BANGS HEAD ON WALL
making out with malleus or just being so affectionate with the fae on that damn tower when malleus KNOWS that rollo's just behind that glass window. watching and scowling as your lips pressed against the fae's jaw with your cheeks burning and eyes half-lidded. how rollo thought you were once pure and innocent from these vile creatures yet here you are completely drunk by mere words and touches alone.
malleus glancing over his shoulder as he caresses your waist and that ghost of a smirk stretching on his lips as he could practically sense the anger from the person behind the glass pane. the handkerchief crumping under rollo's grip, trying to stop himself from punching and breaking the glass. he doesn't know if he's angry at you or malleus. he's not going to lose his only.... well
we can find another way to word his sweet maria.
2K notes
·
View notes
Prompt 51
Hear me out: Either due to a prank originally or them both being genderfluid, Bruce and Kate swap vigilante outfits. Batman is Batwoman for a night and Batwoman is Batman, not that the goons know that. The thing is though… it’s kind of fun. So they do it again, and again.
The criminals don’t know if they’re going to get kick in your teeth Batman or shoot your kneecaps Batman, they don’t know if they’re going to get flirt while terrorizing your gang Batwoman or terrifyingly silent while snapping someones leg Batwoman.
It’s fun for them, and sometimes on slower nights they’ll swap in the middle of patrol. No one can figure out who the bats are, even in rumors or conspiracy theories. People trying to psychoanalyze them are pulling out their hair, the batkids when they find out are going wild with ideas on how to make it worse.
Of course, come the Justice League, they continue to do their whole switching vigilante-sonas.
180 notes
·
View notes
Rhysta shippers have this incredibly weird fixation with Rhys manipulating Nesta into sexual acts or showing this physical aggression towards her. Which is kind of strange when you take into account the fact that according to them, they hate him because he’s a sexual assaulter but they also fantasize about him sexually assaulting their fav???
This is something I’ve noticed for a while now and for all they whine about how much they ship them because they’re “two powerful beings who are actually equal to one another” they have this habit of making Nesta a victim to him…Like I don’t even have to bring up Feyre to explain why that ship and it’s shippers are deeply fucked up.
45 notes
·
View notes
The Slope by @megatron-fucks provides a great scene where Pharma gets to blow up on Ratchet about how he lost everything good in his life and faced a fate worse than death so Ratchet has no right to judge him.
But you know what else I really want to see and might write myself?
I want a post-Delphi scene where Pharma gets to verbally rip Ratchet apart about how he disowned Pharma and is acting as if the 'new Pharma' is a completely different person, but in reality Ratchet is just desperate to convince himself that Pharma was always a bad apple and the "best friend" Ratchet knew was either a lie or a person who's "died." Basically Pharma getting to lambast Ratchet about how 'the person he used to be' isn't some separate entity, that the old Pharma LITERALLY IS HIM and it's Ratchet who's a piece of shit for being unable to reconcile that Pharma could be his former best friend and also the monster he ended up becoming.
Mostly in regards to the aspect of canon where despite being former best friends, Ratchet made basically zero efforts to have any sympathy for Pharma or extend help/mercy to him and mostly used their former friendship to prey on Pharma's insecurities to manipulate him into doing what he wanted.
Of course it's a narration by Pharma so it might not be 100% correct or unbiased, but like. I just desperately crave some sort of resolution between Ratchet and Pharma. Or if not a resolution, at least some catharsis where Pharma gets to unload and Ratchet acknowledges he was a bastard.
16 notes
·
View notes
Okay no joke, when talking about Marvel deciding the straights need rep in Marvel Pride 2024 with a friend on Discord, I straight up joked: "god imagine its a straight x-men next to a gay x-men
just, "see??? they allies!""
And low and behold...that's what Marvel's straight allies covers actually are: straight character paired up with lgbt+ character.
They literally were so desperate to represent the straight characters, they didn't even think of how to do the damn covers themselves.
Hell, remove the 'MARVEL VOICES PRIDE' writing from both and would you even know this was for pride??? You literally wouldn't, because there's nothing to show that, not even a flag at least.
