Tumgik
#the lord of the rings rather than
rotationalsymmetry · 26 days
Text
"Tolkien does not write conventional heroes and the Lord of the Rings is a powerful statement about how all power corrupts" is a decent first order approximation, and it's certainly closer to that than a generic power fantasy action movie.
It's not fully accurate though. The Ring does not represent all power -- powerful items in the wider Legendarium are generally dangerous, but not necessarily uncomplicatedly bad things, and some powerful things like the two trees are uncomplicatedly good things. The Ring is a specific powerful item made by a vicious Maia that causes harm because that Maia crafted it with his ill intent and will to dominate. It doesn't represent power in general.
But there is a very strong general theme of wanting power over others -- mastery -- being a bad thing. While acting out of pity, in the sense of being moved to act towards the common good, is elevated as a good and important thing. Basically, "I don't know how to explain to you that you should care about other people", except on the form of several books trying to explain just that. (And I'll count the hobbit in that -- it's a simpler adventure story, but not without a great big "hey maybe you can put aside your greed-based petty squabbles with basically good people in order to deal with the real enemy for a minute?" at the end.)
But there's also just a whole lot of people being messy. Feanor sucked and his oath was a terrible idea, and obviously the downstream effects of the oath were morally heinous and pragmatically disasterous -- except that the oath and Feanor wanting his special gems back is the only reason the Noldor were in Belariad in the first place, and the Noldor were the only ones mounting an effective resistance against Morgoth that wasn't just holing up in a walled kingdom and everyone outside your borders (including all the humans) fends for themselves. If they weren't there, presumably Morgoth would have ended up dominating the continent much sooner and enslaving and torturing more people. Whereas the sensible elves that stayed behind got to enjoy, effectively, their gated community while the world outside burned. So. It's complicated.
6 notes · View notes
cantsayidont · 1 month
Text
In an undated letter written in the late 1950s, reproduced in THE LETTERS OF JRR TOLKIEN, Tolkien alludes to the legal difficulties Sam faced after returning from the Grey Havens at the end of LORD OF THE RINGS:
When Master Samwise reported the ‘departure over Sea’ of Bilbo (and Frodo) in 1421, it was still held impossible to presume death; and when Master Samwise became Mayor in 1427, a rule was made that: ‘if any inhabitant of the Shire shall pass over Sea in the presence of a reliable witness, with the expressed intention not to return, or in circumstances plainly implying such an intention, he or she shall be deemed to have relinquished all titles rights or properties previously held or occupied, and the heir or heirs thereof shall forthwith enter into possession of these titles, rights, or properties, as is directed by established custom, or by the will and disposition of the departed, as the case may require.’
You can see how the residents of Hobbiton might have seen Sam's return as the premise of a kind of Agatha Christie mystery plot: favorite servant of eccentric middle-aged local resident departs on an unexpected journey with his master; returns home alone two weeks later; and then conveniently produces a copy of said eccentric local resident's new will, naming the servant the heir to all his property — and the only account the servant can offer of his master's whereabouts is a preposterous story about Elves. Suspicious! Very suspicious indeed!
363 notes · View notes
mrkida-art · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Children of Durin
711 notes · View notes
near-dareis-mai · 1 year
Text
Vote for your favourite horse/horse-adjacent character from Fantasy and Science Fiction books, and yell at me in the replies/comments about your fave that i missed.
503 notes · View notes
warrioreowynofrohan · 3 months
Text
It’s aro week, and even though I still don’t feel like I fully have a handle on what aromanticism is, I do get the impression that The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings fit well with it? because all the main character’s most important and most central relationships aren’t romantic ones.
Bilbo is considered odd (“queer”, even) in the Shire for being a lifelong bachelor; his close relationships are with dwarven and elven friends, and with his adopted son Frodo. Frodo shows no romantic interest in anyone; his close relationships are with Sam, Merry, Pippin, Gandalf, and later Aragorn. And the later relationship with Frodo, Sam, and Sam’s wife Rosie all living in Bag End - which is specifically proposed by Frodo - seems like it fits the definition of queerplatonic? Whether or not you see Legolas and Gimli as a couple, their closest relationship is clearly with each other. Merry and Pippin also seem pretty clearly the most important people in each others’ lives, and remain close with their friends in Rohan and Gondor even after returning to the Shire. Boromir’s almost canonically aroace, going by the appendices. The close friendships between Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli are prominent, while the Tale of Aragorn and Arwen is relegated to an appendix. Most members of the Fellowship (6/9) do not get married or ‘fall in love’ in any traditional sense (and of the remaining three, one - Pippin - is only noted briefly in an appendix). The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings both have the characters’ relationships with each other - and the importance of valuing and cherishing those, not possessions or power - at their heart, and almost all of those relationships are non-romantic ones.
