#criteria

[cleopatre31]

Placements giving facial features who doesn't fit in beauty criteria

I want to make a post for persons who doesn't feel beautiful, I think we don't talk about it enough about facial features seen as "ugly" by society in astrology. Don't forget that we are all beautiful no matter our facial features, we are all special in our own way so don't compare yourself to others <3

Reminder: It's just my opinion, you can scroll if you don't suit!

-Capricron/aquarius/virgo/scorpio rising

-Saturn/uranus/pluto in 1st house/ascendant

-Saturn/uranus/pluto conjuct sun

-Hard Venus-ascendant/saturn/uranus aspects

-Chiron in 1st house/ conjuct ascendant

-Hard chiron-ascendant/venus aspects

#astrology #astro notes #astro observations #beauty #criteria

[wordsforyourwip]

Ambulate

Criteria

Nibble

#prompts #one word prompts #prompt list #writing prompts #prompt blog #daily prompt #writing ideas #words for your wip #wfyw word sets #writing inspiration #writeblr #ambulate #criteria #nibble

[omegaphilosophia]

A game for Arguing Topics

Logical Debate

Objective: To argue a given topic using logical reasoning and evidence to earn the most points.

Gameplay:

Preparation: Choose a topic to debate, such as "Should schools require uniforms?" or "Is social media more harmful than beneficial?" You can create a list of topics in advance or randomly select one before each round.

Players: Divide players into two teams, each with at least one participant. If there are an odd number of players, one person can act as a judge/moderator.

Round 1 - Opening Statements: Each team takes turns presenting their opening statement for the topic. The opening statement should include a clear and concise thesis statement, outlining the team's position on the topic, as well as a brief summary of the main points they will be making. Each team has 2-3 minutes to present their opening statement.

Round 2 - Cross-Examination: Each team can ask the other team questions about their opening statement, and vice versa. The goal is to challenge the opposing team's arguments and evidence, and to expose any weaknesses in their position. Each team has 2-3 minutes to cross-examine the other team.

Round 3 - Rebuttal: Each team takes turns responding to the other team's arguments and evidence, using logical reasoning and evidence to support their own position. The goal is to refute the opposing team's claims and to strengthen their own position. Each team has 3-4 minutes to present their rebuttal.

Round 4 - Final Statements: Each team presents their final statement, summarizing their position and highlighting their strongest arguments and evidence. Each team has 2-3 minutes to present their final statement.

Scoring: The judge/moderator scores each team based on the logical consistency and strength of their arguments, as well as the quality and relevance of their evidence. The team with the highest score wins the game.

Variations:

You can adjust the time limits for each round based on the number of players and the complexity of the topic.

You can allow players to consult reference materials (e.g. articles, research studies) during the game to support their arguments.

You can have players switch sides and argue the opposite position in a second round, to encourage flexibility and open-mindedness.

You can also add a bonus round where each team has to come up with a counterargument for their own position, to demonstrate their ability to consider multiple perspectives and anticipate potential objections.

To make the game more challenging, you can add a rule that players cannot repeat any arguments or evidence that have already been used by their own team or the opposing team.

You can also incorporate a visual element by having players create slides or presentations to accompany their arguments, which can include graphs, charts, or other visual aids.

To make the game more interactive and engaging, you can encourage players to ask questions or challenge each other's arguments throughout the game, rather than just during the designated cross-examination round.

Finally, you can make the game more collaborative by allowing players to work together within their own team to come up with the strongest arguments and evidence, rather than just relying on individual contributions. This can help foster teamwork and communication skills, as well as critical thinking and problem-solving abilities.

The judges in the game would need to establish clear criteria for how they will evaluate each team's arguments and evidence to assign points. Here are some possible criteria that judges could use:

Logical Consistency: Judges could evaluate how well each team's arguments follow a logical structure, including whether their premises support their conclusions, whether their arguments are internally consistent, and whether they avoid logical fallacies.

Relevance: Judges could evaluate the relevance of each team's evidence to the topic at hand, as well as how well they use that evidence to support their arguments. Evidence that is tangential or not directly related to the topic may not earn points.

Quality of Evidence: Judges could evaluate the quality and credibility of each team's evidence, including whether it comes from reputable sources, whether it has been peer-reviewed, and whether it is up-to-date and relevant.

Creativity: Judges could award points for original or creative arguments, or for innovative uses of evidence.

Persuasiveness: Judges could consider how effectively each team presents their arguments, including the clarity and concision of their language, the strength of their delivery, and the persuasiveness of their overall argument.

Responsiveness: Judges could evaluate how well each team responds to the arguments of the opposing team, including whether they address each point raised and whether they effectively refute or counter those arguments.

Clarity: Judges could evaluate how clearly each team presents their arguments and evidence, including the use of clear and concise language, and the ability to communicate complex ideas in a straightforward manner.

Use of Examples: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses examples to support their arguments and evidence, including the relevance and quality of those examples.

