“Somewhere there had to be a happy medium between treated as a terrifying murder machine and being infantilized.”
-Rogue Protocol, Martha Wells
I think about this line a lot.
The Murderbot Diaries series leans well into critiques of Ableism, and I think about the books in reference to disability a lot.
Ableism hands out the ‘baby’ and ‘dangerous’ labels left and right. I think about the perception of things like DID, amputations, anxiety, and depression. Sometimes both blankets get laid on at once. The idea of ‘depressed school shooters’ on one hand the ‘how to care for a sad person’ comic. It’s embedded in the culture (at least in the USA).
{Image ID: comic with multiple panels, how to care for a sad person, 2. pick sad person up 3. lay on blanket 4. rol them like a sushi 5. place sad roll on bed/couch/comfy place 6. hug roll close 7. put on rols favorite movies 8. feed roll snacks 9. make sure roll is well hydrated. Tears make roll dehydrated 10. happy lil sushi roll. End ID}
I have spent just the smallest amount of time talking with diagnosed autistics (and with self dxed and un-dxed folks) and seen their critiques on media about autism they make this really hit home. It’s PERVASIVE.
In the hated film Mus1c by S1A there is a throughline of her main character, Music, being childlike, but when she has meltdowns she’s dangerous. This same rhetoric is used by Autism Spe@ks, that autism will destroy marriages and peace and is actively trying to get you, that autistic people are missing something that needs to be found so they can be whole. When I tell you I WANTED to like Love on the Spectrum-- but it played deeply into ‘autistics are missing something, they need help, they’re childlike’ and it infantilized it’s cast-- I am saying it with desperation.
It is so cathartic for me to see this put so plainly into words by a character that is approachable to people who both are and aren’t autistic. These SHOULDN’T be the only perceptions of disabled folks! Because we are people-- multifaced, individual, just as dangerous and childlike as the rest of the population.
Some of us need more support. Some of us need more care. But we are all individuals, and these blankets are smothering.
16 notes
·
View notes
Okay, I wasn't going to say anything about it, but y'all are just being ridiculous now, so I have to say it.
A common criticism of Jay Nakamura is the idea that he only got romantically involved with Jon to get Jon to help him with what he was doing.
And this is meant to be like, an indictment of Jay, that he somehow manipulated Jon into helping him out and that's bad, but like... lets pretend that's true for a second, okay?
The explicit text of Son of Kal El is that Jay is a displaced indigenous refugee who is trying to liberate his country and his people from a western-sponsored dictator (and the literal slavery he has imposed upon them).
So according to this take, Jay had to romantically manipulate Jon into... helping him take a stand against colonialism. He had to trick Superman into helping him do something i hope we all agree is objectively correct. Specifically by bribing him with romantic affection.
I just wanna know: In what universe is that an indictment of Jay and not Jon?
Like, that's a world where Jon had to get something out of the arrangement to consider doing the objectively right thing. That's fucked up! Extremely fucked up! And I would never villify Jay, who again I remind you escaped actual enslavement, for needing to do that to get help for himself and his people! Why would you?
28 notes
·
View notes
PSA: You should question news articles that make you not want to vote
Hey Tumblr friends, but especially young Americans in this, the year of our Lord 2024.
Unfortunately, it is an election year.
Unfortunately, a US election year becomes everyone's problem, and yes everyone else, we are very very sorry that you have to deal with our nonsense.
But in all seriousness, the level of propaganda that's going to be flung around on all sides is going to reach peak levels this year for the English-speaking internet in particular. There's going to be a lot of influence operations, on all sides, and yes including on sides you agree with but they are still influence operations.
Source: I am speaking as a cybersecurity professional who also did a great deal of work in election security.
So, here's what I am going to ask you to do. What I am going to beg you to do: be careful of any article that makes you think there's no point in voting.
That's it. I'm not going to tell you who to vote for, or how to think, or that you should trust or distrust every article out there. I don't care about that. I care about whether or not it makes you think you shouldn't vote.
