Tumgik
#validity
hadesfucks · 1 year
Text
Some fics will have the most beautifully well written summaries and then the fic itself is a 3500 word one shot
Meanwhile another fic will have like “wrote this drunk at 3am after another grippy sock vacay lmao” as their summary and it’s a 50k word whole ass novel with two redemption arcs and a random out-of-left-field AU tag
2K notes · View notes
clouds-regression · 2 years
Text
Let's take a moment to appreciate littles who aren't much represented.
-POC Littles
-Disabled Littles
-Male Littles
-Cis/Het Littles
-Littles Who Aren't 'Aesthetic'
-Littles Who Prefer Dark Over Pastel
-Littles Who Regress Older Than 7
-Littles Who Regress Younger Than 3
-Littles Who Don't Know Their Age Range
-Littles Who Like 'Big' Videogames
-Littles Who Don't Babytalk
-Littles Who Swear In Headspace
-Vent Regressors/Littles Who's Regression Isn't Always Happy
-Impure Littles
-Littles Who Live In Places Other Than North America Or Europe
-Littles Who Aren't Brats But Aren't Always Nice
-Sensitive Littles
-Numb Littles
All Littles are valid. If you regress, then you can identify as a Little. You're valid and I love you! /pos
283 notes · View notes
Text
🌈 welcome to the blog 🧿
blog pronouns: they&/nya post types: validity and headmate requests communities: radqueer, QAMTXP+, and more common blog fronters: shin (main), basil, deku, junkie, kokichi, "sailor moon" asks: yes, send anything in you want to DNI: none, we block freely
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
-shin
20 notes · View notes
desmodus-dragon · 1 year
Text
01 - The Shape-shifters Identity
So to start off the blog officially, I wanted the first of the posts to do a bit of educating on the shape-shifting part of my identity.
So, while it may be a bit easy to play off the shape-shifting aspects of my identity, I feel as though I can’t stress enough that it may not be what first comes to mind.
So first - what do shape-shifts mean for me?
Okay so, if you’ve heard of the term cameo-shift- great! But if not, essentially when it entails is that you’re experiencing shifts that don’t necessarily align with your actual species. So in my case for example, I’m a dragon, but an aspect of being a shape-shifter, at least in my case, is that I’ve gotten used to various cameo shifts, but they’re not exactly at random, nor are they of my choosing. 
What does this mean?
My shifts usually seem to correlate to the times of year, as well as my emotions at times. So, given that the current season as of 2023/28/02 is late winter, coming around to spring, I’ve been experiencing more frequent canine-shifts, and this isn’t the first time this has happened in correlation to the season as well, so I’ve become accustomed that this happens around this time of year. But it’s important to note that these aren’t things I choose, and it can actually weight quite heavily on me mentally, because at times it does make me feel as though if I talk about it, I’ll seem less valid as a creature despite being unable to control it.
So what to take away from this?
As a shape-shifting creature, I experience shifts a bit differently at times, but this doesn’t make me any less valid as a creature, and for any shape-shifting creatures who may come across this, I want you to know that you are every bit as valid as the rest of the creatures, and you deserve to love yourself.
Note to readers: As my first blog, it’s not designed to be perfect, but instead designed to be informative for those who wish to be educated on what I have to educate on.
14 notes · View notes
plural-culture-is · 2 years
Note
uhm a question, is it ok if ive created my own system because it didnt form? i experienced trauma as a kid and its hard to work through as a singlet. they help me work through it, calm down, find solutions, and overall make things better.
yes, of course that’s okay!
28 notes · View notes
randomreasonstolive · 2 years
Text
Reason to Live #7382
 Finding even one valid person to trust with your secrets and thoughts. – Guest Submission
(Please don't add negative comments to these posts.)
52 notes · View notes
omegaphilosophia · 1 year
Text
A game for Arguing Topics
Logical Debate
Objective: To argue a given topic using logical reasoning and evidence to earn the most points.
Gameplay:
Preparation: Choose a topic to debate, such as "Should schools require uniforms?" or "Is social media more harmful than beneficial?" You can create a list of topics in advance or randomly select one before each round.
Players: Divide players into two teams, each with at least one participant. If there are an odd number of players, one person can act as a judge/moderator.
