Hi- er, this is my first-ever writer's strike, how does one not cross a picket line in this context? I know how not to do it with things like Amazon and IRL strikes, but how does it apply to media/streaming?
Hi, this is a great question, because it allows me to write about the difference between honoring a picket line and a boycott. (This is reminding me of the labor history podcast project that's lain fallow in my drafts folder for some time now...) In its simplest formulation, the difference between a picket line and a boycott is that a picket line targets an employer at the point of production (which involves us as workers), whereas a boycott targets an employer at the point of consumption (which involves us as consumers).
So in the case of the WGA strike, this means that at any company that is being struck by the WGA - I've seen Netflix, Amazon, Apple, Disney, Warner Brothers Discovery, NBC, Paramount, and Sony mentioned, but there may be more (check the WGA website and social media for a comprehensive list) - you do not cross a picket line, whether physical or virtual. This means you do not take a meeting with them, even if its a pre-existing project, you do not take phone calls or texts or emails or Slacks from their executives, you do not pitch them on a spec script you've written, and most of all you do not answer any job application.
Because if this strike is like any strike since the dawn of time, you will see the employers put out ads for short-term contracts that will be very lucrative, generally above union scale - because what they're paying for in addition to your labor is you breaking the picket line and damaging the strike - to anyone willing to scab against their fellow workers. GIven that one of the main issues of the WGA are the proliferation of short-term "mini rooms" whereby employers are hiring teams of writers to work overtime for a very short period, to the point where they can only really do the basics (a series outline, some "broken stories," and some scripts) and then have the showrunner redo everything on their lonesome, while not paying writers long-term pay and benefits, I would imagine we're going to see a lot of scab contracts being offered for these mini rooms.
But for most of us, unless we're actively working as writers in Hollywood, most of that isn't going to be particularly relevant to our day-to-day working lives. If you're not a professional or aspiring Hollywood writer, the important thing to remember honoring the picket line doesn't mean the same thing as a boycott. WGA West hasn't called on anyone to stop going to the movies or watching tv/streaming or to cancel their streaming subscriptions or anything like that. If and when that happens, WGA will go to some lengths to publicize that ask - and you should absolutely honor it if you can - so there will be little in the way of ambiguity as to what's going on.
That being said, one of the things that has happened in the past in other strikes is that well-intentioned people get it into their heads to essentially declare wildcat (i.e, unofficial and unsanctioned) boycotts. This kind of stuff comes from a good place, someone wanting to do more to support the cause and wanting to avoid morally contaminating themselves by associating with a struck company, but it can have negative effects on the workers and their unions. Wildcat boycotts can harm workers by reducing back-end pay and benefits they get from shows if that stuff is tied to the show's performance, and wildcat boycotts can hurt unions by damaging negotiations with employers that may or may not be going on.
The important thing to remember with all of this is that the strike is about them, not us. Part of being a good ally is remembering to let the workers' voices be heard first and prioritizing being a good listener and following their lead, rather than prioritizing our feelings.
28K notes
·
View notes
i think also people who dont understand how "stacking some rocks sometimes" can be harmful have heard of the countless cases where "its just a little thing" has destroyed countless landmarks and parks
elafonisi's pink sand beaches only retain 10% of the pink hues they used to retain just a few decades ago,
(source)
and if you didnt know it could happen, a larger scale upheaval of a beach in jamaica actually did result in the disappearance of an entire beach.
(source)
pig beach in the bahamas attracts people for being, well, the bahamas, and native pigs in the area can be found swimming to get around sometimes. people go nuts for the photo opportunity and forget these are wild animals- and youd expect it being the pigs killing people, but actually, people being too friendly caused a ban on feeding the pigs because seven of the poor things died after people figured "how bad could it hurt them if i give them just one?"
