Tumgik
#it's the economy stupid
morlock-holmes · 9 months
Text
Man, YouTube just recommended the most obnoxiously complacent and poorly thought-out anti-AI-art video. Good job algorithm, I did hatewatch as much as I could stand because that's the cyberpunk future and also I guess the past because EM Forster predicted all of this.
In particular, there is this incredibly poorly thought out attempt to distinguish between the tedious parts of artistic work, which are okay to automate, and the non-tedious parts, which are immoral to automate.
There's also a distinction drawn, equally thoughtlessly, between the kinds of automation that destroy jobs and the kinds of automation that don't.
For example, the idea of an AI cutting a trailer together is bad, because it puts an editor out of a job. The cgi crowds in The Lord of The Rings are good, because they allow one animator to do jobs that once would have had to have been done by hundreds of extras or at the very least, way more animators.
I'm really sick of this bizarre half-luddism. I'm also DEEPLY annoyed by this muddled economic idea that people with tedious, unpleasant jobs like it when automation takes over for them, because I can assure you that they fucking don't.
Like, the whole thing stems from this quixotic attempt to be a pro-automation luddite, but luddism is a reaction to economic conditions.
If you sell skilled labor, you can get more money for it because the supply of laborers capable of producing what you produce is low. If there is a sudden flood of supply that stands to quite possibly lower the cost at which you can sell your labor.
This is an economic process, not a moral one. The guy fucking up his bladder working in the Amazon warehouse without using the bathroom all day is not going to be elated when Amazon announces he's being replaced by a robot, because it means the demand for his labor is getting lower relative to supply, which means the price at which he can sell it gets lower, which means it just got a lot fucking harder for him to pay his rent.
This has nothing whatsoever to do with whether Amazon warehouse work is spiritually fulfilling or not.
223 notes · View notes
isaacsapphire · 8 days
Text
The more I think about it, the more I'm certain that there's been a sociopolitical "papering over" of a decades long economic decline. There's been a lot of borrowing again the future for decades, and eventually the piper is going to come calling. Fucking boomers.
30 notes · View notes
homoqueerjewhobbit · 8 months
Text
I think all the time about how, when the Simpsons premiered the year I was born, they were supposed to be lower middle class and now the idea of a family of five owning their own home on a single salary is not just aspirational but functionally out of reach for most people.
Tumblr media
I'm on a wiki wormhole now. They bought a four bedroom, two bathroom house with an attic and basement, when Lisa was a baby. So like, probably they were under 25. When the show premiered, that would have been in 1980.
Tumblr media
9 notes · View notes
jwood718 · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
I was looking back through some past photos and came across this image of George Romney’s Mrs. Trevor hanging at the Carnegie Museum of Art in Pittsburgh.  It was a subject in a post on Jake Rambles n’at where it’s compared with a neighboring piece of art, but what got my attention in this current instance was the name on the title plate: Sarah Mellon Scaife.
Tumblr media
The Scaife family has some old money, and Richard Mellon Scaife is very jealous of his, and upheld as a prime example of neoliberalism in the last 50 years.  But, like so many with wealth, the Scaifes like to bestow a little on the hoi-poloi through things like grants and foundations and donations to museums, ‘cause that’ll make up for capitalism, right?
0 notes
wandering-spork · 2 years
Text
The economy sucks, stupid
More jobs does not equal a great economy-
What’s so great about people working 2-3 jobs in order to survive?
1 note · View note
moeblob · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
"Abduct is SUCH A strong word, pal! But yes."
391 notes · View notes
violent138 · 1 month
Text
Not that I think losing crime is bad, but it certainly would be interesting to explore the financial consequences to a massive city like Gotham where crime does pay for half or more (of everything) and drives the local economy, as partly illegal shipping for gangsters also moves legal products to buyers. Or that working for mobsters is stable enough to feed families.
As Batman succeeds and dismantles these power structures and pseudo industries, what happens to the city? Is there even a way to disentangle all of it from the corruption that runs it (seen when Jim Gordon has to hire cops investigated by internal affairs because they've all been investigated).
Would Wayne Enterprises just have to fill in all the gaps? WE shipping, catering, et cetera to replace lost jobs and income? Or would Batman have to reckon with the fact that he can't shut down everything? At least not as bluntly as he does.
65 notes · View notes
pianokantzart · 4 months
Note
Someone made an angsty theory on the super mario bros movie tv tropes. That instead or their dad tbinkie hes bringing luigi down,that perhaps in some way he coddles luigi?
I dunno... Mario's Dad doesn't strike me as a coddler. If he coddled Luigi he wouldn't have been so blasé about Uncle Tony pulling food out of his hands during dinner, and wouldn't have had such an overwhelmingly positive reaction to Luigi helping Mario fist fight a giant fire breathing turtle monster.
Tumblr media
Now, there is a chance he's softer on Luigi compared to Mario, but Mario's clearly the one leading the charge in their shaky business endeavors.
82 notes · View notes
Text
soup 👍
Tumblr media Tumblr media
I think this perfect encapsulates how good it is:
Tumblr media
27 notes · View notes
yume-fanfare · 5 months
Text
i think one of the funniest parts about machina is that, as far as ive read, there's been at least 4 kinds of cryptocurrency in enstars and no one bats an eye at those
while things like the inconvenience (or impossibility) of conversion and how useless they are, there's little to no actual action against them and They Keep Inventing More
52 notes · View notes
morlock-holmes · 2 years
Text
One of the problems I have reading or listening to stuff that makes a complex argument is, I get fed up waiting for the answer to my specific question.