83 notes · View notes
Hot take—I was looking back at Appendix A again, and Gondor really hit the ally lottery with the Northmen/Rohirrim because I’m not sure I would have put up with Gondor early on if I was a Northman myself. The whole relationship between the two kingdoms only started because Gondor was looking for a buffer between themselves and the Easterlings (“hey, let’s use these blonde guys as a human shield for our own protection!”). Then when individual Northmen distinguished themselves and got a foothold in Gondorian society, the “high men” (ugh) of Gondor “looked askance” at them as a “lesser and alien race” (double ugh). And when King Valacar of Gondor married the daughter of the Northman King Vidugavia, the Gondorians FOUGHT A CIVIL WAR rather than willingly accept Valacar’s totally legitimate half-Northman son and heir as their leader. Just exhausting.
Relationships between countries are never uncomplicated, and some people in Gondor were always accepting and respectful of the Northmen. And over time, Gondor as a whole proved itself as useful and loyal to the Northmen/Rohan as the reverse. The alliance between the two is so incredible in its fully developed form, and Gondor and Rohan as little best buddy nations are so sweet. But how lucky that Vidugavia’s people didn’t watch that civil war way back in the Second Age and just think to themselves, “to hell with this.”*
* I say this as a citizen of a country that is frequently an overbearing bully to its own best buddy nations (Sorry, Canada! Every American loves you!), and I’m constantly grateful that they haven’t all just decided to write us off for good!
65 notes · View notes
sesamenom · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
Some design sketches for Bilbo and Lobelia, plus a bonus thorin
37 notes · View notes
Text
On Arwen, Legacy, and the Gift of Men
I've been meaning to make this post for a while, actually, so here goes:
For all we talk about Arwen's inadequate characterisation (and I won't disagree, because in comparison with all the other characters in LOTR and even the Silmarillion, Arwen isn't very heavily characterised or featured in the text of LOTR at all), I feel like what really defines her, despite a lack of obvious characterisation, and despite possibly being unintentional (though I doubt that somehow), is this overwhelming sense of having been burdened with legacy — something that feels so central to her character that it makes up for everything else and gives you a good sense of who she is. Which leads me to believe that even if she had not fallen in love with Aragorn, she would have chosen mortality anyway.
The most famous part of Arwen's inherited legacy, of course, is her similarity to Lúthien. She is someone 'in whom it was said that the likeness of Lúthien had come on earth again' (LOTR, Book 2, Ch.1), and in the Tale of Aragorn and Arwen (LOTR, Appendix A), Aragorn sees her and immediately calls her 'Tinúviel'. She looks like Lúthien, lives (to some extent) like Lúthien, and ends up dying somewhat like Lúthien too. Then there is the legacy passed down to her as a Finwean. She is named 'Arwen' (noble-maiden), a name choice that echoes the name 'Artanis' (which is of course Galadriel's father-name, and means 'noble-woman'). This sets up a comparison (which cannot be ignored, for names are of utmost significance in the legendarium) between Arwen and Galadriel — Galadriel, who is a survivor of the First Age, learned in lore and magic (under Melian's tutelage too), kind and compassionate, but also powerful and fearsome. So both Arwen's name and her face are, to a great extent, something inherited from people who are in many ways far greater than herself in their power, influence and majesty, and people whom she may feel she has to live up to.
