Tumgik
#nothing against her personally
qhorinhalfhand · 11 months
Text
just found out they’re doing a beetlejuice sequel with jenna ortega playing lydia deetz’s daughter. i want to claw my eyes out this sounds like shitty fanfic
5 notes · View notes
siggytumbles · 2 months
Text
How do I unsubscribe from everything (Taylor's Version)?
0 notes
Eddie *waking up*: Did I die?
Eddie *sees Buck sleeping next to him*: Is this heaven?
Taylor *knocking on the door*: Buck, open up, it's Taylor
Eddie: Oh, god, it's hell.
507 notes · View notes
harryjpotter-shitpost · 10 months
Text
I hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate HATE hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate people who try to justify Petunia Dursley or say she was a good or “misguided” person.
243 notes · View notes
sharpbutsoft · 16 days
Text
.
41 notes · View notes
watanabes-cum-dump · 9 months
Text
For all the ppl writing fics for Fontaine characters, just know that mon is male possessive for my, but can also be used to indicate gender less as masculine is the default. Ma would be the feminine version.
Also in the case of (most) terms of endearment ex chéri (this is the most common one I’ve seen so far) add an e to indicate feminine. So ma chérie vs mon cheri
As for amour because I know I’ll be seeing that as well, that one stays mon amour don’t ask me why French is bull shit okay
Actual French speakers please feel free to correct me, my only credits are three years of French classes :)
90 notes · View notes
placeinthisworld · 3 months
Text
“you don’t get to tell me about sad” says the girlie completely and absolutely avoiding the fact that thousands of people are DEVASTATED bc their families, lives, and homes are being fucking destroyed, murdered and tortured. but she wont acknowledge any of that sadness….
45 notes · View notes
remix-of-your-guts · 4 months
Text
sorry i literally cannot stop thinking abt that post that's like "tboy music is soft ukulele indie bugs and tgirl music is mean and loud and abrasive" cuz i legitimately cannot think of any music that fits those stereotypes except cavetown and against me!... which granted are arguably the two most widely known trans artists/bands but like. come on. tell me you don't actually listen to trans music without telling me you don't actually listen to trans music. two single examples does not make a pattern even if it follows patriarchal and transphobic stereotypes my friend. broaden your horizons and move beyond "trans men are soft uwu babies and trans women are mean and scary"...... i promise you there is a beautiful world out there of transgender music and transgender people breaking stereotypes.
45 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 1 month
Text
"[Elizabeth Woodville's] piety as queen seems to have been broadly conventional for a fifteenth-century royal, encompassing pilgrimages, membership of various fraternities, a particular devotion to her name saint, notable generosity to the Carthusians, and the foundation of a chantry at Westminster after her son was born there. ['On other occasions she supported planned religious foundations in London, […] made generous gifts to Eton College, and petitioned the pope to extend the circumstances in which indulgences could be acquired by observing the feast of the Visitation']. One possible indicator of a more personal, and more sophisticated, thread in her piety is a book of Hours of the Guardian Angel which Sutton and Visser-Fuchs have argued was commissioned for her, very possibly at her request."
