Tumgik
#confirmed canon representation
kinglesbian420 · 7 months
Text
CLANKIE IS OFFICIALLY CANON
989 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Look me in the fucking eyes and tell me this girl is not trans
164 notes · View notes
loreensdarling · 1 year
Text
monthly reminder that yelena belova is canonically aroace and has been confirmed to not have interest in relationships 🗣️🗣️
113 notes · View notes
romance-incubomp3 · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
HELLO I’m loving the aromantic rep more of this in media please!!!
32 notes · View notes
saranilssonbooks · 2 days
Text
My greatest obsession: Moby-Dick
My great obsession: Captain Ahab
My greatest interest: analyzing the characters in Moby-Dick from a psychological point of view focusing on trauma.
My great mission: destroy every case of Moby-Dick queer denial I encounter.
7 notes · View notes
frogs-and-books · 15 days
Note
I have to admit that it's so frustrating to me that people are doing this "He's canon ace but not canon aro" thing. It feels like people wanting to have it both ways at the cost aro people. If you're going to say only what's explicit in the text matters, then be honest with proper embrace of Death of the Author and disregard what Brennan said outside the context of the text. If you want to invest meaning in authorial intent, than be honest about the authorial intent with Riz. It's hard enough being aro in fandom as it is without people playing both sides of the fence on this
I'm sorry that there is a lack of aromantic representation, but you can't decide what the authorial intent was for the author. He could be aro! There's a lot of subtext and ways to read the story like that, but it's just as easy to read it as him being demiromantic or gray romantic or even just a late bloomer. Because of this, I can't confirm the authors intent unless he states it. I don't personally have an opinion on it, I just like Riz, and I'll like his character no matter what his sexuality is. I'm not going to disregard a statement from a cast member, especially when I doubt Brennan would have said without Murph's permission. That, to me at least, is confirmation of authorial intent.
I can understand why you're frustrated, but there aren't (or at least shouldn't be) sides. I'm simply saying that Riz is not canonically Aromantic, which is true. However, this does not mean that Aromantic people are somehow wrong in saying that they believe he is! Just like many other things, it is up for the viewer to decide currently.
If Murph comes out and says Riz is Aromantic, that's it. He's Aromantic. But until then, it's up for interpretation. You aren't wrong for saying he's Aromantic, but neither is someone saying he's not Aromantic.
I am so glad that Riz resonates with you, but others don't have your same experience and might relate to him in different ways, and their experience and interpretations aren't less valid than yours.
The world isn't black and white. There are so many nuisances that can be beautiful if you allow yourself to see them.
I'm not on the fence. I know exactly where I stand. Riz is canonically asexual and he has no confirmed romantic interests, although he has been shown to be less interested than his peers. This could mean many, many different things, but saying that thinking Riz is asexual but not aromantic is being on the fence is discounting real people who are asexual and not aromantic.
It's not all or nothing. I'm not out to get you or hurt anyone. It just frustrates me when people state their interpretations of media as facts and get upset when other people have different interpretations. Your interpretation isn't more valid just because it's more diverse. That would be like me reading a book where someone was never stated to have a race, but I decided that their character would make more sense if they were black, so now they're canonically black, even though I don't know what the author imagined them like. Just because it's adding diversity doesn't make it more morally correct. It doesn't make it more incorrect either. It just makes it your interpretation.
I know you're probably sick of hearing this, but it's up for interpretation, and you can't fault people for having a different interpretation of a character.
7 notes · View notes
divorcedfiddleford · 1 month
Text
ok last thing about that interview before i shut up forever - one author saying outside of the text of a work that a character is or might be gay is not representation. we established this all the way back when people still gave fuckin row.ling the time of day. "word of god" confirmation, especially when it comes to something like a tv show which had multiple writers, is not the same as actually including something in the work itself
11 notes · View notes
br1ghtestlight · 4 months
Text
trying to get tumblr people to watch bob's burgers by telling them that one of the main characters is a queer-coded fat neurodivergent man w/ ptsd and ocd and none of those traits are protrayed as a negative thing or as a joke. I think. i dont remember actually
10 notes · View notes
robitherat · 1 year
Text
Genuinely think it's so funny how everyone latched onto "Jay is canonically a gay man" when it was "confirmed" thru an ask to JACKIE who didn't write for the original series and also considering it held literally less than no relevance to the series itself. Like fuck man if I wanna say Jay is a she/they faggot I'm going to it literally doesn't matter. It has no plot relevance and the series came out in 2009. I will make up as many genders for these fuckers as I want to. They're all transfemme now.
