Are the bisexual women in that video calling gay/lesbian people queer?
i'm more concerned they're saying "bi lesbians" are real and telling every lesbian who says to stop that "sexuality is fluid" and that lesbians can like men. they have larped and support larpers. acting like lesbian is someone who hates men but is attracted to them is fucking absurd. shit take after another. it's basically a homophobic lesbian shit talking sesh where they speak over an for lesbians and act like incels too
3 notes
·
View notes
"can I be [x gender] if I..." "can I still call myself [x term] if..." yes. yes. if you like the term then use it. do whatever you want forever. labels are just little words we use to categorize our infinitely complex existential experiences on this floating rock !! no two people who use the same label are going to experience it the same way and that's the beauty of it !! use "contradictory" labels, use labels that don't make sense to anyone, change your label every day or not at all, explore anything and everything, use no labels at all or every label under the sun, confuse people or correct them or let them assume things rather than explaining, I promise nothing other people think about your identity is worth your happiness !!
2K notes
·
View notes
One of the many things I find funny and irritating is the slant of a lot of interpretations of Alecto's name (that it's about feminine rage)--on this here wlw internet in the year of our lord 2024, it's easily made to figure as rage against God, or rage against patriarchy, or religious oppression, and therefore an allusion to the idea that she's going to get her vengeance on John for betraying and oppressing her somehow, but like
John is the one who named her Alecto. He's the one who named her that. So, naming her "Alecto" is alluding to the embodiment of John's rage--their rage, since they are joined inseparably (John even explicitly says that when he first perceives her: "You wouldn't stop screaming. You were so scared. You were so goddamn mad").
He says of Alecto to Harrow, "In a very real way, you are [Alecto's] children". At a very surface level, Alecto is (depending on the text or tradition), one of the Furies--famously, in several surviving Greek tragedies, who punish Orestes for the crime of killing his mother. In fact, in Aeschylus' Oresteia, they declare that they are specifically bound to avenge matricide.
So the name "Alecto" alludes to the nature of John's mission and how he sees it.
It also implies that his divine rage, the rage that gives him power, the power that makes him divine, that he either represents or wants to represent, is feminine rage. He was chosen by Earth (which, Furies are sometimes the daughters of Gaia); he is her champion, however he's managed to fuck that up. Once the truth of that comes out, it becomes clear that all of his power comes from her.
And that's why you get statements from Tamsyn Muir like:
“[T]he God of the Locked Tomb IS a man; he IS the Father and the Teacher; it’s an inherently masc role played by someone who has an uneasy relationship himself to playing a Biblical patriarch. John falls back on hierarchies and roles because they’re familiar even when he’s struggling not to. Even he identifies himself as the God who became man and the man who became God. But the divine in the Locked Tomb is essentially feminine on multiple axes – I think Nona will illuminate that a little bit more."
So yes, he plays the role of Emperor and God and Teacher, with all of the things that implies. And I don't think it should be discounted. But he also is (and partly sees himself as) the chosen champion of a goddess, or what is for all intents & purposes for a human like him a goddess. He is her avenger, and while she sleeps, her avatar.
And I don't think we're meant to read him purely as a parasite who's taking advantage of her to gain power for himself, either. Or an oppressive, Kronos-like figure. Especially if you consider Palamedes' theory of the Grand Lysis, even if he was purely motivated by desire for power before (which I really doubt), there are parts of each in the other, now. What was clear and separate before is uncertain and interpenetrated. Is his rage his own, or hers? Is his mission of revenge his, or hers? If he wants power, is that his own selfishness, or her desire to survive?
And does it matter?
227 notes
·
View notes
I want to introduce a disability concept that I've been calling paradoxical stigma.
What is paradoxical stigma? It's the stigma against:
1) The actually disabling traits of a disability that's in the spotlight for the parts of it that are convenient to accommodate, and/or
2) The diagnosis of such a disability itself,
Due to the assumption that the spotlight renders it "destigmatized" and no longer in need of support.
