T.T <3
I know he probably planned the meeting and all (that cunty cunty open arms pose isn't fooling anybody) BUT, IMAGINE IF HE WASN'T AND IT WAS A SPUR OF THE MOMENT DECISION
46 notes
·
View notes
You write so well. Were you once a sad child??
I suppose I was, yes.
2K notes
·
View notes
Luigi fans who hate Mario are insane because if you ever told Luigi you hate Mario he would start crying and then put his dukes up while still crying
33K notes
·
View notes
XD i really need to know what happened next xD
"What's 3 256 times 5 417,5?"
"17 639 380. What about it?"
🦆
25 notes
·
View notes
Is he trying to guess if Scrooge it's a robot or something? XD By responding correctly is Scrooge playing at his favor or not? XD
"What's 3 256 times 5 417,5?"
"17 639 380. What about it?"
🦆
25 notes
·
View notes
a helpful tutorial
I was taking with my friend about good omens and we were wondering how the hell aziraphale-as-crowley managed to get into that bath without getting his socks wet and so I drew this ‘helpful’ guide.
I like to imagine that all the demons had to just awkwardly stand around watching him clamber around getting into this bathtub… @neil-gaiman can you confirm?
127K notes
·
View notes
Is there a way to report users for posting works made with/by ai?
According to this news post from May 2023, AI works are not currently against the Terms of Service (whether that changes in the future, I have no way of knowing). In most cases, those works are not something that PAC will take action against.
Instead of reporting, I recommend you mute authors who post those works. That way you won't see them in your search results or tags in the future. To mute an author, click or tap on their username to visit their profile page, then click or tap on the Mute button you can find underneath their name.
Full text of the relevant portion of the news post is copied below. Bold is in the original.
At the moment, there is nothing in our Terms of Service that prohibits fanworks that are fully or partly generated with AI tools from being posted to the AO3, if they otherwise qualify as fanworks.
Our goals as an organization include maximum inclusivity of fanworks. This means not only the best fanworks, or the most popular fanworks, but all the fanworks that we can preserve. If fans are using AI to generate fanworks, then our current position is that this is also a type of work that is within our mandate to preserve.
Depending on the circumstances, AI-generated works could violate our anti-spam policies (e.g. if a creator posts a significant number in a short time). If you're uncertain whether a work violates our Terms of Service, you may always report it to our Policy & Abuse team using the link at the bottom of any page, and they can investigate.
This statement reflects AO3’s policy at the time of writing, as we wanted to be transparent with our users about what our current stance is and what can be done – and is being done – to mitigate scraping for AI datasets. However, these policies are also under discussion internally among AO3 volunteers. If we agree on changes to these in the future, those will be announced publicly; additionally, if there are any proposed changes to the AO3 Terms of Service, they will be made available for public comment as is required of any and all changes to our Terms of Service.
We hope that this helps to make things more clear – this is a complicated situation, and we’re doing our very best to address it in a way that doesn’t compromise AO3’s principles of maximum fanwork inclusivity or legitimate uses of the site. As discussions and approaches evolve, we will keep our users updated.
667 notes
·
View notes
Thanks Donnie 👍
(original meme under the cut:)
10K notes
·
View notes