-J.L. Laynesmith, "Elizabeth Woodville: The Knight's Widow", "Later Plantagenet and Wars of the Roses Consorts: Power, Influence, Dynasty"
#historicwomendaily#elizabeth woodville#my post#friendly reminder that there's nothing indicating that Elizabeth was exceptionally pious or that her piety was 'beyond purely conventional'#(something first claimed by Anne Crawford who simultaneously claimed that Elizabeth was 'grasping and totally lacking in scruple' so...)#EW's piety as queen may have stood out compared to former 15th century predecessors and definitely stood out compared to her husband#but her actions in themselves were not especially novel or 'beyond normal' and by themselves don't indicate unusual piety on her part#As Laynesmith's more recent research observes they seem to have been 'broadly conventional'#A conclusion arrived at Derek Neal as well who also points out that in general queens and elite noblewomen simply had wider means#of 'visible material expression of [their] personal devotion' - and also emphasizes how we should look at their wider circumstances#to understand their actions (eg: the death of Elizabeth's son George in 1479 as a motivating factor)#It's nice that we know a bit about Elizabeth's more personal piety - for eg she seems to have developed an attachment to Westminster Abbey#It's possible her (outward) piety increased across her queenship - she undertook most of her religious projects in later years#But again - none of them indicate the *level* of her piety (ie: they don't indicate that she was beyond conventionally pious)#By 1475 it seems that contemporaries identified Cecily Neville as the most personally devout from the Yorkist family#(though Elizabeth and even Cecily's sons were far greater patrons)#I think people also assume this because of her retirement to Westminster post 1485#which doesn't work because 1) we don't actually know when she retired? as Laynesmith says there is no actual evidence for the traditional#date of 12 February 1487#2) she had very secular reasons for retiring (grief over the death of her children? her lack of dower lands or estates which most other#widows had? her options were very limited; choosing to reside in the abbey is not particularly surprising. it's a massive and unneeded jump#to claim that it was motivated solely by piety (especially because it wasn't a complete 'retirement' in the way people assume it was)#I think historians have a habit of using her piety as a GOTCHA!' point against her vilification - which is a flawed and stupid argument#Elizabeth could be the most pious individual in the world and still be the pantomime villain Ricardians/Yorkists claim she was#They're not mutually exclusive; this line of thinking is useless#I think this also stems from the fact that we simply know very little about Elizabeth as an individual (ie: her hobbies/interests)#certainly far less than we do for other prominent women Margaret of Anjou; Elizabeth of York;; Cecily Neville or Margaret Beaufort#and I think rather than emphasizing that gap of knowledge her historians merely try to fill it up with 'she was pious!'#which is ... an incredibly lackluster take. I think it's better to just acknowledge that we don't know much about this historical figure#ie: I do wish that her piety and patronage was emphasized more yes. but it shouldn't flip too far to the other side either.
23 notes · View notes
eerna · 2 years
Text
I just think that............. *gestures wildly to how Harrow experiences attraction* you know??????
#as you could probably tell by my fanart today i am having a Night#this funky repressed nun chose the object of her worship to double as her imaginary gf#she cuddles her she calls her beloved she tries to make a move on her#all completely imaginary of course. she doesn't feel any of that but likes to imagine she can feel it.#the object of her worship is also the death of god the monster he defeated once but couldnt defeat twice who resides in a tom under her home#a tomb harrow herself was conceived at the price of 200 innocent children to keep shut#she is the symbol of harrow's power as a necromancer she is the proof harrow deserves to live even if the price was so horrible#and then there's ianthe who is also a brilliant necromancer. who understands attraction at the level harrow does and uses it against harrow#how the only two times harrow even considered giving in to ianthe was when she was either at the end of her rope and insanely powerless#or when she felt at the top of her game like the powerful necromancer she is supposed to be and somehow isn't anymore#their touching is always threatening and uncomfortable and makes her feel on edge#and then there's gideon who just. has nothing to do with any of that. gideon exists on a completely different level.#she reduces alecto to ''ice lolly bimbo'' and ''big slut'' and ''bullshit dead girlfriend'' without breaking a sweat#she forgives harrow everything. things harrow had no part in and things she had. it doesn't matter she forgives it all#she holds harrow's hand she hugs her she kisses her she is REAL and the FIRST PERSON TO EVER PROPERLY TOUCH HER WITH AFFECTION#and it stuns harrow so much she is incapable of even processing it. she completely shuts down every time. we dont know how she feels aboutit#just. harrow and attraction and desire. holy shit#tlt liveblog
489 notes · View notes
qcomicsy · 5 months
Note
I just discovered your blog and I wanted to check. Does Dick/Babs count as batcest to you?
This is actually such an good question.
I think what you're actually asking is that if I would or do generally block people who ship Dickbabs and the answer is No. They weren't raised or are treated as siblings in the source material nor were ever referred by each other or by other people as such. So no dickbabs shippers are fine, I won't block them nor do I count as batcest.
Now if you're asking me personally, If I find the vibe around them weird, as someone who was also raised with the children of my parents' friends who pretty much lived in my house (yes like Dick and Babs) the answer is yes. Yes I do find it weird.