Round 1 - Opening Statements: Each team takes turns presenting their opening statement for the topic. The opening statement should include a clear and concise thesis statement, outlining the team's position on the topic, as well as a brief summary of the main points they will be making. Each team has 2-3 minutes to present their opening statement.
Round 2 - Cross-Examination: Each team can ask the other team questions about their opening statement, and vice versa. The goal is to challenge the opposing team's arguments and evidence, and to expose any weaknesses in their position. Each team has 2-3 minutes to cross-examine the other team.
Round 3 - Rebuttal: Each team takes turns responding to the other team's arguments and evidence, using logical reasoning and evidence to support their own position. The goal is to refute the opposing team's claims and to strengthen their own position. Each team has 3-4 minutes to present their rebuttal.
Round 4 - Final Statements: Each team presents their final statement, summarizing their position and highlighting their strongest arguments and evidence. Each team has 2-3 minutes to present their final statement.
Scoring: The judge/moderator scores each team based on the logical consistency and strength of their arguments, as well as the quality and relevance of their evidence. The team with the highest score wins the game.
Variations:
You can adjust the time limits for each round based on the number of players and the complexity of the topic.
You can allow players to consult reference materials (e.g. articles, research studies) during the game to support their arguments.
You can have players switch sides and argue the opposite position in a second round, to encourage flexibility and open-mindedness.
You can also add a bonus round where each team has to come up with a counterargument for their own position, to demonstrate their ability to consider multiple perspectives and anticipate potential objections.
To make the game more challenging, you can add a rule that players cannot repeat any arguments or evidence that have already been used by their own team or the opposing team.
You can also incorporate a visual element by having players create slides or presentations to accompany their arguments, which can include graphs, charts, or other visual aids.
To make the game more interactive and engaging, you can encourage players to ask questions or challenge each other's arguments throughout the game, rather than just during the designated cross-examination round.
Finally, you can make the game more collaborative by allowing players to work together within their own team to come up with the strongest arguments and evidence, rather than just relying on individual contributions. This can help foster teamwork and communication skills, as well as critical thinking and problem-solving abilities.
The judges in the game would need to establish clear criteria for how they will evaluate each team's arguments and evidence to assign points. Here are some possible criteria that judges could use:
Logical Consistency: Judges could evaluate how well each team's arguments follow a logical structure, including whether their premises support their conclusions, whether their arguments are internally consistent, and whether they avoid logical fallacies.
Relevance: Judges could evaluate the relevance of each team's evidence to the topic at hand, as well as how well they use that evidence to support their arguments. Evidence that is tangential or not directly related to the topic may not earn points.
Quality of Evidence: Judges could evaluate the quality and credibility of each team's evidence, including whether it comes from reputable sources, whether it has been peer-reviewed, and whether it is up-to-date and relevant.
Creativity: Judges could award points for original or creative arguments, or for innovative uses of evidence.
Persuasiveness: Judges could consider how effectively each team presents their arguments, including the clarity and concision of their language, the strength of their delivery, and the persuasiveness of their overall argument.
Responsiveness: Judges could evaluate how well each team responds to the arguments of the opposing team, including whether they address each point raised and whether they effectively refute or counter those arguments.
Clarity: Judges could evaluate how clearly each team presents their arguments and evidence, including the use of clear and concise language, and the ability to communicate complex ideas in a straightforward manner.
Use of Examples: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses examples to support their arguments and evidence, including the relevance and quality of those examples.
Use of Analogies: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses analogies to help explain complex concepts or to make their arguments more accessible to their audience.
Use of Humor: Judges could evaluate how effectively each team uses humor to engage their audience and make their arguments more memorable.
Ethos: Judges could evaluate the credibility and expertise of each team, including their ability to draw on their own experience or expertise to support their arguments.
Pathos: Judges could evaluate the emotional impact of each team's arguments, including their ability to evoke empathy, sympathy, or other emotions in their audience.
Audience Appeal: Judges could evaluate how well each team tailors their arguments and evidence to their audience, including their ability to use language and examples that resonate with their audience.
Context: Judges could consider the broader social, cultural, and historical context in which the topic is being debated, and evaluate how well each team takes that context into account in their arguments and evidence.
Use of Statistics: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses statistics to support their arguments and evidence, including the accuracy, relevance, and quality of those statistics.