Arwen's legacy, and the many connections she has to the noble Elves of the First Age, understandably seems to weigh on her, especially in her demeanour. Of her it is said that 'her face was more grave, and her laughter now seldom was heard' (LOTR, Appendix A) , and there is a solemnity to her, unlike Lúthien's unabashed enthusiasm for life, or Galadriel's ambition. It is evident in the little that we see of her that she is, despite being compared time and again to Lúthien and Galadriel both, not much like either of them. Taken in the context of the rest of Middle-Earth's history, as well as with reference to her other name, 'Undómiel' (meaning Evenstar), this difference becomes far more significant. For Arwen was born in the Third Age, when the time of the Elves in Middle-earth was drawing to a close; indeed, Arwen's Elven heritage is referred to by Aragorn as 'the Twilight you must renounce' (LOTR, Appendix A). She is the Evenstar of the Elves: with her, the sun will set on their time in Middle-earth, and they will depart for Aman, to be removed from the rest of the world until thr Dagor Dagorath, if it ever happens.
But Arwen has so much to live up to. She is as beautiful as Lúthien, and named after Galadriel, but the Age itself sort of denies her the chance to live up to that legacy — as an Elf, from what we know of Arda, she can never truly measure up to her ancestors' deeds in the First Age, because it isn't the First Age anymore, and her people, almost collectively, are tiring of Middle-earth, which itself is growing older and weaker. There is nothing for an Elf here. If you'll pardon me for bringing in an unexpected comparison, it's a bit like Sophie Hatter's case (from Howl's Moving Castle by Diana Wynne Jones, if anyone is unaware). Sophie feels she'll end up a failure or worse off than her sisters because that's how the world allegedly works. And in much the same way, Arwen can be interpreted as someone who feels like she can't be anyone of note in the Third Age as an Elf because Elves can't be notable in the Third Age.
Which brings me to my final point: that I think Arwen would have chosen mortality, and the life of the Aftercomers, regardless of whether she'd fallen in love with Aragorn or not. There's a bit in the Tale of Aragorn and Arwen about this that I think of when I try to make sense of Arwen's character. During Arwen and Aragorn's very first meeting, when he is but a boy and she hasn't fallen in love with him yet, she responds to Aragorn's claim that she is 'in [Lúthien's] likeness' with 'Yet her name is not mine. Though maybe my doom will not be unlike hers [emphasis mine]. But who are you?' Note here that she doesn't know or love Aragorn at this point. But she is already considering what choice she shall make in regard to remaining functionally immortal or becoming mortal. Of course, some of this can be ascribed to Elven foresight, but I still find it quite significant, because I see her becoming mortal as her choosing the only way she feels she can live up to Lúthien and Galadriel, who are both in some way a significant part of her identity.
Let's come back to Sophie Hatter. In her text, her transformation into an old lady comes with a sense of liberation, in that she feels she can do as she pleases, and is unshackled from her supposed fate. I tend to see Arwen's choice to become mortal as a similar kind of liberation, made more significant in Arda because in Arda, the 'Music of the Ainur [...] is as fate to all things [save for Men]' (The Silmarillion, Ch.1), and as an Elf, she cannot be anything but what is fated for her. Arwen breaks free of the shackles of 'Elves will fade away or sail, and become insignificant, doing their part in the fate of the world' through her choice, and ends up becoming a Queen. Even if she hadn't been a Queen in some alternate universe, I don't doubt that until her death, she would have been one of the chief advisors of the kingdoms of Middle-earth. But in the role which she ends up, she becomes influential.
No longer will she be remembered simply as 'Arwen, daughter of Elrond', relegated to footnotes much like the daughters of Finwë, but as the first Queen of the Reunited Kingdom, the first Queen of Gondor in living mortal memory. In this she becomes as important as Lúthien and Galadriel ever were — she, too, will make her mark on the dawn of a new Age, until she has 'laid herself to rest upon Cerin Amroth' (LOTR, Appendix A). Even in her death she will be like Lúthien, who chose to die a mortal after living in peace, and like Galadriel, who chose to 'diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel' (LOTR, Book 2, Ch.7). The legacy she leaves — that of a whole kingdom — will be as great as that of her forebears. And I feel like she would, considering how much her heritage seems to impact her and shape her, choose that greatness anyway (almost as a contrast of sorts to Galadriel refusing the Ring, but I digress).
So yes, that's my take on Arwen. That despite the lack of information and characterisation we have for her, she can be interpreted as a complex individual, shaped by her circumstances, her heritage, and her ultimate choice to make a mark on the world as great as that of any of her ancestors by choosing mortality; not simply for love (as I feel it often gets simplified to), but also to break free of the fate that binds her and to be truly free by renouncing Elvenkind and taking the Gift of Men: that 'they should have a virtue to shape their life, amid the powers and chances of the world, beyond the Music of the Ainur' (The Silmarillion, Ch.1).