As of right now, at least around this corner of the internet, the most obvious examples of this are autism and ADHD. It's become disturbingly common for people to treat those like Diet Disabilities That Don't Actually Count. It's been really interesting to watch the popular attitude about these disorders shift from "autism is either a tragedy or an excuse depending on 'severity', and ADHD is just a myth used to drug kids into complicity instead of teaching them actual skills", to "actually these are real disorders that affect people in all aspects of their lives", to "I GUESS they're real disorders but honestly EVERYONE has them can't we worry about more SERIOUS ones?" and...not in a good way.
It comes up...partially as a legitimate backlash to people with these disorders who think that invisible disability and/or neurodivergence begins and ends at their experience, and...yeah, that's a problem all right, in fact if I had a dollar for every asshole who looked at my struggles with things like keeping my space clean or not fucking up my medication doses DUE TO ADHD and went "well I have the same diagnosis and I don't have THAT problem to THAT extent, obviously you're just lazy and careless", or saw me having an AUTISTIC meltdown and called it "bullying" or worse because I get loud and insisted that I NEED to CONTROL that CHOSEN BEHAVIOR if I want to not be a Bad Person, or heard about how AUTISTIC overstimulation defense measures play into my trouble with cleaning and insisted that well THEY'RE autistic too and don't have that specific problem so this is clearly weaponized helplessness because I just don't WANT to learn to do better, I'd...probably have a lot more assistive tech. I also get really, really frustrated and upset when people use RSD to mean "if you ever criticize me that's the height of ableism, no matter how much I'm actually fucking up and hurting you" - especially since it's so often invoked as a defense against being lightly criticized for ACTUALLY harmful behavior and as much as it sucks there IS no substitute to make that more emotional-dysregulation-friendly beyond basic kindness in criticism. That attitude exists. It's bad.
And yet, theoretically, I think we could all agree that the response to that should NEVER be to reinvent the old "ugh, those aren't REAL disabilities, those are just EXCUSES that LAZY PARENTS make for kids being kids, what they need is DISCIPLINE" stereotype of the 90s-2000s, just now aimed at those same kids as adults, in ostensibly supportive spaces - or arguably worse, to revert all our understanding of support needs to the externally judged high-functioning/low-functioning dichotomy.
What really sets this apart as paradoxical stigma, rather than just garden-variety lateral ableism, is that 1) we CAN theoretically all agree that reinventing those stereotypes is a terrible response, yet many people do it anyway, and 2) these stereotypes are invoked not only because of that intracommunity misbehavior, but both within and outside of disabled spaces, because of the illusion that you can bring up those disorders and have them taken seriously because fidget toys and stim videos and weighted blankets are popular now. An event having quiet rooms, or backlash to Autism Speaks being visible outside of autistic spaces, will be taken as "proof" that autism stigma is over forever and anyone who complains about it is just a whiner who doesn't know how good they have it...even when what they're complaining about is, say, being barred from migration. Paradoxical stigma is enacted by people who think that they, alone, are standing up against someone who's throwing others under the bus to continue to progress their own limited agenda...when in fact they're speaking a very popular shitty opinion, that MANY of the people making that claim would disagree with HEAVILY once separated from the "crab bucket reflex".
As a personal example, the result is that when I'm looking for assistance, I'm...hesitant to bring up those diagnoses, because I know I'm going to be written off as "obviously a high-functioning low-support needs scammer who just doesn't WANT to CONTRIBUTE TO SOCIETY and EARN things" - even by people who otherwise agree that people should be allowed to survive even if they truly are the living strawman lazy bum who has nothing wrong with them but just WANTS to lay around eating junk food and doing drugs all day, AND that disability deserves to be respected, isn't black-and-white, and affects everyone differently; somehow when these combine in the context of my diagnoses that have had a very sanitized version of themselves "destigmatized" on TikTok, they cancel out into blatant reactionary sentiment indistinguishable from what I'd hear from my shitty token Republican uncle.
So, that's paradoxical stigma. Feel free to use the term if you find it useful.
