Tumgik
#article quote
soracities · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
"Absolutely no one comes to save us but us."
Ismatu Gwendolyn, "you've been traumatized into hating reading (and it makes you easier to oppress)", from Threadings, on Substack [ID'd]
71K notes · View notes
buttersteps · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
the baseball players are about to mount a coup and i’m here for it
21K notes · View notes
dance-in-my-storm · 1 month
Text
“These feelings will always be yours. They belong to you. This love doesn’t hurt you or make you smaller or weaker. This love, this sadness, this pain, this regret, this passion is here to remind you that you will always care more than you can stand. You will always feel more than you can tolerate. Your love is a renewable resource. Live at the center of that abundance. Feel everything.”
-Heather Havrilesky, Love Doesn’t Evaporate
0 notes
charliejaneanders · 9 months
Text
The United States has always been a terrible place to be sick and disabled. Ableism is baked into our myths of bootstrapping and self-reliance, in which health is virtue and illness is degeneracy. It is long past time for a bedrock shift, for all of us.
Long covid has derailed my life. Make no mistake: It could yours, too.
27K notes · View notes
elitheaceofalltrades · 4 months
Text
"I’m not a child anymore who can be shattered by the smallest rejections — or maybe I am, but I am also an adult who knows how to glue things back together." -Miranda Osmelak, Why Being Broke Makes It Harder To Negotiate
1 note · View note
serialunaliver · 2 days
Text
That year, a Hoover Institution economist who advised both Nixon and Reagan named Roger Freeman said the quiet part out loud when he told the San Francisco Chronicle, “We are in danger of producing an educated proletariat. That’s dynamite! We have to be selective on who we allow to go through higher education.”
3K notes · View notes
exhaled-spirals · 3 months
Text
« To mention the global loss of biodiversity, that is to say, the disappearance of life on our planet, as one of our problems, along with air pollution or ocean acidification, is absurd—like a doctor listing the death of his patient as one symptom among others.
The ecological catastrophe cannot be reduced to the climate crisis. We must think about the disappearance of life in a global way. About two-thirds of insects, wild mammals and trees disappeared in a few years, a few decades and a few millennia, respectively. This mass extinction is not mainly caused by rising temperatures, but by the devastation of natural habitats.
Suppose we managed to invent clean and unlimited energy. This technological feat would be feted by the vast majority of scientists, synonymous in their eyes with a drastic reduction in CO2 emissions. In my opinion, it would lead to an even worse disaster. I am deeply convinced that, given the current state of our appetites and values, this energy would be used to intensify our gigantic project of systemic destruction of planetary life. Isn't that what we've set out to do—replace forests with supermarket parking lots, turn the planet into a landfill? What if, to cap it all, energy was free?
[...C]limate change has emerged as our most important ecological battle [...] because it is one that can perpetuate the delusional idea that we are faced with an engineering problem, in need of technological solutions. At the heart of current political and economic thought lies the idea that an ideal world would be a world in which we could continue to live in the same way, with fewer negative externalities. This is insane on several levels. Firstly because it is impossible. We can't have infinite growth in a finite world. We won't. But also, and more importantly, it is not desirable. Even if it were sustainable, the reality we construct is hell. [...]
It is often said that our Western world is desacralised. In reality, our civilisation treats the technosphere with almost devout reverence. And that's worse. We perceive the totality of reality through the prism of a hegemonic science, convinced that it “says” the only truth.
The problem is that technology is based on a very strange principle, so deeply ingrained in us that it remains unexpressed: no brakes are acceptable, what can be done must be done. We don't even bother to seriously and collectively debate the advisability of such "advances". We are under a spell. And we are avoiding the essential question: is this world in the making, standardised and computed, overbuilt and predictable, stripped of stars and birds, desirable?
To confine science to the search for "solutions" so we can continue down the same path is to lack both imagination and ambition. Because the “problem” we face doesn't seem to me, at this point, to be understood. No hope is possible if we don't start by questioning our assumptions, our values, our appetites, our symbols... [...] Let's stop pretending that the numerous and diverse human societies that have populated this planet did not exist. Certainly, some of them have taken the wrong route. But ours is the first to forge ahead towards guaranteed failure. »
— Aurélien Barrau, particle physicist and philosopher, in an interview in Télérama about his book L'Hypothèse K
1K notes · View notes
soracities · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
Audre Lorde, from "The Uses of Anger: Women Responding to Racism" (1981)
14K notes · View notes
bonolewis · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Maybe a trip to Lourdes will help him
973 notes · View notes
necr0mancers · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
star wars journalism
1K notes · View notes
zvaigzdelasas · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
4K notes · View notes
iamenits · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Screenshots of McCoy smiling (and a few where he isn't) from every Star Trek episode in production order.
406 notes · View notes