Tumgik
#the community label is just to be safe
neonsbian · 13 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
MONKEY MAN (2024) dir. Dev Patel
22 notes · View notes
svnflowermoon · 4 months
Text
btw please block me if you feel the need to gatekeep the queer community. cishet aspecs ARE valid and they ARE queer. the "they don't experience discrimination" argument is possibly the most stupid thing i have ever heard because aspecs experience insane levels discrimination and people are extremely dismissive of them. we our more than our suffering. our community is not yours to gatekeep it isn't fair to invalidate people's queer identities just because you can't fit them in your stupid little box of specific labels.
304 notes · View notes
jijidraws · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
♡ reviving some classics ♡ 
1K notes · View notes
sslowdeathh · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
not requested. hypero is hyper (meaning above, more than normal) and hypo (under, less than normal) put together lol
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
A type of empathy (or lack there of) where one's empathy changes drastically without warning.
It often goes from no empathy to hyper empathy. The user may not know the difference between the two, or may not be able to differentiate between them.
this is intended for those with NPD or other disorders that affect empathy, but anyone can use it.
[PT: Hypero empathy. Not requested. Hypero is hyper (meaning above, more than normal) and hypo (under, less than normal) put together lol.
Definition: A type of empathy (or lack there of) where one's empathy changes drastically without warning. It often goes from no empathy to hyper empathy. The user may not know the difference between the two, or may not be able to differentiate between them.
This is intended for those with NPD or other disorders that affect empathy, but anyone can use it. /PT END]
58 notes · View notes
chrollohearttags · 10 months
Text
not even to wake up in a haterrific mood on such a beautiful morning but I feel like I gotta say something. Especially when I’ve been seeing a multitude of posts critiquing black writers and seeing so many of amazing moots leave. (and reminder that the anon button is OFF so you will argue with the wall or get that ass cussed out publicly, your choice. And if you feel brave enough to come to my DM’s, I got something there for you too 🤗 so feel free) but I am so so so SICK of seeing these very unnecessary and annoying standards being placed on black writers. I’ve said this once and I’ll say it again that the goalpost keeps moving for us. It went from the toxic, plug, sneaky link, etc fics are harmful and damaging to us as black women to now I’ve had the displeasure of seeing that modern AU’s in general are problematic and we should write more canon AOT stories (I wish I was making this up). Don’t know about you but I want no parts of that depression fest. Especially because the ONE black person was basically observed like some type of mystical being. I’ll pass on the whole ‘why does your hair feel like that’ and a handmade’s mammy tale of tending to a war criminal’s wounds in a jail cell. Regardless, all of this is rooted in a respectability and projection issue. Because as I’ve said before, none of these critiques started until the TikTok girls started publicly bashing black writers and using them as a ploy to get views because doing it to other groups who write the SAME tropes with a “digestible” packaging would’ve gotten them backlash. So as does everyone on this hellscape of a planet, they use black women as a punching bag and laughing stock to garner engagement. Now you’ve got an influx of people regurgitating these same things and making others feel bad for what they write. I’ll be honest, a lot of these tropes/stories that I see, they’re not exactly my niche, mainly because I don’t smoke, I don’t do parties and stuff like that so I can’t resonate with it (don’t come at me, I got asthma and social anxiety, bitch 😭) but that doesn’t make me love/wanna read them any less. I love seeing different perspectives and being in another set of shoes for a while. There’s nothing wrong with that because as long as black women/enbies are happy and confident in what they write and it’s not causing harm, I’m going to support ten toes down because we need representation, we need that community and I’ll be damned if I turn my nose up in the air at anyone just trying to express their creativity. What I WON’T support is a bunch of hateful, nasty spirited shrews parading around in clean girl cosplay and bashing others to be seen as acceptable and ‘one of the good ones.’ Not liking smut doesn’t make you a better reader/writer, not liking modern AU’s and ‘overused’ tropes doesn’t make you some prophetic, divine person and sitting up in anons and on the dash, reporting fics because YOU personally don’t like them doesn’t make you superior. And running everyone else off of here won’t make your writing any better. What does it make you is a loser, a cornball ass bitch and a lazy bum. Because the energy you exert into being haters, you can simply open a Google doc or draft on here and write what fulfills you. Be the change you want to see in the world or whatever they say. Also, a lot of us ARE writing these very scenarios you all are claiming you want to see. We can also see the notes count in comparison to the ones being deemed so horrible so again? You as the consumer determine what’s popular and not. We’re only going to write what’s going to be seen. Anyways, black women/femmes/enbies, I love you. I love your stories, I love your portrayals of our favorite characters whether they’re a drug dealer or a doctor, I love seeing y’all on my dash and I hope that you continue to grow in your writing journeys. I hope that you write what brings you joy and block out all the bullshit. Stay safe and have a wonderful weekend! 🫶🏾🫶🏾🫶🏾
109 notes · View notes
afraidparade · 2 months
Text
hey guoys as a reminder i try to keep this account strictly sfw out of respect for people who enjoy my oc content but do not care for the nsfw stuff, and as such i don’t respond to asks regarding nsfw content, even if they are vague. i also don’t reply to anons asking for my twitter, i’ll only respond to dms of accounts who have their age visible on their blog. my dms are always open if you just want to ask a question through there, or if you’d prefer to stay on anon there’s a curiouscat link on the pinned post of my twitter. that is all, be sure to drink water ✌️🐰
24 notes · View notes
chibigaia-art · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
sorry for goncharov posting again but... fix it AU where Sofia is with Katya during her breakdown and convinces her to run away before the inevitable happens (& they live happily ever after)
251 notes · View notes
zees-little-blog · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
this is Hank!! i was originally gonna call him something less… dad sounding, but just look at his face!!! he looks like a Hank!!