I'm like one of those dogs who, the second they see your hand stray near a leash, starts whining and pawing at the door, and as soon as you clip them in they're running full tilt towards the closed door, straining at the leash and whining and barking while you go, "For crying out loud give me a second to find where I put the dog poo bags."
So someone mentioned this long video about fanfiction and I am now 20 minutes in, straining at my leash, pawing at the door and barking "economics economics economics" over and over again.
I've gotten to the part where Sarah Z asserts that Fanfiction should be understood as a separate "medium" and this is to the point where, in dog terms, I'm just going to hurl myself through the front window and run off in a hail of glass shards.
I am deeply convinced that the only coherent definition of fanfiction is "Fiction made by someone who doesn't have the legal right to use the copyrighted aspects used in the work."
It only makes sense as a legal category. Every aspect she attributes to fanfiction is a very direct response to the fact that fanfic writers can't monetize their work in the way that people with proper copyright clearance can.
Like, as an example, she says that one of the reasons 50 Shades of Grey doesn't work so well is because it was written to be about Edward and Bella from Twilight, and so instead of properly introducing them as new characters it just kind of takes for granted that you know who they are and care about them.
Which raises the question: Well, if getting rid of the Twilight stuff makes the novels and films worse, why on earth did James and her editors do it?
The only reason I can think of is that licensing Twilight was simply not feasible, either because of outright refusal by copyright holders, and/or because the copyright holders asked too much money, and/or somebody wanted to keep film rights and the film rights to Twilight had already been sold, etc.
As I continue to listen while writing she is now comparing television writing to fanfiction, and all the links between television writing and fanfic writing that she enumerates are things that are clearly determined by the economics of television production and the economics of fanfiction production but she hasn't yet explicitly said it.
She keeps almost going to the door and then realizing she forgot her keys, it's driving me crazy here.
134 notes · View notes
isaacsapphire · 8 months
Note
Regarding Obama care could be but I don’t think it’s a guarantee. Economy is also tougher now and I have friends who also still have to live with their parents because this city is so damn expensive. For me being covered by my parents health insurance has been a huge relief since I am a full time student with various medical and mental issues that make living independently’ hard. I suppose it could? If by that you mean kids aren’t thinking about stuff like taxes and healthcare.. which they should lol. I was filing W9s etc when I was in high school getting a job. But I entirely agree that kids these days are not equipped to handle adulthood and it’s complexities, and it often drives me nuts the lack of critical thinking…
Oh, I don't think it's a bad thing that the cutoff age was extended! I was uninsured for years back in the pre-existing conditions era when that was gambling with your life, and that was not a good thing or an avoidable one for me during the Recession. But it was me legally being officially my own problem and sure did light a fire under my ass.
Living with parents after 18 seems to have become more and more common since the Recession. On the one hand, it's a return to a more traditional pattern, but on the other hand all the cultural stuff around young adults living with their parents AS ADULTS had died off in the mainstream so the infantilization follows unsurprisingly. I've definitely seen a lot of White white collar homeowner parents just... let their adult children stay indefinitely rent free or well below market rate, still treating them like teenagers and running interference for them while they behave like teenagers. Blue collar parents I know seem to be much more active in getting their kids eg. dealing with their own car insurance and taxes and jobs even if they still live at home. Blue collar Whites are closer to ethnic White traditions that included adult children living at home though, so idk if it's a class thing or a culture thing more.
Wouldn't be surprised if the trend isn't a cause as well as an effect of housing market changes by now; the borderline retirement age people I know who have bought or kept houses in the last decade bought and retained family sized houses despite their being at the stage to be empty nesters, and most of them had at least one adult child living with them who appeared to have no interest in getting a career and their own place.
Idk, it seems like the drop in horniness and increase in mental health issues could be seen as either a cause or an effect too.
5 notes · View notes
Text
i live with my mum still at 20 bcs we usually have a great relationship, and bcs im unemployed and a disappointment.
16 notes · View notes
alalumin · 6 months
Text
What if I don't want a serious career. What if I just want to hang out with my friends and family and travel and pet cats and see every weird bug and flower in the world. What then.
43 notes · View notes
ohsalome · 1 year
Note
My favourite brand of westsplaining is how some Westies seem to think that because Ukrainians who don't serve and hadn't left the country keep going to work etc. then there can't be any war or it can't be that bad.
Like do you think everyone who wasn't on the front or trapped in the concentration camps could just take an extended holiday from life during the WW2 or something?
But you need to see their point of view. This wasn't shown in the Marvel movies. /s
In the meantime, here's a quote from unit commander in the 68th Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Pavlo Vysebaba.
"We have to understand that a strong frontline is impossible without a strong support, because the army needs to be supplied. According to the calculations of international organizations, to fully supplt one soldier you need 12 civilian taxpayers.
Secondly, I heard a lot of similar complaints even when I hadn't been drafted yet, when I was waiting for my turn: "Why aren't you at the military registration and enlistment office? Why are you here? Why are you in civilian life?". Friends, if you even do the math, only one in ten or even one in fifteen men can be in the army. That is, one man in the army and 10-15 men in the rear, because they need to work. They need to sow bread, they need to keep factories running. There are many components of the economy that need to be provided.
We can win only as a joint mechanism, as a people".
95 notes · View notes
brandinotbroke · 9 months
Text
people are now buying their sims games a SECOND time just to switch from ea app to steam……..
53 notes · View notes