Last week, the U.S. Senate confirmed Judge Melissa DuBose to the U.S. District Court for Rhode Island, making her the first person of color and the first openly LGBTQ judge to serve on this Court.
Judge DuBose is also the 100th Black woman ever confirmed to a lifetime federal judgeship in the United States.
Making history during Women’s History Month? Period! 👩🏾⚖️🏛️🤩
All of girl's claims of sex and being in his hotel room are false, the judge himself and the other court guy says this in the video [YouTube Link Provided]
He was given A FINE AND COMMUNITY SERVICE (not jail time) for endangerment via text messages. The court seized their phones during this case for evidence.
Drake claims he didn't know her age, the court didn't comment much on that besides that he should've did better due to his celebrity status.
Drake fucked up, but the evidence dosen't point towards hin being a pedophile.
He also never became a Mexican named Drake Campana. Campana was only a twitter handle and he never moved.
As for the allegations from his ex of domestic abuse and pedophila, she was vpedophile, the pedo stuff and didn't give evidence, Or go through the minor stuff. Since there was no court battle and both sides have opposing claims of abuse and pedophilia (drake denied abuse but that dosen't automatically make him correct. Denial is easy), this cannot be confirmed. I'll include the vid for clarity though
youtube
She says she was 16, meaning the relation would've started in 2005 since she was born in 1989. Reddit and drama sites for some reason say it was 2007 but she would've been 17-18 then
I went to court but the entire jury, defense, judge and my lawyer were all fish. The sentence? I had told someone that fish fingers weren’t actually fishes’ fingers. I was found guilty and sentenced to death by lawn mower. I still don’t know what that means.
no because ariel is so much better than me he’d have hit me with “my little mermaid” and i would would have fucked him right there in his little nerd man cave are you joking
i learned about the strangest piece of evidence ever shown to a judge in a courtroom
In 1983, an unusual scene took place in court in Florida. Three female dancers were on trial. Undercover investigators had allegedly observed the women showing "too much" while working in a nightclub.
The charge was indecency.
The dancers had violated a county ordinance that prohibits nudity in places where food and drink are served. The women's attorney pointed out to the judge that the women's panties had been too large to reveal the body parts that the undercover police officers claimed to have seen.
So the lawyer asked that his clients be allowed to show the dance. The judge refused to allow a dance demonstration in chambers, fearing for his rather young career, but allowed a demonstration in court. He later said that he had not expected the women to follow through with this in court.
The court photographer's picture shows what happened that day in a Florida courtroom.
Two of the three women turned around in front of the judge and presented their rear ends to him. The judge then ruled that their panties were indeed of sufficient size. This unusual evidence exonerated the dancers.