Tumgik
#Ghostbusters (2016 film)
gameofthunder66 · 8 months
Text
'Ghostbusters' (2016) film
Tumblr media
-watched 10/11/2023- 2 [1/2] stars- on DVD
63 notes · View notes
mastercontrol123 · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
Happy 77th Birthday Ernie Hudson!
👻 ❤️
171 notes · View notes
slav-every-day · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
12 notes · View notes
i-hear-a-sound · 8 months
Text
some poor sap needs to take the last jedi 2017 out back and put it down like a rabid dog before I have to hear it come out of youtuber #62719th’s mouth again
8 notes · View notes
tawneybel · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
Imagine wondering whether you should flash Rowan, in ghost kaiju form, as a distraction or not. It works, until he remembers that he doesn’t have to be coy at this height. 
46 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Blue in Films
Ghostbusters (2016) dir. Paul Feig Lilo and Stitch (2002) dir. Chris Sanders Mulan (1998) dir. Tony Bancroft The Little Mermaid II: Return To The Sea (2000) dir. Jim Kammerud Percy Jackson and the Sea of Monsters (2013) dir. Thor Freudenthal The Princess and the Frog (2010) dir. John Musker Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975) dir. Jim Sharman X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014) dir. Bryan Singer Suicide Squad (2016) dir. David Ayer Wolf Creek (2005) dir. Greg McLean
35 notes · View notes
professorpski · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Ghostbusters, 2016, or Academic Fashion Duel
While the search of ghosts obviously drives this funny movie, I want to talk about how the costumes by Jeffrey Kurland signal the hopeless aspirations of Kristen Wiig who plays a young academic named Erin. We first meet her on the cusp of the decision about her tenure at Columbia University, which would give her a permanent position.
She is wearing a pale green and tan plaid suit with blazer and pleated skirt. It is not a completely hopeless outfit until we spot the clashing blouse which is stark white with blue and tan print and a tight, little rectangular bow. That little bow tell us that Abby is trying far too hard to toe the line in academia; she once co-wrote a book on ghosts which she hopes has been completely forgotten.
The hopelessness of her case for tenure becomes more apparent as she talks to a distinguished guest lecturer named Phyllis played by Elizabeth Perkins whose all-black outfit is artfully decorated with a large scarab pin and a dark scarf which repeats the green of the scarab. Phyllis manages to disagree with every single thing that Erin says in what must be the most painfully funny work conversation ever recorded on film for academics like me.
There is lots more to like in the film included the mad scientist outfit on Kate McKinnon including her strange goggles which make you think she is ready for something to explode at any moment. And then, of course, there are the ghosts.
44 notes · View notes
Text
2016 Ghostbuster's is actually not that bad. It's actually an alright film
3 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
The controversial chick flick of 2016, GhostBusters: Who You Gonna Call (that's the full name, it's on the end credits, but the beginning title only says GhostBusters for some reason, and it's also called GhostBusters: Answer the call... Let's just stick with Ghostbusters!
IMPORTANT NOTE: I will NOT be comparing this film to the original two films. These films are different entities and will be treated as such.
The Story
The story is about a University Science Teacher who sees that an old friend of hers has published a book they wrote in highschool which theories the existence of ghosts.
The first part of the film (all of the ghostbusters being established and meeting each other) is definitely the weakest part of the film. Some of the jokes are really cringeworthy and the beginning is definitely rushed.
But once you get past that first hurdle, you are in for a real treat! The story isn't a very serious one, in fact, it never takes itself too seriously. It knows it's dumb and it ravishes in its silliness. Even some of the special effects look cheap and silly! It emphases on the less serious tone of the film and it somehow works!
Watching this film really reminds me of High School DxD. The first couple of episodes that set up the plot isn't that great, but once you are over that hurdle, you will enjoy it's silly, dumb ride.
The Characters
The biggest reason why the first third of the film is so weak is because the characters on their own are really dull, boring and unoriginal. But once they are together, the interactions of the characters are so funny! The best one out of the lot of them is the teacher's fat friend. She is so nuts and over the top that it's hard not to laugh when she's in a skit.
The inventor really reminds me of Haruko Haruhara from the anime FLCL (why does this film make me keep thinking of anime?) just by how crazy and punkish she is. I wish she had more jokes than the over the top gadgets, but she isn't a bad character.