Use of Quotes: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses quotes from experts, authorities, or other relevant sources to support their arguments and evidence, including the relevance and credibility of those quotes.
Use of Logic: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses logic and reasoning to support their arguments and evidence, including the validity and soundness of their reasoning.
Use of Metaphors: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses metaphors to help explain complex concepts or to make their arguments more vivid or memorable.
Use of Visuals: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses visuals, such as charts, graphs, or images, to help illustrate their arguments and evidence.
Use of Narrative: Judges could evaluate how well each team uses storytelling or other narrative techniques to help make their arguments more compelling and memorable.
Use of Counterarguments: Judges could evaluate how well each team anticipates and addresses potential counterarguments to their position, including the strength and effectiveness of their responses.
These are just a few possible criteria that judges could use to evaluate the arguments and evidence presented in the game. Ultimately, the specific criteria would depend on the goals and objectives of the game, as well as the preferences and expertise of the judges themselves.
4 notes · View notes
domoxd · 1 year
Text
finding comfort in sadness
something i’ve come to realise lately is that i really find an odd comfort in having depression. obviously theres the feeling numb and crying because i can’t for the life of me figure out what’s wrong with me, and why i have to feel like this. but then again, it just reminds me that i’m human. if i was never sad, and the only emotion i ever felt was happiness, i would be so tired. being sad makes me savour the moments i feel happy. like the only way i can feel sad after is if i felt something amazing before. it’s a difficult concept to grasp but being sad is comforting, and it’s so amazing i can feel so sad. now, don’t get me wrong, sometimes i feel so sad that all i want to do is lay in bed. but afterwards when i’m happy, i’m grateful that i was ever so sad that i can feel this happy and FORGET feeling like that for a while. human nature is beautiful and emotions are difficult while being amazing. but remember that if you ever feel so sad to a point that you feel the need to end your life, that’s when help is needed. feeling down and numb is completely valid, but please don’t ever feel like you need to stop it completely. you are a beautiful creation and your emotions are what makes you, you. take the bad with the good and remember how you feel. i love you <3
love, r x
3 notes · View notes
Note
Hi! Um I was wondering, can you be both unlabeled and aroace?
Hello, anon! I don't see why not! /gen Some people are nonbinary and unlabeled. Some are transmasc and unlabeled. It's all preference. /pos
- 💙💚
17 notes · View notes
Text
hi
you are all valid. literally fuck the haters, ok? FUCK ‘em
edited to add tags and say that this was  cora ok bye
9 notes · View notes
polyamorouspunk · 2 years
Note
hey as a demiromantic poly person, it totally doesnt make you less poly to turn a lot of people down! im almost never interested back when someone says they have a crush on me, and its really rare that i find people i want to date at all, being demiro, but i still have a polycule (of people i found over the course of literally years lol) and i'd be a valid poly person even if i didn't :') some people just have very high or specific standards, and its really hard to find people who you click with, but that doesnt change our identities! i hope stuff gets better for you soon <3
Thank you
14 notes · View notes
jaszper · 2 years
Text
Bisexual stim board 🏳️‍🌈
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
5 notes · View notes
clouds-regression · 2 years
Text
Regressors that need recognition!
•Trans Regressors
•AMAB Regressors
•Nonbinary Regressors
•Physically Disabled Regressors
•Chronically Ill Regressors
•Regressors With Cancer
•Regressors With Dementia
•Regressors With Cluster B Personality Disorders
•Regressors With Psychosis
•Regressors With Absent Parent(s)
•Orphaned/Parentless Regressors
•Bodily Older Regressors
•"Impure" Regressors
•Hypersexual Regressors
•Regressors With Blood Disorders
All regressors need recognition and love, and I don't see enough rep for these babies n kiddos <3
70 notes · View notes
cistematicchaos · 2 years
Text
You're all valid, I dont give a shit how out of the box or complicated or contradictory your identity is. Thats what we're starting pride off with. You're all fucking valid and I will bite anyone who says differently.
"Even if I-" Yes. "But what if-" Yes. "But ppl said-" Still valid. I dont care what other ppl said. You're. All. Valid.
4 notes · View notes
spitblaze · 5 months
Note
do *you* think with your dick?
I think with my packer
65K notes · View notes
indigonite · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
There’s a lot you can learn about it, trust me
23K notes · View notes