31 notes · View notes
p2ii · 7 months
Text
I feel like there's something to be said about the way fandom will treat characters who's trauma they can personally relate to Vs characters who they cant
#like obviously fandom has a thing against unpalatable victims regardless of where their trauma is from#but like#people tend to be way more understanding and compassionate to trauma that they can personally relate to or comprehend#in narutos case:#naruto struggled academically and was bullied as a child. he was alone and neglected on an emotional/domestic level#people can relate to aspects of his character despite the fantasy stuff of being a human sacrifice and part of the military and tend to car#alot more about his struggles#on the other hand the uchiha are discriminated against. sasuke is the sole survivor of ethnic cleansing/genocide. that is not something mos#people could even fathom the pain and trauma of. i mean its fucking /genocide/. and ontop of that he was essentially mind raped by his#brother. the person who he loved the most who betrayed him#and is still expected to function in a society that provides no support and continues to objectify him for his clans desirable traits#i feel like atla is also a good example#people can relate to and sympathize with the parental abuse and inadequacy/anger issues zuko deals with. and are forgiving when it comes to#his redeption arc#but when you take a character like jet. who has trauma in loosing his entire village/community and taking on a caretaker role to other#war orphans. thats not exactly a regual occurrence the average person can personally understand. his trauma is directly related to the war#and so despite him doing WAYY less shitty things than zuko. his is still demonized by the narrative. killed off and then mocked#and the fandom largely saw nothing wrong with this outcome#hama is in a similar bag but she also has the whole 'exploding apartments of pregnant women' distraction tactics added onto her#cause just showing colonialism and forced assimilation and fucking SLAVERY is bad on its own isnt enough ig#psii.txt#slavery mention#genocide mention#rape mention
50 notes · View notes
lavellenchanted · 1 year
Text
also still thinking about the fact that airk has tried so hard to be what he thinks a good man should be and that that’s basically the opposite of madmartigan (which, ouch)
and that he’s tried so hard to resist the evil of the city and the crone because he knew something wasn’t right and he only gave up after being physically broken down and almost dying of thirst multiple times
and if elora and kit can’t save him after all of that I’m going to be so mad
156 notes · View notes
stardustedknuckles · 2 years
Text
I cannot adequately express how delighted I am to learn that Yasha has literally always been ready to rumble. So many post-canon portrayals of yasha focus on an idyllic reversion to some unknown or forgotten point in her life where she was soft, or they assume that zuala was/made her soft and - actually no, she's been a sack of knuckles and the living embodiment of the fight emoji since she was what, five? Grass cloak, bare feet, will bite if provoked and also maybe if not provoked. Believes she's destined for greatness, no worries about whether she's worthy, of course she is, get out of the way. I unironically love this for her.
Soft, shy angel kiddo forced to grow up too fast had its place as headcanons went, no doubt. It would've been just as fun. But I'm thrilled that the earliest portrayal we have of Yasha, as a little kid, is just all systems go I'm Gonna Kick Your Ass. Spitting blood and absolutely indomitable, confident she knows what her life is leading to and sprinting for it.
It also provides a starker contrast to the aimless, softer version we meet in the show, after the trauma and memory loss and the time spent with Molly. He was always supportive of even her more murderous qualities and having a better understanding of who he might have glimpsed on her worst days just makes me appreciate their friendship even more. So much of her story is just finding balance and learning how to direct her own strength so nobody else can use her.
There's this perception of Yasha that she's been yearning for softness for so long and it never fit her, but now it's even clearer. She wants the CHOICE to be soft, now that she knows what that feels like - now that she understands what it is to feel safe. But no part of her has ever been incongruent with violence or distasteful of her abilities. She revels in her strength, she values the things she can do with her power, and she's found herself in a place where she can have it all. Forcing her into the box of soft passivity post-canon does her just as many favors as her being forced into the brutal violence box for so long. The point is the choice - for both. Some part of her will always be ready to throw down, no questions asked, and she didn't spend all that time learning how to find her own will and re-embrace her terrifying strength just to give it up. She has the option to rest, and resting is all she's asked for. A break. A breather, time to soak in this new way of living. But she's unapologetically wired for and good at absolutely beating things into a pulp, and a better grasp on when that's appropriate does not cancel out her pride in doing so.
470 notes · View notes
kcciny · 10 months
Text
Straight fgo Bros should not be allowed to like proto Merlin, tell me why I just saw them call her “breedable loli version of Merlin”
62 notes · View notes
lieutenant-amuel · 5 months
Text
People always justify “awkward quirky teenage girls” by saying what teenage girl would not be awkward and quirky as if all teenage girls are the same.
20 notes · View notes