52 notes · View notes
kaleidoscope1967eyes · 4 months
Text
jesus i haven't felt this bad in a long time... i got tricked into reading some article that was like "breakthrough study about the science behind bisexuality" and it was the most stereotypical, degrading thing i've ever read
18 notes · View notes
dolliecworpse · 11 months
Text
🥀 。。。 FALSEGODEIC
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
ᶻ 𝗓 FALSEGODEIC : a gender connected to always doing good deeds, but not because you see yourself as a good person, but rather because you fear punishment if you don’t do them. this gender may feel fearful and fake, as though it is always walking on eggshells.
✎ term and flag by the virtual pup 。。。 coined for day five of @lovesse ‘s event 。。。 tagging @accessmogai for a flag id !
Tumblr media
49 notes · View notes
sslowdeathh · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
finektin ; requested by @ginganthropy. fih - nekt - in
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
a fictive that doesn't identify with their source, but does identify with other beings from the same source in a kin-like way.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
[PT: Finektin: Requested by @/ginganthropy. Fih-Nekt-In.
Definition: A fictive that doesn't identify with their source, but does identify with other beings from the same source in a kin-like way. /PT END]
41 notes · View notes
plvtosun · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
come to mummy!
29 notes · View notes
hungryslothwrites · 5 months
Text
what is love! baby don't hurt me. don't hurt me. no more.
8 notes · View notes
kiruliom · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
old symbol | new symbol
"eccentric/quirky" singlet identity flags (name is a WIP qwq)
a flag for when you relate to the experiences of plurals (namely osdd-1 or median plurals) more than singlets, but do not show any easily noticeable symptoms of plurality other than that and therefore dont wanna label yourself as plural out of respect and concerns. this identity is commonly caused by other types of dissociative disorders, and/or plural contraumia.
template by localhazard (link) , hope you dont mind <:) also so sorry if this harms anyone and if so Im willing to take it down if so even if Id rather not
45 notes · View notes
necropoleis · 9 months
Text
assuming that abusers (child or otherwise) exist only or even primarily within the radqueer community is extremely dangerous. no “community” is free from abusers as they’ll justify their actions regardless of what they say or who they associate with.
12 notes · View notes
hehimdykesrock · 10 months
Note
Hi. I was wondering if you could elaborate a bit on your reasoning for encouraging the “Bi/Mspec Lesbian” label? I’m not a fan of the label but at least want to try to see where you’re coming from??
Bc as a lesbian who previously identified as bisexual, I honestly find the “Bi Lesbian” label invalidating to both identities. For context, I identified as Bi for quite a while bc I had been told that Lesbians don’t include nonbinary people or trans women. Which is not true!!!
Mspec sapphic people already have the terms Bi and Pan (and Queer, Sapphic, etc.)- Lesbian is the ONLY one that doesn’t include men. Adding it to the Bi label just caters to the fear of not being ‘gay enough’ that society drills into mspec sapphics. Bi women/enbys are still queer. A feminine gender preference can be described just as easily with the term Sapphic. The “Bi Lesbian” term just reinforces the harmful idea that Lesbians ‘jUsT hAvEn’T mEt ThE rIgHt GuY yEt’.
