Tumgik
#former president
one-time-i-dreamt · 10 months
Text
I went to a Ghost concert with a few friends and former US President Theodore Roosevelt. He was arguably a bigger fan than the rest of us too, like he had a band shirt and everything and pushed through all the way to the first row.
949 notes · View notes
demented-nightstand · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
158 notes · View notes
sher-ee · 15 days
Text
Trumps numerous Truth Social postings since this morning.
It should not be a surprise how unhinged he is, but the fact that he was once President of the United States and now a candidate for office again and conducts himself like this is just staggering.
He’s a terrified, sick minded man.
46 notes · View notes
william-r-melich · 18 hours
Text
If Nefarious Breach, You Must Impeach - 04/26/2024
Presidential immunity is something that I haven't previously given much thought to, probably because it's something that hasn't surfaced much as an issue until recently. Yesterday at Trump's hearing on presidential immunity, US Supreme court justice Samuel Alito questioned whether prosecuting former presidents would harm the country's governance. Trump's lawyers argued that former presidents should have absolute immunity for official acts they made during their tenure as president. They said if they didn't, then prosecuting former presidents would become routine and would undermine future presidents from being able to execute difficult decisions without worrying about future legal repercussions. After all, our country's presidents are commonly put in difficult positions wherein the right thing to do would be considered illegal if performed by any other citizen outside of the executive office.
While speaking to Michael Dreeban, an attorney for special counsel Jack Smith's team who are persecuting Trump in two other cases, the Bush-appointed justice (Samuel Alito) asked him this. “I’m sure you would agree with me that a stable, democratic society requires that a candidate who loses an election, even a close one, even a hotly contested one, leave office peacefully, if that candidate is the incumbent?” “Of course,” replied Dreeban. Alito further posited this, “if an incumbent who loses a very close, hotly contested election, knows that a real possibility after leaving office is not that the president is going to be able to go off into a peaceful retirement, but that the president may be criminally prosecuted by a bitter political opponent, will that not lead us into a cycle that destabilizes the functioning of our country as a democracy?” Dreeban replied that he believes there are “lawful mechanisms to contest the results in an election and outside the record” but claimed that President Trump and others “filed dozens of electoral challenges and my understanding is they lost all but one” in the courts following the 2020 election. He continued, “There was an appropriate way to challenge things through the courts with evidence, if you lose, if you accept the results, that has been the nation’s experience. I think the court is well familiar with that.”
Alito rebutted those assertions on whether there are enough legal safeguards to handle prosecutors acting politically. Dreeban and Jack Smith's team have said that prosecutors must go to grand juries for securing indictments as a check against prosecutions that are politically motivated. The justice responded by saying, "prosecutors could convince a jury to indict a ham sandwich."
Trump's lawyers also argued that their client was merely performing his duties as president while looking to uncover voting fraud during the 2020 election.
This week in New York, the former President, in reference to the Supreme Court case, told reporters the following. “If you don’t have immunity, you’re not going to do anything. You’re going to become a ceremonial president, you’re not going to be taking any of the risks, both good and bad.”
Chief Justice John Roberts, along with at least four other justices didn't seem to support the claim that absolute immunity would stop Trump from being prosecuted on charges of supposedly conspiring to overturn his loss in the 2020 election. Roberts was also with several of the other justices who indicated that the case might need to go back to the lower courts previous to the start date of any trial.
Roberts also showed his dismay with the reasoning brought by the Washington appeals court who gave the ruling against President Trump. During the hearing, the chief justice said this. “You know how easy it is in many cases for a prosecutor to get a grand jury to bring an indictment and reliance on the good faith of the prosecutor may not be enough in some cases.”
So, it appears to me that it's likely they will uphold limited presidential immunity, not absolute immunity. As such there's a good chance that it will go back to the lower courts to determine if he was actually performing his official duties while he was questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election results. If it's determined that he was, then immunity would apply, if not then it won't.
Oh, and by the way, there's something I forgot to mention. In the framer's wisdom they installed an important mechanism should the POTUS (President of the United States) engage in severely unlawful, egregious acts; Impeachment, - Duh! (I can't believe I forgot that and it's so important that I had to change the title of this post from, SCOTUS Hearing on Presidential Immunity.) Under impeachment it would require a 2/3rds majority vote in the senate to convict the President or one of his office holders. So, in deference to a famous Johnnie Cochran line, "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit;" although with the opposite intention: "If nefarious breach, you must impeach."
2 notes · View notes
tattoorue · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
25 notes · View notes
yamimichi · 1 year
Text
I'm confused as to how the legal system works at times. Let me get this straight:
Trump was indicted. He arrived in NY, was arrested and arraigned.
34 FELONIES!
And now he gets to go back to Mar-a-lago? They're letting him go home after arresting him on 34 felonies?
I'm very confused as to why he gets to go home.
15 notes · View notes
readyforevolution · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
The Contemptible Criminal, Twice Impeached, Forever Disgraced, former president donald j. trump at his arraignment in Manhattan, NY.