30 notes · View notes
thatsitso · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
Just finished The Lord of the Rings (I cried)
94 notes · View notes
gandalf-the-fool · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
66 notes · View notes
exdeputysonso · 11 months
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Pavement Magazine December/January 2002
79 notes · View notes
invisiblewashboard · 5 months
Text
Small Child’s Thoughts on “Treebeard” Part 2
I think Ents are just supposed to be tree-ish. They sound like tree-ish people.
Hey, Treebeard uses the word “lost” correctly. I don’t like when people say they lost someone when they just mean they died. Those words are not the same.
I don’t think the ents and entwives are good at being married. Because if you’re married you’re supposed to be a team and work together and stay together. And they did not do that.
I don’t understand why he has a bed if he stands up to sleep. Beds are for sleeping and for lying down.
“Dingle” is a word that sounds hilarious to me.
I think my favorite ents would be ones like oak trees because I like oak trees a lot.
I do not think I am a very hasty folk. I take a long time to do things and to decide things.
Merry has maps in his head like me! But my maps are railway maps.
Wow, that was just very rude of the orcs to do. So maybe I can get why he that ent wants to fight them.
Hmm, I am a little confused about trolls and ents and orcs and elves. (That’s alright, we can talk about it later.) No, I think I will just stay confused, but thank you for the offer.
Well, now trees are just doing things trees aren’t supposed to do again!
34 notes · View notes
essenceofarda · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
Playing around with the idea of posting more sketchy/sketchbook/preliminary stuff now that I'm setting a goal for the rest of 2023 and into 2024 to put more prep/thought into my illustrations...
Working on an illustration that is "Arwen Meets Princesscore" and I haven't decided if I'll be doing the final illustration in gouache or digitally, probably digitally bc I don't use gouache like ever haha but I might do some sketchbook paintings to practice and like i said, may be sharing the process as I work on this illustration...
Here's two fun character sketches for this piece... Arwen in a 'underdress' as well as having fun playing with her hairstyle for this illustration :)
25 notes · View notes
wizardnaturalist · 1 year
Text
I hate readings of eowyn that are "of course the only woman interested in battle and glory decides she actually just wants to be a wife at the end of the story 🙄" bcs congrats, you have spectacularly missed the point!
yeah, eowyn decides she no longer wants to be a warrior at the end of the series, but that is the overarching theme of Literally The Entire Story. lord of the rings is not, and has never been, about epic battles and great fighters and glory through combat. war is continuously framed as a horrifying consequence of the greed and selfishness of powerful people that ruins the lives of everyone involved
aragorn is not accepted as king of gondor because he won the battle of pelennor fields, he is accepted because of his skill and care in healing the wounded afterward. boromir's desire to use the ring as a weapon is what allowed it to corrupt him so easily, despite his noble intentions.
and yes, eowyn wanted to fight. she got to see firsthand the "glory" she sought. she got to see her uncle die in her arms, and herself and her best friend greviously injured and almost killed themselves. the whole point is that there was no glory. there was no great triumph on the battlefield. there was only struggle and horror and death.
and how could you see eowyn best one of sauron's top minions, someone even gandalf feared, and think the ultimate message was "obviously she belongs in the Home :)"
105 notes · View notes
lenin-it-to-win-it · 2 years
Text
the more I think about it, the more frodo being the deputy mayor following the scouring of the shire is so fucking funny because everyone’s like “oh, our current mayor is unwell and needs time to heal before he can resume his duties... frodo, YOU don’t have any serious physical conditions or horrific trauma to work through, do you?” and frodo, fresh off his miserable death quest, is just holding back tears like “mhm yeah no trauma here,,” 
142 notes · View notes
andromeda3116 · 7 months
Text
shit, man, i remember with that weird sharp sort of recall of the stabs of moments in childhood, a shitty op-ed article about the release of fellowship of the ring titled "an ugly galadriel?"
and that has stuck with me for over twenty years, and rises every time i watch these movies and see cate blanchett as galadriel, how fucking wrong that shitty journalist was
7 notes · View notes