listen. I have never watched Riverdale and never will. but that doesn’t mean I’m not sO FUCKING PISSED at the polycule ending.
I’m not mad about the polyamory (I would like to stress this point for anyone who wants to come after me for this post), I’m mad that Jughead Jones, one of, like, the two aroace characters in media people have actually maybe heard of (the other being Yelena Belova) is part of this romantic, sexual relationship.
he’s ace!!!
he’s aro!!!
and it fucking stings that the writers thought it was okay to erase that aroace rep when there’s next to none for us to begin with.
fuck your amatonormativity and fuck your queer erasure. we aspecs deserve better.
895 notes
·
View notes
Me watching Tristamp: I enjoy these characters, but idk if I’d consider any of the characters shippable. At least not at this part of the story.
Me watching Trigun98: Oh wow, they really went ham on VashMeryl here didn’t they?
62 notes
·
View notes
hahaha I just realized that I have a distinct mental category for (the vast majority of) smut scenes in fic. They're usually so disconnected from the plot that they're commercial breaks. And now a word from our sponsor, Allosex! Use my code BOREDACEJO to get 20% off--
135 notes
·
View notes
high and low libito aren't a synonym for hyper/hyposexual. furthermore hypersexual and hyposexual are not synonyms for allosexual or asexual. hypersexual is not the oposite of asexual.
hypersexual and hyposexual are both conditions most commonly found in trauma victims, or are due to hormonal issues, and medications. it consists of intrusive thoughts or very separately; urges to not just do/initiate sex but also masturbate as a go to self soothing tool. asexuals can be hypersexual. it is not "asexuals or hypersexuals" when you're talking about fucking libito. get that through your thick fucking skulls please. i beg of you.
not everyone with a low libito is hyposexual, not everyone with a low libito is asexual. not everyone with a high libito is hypersexual. not everyone with a high libito is allosexual. not all asexuals trauma responce is going to be hyposexual. not all people with sex repulsion is an asexual.
not all people who dress scantilly clad have high libitos or are hypersexual. not all people who dress "slutty" or make jokes are hypersexual. not all people who dress "tOo mOdEsTlY aNd PrUdISh" is an ace or hyposexual or traumatized or religious. THEY ARE CLOTHES.
hypersexual and hyposexual is often distressing for the person who has it. regardless of if they're ace or allo. hell. a person can go from being one to the other.
when you are talking about differences in libito effecting relationship capatability for example and you say "hypersexuals and asexuals" when you mean high and low libitos, or hyper v hypo sexual or asexual or allosexual
you are stating a valid sexuality as on par or comparable to a trauma/hormone/medicinal based medical condition that needs intervention. you are ignoring that aces can struggle with hypersexuality-YES EVEN THE SEX REPULSED ONES because it's a fucking CONDITION.
2 notes
·
View notes
Brain still soup but like. I think making one or both (or more!) characters involved in relationships with each other aromantic makes the dynamic soooooo much more compelling. Because if you remove romance as a motivator, you really get down to the nitty-gritty as to WHY that character is seeking out/involved in those relationships in the first place. Whether that relationship involves romantic factors or is more of a queer platonic thing. Much to think about....
4 notes
·
View notes
“i headcanon them as ace” and it’s a picture of either the sluttiest character in the show or someone who canonically likes sex and talks about it a lot
2 notes
·
View notes
I saw a post that said that it's so annoying how people always make a person who does not reciprocate romantic feelings out to be a villain. As someone who is aroace I fully agree with this and this is more an explanation of why I think this is such a common concept.
In my opinion one of the bigger issues regarding this situation is the fact that people are taught that their romantic partner should always be prioritised over their friends.
I think that most allo-romantic people feel so offended when you tell them you don't have romantic feelings for them, is because they view love as a ranking system. With strangers being the lowest and romantic and or sexual love on the top. Therefore if you tell them that you experience 'mere platonic feelings' for them, they see that as a lower ranked emotions and feel underappreciated. Since most people are told that romantic partners and romantic love is more valuable than friendship and platonic bonds, they will interpret it as a rejection of saying 'I don't value you as much as you value me'.
Also I don't mean to downplay the feeling of genuine rejection, however it does start to become a problem when people blame the other person for not reciprocating.
86 notes
·
View notes
Get his arse Michelle 🔫
6 notes
·
View notes
Once read a soulmate au where the two immediately fell in love (only continue reading cause I liked the author and pairing) and it turned out they were just faking it/forcing it because they thought that was how it was supposed to go. It was really funny cause technically it was a slow burn but on the outside they were being lovey dovey while cringing and being annoyed on the inside
SEE THIS IS WHAT I WANT!!!
this is the juicy drama i desire 😍 this would probably be one of the only reasons i would read soulmate AUs where the pairing immediately “fall in love” because that’s where the main conflict is!!!!
i love when soulmate AUs question the superficial concept of love that is so over saturated in Western media (media i am the most familiar with). i love when soulmate AUs ask, “why should a soulmate only be your romantic partner? why can’t it be a friend or family or an animal or all of them?”