417 notes
·
View notes
Any other LGBTQ+ Headcannons that are canon is the comic??;)
*patiently awaits Cupioromantic Donnie*
hmm... had to think about this for a while and talk about it with co-author, but here's what we got. we mostly base this stuff on how plausible it is in show/if there's evidence for it. with a dash of personal experience. This only applies to residuum, btw. I have different personal headcanons for these characters outside the comic.
april: lesbian. this is mostly based off of the fact that most aprils get with their caseys & the comment she said to dale. which could be taken as disinterest in dale specifically, but she seemed more concerned with impressing that popular girl earlier and that reads as more... saphic, i suppose. or at the very least homoromantic.
raph: raph is just raph. we look at him and basically just *tv static*. go crazy. all we got is jokes or stuff that has too little evidence to support. so, yeah, he's whatever you want him to be i guess?
leo: trans. already said my reason in the other post. also, gay. if gay were a power source he could power the entirety of the united states for five months straight without a single power outage. failing power grid notwithstanding (< thats the actual word. its supposed to be mushed together like that. wack.).
donnie: as much as i'd like him to be ace/aro spectrum rep, he just doesn't have the evidence in show for us to apply it to him in this comic. it's funny, for being hc as ace so often he sure is the most outwardly romantic/sexual turtle in the show lmao. one! cherry: "you're so cute, but you're so mean! why do i always go for your type?" two! astrogirl?? (whatever her name is) he is very very romantic with her. he has a type y'all. also just look at those two, he's a leg man lmao (bootyyshaker9000 anyone? ha!) anyway. and with the bromance/instant chemistry he had with that one guy in the purple dragons... Pan. or possibly Omni as he does seem to favor... cute brutal femme... Yeah. Omnisexual.
(you have no idea how fucking bad i want this boy to be ace spectrum. hes got the colors y'all!! The Colors!!!!! but alas... i am bound by my canon plausibility creed for this comic)
mikey: ace. possibly ace/aro. he shows interest in literally no-one. we're aware that the common hc is pan but... we know a pan 13 year old, and let me tell you ahahahaha, kids going through puberty are very uncomfortable to be around sometimes, especially around their partners. or crushes. and mikey... well, that boy is ace behavior personified lmao. aces in the back you get what we mean right?? right??? anyway commiting to aroace
469 notes
·
View notes
💗~Hyperxenogender~💜
[PT: Hyperxenogender /end PT]
Hyperxenogender is like xenogender, but more complicated. It's when your gender is so complicated, deep, infinite, unique, indescribable, alien, xeno if you will, that you need an essay just to explain what it is. It's like a xenogender, if the xenogender was it's own complicated, fleshed out universe. If the xenogender needed worldbuilding to explain. Hyperxenogenders usually have multi-paragraph definitions that are usually much more complicated and long than normal xenogenders.
Flag made by me but i think the flag looks like SHIT so feel free to make a new one
Possible suffixes for hyperxenogenders might be -hyperic, -hypergender, -hyperid, -hyperxenogender, -hyperxeno, -hypercharic, -hypercoric, -hyperkin, -hyperstimmic, -hyperspinnic, -hypersongic, etc.
I already coined a hyperxeno: KEINhypergender, or kenohyperchoric
This is an umbrella term for any hyperxenogender that is kenochoric in nature (KEIN).
61 notes
·
View notes
It's so interesting and so exceedingly frustrating how agab is being utilized now within the queer community as a way to isolate and sort nonbinary and genderqueer folks into binary boxes that determine their moral purity levels, and their authority to do and write and exist.
The way nonbinary writers are being put under accusation of fetishizing gay men while their AGAB is continually brought up in a way that feels like queer-space-approved misgendering.
The way feminist circles that are supposedly trans-inclusive will use the word AFAB in a way that implicitly but intentionally isolates nonbinary people who aren't AFAB from joining. It's for women*.
The way the language is already flawed and leaves out intersex folks from the conversations while focusing on a binary of sex that isn't truthful.
The constant obsessing over whether someone is AFAB or AMAB and whether or not that gives them the privilege to join, do, write, or be present in certain spaces really really concerns me. How are we supposed to dismantle a binary system of gender if we can't even move past forcibly assigning and focusing on people's genders assigned at birth?
185 notes
·
View notes
. . . fairy flag !
[ PT: fairy flag! End PT ]
a flag for anyone who reclaims the derogatory term “fairy.” this is especially used to target feminine queer men, however it had also been used against gender non-conforming queer and/or intersex people in general. use whichever version you prefer!
