[ID: Brennan as The Beast saying, "Everyone you ever knew who told you that they would keep you safe as long as you behaved were already hurting you. end ID]
ok fine.
5K notes
·
View notes
the hiram/hermione/veronica/archie stuff is so wild.. like literally how are we supposed to take this if not as textual confirmation that hermione sees herself as having to compete with ronnie for hiram's affections and furthermore that she sees archie as a threat to them both simply because he's not a woman? the princess can never be let into the throne room but archie gets invited there on first meeting for a chat with hiram "man to man"... the simple fact of his gender grants him easy access to a level of intimacy with hiram that hermione has been trying to claw back to no avail for months.
at the beginning of the episode you think she's warning ronnie and archie off for their own safety when she tells them to steer clear of hiram and in this moment it's revealed that she's actually been acting in her own self-interest in an attempt to neutralize a perceived threat to her relationship with hiram. she's beefing with sixteen year olds. her ops are children
35 notes
·
View notes
Colonialism may be best described as the formal political domination of one country by another in which the relationship between the two nations is always one of economic exploitation, although the dominant nation may pretend otherwise.
— Jerry Kloby, "The Legacy of Colonialism," in Beyond Borders: Thinking Critically about Global Issues, ed. Paula S. Rothenberg (New York, NY: Worth Publishers, 2006), 99–106.
5 notes
·
View notes
actually the way to solve all of The Twice-Dead King's problems was for Zultanekh and Djoseras to steal Oltyx out of Sedh, then for the two hothead princes to spearhead an operation to oust Unnas and Hemiun, so that Djoseras wouldn't have to violate his own personal code and die. Zultanekh and Djoseras should then have gotten married, and elevated Oltyx as co-ruler (because he has the most progressive ideas), so they could all serve as one extremely happy triumvirate. This plan involves Djoseras being normal and a lot of wishful thinking and telling Anathrosis of the Black Star to go fuck herself, which is not something I'm sure anyone is capable of doing, but imagine
26 notes
·
View notes
misc thoughts about klaus & leah
How Klaus feels about Leah is complex but at the same time probably one of his most simple sibling bonds. She left in the midst of chaos and she has continued to evade him better than anyone else ever could. Majority of it is her being able to get away before he can get to her but part of it is him not really being certain he wants to get to her. It differs greatly from his relationships with his other sisters and for once, it is mostly due to the other person rather than him.
He played a very large part in why she wanted to leave, but ultimately, the strain on their relationship is due to her constantly running. It isn’t as if they never see each other throughout the centuries, but he always lets her get away in one way or the other.
(While she’s capable of getting away, if he truly tried to stop her, he could very much so overpower her).
A huge difference in how she was able to leave and Rebekah almost never is, happens to be when she left. It was in the midst of Mikael possibly descending upon them and Kol was causing trouble, which left Leah as a blind spot, and he was so preoccupied with everything else that his anger with her was left churning for a while.
The thing about Leah is that for a very, very, very long time, her greatest sin against Klaus was that she left. The others (bar Finn), over time, did other things that left him angry, but his anger was Leah was stagnant almost.
One huge thing, though, is that he has always been afraid she would run into Mikael. Not because he’d kill her, but because he’d tell her the truth about Esther, and for a while, that keeps him from wanting her to come back, honestly.
He hates her for leaving. He’s glad she stayed away. She’s scared of him. She’s scared for him. They’re sort of strangers, sort of siblings.
5 notes
·
View notes
what rules about claudia being a child vampire is like. the whole 'family' dynamic is based on denying claudia because she's 'the baby' except that the being a vampire of it all completely voids all the usual excuses that are trotted out to justify the typical (mis)treatment of children by their families... for example, children are expected to physically restrain themselves, ostensibly so they don't get hurt. yet the fragility associated with youth doesn't apply to claudia, and both louis and lestat tell her not to run in the house anyway; the rule is revealed as being grounded not in child safety but in the comfort and preferences of adults.
everything that might be said about claudia's physical weakness or vulnerability is annulled by her vampirism; everything that might be said about her being lesser because she is a fledgling is pretty much equally true of louis, who for the decade of experience he has on her seems to have very little vampire knowledge to show for it. and she owes louis and lestat no kin-based loyalty or deference because for all they say they are her parents, they did not birth or raise her and she did not ask to be turned! she is a "child" but without any of the associated conditions which usually conspire to fix children in their traditional roles; and once the excuse provided by those traits is gone, all that remains is the desire for control and the willingness to enforce that control with violence.
all the perfect hypocrisy of parenthood is on display; lestat admonishing claudia for unsubtle killings when he famously loves to do like. murder-based performance art, both louis and lestat refusing claudia a mate of her own despite neither of them being able to come up with a good reason for denying her other than 'because i said so.' and for all that claudia's behavior is framed by both louis and lestat as her 'acting out' for one reason or another, they never manage to come up with even one convincing explanation as to why she should not be allowed to do exactly as she pleases. who are they, after all, to tell her what to do?
