The generational progression of team dynamics is truly so funny to me.
You have the Justice League and they're all coworkers. They're friendly and polite with each other but they don't really hang out together outside of work. Two of them might transcend the work friend dynamic and buddy up outside of work (i.e Barry and Hal or Ollie and Hal or Bruce and Clark) but you will never see all of them casually hanging out for fun.
Then there's the Titans. These guys are friends. They all have busy lives so they maybe don't see each other as much as they'd like to but they're all deeply bonded with each other. They make a point of planning big get togethers with each other unrelated to work. They know each other's deepest secrets. Their kids consider the other Titans aunts and uncles.
Last but not least there's Young Justice. Young Justice is the definition of unhealthy codependency. They're all best friends and they act like siblings but they might also all be in love with each other? Kon dated Cassie, hit on Cissie, flirted with Bart's clone and had a dream where Bart was in a cheerleading outfit and was with his other love interests and then just everything with Tim. Cassie dated both Tim and Kon, and then there's everything with Cissie. Bart admitted that Cassie made him 'like girls' (?), took Cissie to a dance, and is extremely close with Tim and Kon to the point where it could just be unhealthy codependency but it might be something more. Honestly this entire group is so intermixed and codependent it's insane. They go from 'i love you so much you are my best friend' to 'i wanna make out with you' so fast and with barely any breathing room. They are constantly with each other and hang out at least once a week. They cannot exist separately.
6K notes
·
View notes
Striking Today?
If you're staying home from school/work in protest of Israel, and don't have a physical protest to go to, and you have an election this year (cough America cough) today's a perfect day to research your ballots!
With this tool you can simply enter the address tied with your voter's registration and be shown your election dates and candidates; information about these candidates (such as a photo, their platform, or any previous political work) are listed.
Make sure you are registered to vote and, if needed, opt for vote-by-mail. Request off from your jobs on election dates if you can. The more research you do now, the better off you will be come election days!
(If you are not from the states and wish to share voter resources for your country in this post, please do so!)
(If you are from the states and have more important resources or tips to follow, please do so!)
16 notes
·
View notes
Hey I hope this is okay to ask. I saw that you sent the Sandman Big Ban a ask about the faq. Are you satisfied with their reply? I don't know if this is really common and if I should participate
Hey nonnie, that's entirely fine to ask yes!
Short answer: no, I'm not.
Long answer, giving a few reasons with none of my snark being aimed at you personally:
This is how it's done. No, this is absolutely not standard practise - I can name you at least 5 bangs off the top of my head that do not, in fact, do this. Including content restrictions is very much a choice that the mods are making, whether it also is their private opinion or not. None of those other bangs have problems matching, which brings me to:
No PWP: first of all, their word count requirement is incredibly low at 6k, and claiming that authors would struggle to hit that with "porn only"? That's, I'm sorry, ridiculous, not to mention condescending as hell - authors are perfectly capable estimating whether they can hit goals or not with whatever plot (or lack thereof) they are writing.
Artists/betas won't want to claim, or need to know what they get into: First of all, there is a huge bunch of amazing nsfw art and artists in this fandom who, I'd assume, would be happy to make nsfw/dark art. Second of all: have authors provide content notes/warnings for the claiming process, problem solved.
We're not banning dark/nsfw content, just any glorification of it: Right. And who decides what's glorifying? Do they vet this during sign ups? Claiming? Might I end up submitting a fic and get it pulled? Do I have to provide personal information about my trauma to be "allowed" to write dark content in a certain kind of way? This is a slippery slope at best. It is also massively hypocritical because, you'll notice, there are no such restrictions when it comes to violence or murder etc. It gives big ole "I can excuse the eye-eating serial killer, but I'll draw the line at porn" vibes which is a staple of anti culture.
On the above point, it is also worth noting that the entire argument is moot to begin with because even if it is "glorifying" or "romanticizing" it literally does not matter. It's fiction. It's not real. Tag your shit, give warnings during the claiming process, and it's fine. Everything else is cuddling up to censorship, there is no middle ground to be had here. (Which is arguably very ironic considering both the source material and the source material author's stance on such things. Yes I'm salty as fuck about this. Anyway).
All this is to make the event "more accessible." This is, frankly, absolute goddamn bullshit. If people warn properly for their content, and if in the context of a discord server for the fest you have designated spaces to talk about nsfw and/or dark content, people are perfectly capable of curating their experience, what they engage with or not. Conversely, banning content, considering yourself as mods an authority on what is and isn't glorification, is not only condescending as hell, it also makes your fest, in fact, less accessible for anyone who a) wants to write such content, or b) simply is not a fan of censorship vibes in their fandom spaces.
So long story short, I'm the opposite of satisfied and will absolutely not participate. People are, of course, welcome to run their events however they want. I am, of course, perfectly in my rights to run my own big bang without all this nonsense, which is something I am considering doing because I love big bangs, and hate the thought of relinquishing the fest format to something so inaccessible. 😉
144 notes
·
View notes
i recently found some old rolling stone magazines at a local thrift and as i was showing my dad, i was flipping through the ‘99 brad pitt one and he made a comment about how “brad was wearing dresses before harry” (paraphrased in good faith, but also shock, because i still can’t get over how pop cultured by sixty-five year old father is…)
this generally is the discourse point many make when talking about how harry feminizes his expression and identity to the general public, and while i don’t think it’s necessarily a stan twitter talking point veering into a bible thumping lecture, or something that’s from bad faith collectively, it’s odd and mostly disheartening to see this be brought as a response when a masculine-presenting man (to the general eye; tattoos and heartthrob and muscles and all) chooses to wear a dress, or paint his nails, or wear some makeup, or make history and wear a dress on variety’s cover. because yes, people have down this before, and it’s not a “new” idea, but harry has never claimed to be the emblem of feminine men, nor the starter of men who wear dresses and dabble into a more feminine side for the sake of expression — or whatever the hell their reason is, because who cares!
my take on this is that just because people are gushing over harry doing this does not mean people are undermining the ones that did it before him. considering the backlash he got from popular and reactionary conservatives, harry’s success to be open and in touch with his feminine side has a very modern and appealing tenderness to becoming a representative for freedom of expression and these sexual and gender bending ideas in the form of appearance, clothes, etc… the right to be yourself and express that confidently, dammit. and yes, this begs the point that the people before harry have paved the way, but that reaction to harry also eerily reminds us the bigoted time we are living in, where the “silent majority” are fear mongering and pushing their agenda onto the public.
because yeah, maybe brad pitt (a known abuser) can’t reach a young man’s heart, but maybe harry can, and there’s nothing wrong with that: the approach at which harry does it at, or the feelings of that man at which he connects with certain people over others. praise the past, embrace the present.
it is also so fucking weird seeing inherently twitter talking points be spewed out of its echo chamber into my very fangirlish room. it collects dust as we speak.
13 notes
·
View notes