The side characters are quite weak. The only side character I really remember is the secretary for the Ghostbusters just by how much I can relate to him. It is implied by his actions that he does seem to have a mild form of Aspergers Syndrome and it doesn't put any stereotype of the disability in any way. Plus, he is the most funny character in the film (other than the teacher's fat friend).
The Special Effects
The special effects don't look that great, but when it's a silly film like this, really nice CGI won't suit the film in the least. But the special effects suits the tone of the film well.
I he film also givens some nods to the fans of the original films such as mentioning Zuul in the post credit scene (if you stick around to see all of the end credits at the cinema), and others which I won't give away.
Some of the acting from the extras is terrible (such as the tour guide at the beginning of the film) and you can tell that they didn't know what they were doing.
Final Thoughts
Overall, this is a great movie, but it has some serious flaws that might put some people off from watching the film (plus, the trailer has had a lot of dislikes on YouTube) and many reviewers who were fans of the original bashed this film to the point of being to biased. Even though I enjoyed this film, I do understand why some people don't like it. But don't treat it as the worst film ever made. I can assure you that there is a lot worse out there.
I think the main reason why this film is hated by the fans of the originals is because the original films were very manly films, while a this film is more of a chick flick. I'm not saying all fans of the original hate this film. But this film is definitely targeted to the female audience and it knows how to make females laugh!
So don't end up cursing the creators of the film when you become a ghost, they clearly knew that they were taking a lot of risks with this film, and in this reviewer's opinion, it paid off. So, please spare him so I don't have to spend 100s of pounds on a phone bill from New York City to call...
You know who I'm gonna call!
The Story 4/5 The Characters 3.5/5 The Special Effects 3.5/5
Overall 3.5/5
3 notes · View notes
erin-gilberts · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
A fun fact about me is that I have so many childhood photos I could pass off as being a young Abby Yates. Tell me that's NOT what she would've looked like.
1 note · View note
beesmygod · 2 months
Note
What's your take on the 2016 Ghostbusters film? Was it really bad or was it all just thinly veiled misogyny? I thought it captured the spirit more than the 2 films the followed it
the truth lies somewhere in the middle: i thought it was a perfectly competent film and enjoyed it. but in hindsight, i probably would have enjoyed it a lot more if they had scrubbed it clean of the ghostbusters IP. if it were an original IP heavily inspired by ghostbusters, i think it would simply have had a more solidified identity and some of the worse creative decisions probably would have been left on the cutting room floor where they belonged. these new films are fucking dire dude lol. like comparatively they are vile sludge.
more than anything, chris hemsworth is an insanely strong comedic actor. its probably misogyny for that to have been my biggest take away but i remember being floored at how good he was and how well he kept up
71 notes · View notes
tyrantisterror · 4 months
Text
You Don't Remember Muncher
Tumblr media
Sony, as a film-making company, has reeked of desperation for at least a decade at this point. They have IPs that they know SHOULD be making them more money but they just. Can't. Get them to. And sometimes this results in them taking some big creative swings, to be completely fair - I love the Spider-Verse movies, and you don't get movies that expensive and conceptually heavy with a studio executive who's playing it safe. And I think the fact that they keep taking these big swings even when some of them end up duds like Sausage Party is commendable.
But I do think one of their big problems is this inability to understand that 1. films are a form of art and 2. what art is. They're good enough to understand that artists know what art is, which is more than a lot of studio leadership can say, and those big creative swings they take come from trusting artists to do their art thing. And even their misfires tend to have laudable stuff - Sausage Party may be an SNL gag that someone decided to stuff full of the most dated racism and bigoted jokes imaginable to get up to movie feature runtime, but the animation in it is oddly beautiful, even when depicting things that are repulsive. Like a protestant on the way to Dracula's castle, the heads at Sony seem to treat their artists with respect despite not understanding why they gave them a rosary and other primitive superstitious charms to protect them from vampires.
But when they have to make choices themselves, hoo boy, those poor bastards. They don't know what they're doing.
Tumblr media
So Ghostbusters is one of those valuable IPs Sony is desperate to monetize, right? They just know they can have a huge hit on their hands with Ghostbusters. It was popular in the 80's, and things that were popular in the 80's are HUGE now! Look at that Stranger Things, baby!
