It's time for supper but Magdaleine, "Maddie", doesn't want to go inside just yet. Hoping Alvin will let her stay outside for "just five more minutes". She's a bit grumpy that he's not taking her side and she's resorted to squeezing the life out of his tail.
232 notes
·
View notes
The elusive arboreal octopus (currently in its winter coat, to better blend in with the snow)
aka I made my giant octopus pattern with faux fur and it turned out, according to my dad, “vaguely prehistoric”
273 notes
·
View notes
recently had a realization
230 notes
·
View notes
A FRIEND <3
[id: Photo of crocheted isopuppy hanging off the side of a laptop. End id.]
PS don't zoom in on the notes that, uh, potentially has Fox's Tongue spoilers.
Also someone asked what his belly looks like, so HIM'S BELLY:
[id: Photo of isopuppy belly, with embroidered shell marks. End id.]
Is good boy, please send rubs
295 notes
·
View notes
I think, considering the posts I’m seeing, people are getting confused on what a canon event is because the way Miguel defines it to Miles vs how he talks about his own “canon breaking” just don’t align neatly with one another, and are probably foreshadowing a loophole Miles will expose if the writing doesn’t go the route of entirely tossing out canon events.
They are, as Miguel explains them to be, specific story beats that will just happen naturally to every Spidey. They can be interfered with yes, but to catastrophic consequence to his mind. Simply existing in another dimension like the spider society or nicking gizmos like Hobie isn’t canon breaking, because it isn’t touching any story beats.
This feels confusing because the way Miguel talks about his adopted universe disintegrating makes it sound like he thinks his very continued presence did damage to it. Unless his counterpart’s death was specifically supposed to be a canon event for Gabriella, I can’t see how it fits into the previous model.
But that’s not the way the story is presented, and I think Miguel’s emotional vulnerability about that trauma, combined with the dissonance between both “definitions” is supposed to draw our attention to the idea that while this character is operating out of a sincere desire to prevent this every happening again, his understanding of what caused this disintegration is flawed and not immutable.
24 notes
·
View notes
I wanted to make this guy a reoccurring (side)character. He and his friend get to deliver mail to not-so-everyday people after the previous mail person disappeared, after serving a way longer than it could've been possible. He wants to do his job but he's not particularly excited of all the things that he needs to encounter for now on.
This must be the most normal character that I've created in many many years. He's perfectly normal average dragon person thing in his world, his parents are still alive and not mysteriously dead, he himself won't die dramatically or become eldritch something, his life has been perfectly fine so far, even his name is the most generic fantasy-esque name that I could think about. 'Young adult' is also probably the overusedest protagonist type ever.
This all came to be just because I drew this specific expression.
No worries Percy you get used to see weird people with no face and stuff. Maybe.
6 notes
·
View notes
wips of the cosplay….. i finished my mock up blazer but it’s rlly messy so i’m refraining from adding it lol
8 notes
·
View notes
I'm asking ChatGPT to explain Bleach lore to me and it's making more sense than watching the show.
9 notes
·
View notes
if i put together another pokemon plushie do yall want me to document it like i did rockruff?
21 notes
·
View notes
Working on something
Testing
6 notes
·
View notes
Details: Skitter
Verbal communication doesn’t really agree with Skitter — for that matter, linguistics don’t always agree with him, particularly in his alien verse.
.
Humanoid Verse
In his humanoid verse, verbal communication is nearly always at least somewhat uncomfortable, and he can experience verbal shutdowns when stressed or when he’s spent too much of the day talking. The sound of himself or other people talking can also just be overstimulating at times.
For the first several years after his escape, even understanding what other people say can also be difficult, especially when he’s tired. If he’s struggling, he tends to start relying on trying to catch any key words — usually words or phrases that are most familiar to him — and extrapolates what someone’s getting at from there.
He doesn’t always get it right.
.
Alien Verse
In his alien verse, the way Skitter processes language isn’t fully integrated. He recognizes that words have a pattern, and he can mimic that pattern (i.e. grammar); he recognizes that words mean certain things, and mean other things when arranged in certain ways, and he can put together an understanding accordingly.
But it’s like an unfamiliar second language, or like translating something into a memorized code; he doesn’t actually think in words, and none of it comes naturally to him. Communicating is an active process.
Most modes of communication are also stressful to him in the alien verse; the sound of verbal language can be grating, and even the movements of sign language can be overstimulating. It’s generally just a minor irritation, but it can add up over time, and if he’s already stressed from other things it can be the final straw.
Written language is more comfortable for him, even if it’s inconvenient.