10 notes · View notes
frmulcahy · 2 years
Text
My jaded, cynical ass: I’ve been a part of fandom spaces for too long to fall for queer baiting or get my hopes up for representation. Ofmd was an anomaly you think your gay ship is gonna be canon??? Bitch wake up I was there during bbc Sherlock’s peak I witnessed the spn fandom from the sidelines for years Ive seen so many shows and movies throughout the years that I am just tired. I have resigned to the fact that hetero ships are just always gonna be the default and that if we’re “lucky enough” to be in a piece of media, we are a friend who’s stereotypical and/or has to come out and its meant to be this big emotional and painful thing, only to be shoved to the side because its not our story, its the straights story. That’s just how it is.
Also me, whenever Trent Crimm is on screen:
Tumblr media
40 notes · View notes
peridyke · 2 years
Text
I'm always like kinda hesitant to talk abt this and I don't know if pointing it out really means anything or if I even have a solid opinion on it but its kind of bizarre thinking back to shows people directly compared to su and recommended partially because of su's regressive(?) politics and poor representation but said shows just absolutely did NOT try at all when it came to rep and often times played into the same offensive tropes. ok sorry its star vs I'm thinking of star vs
23 notes · View notes
Note
I heard that Andre Glacier gets chased out after being exposed as not having a vending license? But really I just want to see what happens if Alix, who according to TA is aroace, goes to him for ice cream. I need to know
Alix did canonically get ice cream from him which is hilarious.
13 notes · View notes
vaugarde · 2 years
Text
oh apparently lillith from TOH is aroace good for her <3
9 notes · View notes
freckledsweetpea · 2 years
Text
the fact that people see an lgbtq+ character and HAVE to ship them with any character who has no indication of being queer who is nice to them and is the(or one of the) gender(s) they're attracted to is just...not helpful.
like queer people can have meaningful friendships that aren't romantic or sexual and that doesn't lessen the impact of the relationship between the two.
(this doesn't apply to queer baited ships and/or completely cishet media and/or people who are shipping for fun and aren't trying to create a narrative that clearly isn't there)
1 note · View note
cryptidjeepers · 9 months
Text
I try to stay out of discourse but i have to say something controversial. If youre genuinely upset because good omens 2 ruined your personal headcanons and feel the need to send neil gaiman asks to confirm or deny said headcanons, maybe log off idk. thats not a healthy way to interact with media or creators. And honestly no show is going to be your perfect ideal queer representation and complaining about perfectly fine representation because its not what you personally want is just awful
1 note · View note
styrofauxm · 1 month
Text
look. i'm sorry. really sorry for not just letting this die. but it bugs me. so suffer i guess.
If I saw a canonically trans character and said "well I prefer to write them as cis" people would be pissed at me, for good reason.
If I saw a canonical trans woman/man character and wrote them as a demigirl/boy and said "while the show just says she/he's trans, not that she/he's a trans woman/man" people would be pissed at me, also for good reason.
If a character was directly implied to be trans, and the creator confirmed later that they were meant to be trans, and I went "well it wasn't said explicitly in the show so it's not canon," people would be pissed at me, for good reason.
If the majority of a fandom did those things, we could collectively agree that the fandom is really transphobic.
You can sub this out for any queer identity with mainstream representation, and probably non-queer identities too.
So why is it considered acceptable to do these things to aspec characters?
Why are ships contrary to aspec identities the only ships against a character's canon queer identity that get popular?
Why are aspec people the only ones that get consistent ship discourse over our real identities?
Why are aspec people the only ones asked to sit back and take it?
Why is it on aspec people to not ruin allo people's fun in fandom, but allo people are allowed to ruin ours?
(The answer to all of the above is: aspec identities are viewed by other queer people as functionally straight and are treated as such)
2K notes · View notes