Now, the heads at Sony may not be able to understand art, but they try. They are at the very least good at picking apart a piece of art and sussing out what ingredients made it, like Claire Saffitz trying to recreate an oreo. For their 2016 reboot, they correctly deduced that the original Ghostbusters was 1. a comedy 2. starring at least two actors from SNL and using their star power for promotion and 3. was liked by nerds because the heroes are out-of-shape nerds rather than chiseled Rambo/Arnie types. Also it has ghosts in it, probably.
Now, the problem is, the SNL actor-led comedy was taken out into a dark alley and slowly beaten to death by Adam Sandler and his cadre of goblin men starting somewhere around the time Little Nicky was made. It gave way to the era of cringe comedies like The Hangover and Judd Apatow bromances, which were led less by SNL stars and more by actors and actresses who'd gotten their start on NBC thursday night sitcoms - a minor difference, perhaps, but notable I think. And, like, even then, by 2016, that era was also pretty much over. The cringe comedy was a dying genre. Comedy itself, at least pure comedies, was kind of losing its place in film, being supplanted by action movies with more quips than they used to have. We were three years deep into THE WHEDONING.
But being three years behind the curve has never been a problem Sony worried about. I mean, historically it should be, but they never do. So Sony tried to assemble the best Ghostbusters they could make from the ingredients they could suss out, using the closest equivalents they could make. Grab some of the actresses from Bridesmaids, and an SNL star or two if you can. Kristen Wiig and Melissa McCarthy have a pretty good banter going on ala Bill Murray and Dan Akroyd, really put them front and center. Oh, and we sussed out another ingredient! The original Ghostbusters had Sigourney Weaver as a love interest, and she was the star of Alien, which our Sony genre determining bot claims is an action movie, so let's get a hot action star as a love interest. Chris Hemsworth! Oh, we can make him be a silly goober like we did with John Hamm in Bridesmaids! People love handsome guys being silly goobers! (in this, Sony is correct)
The result was... fine, I think, if missing a few crucial ingredients. You know the ghosts in Ghostbusters? First syllable of the title? Most of the ones in the 2016 movie are just, you know, transparent humans, maybe a bit bluer than normal, making maniacal faces. Whereas in the original:
youtube
Well, they got some fucked up freaks in the original.
A lot of fans didn't like the 2016 movie, some for stupid sexism reasons, some for "I don't see why you need to remake Ghostbusters at all really" reasons, and some for, like, just personal taste reasons. It did not provide the big box office hit Sony wanted. Their first attempt to recreate the oreo was a failure.
Tumblr media
So they go back to the drawing board, listening to the loudest, angriest criticism and looking to what's working outside of their influence for answers. Fans thought the 2016 movie was too different, not reverent towards the original as the perfect golden calf of Bill Murray comedies that it is. So this new reboot would be oozing with reverence. Fans didn't like the cast of ladies, so, yes, got it, scrap the lady-led ghostbusters.
Star Wars Fans loved that J.J. Abrams Star Wars reboot, The Force Awakens, for being a sequel rather than a full reboot, but also for just telling the same story they already love but slightly different. And nerds in general still fucking love that Stranger Things show - they even had an episode where the Stranger Things kids wore ghostbusters costumes! Hey, there's a million dollar idea, Stranger Things kids... as ghostbusters...
Now, the one thing they can't take from The Force Awakens is copying the tone of their original movie, because they tried copying the irreverent tone of the original Ghostbusters and fans did not like it. They need to be reverent to the original, because that's what The Force Awakens, even if showing reverence at all is antithetical to the tone of the original movie itself (which it is, because Ghostbusters is an irreverent Bill Murray comedy, like that's its whole schtick). But if they can drape this new-found reverence in 80's nostalgia, maybe, just maybe, nostalgic fans will be too dumb to notice.
And hey, they love that Stranger Things, which is a big homage to The Goonies and E.T. and Steven Spielberg-esque stories about pubescent kids going on perilous adventures where they face bad guys and learn life lessons in the process, reverent but dated in the same time period as Ghostbusters. And what an idea... Stranger Things kids... as ghostbusters...
