Okay I’m going to say this and I’m going to say this once.
I do not like how the relationship with Jamie’s father was handled in season 3.
If they wanted to go the route of forgiveness they absolutely could have. If they wanted to go the route of his dad going to rehab they absolutely could have. Those are not inherently wrong or bad. It’s a show about forgiveness and I get that. It’s a comedy and Jamie is not the main character - I get that too.
My issue is this: the show went out of its way on multiple occasions to show just how violent and abusive James is. Just to give a few examples:
Repeated physical abuse
Repeated verbal abuse
Planning, funding, and likely pressuring the sexual abuse of his 14 year old son (a minor and below the age of consent in both The Netherlands and the UK regardless of the age of the girl in the red light district)
The willingness to beat Coach Beard (basically a stranger to him) with a metal pipe in a 3 to 1 fight in a back alley which could have realistically resulted in his death (and calling Beard “son” right before the final blow)
Jamie literally gave up his dream - a job as a professional footballer on a top hometown team - to leave the country on a trashy reality show just to get away from his father. The show traced a large portion of Jamie’s issues back to his relationship with his father. Not all of course - but that was a big theme of his growth and development.
So even if we entertain the notion that this stint in rehab was successful and James is sober - that’s great. That’s a storyline I wouldn’t mind hearing - IF we had the appropriate time to show it. But the thing is, we didn’t. This season was disjointed and rushed in many ways - and I’m not complaining - I still loved it. But if they’re going to tackle a topic this serious, they need to do it right. They need to be clear that alcohol was not the only problem James had and that sobriety does not absolve you of accountability. As important as it is to portray the message that all human beings can change, including addicts, it is equally as important to show the serious work that addicts in recovery put in to address the hurt that they caused through their addiction. It is not easy work to battle addiction and to mend relationships - sometimes part of recovery is accepting that you can’t mend things with everyone you’ve hurt and that is the right of the victim to decide how they feel.
We were shown none of this. What we got instead was:
A speech from Jamie’s mom about how he is still amazing despite his dad while still somehow crediting Jamie’s talent to his dad’s abuse
Ted telling Jamie to forgive his dad as he’s mid-panic about his safety and his dad’s location
Ted making a point to say the forgiveness was for Jamie’s sake, not for James - which was ALMOST good until they ruined it
Denbo and Bug suddenly supportive despite being just as violent as James in 2x09
James suddenly in rehab for 0.2 seconds
Jamie reaching out to his dad via text despite having no idea his dad is in rehab - something that is realistically compromising his physical and emotional safety
A quick clip of Jamie bonding with his father before the season/series ends for good
The reason I connected with Jamie so intensely from season 1 was the shared experience of abuse from my father. I want to be clear that I know I’m projecting - that’s what fandom is - and I in no way expected the show to end exactly as I wanted. However, this is what I would have liked to see as 1) an abuse survivor 2) a licensed therapist and 3) a person:
The message that you can heal without forgiving those who hurt you OR that you can forgive them and still not allow them back into your life (ESPECIALLY if it compromises your safety)
The message that sometimes people don’t change for the better and you can grieve that relationship while still fostering healthier ones elsewhere.
An emphasis on support systems and chosen family when someone doesn’t have the reality of a parent or partner getting better (we saw this with Bex seeking out Rebecca and Rupert’s assistant)
Instead of Man City suddenly cheering for Jamie, which felt insanely unrealistic, having the cheers of Richmond fans drown out the boos and verbal assaults of the Man City crowd - further emphasizing that despite the pain he has attached to Man City and his father, he has a home with Richmond.
So to wrap up this very long rant, I feel very disheartened by this part of the season. I still love Ted Lasso and always will - there were so many parts of this season I absolutely adored and wouldn’t trade for anything - but I feel that they dropped the ball on this one. Most people don’t get to repair relationships with abusive parents. Is it possible? Of course. Is it important to depict that it can happen? Absolutely. It’s a show about forgiveness. But they didn’t need to do it like this for Jamie’s storyline. They could have kept the speech about forgiving James for Jamie’s sake and deleted all of the rehab/texting afterwards. I still wouldn’t have been thrilled but it would have made more sense to me in context of the show. And it would have meant a lot more to me as someone who’s father is unlikely to ever stop being a risk to my safety.
This just felt bad. Jamie Tartt had one of the best arcs I’ve ever seen in media and he deserved better than that.
186 notes
·
View notes
cannot stop thinking about Jason in relation to like. the next generation of superheroes and kids in general. bc I do kinda think the way fanon keeps giving him these overbearing maternal urges that will help him overcome his trauma is super weird and not really a good storyline at all, but I also think that Jason (like Bruce) is very very driven by the terrible things that happened to him when he was a kid and the fundamental desire both to somehow fix it (fighting crime/killing the joker/cleaning up crime alley) and to try and keep it from happening to any other kids. it’s a really key piece of why I like him being mad about there being a new Robin: to him it means even his death wasn’t enough to stop Bruce from putting another kid in that exact same danger; that it wasn’t a seismic enough event to make Bruce change the way his parents death was. I think it’s something that it would make sense for Jason to be very deeply upset about in a way that he can’t really reconcile. the way I characterize him, it’d be a really, really serious issue to him whether teen vigilantes are safe and protected bc of how he died and how little things changed. idk that he’d recognize that about himself but it doesn’t make it untrue.
so anyways, the real point of this post: for me personally this would be one of the major emotional beats of a serious Jason-as-Batman run. it would be Jason realizing that going forward in his life and his career as a vigilante, he wants to prioritize protecting people; just him really starting to internalize the idea that he can be a symbol that makes people feel safe, not afraid. and in my mind, a part of that for him would be after bruce steps down/dies, seeing a) most of his siblings, who have all also been at this shit since they were literal kids, absolutely dreading taking on this further responsibility, and b) the ones that are still kids (looking at you Damian <3) thinking that this is a responsibility they should be somehow prepared to take on. I think a lot of older siblings with not great parents have experienced that feeling of seeing your younger sibling go through the shit you did, and realizing suddenly and violently how not okay it was and exactly how far you’ll go to keep it from happening again. and so of course Jason would step up to bat, and begin to realize how hard it can be to keep kids from trying to fight crime when they know you’re doing it lol. I just think it would be really really cool for Jason, as he is stepping into Bruce’s shoes, to understand how difficult it was for Bruce and how little it excuses the ways he failed Jason and his siblings over the years. bc Jason can and will be better than Bruce ever was.
20 notes
·
View notes