Use of Analogies: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses analogies to help explain complex concepts or to make their arguments more accessible to their audience.

Use of Humor: Judges could evaluate how effectively each team uses humor to engage their audience and make their arguments more memorable.

Ethos: Judges could evaluate the credibility and expertise of each team, including their ability to draw on their own experience or expertise to support their arguments.

Pathos: Judges could evaluate the emotional impact of each team's arguments, including their ability to evoke empathy, sympathy, or other emotions in their audience.

Audience Appeal: Judges could evaluate how well each team tailors their arguments and evidence to their audience, including their ability to use language and examples that resonate with their audience.

Context: Judges could consider the broader social, cultural, and historical context in which the topic is being debated, and evaluate how well each team takes that context into account in their arguments and evidence.

Use of Statistics: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses statistics to support their arguments and evidence, including the accuracy, relevance, and quality of those statistics.

Use of Quotes: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses quotes from experts, authorities, or other relevant sources to support their arguments and evidence, including the relevance and credibility of those quotes.

Use of Logic: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses logic and reasoning to support their arguments and evidence, including the validity and soundness of their reasoning.

Use of Metaphors: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses metaphors to help explain complex concepts or to make their arguments more vivid or memorable.

Use of Visuals: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses visuals, such as charts, graphs, or images, to help illustrate their arguments and evidence.

Use of Narrative: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses storytelling or other narrative techniques to help make their arguments more compelling and memorable.

Use of Counterarguments: Judges could evaluate how well each team anticipates and addresses potential counterarguments to their position, including the strength and effectiveness of their responses.

These are just a few possible criteria that judges could use to evaluate the arguments and evidence presented in the game. Ultimately, the specific criteria would depend on the goals and objectives of the game, as well as the preferences and expertise of the judges themselves.

#philosophy #epistemology #ontology #argument #debate #logic #game #knowledge #learning #education #argumentation #chatgpt #politics #reasoning #truth #falsehood #judge #criteria #evidence #validity #soundness

[zakirnaikpersonal]

Two Criteria for Being Muslim - Dr Zakir Naik #Two #Criteria #Being #Muslim #Zakirnaik #Drzakirnaik

#Two #Criteria #Being #Muslim #Zakirnaik #Drzakirnaik

[maurorojas]

⭐ We know the importance of tech and the opportunities on taking advantage of it, but there's an issue that must be pointed on times that we are passing through: the essential requirement of strenghten our selfpower. Let's be aware that, when tech development raises, we must ensure that human intelligence keeps on top. Intelligence and criteria have the highest value on times like this. © Mauro Rojas® ACJ™ • ars ad aeternum™ UCC § 1–308 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ #MauroRojas #arsadaeternum #bizdeveloper #bizmentor #mentalengineer #businessconsultant #businesscoach #businessmentor #intelligence #criteria #selfpower #success #arsmagica #devdraft #business #Ecuador #America (at Asociación de Emprendedores del Ecuador) https://www.instagram.com/p/CpyfTMAs0mx/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

#maurorojas #arsadaeternum #bizdeveloper #bizmentor #mentalengineer #businessconsultant #businesscoach #businessmentor #intelligence #criteria #selfpower #success #arsmagica #devdraft #business #ecuador #america

[wutbju]

A cult can be a direct sales company or a parachurch organization. Do you recognize the signs?

#Bob Jones University #Criteria #Cult #Sect

[evilwizardsgaming]

The Evil Criteria 💀🎮

It is on these 6 sinister subjects for which all evil games must be measured accordingly.

Scheming: The ability of a game to feel as clever as we are.

Villainous Vibe: The overall evil presence of a game.

Enchanting: The ability of a game to capture the minds of the player and bend it to their will.

Evil Mechanics: The playability of a game from a physical user standpoint- but evil.

Baneful Actions: The ability to empower an evildoer.

Love: The essential component to any evil game.

 🖤 Mod Kolpesh & Mod Varikul

#video games #wizards #gaming #game review #criteria #evil criteria

[everythinkaloud]

People often ask what does success look like but I would suggest asking “what does success feel like?” is more apt

#success #criteria #evaluating success #are you successful?

[kt041978]

World Organ Donation Day 2022: Who can donate organs, who can't....

World Organ Donation Day 2022: Who can donate organs, who can't? | Learn its methods and criteria 

Read the full article

#criteria #Day #Donate #Donation #Experts #importanceoforgandonation #Learn #methods #Organ #OrganDonationMethods #organs #whatarecriteriafororgandonation #whatarethecriteriafororgandonation #whocandonate #whocandonateorgan #whocannotdonateorgan #Whocan'tdonateorgans #Whyisorgandonationimportant? #World #WorldOrganDonationDay #worldorgandonationday2022

[monriatitans]

The Neverending Reading List

I'm starting a new Instagram project called "The Neverending Reading List." The main goals are to encourage reading, to share resources, and to have a bit of fun! Interested in learning more? Click the link below!