💃🏽💃🏽💃🏽💃🏽💃🏽💃🏽💃🏽💃🏽💃🏽💃🏽💃🏽💃🏽💃🏽
11 notes · View notes
Text
wheres the white house
2 notes · View notes
Text
A Country Song
Oh the world will sing of a treasonous king a thousand years from nowAnd not just ’cause he broke some laws or where or why or howWhile waiting for some peace after Barack Obama had gone,We all had to suffer under that good-for-nothin’ DonDespicable as he is inept, whenever the history books are kept,They’ll call him the Felon Prez of the US A pox on the Felon Prez of the US! Don’t tell us…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
6 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
new funny comic James
6 notes · View notes
juniperandjustice · 11 months
Video
youtube
Jim Jordan LOSES IT when confronted to his face with Trump’s crimes.
The sarcasm in this is hilarious!
2 notes · View notes
Text
For as ostentatious as he is, Donald Trump showed an uncharacteristic amount of restraint by not adopting the title "president emeritus" after leaving office. He consistently refers to himself as former president, but that's barely a step above ex-president, which he uses to refer to all the others (Carter, Clinton, Bush, Obama), so I can only assume he chose not to go by emeritus because he didn't know what it meant.
Like, I'll never be president, but if I was, I would absolutely call myself president emeritus after retiring. Professors do it, judges do it, even the last Pope did it, so I'm surprised Trump hasn't done it (yet).
15 notes · View notes
hungergames2023 · 1 year
Text
March 30th, 2023
The 45th President of the United States has be officially indicted by New York.
4 notes · View notes
william-r-melich · 25 days
Text
Trump Gagged? No Way! - 04/03/2024
The New York supreme court judge Juan Merchan in Trump's "hush money" case has expanded on his earlier gag order which tried to restrict what Trump could publicly say about the case. The order came late yesterday which gags the former president from speaking in public about Manhattan D.A. Alvin Brag's family members and all others named including jurors, potential jurors, counsel, court staff, witnesses, and their families. The judge wrote, “This pattern of attacking family members of presiding jurists and attorneys assigned to his cases serves no legitimate purpose, it merely injects fear in those assigned or called to participate in the proceedings that not only they, but their family members as well, are ‘fair game,’ for Defendant’s vitriol.” He further wrote that courts are "understandably concerned" on restricting defendants' free speech, especially for those who are publicly notable. He further wrote, “The circumstances of the instant matter, however, are different. The conventional ‘David vs. Goliath’ roles are no longer in play as demonstrated by the singular power defendant’s words have on countless others.” In his ruling arguments he cited from the prosecution, “multiple potential witnesses have already raised grave concerns [...] about their own safety and that of their family members should they appear as witnesses against the defendant.” On those fears he wrote that they would "undoubtedly interfere" with the proceedings, and he continued. “The average observer, must now, after hearing defendant’s recent attacks, draw the conclusion that if they become involved in these proceedings, even tangentially, they should worry not only for themselves, but for their loved ones as well.” State prosecutor Matthew Colangelo wrote, “Defendant’s dangerous, violent, and reprehensible rhetoric fundamentally threatens the integrity of these proceedings and is intended to intimidate witnesses and trial participants alike—including this Court.” The state attorney's office was referencing Trump's remarks about the judge's daughter.
This judge, Juan Merchan, is compromised with a serious case of Trump Derangement Syndrome, and Trump's lawyers think he should recuse himself from the case because his daughter, Loren Merchan who owns a Democrat political consulting firm, heavily profited from her fundraisers dedicated to hurt and remove Trump from the political scene. The judge's wife, Lara Merchan, used to work for New York Attorney General Letitia James, who prosecuted Trump for a victimless crime of "over valuating" his property to get a more favorable loan, and to which he paid back fully with interest that made Duetsche Bank (no complaints) a lot of money. Another ridiculous, unconstitutionally brought case, which, like all the others, is nothing more than political persecution. Judge Juan Merchan's profile picture on X was of Donald Trump behind bars. I think it's fair to say that this judge is compromised, or as Trump would say, "by a lot!"
Of course, the mainstream media's talking point's echoe-chamber put out that Trump made threatening remarks about the judge's daughter, when in fact he did no such thing. One of his Truth Social posts reads, “Judge Juan Merchan, a very distinguished looking man, is nevertheless a true and certified Trump Hater who suffers from a very serious case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. In other words, he hates me! His daughter is a senior executive at a Super Liberal Democrat firm that works for Adam ‘Shifty’ Schiff, the Democrat National Committee, Senate Majority PAC, and even Crooked Joe Biden.”
As I have said before, I think all of these cases against Trump should be dismissed and thrown out, as they are obviously political witch hunts directed by Biden's crooked administration and their weaponized justice department. So, Trump appropriately calls them the "Biden trials." The left thinks they can stop him from coming back to DC, and this judge thinks he can silence him, to keep him from pointing out all of the obvious corruption in that's clearly in plain sight for anyone with a functioning brain to see; --No Way! No Way! - will they ever silence or stop him, and No Way! - will they ever silence or stop us, we the people. Trump is right when he declares these trials as being "election interference," and that they should never, ever take place in the United States of America: abso-futting-lutely; -- No Way!
2 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Barack Obama served as the 44th President of the United States from 2009 to 2017. He was born to an American mother of European descent and an African father from Kenya. Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, making him the first president not born in the contiguous United States.
3 notes · View notes
nerdykeith · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
Oh My! George Takei can do no wrong! I have to admit he really does bring a ray of sunshine to Twitter. What an international treasure! Keep being you George!
11 notes · View notes