A personal anecdote: in the past few years, I have begun to actively avoid telling men I’m not close to that I’m a Lesbian. Because they frequently want to take it as a challenge. To “convert” me. The “mspec lesbian” idea actively puts Lesbians in danger by just repackaging conservative ideologies under the veil of being *progressive*. (Invalidating the validity of sapphic identities/relationships, and that ‘ALL women are attracted to men/can be converted’. I have also seen mspec lesbians say Lesbians are terfs as a justification for the new label- while the justifications themselves sound transphobic??? The jist of it usually is- ‘Lesbians are transphobic. The identity is defined by not being attracted to men- So why can they like trans women but can’t like binary trans men! Even though I totally believe that trans women are women and trans men are men!!!’)
Sorry this is long and repetitive. I wanted to try to put as much of my reasoning as I could. While I can empathize with why the bi lesbian label was created (bc I identified as Bi for a very long time + thus became heavily aware of biphobia within the LGBTQIA+ community. Even from Lesbians.)- it ultimately implies that Bisexuality isn’t considered “gay enough” and unintentionally perpetuates the idea that Lesbians can be converted into liking men.
My first thought is this sounds like some radfem Gold Star Lesbian bullshit lol. And yeah this is super long and repetitive, so I'm not gonna worry too much about the quality/conciseness of my response. Guess ill try to just take it peice by piece. I usually don't entertain shit like this but I'm bored today so let's try it.
Why do you find someone else having a different experince than you invalidating? Have you considered that this may be a personal insecurity more so than the responsibility of the people who's identities you're uncomfortable with?
The bisexual label has bever been exclusive of trans/nonbinary people, and the misconception that it is is itself transphobia in action. You say you changed your mind about that label after learning that it isn't exclusive of trans people, congratulations. That doesn't mean that everyone else using the bisexual label just hasn't come to that conclusion yet.
Lesbian has historically included bisexuals and etc. It's never been exclusive, but there have always been exclusive people in every queer community.
Do you think there is any true distinction between bisexual history and gay/lesbian history? Why can't we share words? Why are we all obsessed with being unique? Why does it matter so much if we overlap? Isn't that the point of community? To share and to be different and have overlap, to take joy in each other's experiences? Why are you so intent on defining exactly who can be what? Is the point of queerness not to acknowledge our inate and complex humanity, to say "I am unquauntifiable"? It is to me. But maybe that's philosophical, in which case my practical down-to-earth questions are: who gets to make the rules about who gets to be what, who is going to enforce these rules, and what tool of violence are you granting them to do so? Is it you? Is it the government? Is it an organized elected council of queer elders? Are the freaks who don't follow the rules exiled, shunned, imprisoned?
As for these other words we "already have" like sapphic, have you considered that we "already have" lesbian? Lesbian has historically been a word for women(etc) who are attracted to women(etc). Why did we need to make new words to separate each other? Why did we need sapphic when we already had lesbian? I don't feel that making and using new words is wrong and I support anyone who wants to use these labels, I'm just demonstrating that the logic behind that point of yours is identical when flipped. Lesbian has always been here for people like me, it was the only word we had for a long while, so who are you to rewrite its history?
Your personal experience of queerness is not universal. Words mean slightly different things to everyone, that's how languages and humans work. And that's a good thing. That's the point of all this!
The kind of people who harass and assault lesbians don't care about this shit. Are you seriously trying to blame a whole group of queers for ... queers being harassed and assaulted? The straight cis guys who are chasing and trying to "convert" lesbians already don't think of women and lesbians as people. They're not gonna sit there and debate the finer points of someone's identity before they decide if they want to assault them.
The bigots don't care about our labels. They don't even respect whether someone is actually queer or is just someone they perceive as queer. Outside online discourse like this, a faggot is a faggot is a faggot.
I do not have any patience for anyone who believes certain types of queers make the rest of us look bad. Like seriously why are we still doing this? Also you personally right now with this ask have just repackaged dangerous conservative ideologies under the veil of being *progressive*! This is some seriously puritan stuff you've said here! You say it yourself that you have been a victim of being sexually pursued against your will and that you take certain precautions in life to prevent that from happening, and then you turn right around and blame a whole demographic of people *with that exact experience* for bringing that experience onto themselves *and onto you*! What!
Literally nobody is saying all women have the ability to be attracted to men. I have literally never seen or said that apart from this very ask right here. I guess it could happen, someone could be saying that somewhere, but in that situation I'm gonna call them a misogynistic ass and consider them to not be speaking for all lesbians everywhere. And I don't think it's too much to ask that others use the same level of critical thinking skills in that situation.
And as for the people you have seen saying "all lesbians are terfs" those people are lesbophobic. Those are lesbophobes. I don't know what else you want me to say about that, I don't really see how some people being lesbophobic should impact whether or not a whole bunch of other people are morally correct (?) in using the word lesbian.
Ask rating:
4/10 for nonsense and contradiction
11 notes · View notes