Tumblr media
This was admittedly a lot of preamble to get to the actual topic: Muncher. See, in that Force Awakens style, they needed to not only bring old characters from Ghostbusters back, but also make new characters who are really just the old characters but slightly different. For example, The Force Awakens brings us BB-8, who's basically just R2-D2, but visually different enough to feel new, and maybe a little cuter. Instead of moving on treads, he moves on this big ball, which is more complicated from a puppetry aspect and thus looks a lot more impressive and just a bit more "modern" while still basically being R2-D2 again.
Such was the genesis of Muncher.
Slimer (originally called Onionhead by the production staff and John Belushi's Ghost by Bill Murray) wasn't intended to be the franchise mascot, in part because Ghostbusters was never meant to be a franchise. He was a one off ghost who's iconic design and role as the first ghost to be busted made him a fan favorite, and eventually became, like, the ghostbusters' dog in the cartoon series. We love that for him, but the fact remains that Slimer's success was accidental.
Muncher, by contrast, was an attempt to recreate Slimer. But different! He's a gross gluttonous monster, because that's what Slimer is, but there's a lot less focus on wet goo when he eats and more solid chunks. See, it's different? And you know what's popular now thanks to, like, a cracked article or something? Tardigrades! They're these cool little microscopic things that everyone's making into monster designs now, they're even on a Star Trek! Why, if we made Slimer 2 - err, that is, Muncher have some tardigrade elements, he'd look weird and, like, modern - but not too modern! Like Slimer, but different!
Before Ghostbusters: Afterlife came out, there was a LOT of Muncher merchandise. A lot. Which makes sense, Slimer had so much goddamn merch in the heyday of the original Ghostbusters. There was fucking Slimer toothpaste. Toothpaste! From Slimer's teats!
Tumblr media
It looked identical to Slimer bubblegum.
But, for whatever reason, Muncher did not connect like Slimer did, and so Sony did a last minute trend-chasing pivot and tried to focus on the new hotness: cute baby versions of characters who were old and not cute in the original movie.
youtube
I don't know if this scene was planned to be in the movie before The Mandalorian was a big success, or if it was a hasty addition to it, but it doesn't matter, because what does matter is the late marketing shift to focus on these little fuckers, and giving them lots of toys. They're already in the marketing for the sequel, where Muncher is nowhere to be found.
Because you don't remember Muncher, do you?
Muncher didn't connect. They took a swing with Muncher and they fucking whiffed. They made a shitload of Muncher toys and all those little blue fuckers ended up clearanced to Hell. Muncher is a failure, a loser.
You don't remember Muncher.
And you never will.
65 notes · View notes
Text
Improving Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire (2024)
Frozen Empire has some neat ideas (Ancient ghostbusters, Phoebe & Melody, the Possessor, everything Dan Akroyd, Paul Rudd, James Acaster & Ernie Hudson do) but it’s bogged down by far too many characters and slavish fanservice. Afterlife was meant to pass the torch, but Frozen Empire is stuck replaying the greatest hits.
OPENING AND CHANGED VILLAIN
Instead of firefighters, we open on a 1900s team of ghost-hunters locking the villain Garraka away, led by Nadeem’s great-grandmother
Sealing Garraka away causes a huge explosion, and as we pull out of the burning building, we see a new ghost fly away. This is Melody, the ghost-girl, paralleling Egon’s ghost leaving his farmhouse in Afterlife's opening
Melody’s family were cultists who tried to summon big-bad Garraka. She’s the one who called the ghost-hunters to stop them, but was killed in the confrontation
Garraka tells Melody that her ‘unfinished business’ is summoning him to this dimension—the ritual she stopped her family completing. The only way she can be free is freeing him.
This establishes Melody’s distrust of ghost hunters, because they killed her
CUT CHARACTERS
Venkman and Janine don’t need to be here at all, they’re gone
Cut Podcast. Ray wistfully watches the opening car-chase  alone, out-of-the-loop. He seizes on the arrival of the Orb as his chance to get back in on the action. Podcast's absence also heightens Phoebe’s isolation
Cut Lucky. Her only real moment is defending Phoebe from Garraka, which itself was cut down from the trailers
THE AQUARIUM & COMMUNING WITH GHOSTS
‘Garraka wants to free the ghosts in the Firehouse’ is yet another reused plotpoint in a film full of them.
