above the image]
23 notes
·
View notes
tom's show the night manager is getting seasons 2 and 3!
one of the reasons i sometimes don't fit in that well in fandoms is that i don't usually care enough about actors to follow their projects :( Except for that period where I decided to watch every Will Smith film and insist on his genius as proved by his choice of such seminal movies as Hancock, I Am Legend With The Wrong Ending And Therefore Without The Moral Which Was The Entire Point Of The Story, and indeed pretty much anything he has starred in since roughly the year 2000. but i wasn't actually in any fandom related to a Will Smith project so does that even count?
(i *was* a bit tempted to find and watch High Rise because i like the works of JG Ballard BUT after obtaining a copy of the book i found that I couldn't actually bring myself to ruin my perfect state of knowing that particular Ballard novel only as "the one that [1987 Doctor Who story] was based on" and it turns out that this extends to any film version as well.)
but i hope you enjoy getting more of a thing you liked, Anon :)
5 notes
·
View notes
i didn't like the roaring girl by middleton and dekker as much as i was expecting to. i have the feeling it's just one of those you-have-to-watch-it plays but as someone who has read a lot of elizabethan-to-restoration era comedy this year, there are other have-to-watch-it plays that still fare as better entertainment in a reading. basically the selling point to me moll cutpurse as the main character herself, and on that front she didn't disappoint, but every other character in the play had minimal interest to me, or if they did, they only had a little bit of time on the stage. having already known that the plot is that she saves other women from dishonor and remains a single woman by choice, yes, that's still cool—the gender fluidity inspired by the real moll cutpurse is cool. i enjoyed reading about that. but the whole action and plot around it. lackluster.
3 notes
·
View notes
What’s your opinion on the novel 1984?
idk i read it a couple times as a kid but i haven’t read it since i was like 15? i think i remember thinking that orwell isn’t a very compelling fiction writer and should’ve just stuck to essays. like the part where rats (almost) eat his face is literally the only part of the book that feels like reading a novel instead of just wishing that he’d written an essay.
6 notes
·
View notes