8 notes
·
View notes
thank you for your posts! they've been super helpful in understanding far cry 5 lore better. if you don't mind, i have a lore question; i've seen people claiming that the faith seed in the game killed her predecessor (in the cult, not joseph's wife), and other people claiming that joseph and/or john killed her. do you know if there's anything in fc5 that says or implies who killed the former faith?
You’re welcome! I’m glad you enjoy my posts :)
People who claim that Faith killed her predecessor have probably played the Far Cry 6 Collapse DLC. In that game, she explains she pushed the previous Faith off the statue of Joseph and that’s how she took her place in the cult. It was her test, the “leap of faith” she talks about in Far Cry 5, but according to the DLC, she didn’t actually jump.
Technically, she isn’t really the one telling this story because everything Joseph experiences in Collapse is a creation of the Voice and/or his tortured mind. Still, even though he’s upset when “Faith” says what she did, it’s more in a “don’t remind me of my mistakes” way than in a “stop telling lies” way, I think, so it seems it’s supposed to be true and not Joseph/the Voice distorting the facts.
The problem is that this was never mentioned in Far Cry 5 and that the DLC has a different writing team. It’s still official, and to some people that’s enough to make it canon, but to me it’s not, and I’ve noted too many inconsistencies to consider it a reliable source of information. It was also Collapse that “revealed” Joseph’s wife was the first, original Faith Seed, but this was never mentioned anywhere before, either; she didn’t have a name in Far Cry 5.
So it’s not really wrong to say Faith killed her predecessor because it’s the story officially told in Collapse, but it’s not what Far Cry 5 said, so I don’t consider this canon (it’s just my opinion, though). Maybe the DLC’s writers felt they had to explain how she survived jumping off the statue because they thought it would have killed her (even though we know the leap of faith isn’t always lethal)...
In Far Cry 5, there unfortunately is almost no information about what happened to the other Faiths. We just know there were at least two, Lana and Selena, and that, according to the author of the “Grieving Note”, Lana died and her body was disposed of at the Horned Serpent Cave. It seems it was then Selena who replaced her and that she was the predecessor of the current Faith, Rachel, but her whereabouts are unknown.
The note “A Confession” implies the Faith who wrote it was afraid of Joseph’s reaction if he found out that her devotion to the Project was “plagued by doubt”, so that suggests he might be at least partly responsible for her presumed demise. That said, no one clearly explains anything and the previous Faiths are barely mentioned, so we can only speculate about what exactly became of them. The Father says Rachel “was not the first”, and he must know the truth about her predecessors, but we don’t.
As for John being the murderer of the former Faith(s), I guess it’s not completely improbable since we can imagine anything, but there’s zero evidence he was directly involved in whatever happened.
25 notes
·
View notes
from the fake “art deco era” dress picture going around to “Emile Corsi” I’m wondering what people’s takes would be on using already generated AI images as inspiration for real, human made art. After all, if at least a first glance at some of them leads people to think it’s real (AI is getting better in some ways, the hands aren’t always such a tell,) and the image itself is real in that it’s there in front of you making you think and feel things, is there a degree of separation from the art scraping/theft that would make people more comfortable with using it as inspiration, as long as it’s not encouraging people to generate more? I’m not talking direct copies, not even necessarily direct copies but having things like anatomy errors fixed, I’m not even talking about me specifically, (though I have used one as a pose inspiration before for something not posted, only because the pose suited what I wanted so well for a particular character and again I can’t simply pose my siblings like dolls,) but just in general.
To be clear I’m talking about possibly not even linking to the AI image or whoever generated it, at most mentioning that it was inspired by AI images but I guess not in such a way as to give credit where credit is dubious, or to drum up interest in using AI more. …Or would that be two wrongs not making a right? I guess since no artist is obligated to show everything that directly inspired a particular work this could all be just my brain cycling in a loop for no reason, going back and forth about something no one has any real issue with. I know where I stand on having someone’s work scraped and fed into a generator without their consent, but where is the line between not using that and benefiting from someone else using it? I take inspiration from many artists, but I cannot literally copy their art. The best I can do is try a master copy, mimicking as best I can and learning from it, but I’m not a robot. My own style will creep in, for better or for worse and if I want something new drawn in their style I can save up for commissions when available.
I guess my question is, if you knew someone had fed your art to a generator and posted the image it came up with, how would you feel if you knew someone else was inspired by that image to create something new?
18 notes
·
View notes