(source)
and these are just cases of something specific happening or being taken or given. thats not including people ruining and closing down entire tourist attractions, beaches, and parks by completely overcrowding it, disregarding rules, or trashing and littering the places.
like if someone preserving the park tells you not to do something you think is "harmless," i swear they arent just doing it because they want to ruin your fun. maintaining these places is delicate work- its a privilege to see and visit these areas, not a right. please take care of the world around you whether youre very close or very far from home, okay?
14K notes
·
View notes
morality: a character creation guide
creating and understanding your oc’s personal moral code! no, i cannot tell you whether they’re gonna come out good or bad or grey; that part is up to you.
anyway, let’s rock.
i. politics
politics are a good way to indicate things your character values, especially when it comes to large-scale concepts such as government, community, and humanity as a whole.
say what you will about either image; i’d argue for the unintiated, the right image is a good introduction to some lesser discussed ideologies… some of which your oc may or may not fall under.
either way, taking a good look at your character’s values on the economic + social side of things is a good place to start, as politics are something that, well… we all have ‘em, you can’t avoid ‘em.
clearly, this will have to be adjusted for settings that utilize other schools of thought (such as fantasy + historical fiction and the divine right of kings), but again, economic/social scale plotting will be a good start for most.
ii. religion + philosophy
is your oc religious? do they believe in a form of higher power? do they follow some sort of philosophy?
are they devout? yes, this applies to non-religious theist and atheist characters as well; in the former’s case… is their belief in a higher power something that guides many of their actions or is their belief in a higher power something that only informs a few of their actions? for the atheists; do they militant anti-theists who believe atheism is the only way and that religion is harmful? or do they not care about religion, so long as it’s thrust upon them?
for the religious: what is your oc’s relationship with the higher power in question? are they very progressive by their religion’s standards or more orthodox? how well informed of their own religion are they?
does your oc follow a particular school of philosophical thought? how does that interact with their religious identification?
iii. values
by taking their political stance and their religious + philosophical stance, you have a fairly good grasp on the things your character values.
is there anything they value - due to backstory, or what they do, or what they love - that isn’t explained by political stance and religious and/or philosophical identification? some big players here will likely be your oc’s culture and past.
of everything you’ve determined they value, what do they value the most?
iv. “the line”
everyone draws it somewhere. we all have a line we won’t cross, no matter the lengths we go for what we believe is a noble cause. where does your character draw it? how far will they go for something they truly believe is a noble cause? as discussed in part iii of my tips for morally grey characters,
would they lie? cheat? steal? manipulate? maim? what about commit acts of vandalism? arson? would they kill?
but even when we have a line, sometimes we make exceptions for a variety of reasons. additionally, there are limits to some of the lengths we’d go to.
find your character’s line, their limits and their exceptions.
v. objectivism/relativism
objectivism, as defined by the merriam-webster dictionary, is “an ethical theory that moral good is objectively real or that moral precepts are objectively valid.”
relativism, as defined by the merriam-webster dictionary, is “a view that ethical truths depend on the individuals and groups holding them.”
what take on morality, as a concept, does your character have? is morality objective? is morality subjective?
we could really delve deep into this one, but this post is long enough that i don’t think we need to get into philosophical rambling… so this is a good starting point.
either way, exploring morality as a concept and how your character views it will allow for better application of their personal moral code.
vi. application
so, now you know what they believe and have a deep understanding of your character’s moral code, all that’s left is to apply it and understand how it informs their actions while taking their personality into account.
and interesting thing to note is that we are all hypocrites; you don’t have to do this, but it might be fun to play around with the concept of their moral code and add a little bit of hypocrisy to their actions as a treat.
either way, how do your character’s various beliefs interact? how does it make them interact with the world? with others? with their friends, family, and community? with their government? with their employment? with their studies? with the earth and environment itself?
in conclusion:
there’s a lot of things that inform one’s moral compass and i will never be able to touch on them all; however, this should hopefully serve as at least a basic guide.
2K notes
·
View notes
Insatiable
CW: Self-harm Idealisation
I was diagnosed with hearing loss at 2.
Both ears, sensorineural, moderate, most likely genetic.