Instead the (much bigger) property damage in the opening chase loses the team the Firehouse completely, increasing Phoebe’s guilt and isolation
They’ve already been moving ghosts into Winston’s Aquarium lab, so go straight there
They’re testing new technology- think Ghostbusters (2016)’s ghost-chipper, proton-gloves, proton-grenades etc. Callie tests this stuff (bc she has nothing to do otherwise), bonding with Winston as the table uncle-figure she never had.
James Acaster's Dr. Lars is trying to communicate with the caged ghosts, to learn about the other side- he tries to interrogate one to no avail
The idea of someone volunteering to go on 'expeditions' as a ghost via the Spirit Extractor, like an abassador to the Afterlife, is brought up- both Phoebe and Ray are tempted
This makes Phoebe talking to Melody an incredible discovery- a sentient, talking ghost who apparently fully retains her humanity.
MELODY’S FAMILY
When Phoebe finds Melody in the diner, it’s because that's is where she was killed- where her family tried to summon Garraka.
Now the Orb is uncontained her family’s ghosts have become active again, and descend from the upper floors of the building to attack the diner.
Melody’s family are a Cluster Ghost- an amorphous blob of limbs and heads bonded by the sane traumatic cause of death, tripping over itself to get to her. This physical manifestation of her family trying to drag her down parallels Phoebe’s conflict about hers.
Phoebe now takes Melody on a tour of the Aquarium and they bond there, rather than the Firehouse
TREVOR
Finn Wolfhard's Trevor had fuck-all to do in this movie lmao
Replace his pointless sublpot with Slimer with him bonding with the Possessor ghost, which communicates through switching TV stations/radio channels.
The Possessor would probably need some kind of cute visual manifestation to sell this. Think Mogwai, Lilo and Stitch etc Slapstick antagonism turned genuine fun, games of catch etc
With Podcast gone, Trevor accompanies Phoebe and Ray to the library. When the Possessor tries to steal the chant recording he tries to reason with it- c'mon, man, I thought we were bonding, this isn’t you, Garraka’s controlling you, only to get absolutely dunked on
Ray’s research reveals that Garraka’s horns- the 'object' that allows its apparition to manifest- were hidden away separately from the orb
NADEEM'S GRANDMOTHER
To build on the theme of communicating with and humanizing ghosts, instead of pyrokenesis (which felt a little out of place) Kumail Nanjiani's Nadeem is literally possessed by his estranged grandmother.
The idea Nadeem was 'haunted' is already suggested, but by making it explicit we get the slapstick of her puppeteering his body and chewing him out for neglecting his family legacy- arguing with the same mouth etc
Swap Venkman questioning Nadeem with Callie, holding a comedic seance. This gives her a much-needed emotional beat bonding with him over their baggage with their ghost-hunting relatives (Egon vs Grandma). Callie expresses how it feels to reconnect with her dad's legacy, which Frozen Empire never gave us.
She then replaces Podcast helping Nadeem try to hone his powers- in this case, help him and his grandmother work together
GARRAKA THE GHOST-EMPEROR
Garraka can't manifest as a full apparition without its horns.
It's more like the Mind Flayer from Stranger Things, a hive-mind that works through other ghosts. When the ancient ghost-hunters banished Garraka to the Other Side it took over, and has ruled there ever since. This is the 'frozen empire' he's looking to expand
In this way ghosts are shifted from no longer strictly antagonistic, but victims of a cruel tyrant
 When Melody tricks Phoebe into freeing Garraka, it tries to take Phoebe's ghost as a vassal, but Melody volunteers herself to save her. Phoebe returns to her body just in time to see Melody be possessed.
Now Melody is more directly involved in the climax, giving the antagonist a complex, sympathetic face
Dr. Lars replaces Lucky trying to stop Garraka. It kills him to up the stakes
FINALE
Garraka takes Melody to the Diner, where she joins with her family’s Cluster, spreading its supernatural winter as it goes
Change the Death Chill so everyone Garraka chills has their spriti pulled out of them, to join it army of spectral drones. Everywhere it goes it's recruiting, getting stronger. If it finds its second horn it will be able to 'recruit' all of New York
Expand on the Possessor using the Ghostbusters’ own gear to fight them. It steals the Ecto-1 and all the old Proton packs
The new generation of Ghostbusters have to use the new tech they’ve been developing to defeat the old stuff.
