Tumgik
#definitely need to reread
izzenithal · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
Percy “Has Been Waiting to Use This Meme as an Excuse” Jackson, and Annabeth “Never Seen a Meme” Chase
19K notes · View notes
spookybeandoodle · 1 year
Text
Blue Skies~!
Recently replayed the portal series after years of not playing it and now I’m sucked back in to my obsession of this series. It’s sooooo gooooood! So I did a doodle to celebrate me getting back intoy obsession with Portal! There’s a bit of a reference to a certain *cough cough* popular fanfic-
Tumblr media
950 notes · View notes
And now, a book review I've been saving. I want to savor this one:
Julius Caesar and the Roman People, by Robert Morstein-Marx, 2021.
It's hard to overstate how much I love this book. If you only read one book about Julius Caesar, get this one. It's not just a biography of Caesar, but a reassessment of the role of the "People" in Roman politics, of how democratic vs. oligarchic the republic truly was, of reliability and bias in ancient sources, and how we construct history through the lens of our own values and fears. Morstein-Marx sets out not merely to describe Caesar's life, but explore where our ideas about him came from, what biases are in our sources, and how those biases erased the agency and diversity of the Roman People themselves.
When I first read this book, I found it persuasive and well-researched - Morstein-Marx is a professor of classics, after all - but its conclusions were so different from the pop culture view of Caesar I had to check if this was another Michael Parenti situation, where an author exaggerates and cherry-picks evidence to support his own political agenda. But, from all the other references to this book I found, Morstein-Marx does seem to be a respected scholar who knows what he's talking about, and other historians like Erich Gruen, Fred Drogula and John T. Ramsey seem to agree with a lot of his points.
So, what are his main points?
That Caesar was not a radical popularis or Marian, nor was he consciously attempting to subvert the republic or install himself as an autocrat; his career up till 49 BCE was broadly conventional, his policies moderate, and his rift with Cato et al is better explained by personal rivalries, not ideology.
That Caesar was in many ways more traditional and respectful of the law than Cato, Bibulus and their allies, and there was a legitimate argument for siding with him in 49 BCE.
That much of the argument for seeing Caesar as subversive or radical depends on equating the government with the Senate, and downplaying the role of the People.
That neither Caesar nor Pompey deliberately started the civil war, but that it happened due to a breakdown in communications between the triumvirs, and fearmongering from a pro-war faction in the Senate.
That the majority of the Senate and People probably sided with him during the civil war.
That it's not actually clear whether Caesar "wanted to be king." Many of his actions as dictator are better explained as ad hoc responses to immediate political crises, while others may have been taken out of context, exaggerated or misattributed to him.
Now, you might be thinking this sounds awfully pro-Caesar. And Caesar does come across more sympathetically than in most portrayals. But Morstein-Marx also reminds us that Caesar killed or enslaved about two million people, ended free Roman elections, and other awful things. He tries to explain Caesar's actions, but not to excuse them.
Morstein-Marx's argument is not that Caesar was a hero, or a villain, but an ordinary man and product of his time. He was, to be honest, just not that important until his runaway success in Gaul. He had no long-term master plan, but was reacting to immediate issues most of the time, like all politicians do. His policies were mostly conventional, not revolutionary.
Julius Caesar and the Roman People is an attempt to take off the filters of hindsight, myth, and propaganda, and try to understand Julius Caesar's actions in the context of his time. And it will teach you a lot about how history is "constructed" along the way.
207 notes · View notes
itsdefinitely · 8 days
Text
do girl jeri and boy jerry exist explicitly to torment me
74 notes · View notes
mizartz · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
The man with his rucksack raises the gun. Danny looks at him, really looks at him, sees his wide eyes and trembling hands and thinks that it serves him right. Danny’s own eyes glow green and bright, blood dripping down his face. “Better make it count,” he snarls.
fanart for close enough to be whole again by @hailsatanacab <3 i am obsessed with this fic!!!
2K notes · View notes
greenlaut · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
✧˖° into the fangorn forest  🌿🍃
based on The Instruction Manual To Loving Well  by @crownlessdunedain​
343 notes · View notes
Text
Wait I just finished No Gods For Drowning through @queerliblib and HOLY FUCK??? HOLY FUCK??????????
God... If you ever need a story that's dark but ends in HOPE (and is so unabashedly queer) definitely give it a read!!!!!