2 notes
·
View notes
having thoughts about nine, and i think one of the biggest things i would personally do to fix him and his role in the story (without making him a flat out villain) is to change the core theme of his character from 'missing stair will not and should not ever be held accountable for their actions,' to:
cruelty and defiance are not the same thing. existing out of spite is not an evil thing; refusing to lay down your weapons under the guise of being small and soft and palatable is not evil; defending yourself and others from being wiped out or made less than you are is not evil. it is not cruel. making good on 'fuck around and find out' can be one of the most important things you will ever do.
and because it's not cruel, it does not excuse cruelty. 'kind does not mean nice' doesn't mean 'cruelty is acceptable as long as it's for a Good Cause'; it also doesn't mean that cruelty in some instances and kindness in others balance each other out. if anything, the latter just ends up becoming part of the former with a different face. it doesn't matter how soft or palatable or loud and rough-edged you are: either your worldview is built on kindness or it isn't, and that will show in how you act on it no matter how hard you try to quarantine one philosophy from the other.
there are lots of other things i'd change; a major one being to pull the fuck up on said cruelty by a LOT, holy shit. as well, don't make him abusive, whether as a) a tactical abuser who pretends his trauma took out the filter he absolutely still has, or b) someone whose trauma has taken out their filter, and left them a disoriented, barely functioning wreck with no idea what the hell is going on inside or outside their own head; whose confused flailing manifests as lashing out in abusive ways, and who wants to do better, and would actually improve with both help and accountability for their actions. that last one has worth as a narrative, but it requires pulling on the sensitivity gloves so far up your arms that it's just a whole spandex suit, and these writers have well and truly proven they are just not fucking capable of that lmao
but in the end, one of the things that does absolutely have to change is that his character has to have a point other than getting away with being a missing stair. there might be other ways to write him as a static character and still a good one; they do have their place! but given that the conventions of the genre would generally involve a growth arc for a character like him, i feel like this interpretation is one that probably falls closest to what they were actually going for.
(or at least, what they wanted to trick the audience into thinking they were going for. lol)
anyway yeah, i have a piggy bank full of cents about this and that is two of them. tl;dr justice for nine, we could have had it all
3 notes
·
View notes
if anyone ever tries to bring up iq as an actual show of intelligence, run
6 notes
·
View notes
Having a field day with Ellis's (1889) Existing Phonology of English Dialects discussion of Cockney, I have absolutely no experience with historical English dialectology and therefore I cannot judge the accuracy of his data, but the comments that he's collected are fascinating nonetheless:
[Image Transcription:
§ 2. Walker (1792-1807) and Smart (1836) on London Speech.
These two well-known authors of Pronouncing Dictionaries have each given a section on Cockney Pronunciation. I quote Walker from the stereotype edition of 1814. He enumerates four faults only. 1) postes, fistes, mistes, etc., for posts, fists, mists [mentioned in § 3 under P, p. 228]; 2) interchange of v, w as weal, winegar, vine, vind, for veal, vinegar, wine, wind, the two latter are spoken of as common; 3) not sounding h after w to distinguish while wile, whet wet, where were [now firmly rooted even in educated speech]; 4) interchange of h as art, harm, for heart, arm. There is no hint at pronouncing ā, ō as ī, ow.
Smart in his Hints to Cockney Speakers finds it almost unnecessary to remark on the interchange of v, w. But notes wōōld cōōld shōōld, would could should, [now never heard]; chick'n, Lat'n, nov'l, parc'l, but swivel, heaven, evil, devil, [the last of which is scarcely heard now but in the pulpit]. Other errors he notes as arethmatic, charecter, writin', readin', spīle sīle, for spoil soil, toosday, dooty, perput-rate, affinut-y, providunce, edecation; boa'rd fo'm co'd for board form cord, lawr, sawr, 'and, 'eart, honour, honest. There is no hint of sounding ā, ō as ī, ow. But he says that the ā of "a well-educated Londoner...finishes more slenderly than it begins, tapering, so to speak, towards the sound of e" (ii); and that ō "in a Londoner's mouth is not quite simple...finishing almost as oo in too." These are the ee'j, oo'w of rec. sp. which are quite different from the ī, ow sounds.
/End Transcription]
Also, and I'll just link the page scan (hopefully it works if you don't have a university library login? it's in public domain) of notes from Lackington's 1817 list of London mispronunciations but there's the glorious note on "leeftenant pronounced levtenant [leftenant, now usual]", which really makes you think. Anyways, I just find the historical evolution of Cockney really interesting, because it's an accent that has a very clear stereotyped version for lots of English speakers today, but a lot of those features came about in the mid-to-late 19th century, and it's fascinating to think that what was a defining feature of the dialect (like the interchange of w/v) has just completely disappeared off the map, while the distinct vowels were just not a thing at all. Really goes to show how fast spoken language evolves, especially outside of the standard, and we love to see it <3
1 note
·
View note
Does this guy only look at whatever im saying when he's 100% sure im not talking about yuri again because if he does then that is so fucking funny
0 notes