American Christianity is Terrible at dealing with Sin.
All the emphasis is on enraptured revival. I've mentioned before how much I hate the word, "revival" and what it's come to mean. Protestants assume sin - their whole way of thinking revolves around it - but they never actually deal with it.
The besetting sins - rage, envy, pride, among others… - all of which I am guilty of nurturing in myself when inattentive. Are not dealt with healthfully. Especially when people think of their Christianity as an accessory - like a purse, or shoes, maybe a nice piece of eye-catching jewelry. After confiding to someone about a struggle, a single prayer might be offered in support, maybe even a second one, later.
But if the sin is socially acceptable, people eventually tell you not to worry about it; and if it isn't socially acceptable, people judge your Christianity, your morality, your will-power, and a whole host of other personal failings - all of which you, yourself, may be acutely aware of as you struggle alone. All the while the larger Christian communities will attend Church on their appointed day of Worship, check off a box, and call it a week!
I've heard so many Christians brush off personal sin with 1 Corinthians 15:52. They take it to mean that sin will no longer have a draw on us when that last trumpet sounds, that we will be "changed" in the "twinkling of an eye". That nothing more need be done for our salvation but for us to wait in serene peace.
‘God, I thank you that I am not like other people — robbers, evildoers, adulterers…'
-- Luke 18:11
I think that this is delusional.
Too many of us brush past Romans 7:15-20, where Paul breaks down and really addresses the Christian struggle; or think about 1 Corinthians 9:24-27, Hebrews 12:1, Galatians 5:7, or 2 Timothy 4:7 where the Christian struggle is compared to a race - one that can be lost.
My favorite part of the liturgical year is the Bridegroom Matins where the parallels are drawn between Christ coming like a thief in the night to an unprepared world, and where the parable of the virgins makes plain that preparation for the Bridegroom is important.
Christ himself, at the Start of his ministry in Matthew 4:17 preaches - “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”
I think the root of all this lies in ontology. Ontology is foreign to the English speaking world - hence the borrowing from the Greek. To my mind, preparation does not mean that we are perfect people who do not sin. Preparation mean attuning oneself to the voice of God through the Holy Spirit. He has offered, through his Spirit, to help us attune ourselves to his energies (which radiate from his essence - who he is - his ontological core), so that our hearts and minds may become compatible with what he is doing here on earth, what he has done, is doing, will do in heaven, and especially, finally, what he will do in the world to come.
“Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”
God, have mercy on me, a sinner.
0 notes
the paradesi synagogue in kochi, kerala, india. the first synagogue on the site, built by the city's longstanding malabari jewish community, was destroyed by portugese who'd colonized the area in their persecution of locals. it was rebuilt in 1568 by spanish and portugese jews who fled persecution and later expulsion, hence the name "paradesi" ("foreign" in malayalam).
these sephardic jews and a community of jews of mixed african and european descent who were formerly enslaved ("meshuchrarim", "freedmen" in hebrew) joined the malabari jewish community of kochi and somewhat integrated. they were later joined by some iraqi, persian, yemenite, afghan, and dutch sephardic jews. the middle eastern and european jews were considered "white jews" and permitted malabari jews and meshuchrarim to worship in the synagogue. however, in what seems like a combination of local caste dynamics and racism, malabari jews were not allowed full membership. meshuchrarim weren't allowed in at all, but were instead made to sit outside during services and not allowed their own place of worship or other communal rights.
as the "white jews" tended to be rather wealthy from trade, this synagogue contains multiple antiquities. they include belgian glass chandeliers on its walls, hand-painted porcelain tiles from china on its floors, and an oriental rug that was gifted by ethiopian emperor haile selassie.
44 notes
·
View notes
do you have any thoughts on the story of abraham and isaac? my parents talk about it and praise abraham for being willing to kill his son which..... scares me to say the least, and i'd love to hear your perspective as someone who seems more well-adjusted
Where I am now, it disgusts me more than anything. The interpretation of "I'm willing to sacrifice your life if I was told to" feels like the step before "I put you into this world and I can take you out of it." It's entitlement to a child, who is an independent individual, just because they are dependent on you for survival. I prefer the interpretation of understanding the actions you're taking and the reasons why (like how there's multiple religions that don't eat pork because it was so unsafe to eat at the time), especially if it's at someone else's expense.
Where I was in the thick of it all, it gave me morbid comfort that scares me now. I had fantasies of being a martyr for the church and the idea of being the next Isaac was just so appealing. Being a hand-selected sacrifice chosen by the Good Lord Himself? Sign me the fuck up, babey!
I think if I admitted that to my family, they'd be horrified.
It's another one of those stories or beliefs where I think the majority of christians just regurgitate what they've heard. It's a point of pride and devotion, but there's no personal reflection or cross-cultural awareness of it. Lean not unto your own understanding and whatnot. It's the potential that scares me the most, like the Quiverfull movement with the Duggars or Turpins. I'm sure there's stories now, but I can't remember them off the top of my head
(Also I will be telling my therapist someone on Tumblr called me "more well-adjusted" thank you anon)
31 notes
·
View notes
The evidence for our New Testament writings is ever so much greater than the evidence for many writings of classical authors, the authenticity of which no one dreams of questioning. And if the New Testament were a collection of secular writings, their authenticity would generally be regarded as beyond all doubt.
F.F. Bruce
30 notes
·
View notes
gonna take the anglo-catholic off my blog cause while I still identify with it due to where I live and the resources lacking here I'm not able to participate in it much anymore. not to mention that I've begun combining it with the eastern practices like zen buddhism and daoism that I've adopted.
while my personal beliefs fall closer to buddhism and daoism, there is no doubt that anglo-catholicism will always be my cultural faith and will guide the way I interact with spirituality alot. very much akin to how many cultures such as chinese, japanese, korean, etc have melded their own native faiths into those two religions other centuries as well.
6 notes
·
View notes
No Doubt
The interval then between the dates of original composition and the earliest extant evidence becomes so small as to be in fact negligible, and the last foundation for any doubt that the Scriptures have come down to us substantially as they were written has now been removed. Both the authenticity and general integrity of the books of the New Testament may be regarded as finally established. ~ Sir Frederic Kenyon
3 notes
·
View notes