A lot of influence operations are about making you feel like there's no point. That both sides are just as bad as the other. The the election is falsified. That you can "protest" by not voting (false: you will simply not be counted and your voice will be ignored). All sorts of reasons not to vote.
No matter what you do, what you believe, or who you trust, you really really have to vote this year, and every year, and you need to not listen to articles that say there's no point because among those articles are in fact active foreign influence campaigns trying to promote one side or the other for their own reasons, I am deadly serious right now.
(More context, sources, and examples sources below the cut.)
In 2016, Russian influence operations were focused on tearing down Hillary in order to specifically depress voter turnout among young men of color in the belief that this would help Trump get elected.
From the article: "“Buried literally in the middle of the indictment is a paragraph that should jar every American committed to the long fight for voting rights,” Anders wrote in a statement. “The Russians allegedly masqueraded as African-American and American Muslim activists to urge minority voters to abstain from voting in the 2016 election or to vote for a third-party candidate.”
This is the flavor of influence campaign that has been proven, that does exist, and is the sort of thing that does numbers here on Tumblr.
Things like the situation in Gaza, for example, are incredibly fraught situations. Articles don't even need to lie about facts on the ground there to make people feel hopeless and angry. Again, I am not telling you who to trust or not trust when it comes to news sources. But if an article about this event, for examples, makes you think or even outright tells you, "There's no point to voting, both sides are awful, I just shouldn't bother." You need to pause and at least consider that this might be an influence operation. You need to think critically. You need to check sources. You need to think about the world you want to live in, to vote for, and who might not want that world to happen for any variety of reasons.
Protesting by failing to vote isn't a real thing.
Old politicians ignoring young voters because they famously do not bother to vote is absolutely 100% a real thing. It is why so many policies that are popular with young people are low priority for politicians: they are not afraid of losing the young vote because no one plans on having it in the first place when it's never there in big enough numbers to matter.
So please, please, read what you want. Believe what you want. Follow your heart and your brain and whatever other organ you want to think with. I'm not here to tell you who is right, wrong, trustworthy, good, or bad. I'm just here to tell you that despite all of that, whatever you read, you must vote in your elections, no matter where you are in the world and you must not listen to voices that tell you not to as a protest.
2K notes
·
View notes
the interesting thing to me about barbie (2023) is that while it is very pink and girly and Feminine with a capital F it doesn’t seem to be an indictment of the aesthetic as either Good or Bad…like i remember seeing posts on here about how barbie was going to make being a “girly girl” (read -> tiktok tradwife divine feminine bs) cool again, and like collectively bring down advanced gender-neutral type feminism ideas, but the pinkness and sparkles of barbie do not speak to Being a Woman circa 1950s USAmerican gender roles but to the idea of individuality and freedom of expression. like little girls as they grow up are so often taught that they’re not gonna be taken seriously unless they force themselves to look and act Serious. the pink is a metaphor for being bold the sparkles are a metaphor for being brave!!! for having the confidence to be the person You Want To Be and i think that’s really beautiful
5K notes
·
View notes
I've said this to a couple people already, but I'm actually really interested by Felix's crash alibi. The description of Lacrimosa tells us what he told to the police the morning after the crash:
And I'm assuming his story here is that he was driving drunk, got into a wreck, and after he came back to consciousness he spent the whole night and morning looking for Edd & Molly in the woods, and when he couldn't find them he went to the police. Which is actually a really strong alibi to explain his behavior and the huge gap of time where he was unaccounted for. Like, it's suspicious, but short of uncovering buried remains that the police don't know exist, there's really nothing that can disprove it. It's very difficult to say that isn't what happened.
Which I really like, because I think it lays the groundwork to explain why Felix has gotten away with so much for so long. A really common complaint I hear about The Walten Files is that people don't find it believable that all this could happen, all these missing people and mysterious circumstances, and seemingly no one in Brighton cared, and Felix was never indicted. But as I suspected, the series is already starting to put forward explanations that are believable and that can facilitate the future circumstances we've already gotten a taste of.
605 notes
·
View notes