It was always a part of me, and not something I questioned.
I saw specialists to keep tabs on it,
and had teachers assigned to me for one-on-one times.
I was part of a kindergarten class designed for deaf kids,
to smooth integration into mainstream learning.
I got my first pair of hearing aids within the year I was diagnosed.
***
I don't remember much of my earliest years, but
I enjoyed wearing them at least since I was 5...
...or, more accurately, there were times I enjoyed playing with them.
There was hide-and-seek, where someone wore the FM transmitter,
so I'd be able to hear them a while away.
There was using the transmitter by myself,
making funny noises and messing with what I could of the volume.
There was asking my brother if he wanted to try them on.
He thought they were interesting enough.
***
I didn't like the teachers wearing the FM transmitter.
I'm not sure if it was because it didn't feel like it helped,
or if it was solely because people would see it,
which would make me stand out that much more,
but handing the transmitter just felt...uncomfortable.
I never used it during high school.
But my hearing aids were a different story.
***
I found myself asking a few friends to wear them over those years.
Each of them had things to say about it, as one might.
I saved photos of them where I could.
Isn't it weird, having photos of your friends wearing your hearing aids,
as if it were designed for their ears to wear?
Or was it simply the aesthetic, seeing a close friend
wearing the things that make up a part of you?
I only ever figured out half of that story.
***
Years pass, high school passed, Uni slipped away from me.
I no longer had contact with any of my friends.
I never was the most social person.
My hearing aids were still worn on the regular,
though some days had me wear it less.
Was I growing uncomfortable with them?
Or did I just never realise not wearing them was comfortable too?
I never go out without them, however.
I still enjoyed the look of hearing aids,
the way they sat in people's ears as they did.
***
I searched up things. Things I didn't think to look for before.
I searched up "hard of hearing" and "actually deaf".
Was I looking for more people who had hearing loss like me?
Did I want to make friends who could relate to this one aspect?
...or was I just after the appearance of hearing aids again?
In high school, I made friends with hearing loss
(though not high school friends; I was the only one at my time)
Who I had the chance to see once a year,
and keep connected with over the internet.
But they didn't last.
Why was that the case?
Was I not actually interested in deaf friends?
Did I not care beyond a certain shallow interest?
So why was I looking these things up in this way only now...?
***
...for the first time, I truly thought about my hearing.
Not my hearing aids.
My actual level of hearing.
I wondered about how I'm perceived as far as my voice goes.
I thought about if people treat me differently because of my hearing aids
(even if I'd learn later that most people don't even notice them)
I wondered how I compared to others with less hearing than average.
Feelings were produced.
I went months without searching it up again.
***
But it would not be the last time I tried.
For some reason, only now was I interested in it all...
...except, I wasn't really...was I?
I never cared strongly about others with hearing loss.
I never connected with the fully deaf.
Sign language wasn't even something that interested me much.
It was all about the hearing aids again, wasn't it?
Admittedly, it was part of something where it was just a part of it,
but that was all my mind desired to think about when it came to this.
***
...I found myself shrinking inside, an inescapable feeling growing...
I found a group chat of others with hearing loss,
hopeful it would allow me to connect with them.
People who, aside from this fact of theirs, had other similarities.
After all, we all used Tumblr. That says something on its own.
There were even one or two whose hearing was similar to mine.
...all it did was make me feel outside of it all.
...why did I want to become inside of it...?
...aren't I a part of it...don't my experiences count...?
...I already discovered I didn't really care about it in that way anyway.
...didn't I?
***
I still think about it often times,
my relationship with deafness and my hearing aids.
And my desires that sit outside of the usual connection.
I still think about my feelings of inadequacy,
as if having more hearing than another deaf person
somehow makes me less of one.
(I've never figured this one out)
I still worry about falling into the pits,
and taking it out on myself,
as if that will make me fit any more.
I don't know if these feelings will ever quite fade...
...but I've still got my hearing aids...right?
1 note
·
View note