Books are the quietest and most constant of friends; they are the most accessible and wisest of counselors, and the most patient of teachers. Charles W. Eliot I have decided to start a project called The Neverending Reading List where I will be sharing my book collection with everyone via Instagram. The “Neverending” is a jab at avid readers, myself, who know full well we will never read our…

View On WordPress

#affiliate #affiliate links #Amazon #Artist Shout-Out Criteria #Artist Shout-Outs #Become Empowered! #become smarter every day #becomempowered #bempowering #Book Collection #book list #book lover #book obsession #Books #books are life #bookshop.org #criteria #educational post #Educational Posts #Instagram Series #learn something new every day #MonriaTitans #MonriaTitans &amp; WGS #MonriaTitans &amp; WGS&039; Bookshop #MonriaTitans - WGS #neverending #Neverending Reading List #Personal #reader problems #reading list

[shayerid]

Navigating the Super Visa Process in Edmonton with RSR Immigration Consultancy

Are you eager to bring your loved ones closer but daunted by the complexities of the immigration process? Look no further than RSR Immigration Consultancy, your trusted partner in realizing your family reunification dreams through the Super Visa in Edmonton.

What exactly is the Super Visa, you might ask? It's a unique opportunity for parents and grandparents of Canadian citizens and permanent residents to visit their families in Canada for extended periods. With its longer validity and multiple-entry privileges, the Super Visa offers unparalleled convenience and flexibility.

At RSR Immigration Consultancy, we understand the significance of family ties and the desire to be together, which is why we're dedicated to simplifying the Super Visa application process for our clients in Edmonton. Our team of experienced immigration consultants possesses the expertise and insights needed to navigate the intricacies of Canadian immigration law, ensuring a smooth and hassle-free experience from start to finish.

Whether you're facing uncertainties regarding eligibility criteria, documentation requirements, or financial obligations, our knowledgeable consultants are here to provide personalized guidance and support every step of the way. With our comprehensive understanding of the Super Visa in Edmonton, we'll help you compile a thorough application package that meets all regulatory standards and increases your chances of approval.

Moreover, our commitment to client satisfaction extends beyond just securing the Super Visa. We strive to empower our clients with the knowledge and resources they need to thrive in their new chapter of life in Canada, offering valuable insights on healthcare coverage, travel insurance, and settlement services.

So why wait any longer? Take the first step towards reuniting with your loved ones by partnering with RSR Immigration Consultancy for your Super Visa in Edmonton. Contact us today to schedule a consultation and let us guide you towards a brighter, more fulfilling future together.

#Super Visa #Visa #Edmonton #consultation #Consultancy #services #Canada #immigration #criteria

[welcomeinthisplace]

Cults fascinate the general population as people wonder what draws individuals to get involved with them. What's it like to be in one and what's it like to get out of one? Join Apostle Lee Ann Marino and guest Aaaron Joy (Portland, Maine) for an exploration into his time as a member in Adidam, a cult centered around the ideas of Adi Da Samraj. (Intro and conclusion track "No Mistakes" provided by https://slip.stream/748LSd.)

#adi #adidam #control #criteria #cult #da #groups #high #samraj #testimony

[sweetfawnsposts]

YALL THE FANFIC DATE IS GETTING DELAYED TO TOMORROW BUT HERES SOME THINGS I DO FOR FANFICTION!!

Fanfic types!

Nsfw- yes but not rough nsfw :)

Fluff- DEFINITELY!! IF YOU GUYS DONT KNOW I LOVE FLUFF FANFICS!!!!

Angst- yep!!

People I’ll only write about in fanfics!

Kieran culkin

Macaulay culkin

Ryan gosling

Devon sawa

Thom yorke

Damon albarn

Graham coxon

Criteria for requests :) (requests start in may, I probably won’t do a lot of requests)

No l0licon, sh0tacon, big age gap d d l g, r4pe, SA.

No rough smut. But gentle smut is perfectly fine.

THATS ALL FOR NOW!!

#fanfic #criteria

[tenth-sentence]

To be aromatic, a ring must:

have one 2p orbital on each of its atoms

be planar or nearly planar, so that there is continuous overlap or nearly continuous overlap of all 2p orbitals of the ring

have 2, 6, 10, 14 18, and so on, π electrons in the cyclic arrangement of 2p orbitals.

"Chemistry" 2e - Blackman, A., Bottle, S., Schmid, S., Mocerino, M., Wille, U.

#book quote #chemistry #nonfiction #textbook #erich huckel #criteria #aromatic #benzene

[digitalcreationsllc]

US Agencies Release Security Guidance on Managing SBOMs and Open Source Software

The report provides guidance on open source software adoption, including criteria for selection, risk assessment, licensing, export control, maintenance, vulnerability response, and secure software delivery.

View On WordPress

#adoption #criteria #guidance #including #open #provides #Report #selection #Software #source

[postersbykeith]

#quotes #T S Eliot #number of people #criteria #good and evil