54 notes · View notes
erregiulydraws · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
“Let’s go on and on together forever“
206 notes · View notes
mamawasatesttube · 2 months
Text
<- experiencing shrimp emotions (listening to the return of the king ost: battle of the pelennor fields)
29 notes · View notes
writingtot · 30 days
Text
i think one of the reasons i enjoy the percy series so much is because it’s an adaptation of the novels and not word for word the same.
at first i was a little upset by all the changes, but after rereading the books, i actually like the series even more now. as much as we all adore the books, i think we can agree that they’re not perfect. sometimes there’s plot holes, inconsistencies, or just bad writing in general. this gives rick a chance to fix those things, and that’s OKAY.
the series isn’t perfect either, don’t get me wrong, but it is nice to see the characters going on the same adventures even with some variation to the original story. i think this will allow the characters to be fleshed out more.
we have to remember that a tv show and a book is not the same medium, so the way these things are presented cannot be identical. otherwise the characters in the show would probably seem pretty flat since the books are only from percy’s perspective. the series allows us to learn more about the motives and personalities of other characters, be it annabeth, grover, or luke (personally, i’m really excited to see how his character’s story goes).
anyway, all of this is to say that the percy series is great for what it is (an adaptation of a book series). yes it could be better (cough longer and more episodes cough), but i personally really enjoy it so far.
31 notes · View notes
bloodied-dagger · 1 month
Text
y’all can block me if you want, but some of y’all need someone to disagree with you and bring a little bit of discourse into the circle imo. Like you don’t need to surround yourself with people that will always disagree with, you but there should be somebody to disagree with yourself on some things, lest you build yourself an echo chamber
there should be someone who might challenge your views sometimes. And when they do, you should be ready to listen to what they have to say and reason with it. Who knows, you might actually change a personal view or two because of it
27 notes · View notes
akolnoix · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
seishin is my fave character in shiki (if you don't understand, you must read the novel) so i'm redrawing panels to practice drawing him, as i find it strangely difficult.... like i go to draw his hair and my years of being into persona makes my hand default to drawing tatsuya suou
46 notes · View notes
bunnyhysteria · 4 days
Text
bingqiu is nice and I love that they're so happy for them. good for them. I like that. love it.
anyways I am now going to put bingge and shen jiu in a tube and shake it up until they kith whether they want to or not, and it will be the most toxic shit ever
8 notes · View notes
grimlocks-noodle · 1 year
Text
Tumblr NERFED me the last time I tried to write this so clearly I just need to think about it
But one day I will write something about Sins of the Wreckers, and how I like to think that Tarantulas curing Verity from her radiation sickness was both a Massive Snub at Prowl for seemingly tossing away everyone once they're no longer useful to him, (including this wonderful organic who is risking her life to fix his mistakes) and also a Huge peacocking thing (aka Look Prowl, aren't I still so smart and clever?? Look, I fixed your useful organic, remember when I was useful??)
The whole thing boils down to Tarantulas, essentially bringing a bouquet of roses back from the dead for Prowl. Unfortunately for him, Prowl has the emotional availability and intelligence of an amoeba, thus rendering it a Moot Point.
104 notes · View notes
sillayangel · 1 year
Text
thinkin about character arcs in homestuck and how they interact with the narrative....the way that so many character arcs are DEFINED BY how they fit into the narrative itself....
throughout act 1-4 john generally does. whatever is required of him by the narrative, sometimes for reasons that are difficult to justify from the perspective of Character Motivations that would probably be called bad writing in more traditional stories. why did john create the ectobabies? he's a curious kid and likes fuckin around with technology he doesn't understand. but mostly because it's what the alpha timeline (i.e. the narrative) required of him. when we get to act 5, this starts to tie into vriska's characterization of "character who steals agency and relevance from other characters" (see also: jade's narcolepsy, creation of bec noir). instead of doing whatever the narrative requires of him, john does whataver vriska requires of him. who is so tied into the narrative at this point it's essentially the same thing. fast forward to a6a6 - caliborn takes control of the narrative and john is literally fighting against him to RESTORE the narrative. he's still doing what is required to uphold the traditional narrative but he's doing so in a way that requires his AGENCY - because the narrative is no longer able to guide and direct him anymore - because he needs to save the people he cares about from being twisted and mischaracterized until they are no longer recognisable.
vriska too, her arc throughout most of act 6 being. coming to terms with being irrelevant to the narrative (i.e. dead) after working so hard to strive towards relevance for her entire presence in the story. the culmination of this being becoming (vriska) - putting her name in parentheses as the ultimate irrelevance. dave's arc as well (i am definitely less versed in daveology than johnology and vriskology) but how he is constantly stuck in the "refusal of the call" step of the hero's journey - he basically states this outright in a6i3 when he talks about being "supposed" to defeat lord english.
85 notes · View notes
wlwloverwrites · 4 months
Text
Working on the next chapter for teacher’s pet
14 notes · View notes