Nadeem and his Grandmother finally call a truce and work together to play defence bending the proton streams. She grumbles about how bad this generation of ghost-hunters is
Trevor's bond with the Possessor causes it conflict when it tries to kill him- it fights itself, the equipment it's possessing self-destructing
From here it’s a race to stop Garraka collecting its horns. Garraka successfully finds the first, increasing the scale and power of the big freeze
In the final confrontation Phoebe lets Garraka pull her spirit from her body to loosen its hold on Melody. Melody lights her match: Her unfinished business wasn't to summon Garraka, it was to finish destroying him as she tried to when she died. Nadeem and his Grandmother incinerate the thing.
Again taking a good idea from Ghostbusters (2016), Phoebe is given the choice go to the Other Side with Melody, to finally discover and understand what happens next. Her family ask her to come back, hold on. Melody says that Phoebe should accept their love and support, as she was never loved or supported by her own family
Melody kisses Phoebe goodbye, because not following through on that (when we’ve seen ghosts make similar physical contact with people before) is taking the coward’s way out. They should've cast a minor!!
Nadeem's Grandmother gives her blessing to the ghost-hunters who inherited her family's responsibilities. Then she leaves his body and offers to guide Melody to the Other Side, apologizing for her death on her mother's behalf
We end with Podcast and Lucky finally arriving in New York for a summer internship with the Ghostbusters.
Dr. Lars has returned as a ghost to be an 'ambassador' to the Other Side (playing a ghost would really unleash James Acaster's weird and whacky side), and the Possessor is even working with them as a new team mascot.
Ray has settled into a role as the team's full-time researcher, rather than working in the field
47 notes · View notes
one-time-i-dreamt · 1 year
Text
They were making a sequel for the 2016 reboot of Ghostbusters and they needed the garage of my childhood house to film a car wreck scene. I got a picture with Kate McKinnon, Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, and Leslie Jones.
275 notes · View notes
archerygun · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
So, I did it. I caved and started designing an older Oscar Barrett (based mostly on his actors William and Henry Deutschendorf and Sigourney Weaver).
He was probably born in very early 1989/very late 1988 according to the film’s timeline so he’s a bit younger than Callie. It’s been theorised that his (biological) father was the violinist from Ghostbusters II, but Ivan Reitman said in 2016 that he thinks Venkman is the father. Do what you will with that information.
But yeah, I haven’t gotten around to PROPER designs yet because I still haven’t got his personality and life details quite figured yet. All the canon information we really have about him is that he did martial arts (which is probably a reference to his actors being martial arts champions) so I’ve got way too much creative license here. Leave your thoughts if you have any I’d be interested in suggestions.
26 notes · View notes
ms-ship · 1 month
Text
Okay, so before, I've posted my opinion on Janine Melnitz's physical appearance on both The Real and Extreme Ghostbusters animated shows. But now, I would like to acknowledge Annie Potts' looks from the live-action films we all know, from how it started to how it was left.
I immensely believe that Annie Potts' classic Janine Melnitz look from Ghostbusters 1984 was, and still is, the superior signature look of Janine Melnitz. I mean the pixie cut hairdo and pink wide specs are just Janine's style and you know what they say: why mess with a classic?
The GBII look, on the other hand, took a downturn for me, from the red bobcut to the round black glasses. Even in the movie's universe, anyone could tell that she was obviously wearing a wig. If I were in the GB universe, I'd have a hard time believing Janine would go from a pixie cut to a full grown bob cut, even in the span of the timeline from the first and sequel of thr GB franchise.
Sidenote: I know I haven't mentioned Janine from Afterlife or Frozen Empire, or even *horrified gulp* the 2016 one. Regardless, however, I believe that Melnitz's most timeless look that can never be beat is from the Ghostbusters in the live action universe is the classic. Again, why even mess with a classic look?
Tumblr media
@bixiebeet @spengnitzed @spook-spectre-ghost @spenglerssweetheart @spook-central @janeb984 @lulusplaycorner @silver-embersss @kawaiisakura143 @soulfulbelieves
38 notes · View notes