[ PT: a flag for anyone who reclaims the derogatory term “fairy.” this is especially used to target feminine queer men, however it had also been used against gender non-conforming queer and/or intersex people in general. use whichever version you prefer! End PT ]
— stripe meanings, flag blanks, and fairy silhouette under the cut!
stripe meanings:
flag blanks with no fairy silhouette:
plain fairy silhouette, if needed:
157 notes
·
View notes
🪦★Faggot pride flag
[PT: 🪦★Faggot pride flag. End PT]
A flag for those who reclaim the f slur. Inclusive to all faggots
Tagging friends; @polyfragmentedchaos (we made this 2gether :33) @ars3n1cc @joehallwayreal uhhhh ask 2 be tagged / taken off
306 notes
·
View notes
꒰ ⋆° 𐙚 favoromantic ᡣ𐭩 favosexual !!
ೀ favoromantic; when one feels little to no romantic attraction towards others besides their favorite person(s)
ೀ favosexual; when one feels little to no sexual attraction to others besides their favorite person(s)
exclusive to those with BPD !
coined by me / morutefawnn on twitter / X, 4/13/24
alt name. feveromantic and feversexual. named after love fever and my attraction to my girlfriend named feverfew, as feveromantic was catered around my romantic attraction lol... :3
46 notes
·
View notes
"their relationship is romantic" "their relationship is familial" "their relationship is platonic" you're thinking too narrow. their relationship goes beyond labels. the family is inherently queer. their platonic love is romantic. the erotic is familial. each one is the other and the other is them
55 notes
·
View notes
a quick PSA:
my pronouns are they/them
I do not identify with having a gender and do not particularly enjoy being referred to as a female or male in any context.
I understand I write for a female Reader in a female heavy fanfic space, but please keep in mind that doesn't mean I am.
56 notes
·
View notes
Cannfofura
[PT: Cannfofura /END PT]
A cannibalistic attraction characterized by wanting to consume the person that you have cute attraction to so they can become a part of you, or vice versa, wanting to be eaten so you can become a part of them. This can be in a literal or metaphorical sense.
The suffix fofura at the end of the name means cuteness in Portuguese.
Flag, image id, and attraction templates made by @webby-mogai
[IMAGE ID: a rectangular flag with 13 horizontal lines. the 1st, 2nd, 12th, and 13th line are triangular. the 4th and 10th lines are wavy, and the rest are straight. line sizes in this order from top to bottom: 2 thick, 9 medium, 2 thick. the 4th line has been made to look like it is dripping from multiple spots. colors in this order starting from the top and reflected after the last listed color: salmon, reddish pink, lilac, light sky blue, pale cyan, baby blue, lighter baby blue, and snow. in the center of the flag is a heart shaped piece of meat with baby red, lilac, and shades of light blue flesh. /END ID]
53 notes
·
View notes
[Low Spoons for IDs on flags]
Pridemon
[PT: Pridemon]
A label for those who are queer in the most loud, aggressive, "problematic", fuck you way possible. For those who's queer identity is a middle finger to every conservative, bigot, right winger, t3rf, fascist, purist and any piece of shit who thinks they have a right to an opinion over our identities. A general "Fuck you" punk kind of identity.
While made with queer people in mind, anyone who identifies with this term may use it! Just don't be a bigot yknow?
Inspired by the following image:
[PT: A label for those who are queer in the most loud, aggressive, "problematic", fuck you way possible. For those who's queer identity is a middle finger to every conservative, bigot, right winger, t3rf, fascist, purist and any piece of shit who thinks they have a right to an opinion over our identities. A general "Fuck you" punk kind of identity.
While made with queer people in mind, anyone who identifies with this term may use it! Just don't be a bigot yknow?]
Everyone is free to interact with this one, I think this term is more important than discourse.
Tagging: @radiomogai @accessmogai
Saturated flag under the cut
202 notes
·
View notes
GAYDYKE!
gaydyke: someone who identifies as both gay and a dyke, for whatever reason! inspired by the ocean gay/vincian flag and this dyke flag
— a sort-of subset label for gaybian, but doesn’t necessarily need to be used as such. open for any and all queer people to use!
34 notes
·
View notes