556 notes
·
View notes
archie's rapid s2 descent into outright vigilantism is kind of a meme at this point but i do think it bears repeating that at bottom his frantic urgency stems directly from the fact that he knows the cops and the mayor aren't going to do anything meaningful to stop the violence. it is this utter lack of faith in adult institutions, which comes directly off the back of the mishandled investigation and exposed corruption of s1, that makes him feel the need to take matters into his own hands. in a lot of ways, archie's night watch is the flip side of the coin that is betty and jughead's teen detective squad; woefully misguided though his efforts are, they come from an accurate assessment of the political landscape in riverdale, shared by many of the town's teens, which leads them to conclude rightly that the town's adults will not keep them safe and are in fact likely implicated in what's going on.
43 notes
·
View notes
Peter Pan's status is not, therefore, that of a children's book, but rather that of a concept or class—the whole category of children’s literature out of which all these other stories are produced. A convenient way of sidestepping everything which constitutes the fundamental illegibility of Peter Pan.
— The Case of Peter Pan: Or the Impossibility of Children's Fiction, Jacqueline Rose
11 notes
·
View notes
wait okay i need to ask genuinely because I'm not understanding very well. i promise im trying not to be rude
but how are mspec/bi/pan lesbians valid/a thing?
Lesbian quite specifically means "woman who loves women", therefore, someone who loves men or someone who identifies as a man, couldn't be a lesbian? It feels like stealing the term from... lesbians, does it not?? "words are just words, gender is made up" but these terms, these words, they do hold meaning, don't they? They were made for a reason, after all. Lesbians feel a bit... pushed out when it comes to certain things sometimes, if that makes sense. I'm a lesbian myself and I sincerely feel like this label isn't "just a word" really and this invites male-aligned people into our space. We made these words so that we can describe ourselves, not even just lesbian, more words than that of course. Most, it not all identities, were named so that we could put words to our identity. for us thats women who love women. I'm not fully educated, and I'm open to it, and sorry for ranting but the term just does... bother me a little.
most of my friends, who also identify as lesbian, agree to this sentiment, and I do feel it's important to listen to wlw who say these things, we feel pushed out of our own space by people who could very well have their own space without taking a word we have always used to identify ourselves and mixing it to have a different meaning.
I’m not really good for this type of question as I myself do not fully understand(mostly because I am not of that minority specifically)but I get using labels that might be strange to others to explain yourself which is why I’m open and greatly love people who use them as well
you might wanna ask someone who does actual research and has a big understanding about it I could recommend some if you wish I know a bi lesbian blog that could help or you could search some up as well
sorry I can’t help but as someone who doesn’t have first hand experience I feel like I can’t really give a good one
but I think they’re valid because gender can be complicated and so can sexuality and I think if people truly feel that these labels fit them then so be it
I’ve noticed most people who use these terms are mostly people with more genders
or with different romantic and sexual attraction
or or they themselves are a system with multiple different people in there
or or or it can be for people with preferences as well
doesn’t mean they have to be of that to use em but it’s the most common
I personally think if you truly feel that you are this thing
then you are
gender and sexuality are all about feelings are they not?
and these terms were made to explain feelings and emotions we ourselves back in the day could not understand isn’t that true?
so….why not in my opinion
I’m sorry if it makes you uncomfortable but that might be an issue you yourself need to solve other then that I can’t give much else
also also how have y’all felt pushed out of your own space as far as I know mspec lesbians have their own?
as do male lesbians so how have you been pushed out of your own space?
I think you have some stuff to figure out but that you can do in your own time
though you again could find some help in the spaces and blogs I’ve talked about
either way I hope you find whatever your looking for
and I thank you for trying to understand and for being brave enough to ask even with your complicated and pretty strange views
1 note
·
View note