THATS WHAT MAKES THEM SO GREAT!!! because it explores all the facits of love, even healthy and toxic relationships. it can also be how sometimes your soulmate may not be a person you can be with forever, you may only be able to be with them for a moment.
it’s just 🫠 i love this au so much
2 notes
·
View notes
Tagged by @why-is-it-always-autumn
enemies to lovers or friends to lovers // coffee shop au or flower shop au // hurt/comfort or there was only one bed // found family or partners in crime (a good partners in crime Is a found family, whereas many found family stories simply say so without walking the walk, I think) // canon compliant or canon divergent // domesticity or pwp (either?? neither?? I'll read what's good) // fluff or angst with a happy ending // 1st person pov or 3rd person pov (picking 1st just to be contrary. But give me a Good 1st person fic and I will cry on you) // soulmates or forbidden love (they're both gruesomely allo on the whole but I just have no investment in forbidden love scenarios) // roommates or fake dating (I guess?? The ~inevitability~ of well Of Course they'd fall in love after being that close bugs me but the "I can't tell the guy I'm dating that I want to date them" is toptier) // slow burn or meet-cute // love triangle or polyamorous relationship // secret relationship or unrequited love // royalty au or magic au // high school/college au or neighbours au // mutual pining or idiots to lovers (gimme that yearning!)
Tagging @pidgeonpostal @anderazu @authoressconjurer @nickelanddamned
3 notes
·
View notes
2023 reads
Adrift In Starlight
space opera adventure romance
a courtesan is hired to seduce the soon-to-be-wife of a famous actor
a historian who’s focused on her career & has no idea her marriage has been arranged by her rich parents
after a museum tour they and two co-workers accidentally resurrect an ancient alien artifact and end up on the run from the law, traveling from planet to planet
pan nonbinary transfemme MC, touch-averse ace MC
2 notes
·
View notes
is that guy legit confused by aros liking to fuck... is that legit the dumbass take i'm seeing here.. 😭
no it was lowkey like the alloarophobia and general sex negativity of like, oh sex without romance is selfish and bad, i can understand allo aces because sexless love is puuure uwu, but if you have sex without romantic attraction then youre just an heartless player 💅💅
they phrased it nicer than that, but the person was confused as to how “allo aro is a ‘justified’ orientation” because they knew someone they suspected was allo aro and didnt like them, for the above reasons (of which they were yknow, just Assuming). so basically their cutesy “confusion” about being allo aro was really just repackaged general intra community BS that makes me frustrated with a large portion of the ace community
5 notes
·
View notes
My poetry voice: irony, sardonic humor, rage, grief, and hope.
Oh yeah. And some sort of narrative. Always a narrative. (I’m too ace and aro for anything else, what’d you take me for. Even my one (1) attempt as a cutesy romantic poem read as “too platonic” apparently ‘cause the Unspecified Narrator didn’t kiss/get kissed at the end. But like…and?? Who has time for forced normative kissing when you can STARGAZE and DRINK COCOA with someone you feel safe with and adore instead??)
2 notes
·
View notes
Alice Oseman really wrote "we're gonna knock down the fences between our gardens so we can have one big garden, and we can both get a dog and take turns looking after it" and expected me to be okay
4 notes
·
View notes
getting really annoyed at certain ships while also not wanting to filter the tag cause that's majority of the fanart
5 notes
·
View notes
this post was supposed to be a lighthearted post about aspec people by highlighting them in a joking way that still instills positivity and pride in the identity .
unfortunately too many people are too chronically online and media illiterate to realise that so let’s break down the post.
‘shout out to the people not having gay sex this pride month’
this was intentionally a worded to counter the ‘have lots of gay sex this pride month’ jokes and positivity that surround pride discussions. The wording directly associates with anti-queer activity and their frequent attempt to divert attention from queer people during the month of pride. it is worded intentionally. it is supposed to seem counter active to pride .
the humour is then seeing a pride flag. specifically the asexual flag- in which case this stands for an umbrella term across the aspec community which is more recognisable than the variety of aspec flags that i had seen whilst looking for a flag for this post . the grey line of the asexual flag stands for the spectrum between allosexual and asexual it represents the degrees of asexuality and in so, with the purple, stood for the aspec community in this post.
if the joke is still lost on you, the idea was to read a statement that counters the idea of queer pride and find it recontextualised to humorously represent an identity associated with the lack of sexual attraction; ergo no gay sex .
what this post is NOT, is a comment on varied asexual attraction. it us not a commentary on what makes a valid asexual person or whether or not you specifically will have sexual inter course this pride month . it is not saying asexuals are not allowed to have sex . this post is pushing any stereotype of asexuality . op is a sex having aspec person. i am demisexual . i have been with my partner for almost 2 years and engage in sexual activity .
what this post IS, is a joke. it’s a fucking joke i cant make it any clearer. not every single joke is going to relate to your own experiences and that’s ok. not every post about asexuality is going to relate to your own experiences that’s ok. you need to stop taking things at face value and actually engage in some media literacy to understand when something is a reductionist and stereotyping commentary which is inherently negative and when something uses a reductionist approach to convey humour because a lot of you really seem to be struggling with that one.
i fear a lot of you take yourselves too seriously and can’t find the humour in simple tumblr shitposts to the point where i’m having to actually explain what i thought was a very easy concept to grasp because it has upset a lot of people . stop taking everything so seriously .
if you are offended by the original post that is actually a you problem. that is something you have to work on where you cannot accept any form of lighthearted media that does not directly align with your own experiences . bc it’s not serious . it’s a joke x
also allo people can fuck off bc this is literally a post celebrating aspec ppl idc if your gf lives across the country or if you’re just a single loser this literally has nothing to do w u
yall make me want to kms for making me do this
39K notes
·
View notes