Tumgik
#Roland Manuel
genevieveetguy · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Remorques, Jean Grémillon (1941)
6 notes · View notes
homosexual-newsboy · 1 year
Text
I really like seeing peoples opinions so
55 notes · View notes
mrjoeiconis-blog · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
youtube
13 notes · View notes
stateofsport211 · 1 year
Text
RG MS Q2: Hamad Medjedovic def. Juan Manuel Cerundolo [4] 6-3, 3-6, 6-3 Match Stats
Tumblr media
📸 France TV Sport
Medjedovic had to dig deep for this one. Juanma found his range from the baseline, but several errors under pressure toward the end of the third set could not sustain his moment. This was apparent from the break point conversion rate, where he had 14 opportunities to break, but Medjedovic could materialize 50% of his chances (5/10) thanks to his service game clutchness and balanced power trying to drive Juanma off the balance.
Speaking of Medjedovic’s clutchness, even if he had a risky service game with only winning 36% of his points from his second serves (blame the 7 double faults), he was able to score 9 aces and won 12% more points from his first serves even if he only landed 63% of his first serves. On the other hand, Juanma’s reliance to the second serves often led to some shot rushes to finish, hence Medjedovic stepped in and took the whole match.
The third qualifying round will be juicy tomorrow as Medjedovic will face Jesper de Jong, who earlier defeated Norbert Gombos 6-3, 7-5. Knowing Jesper’s clay form, which is also interesting with several deep runs (exemplified in Girona and Rome (IT) Challengers), this could be an absolute grinding festival to see which one went the deepest in the return. Should be a fun one, with those going more aggressive could prevail.
0 notes
mundillotaurino · 2 years
Text
Saint Gilles présente les cartels de sa Féria 2022
Saint Gilles a présenté les cartels de sa Féria 2022
L’empresa ToroPasion de Pierre Henry Callet et Julien Miletto, a présenté les cartels de la Féria de la Pêche et de l’Abricot 2022 de Saint Gilles. La Féria aura lieu le 20 et 21 août avec une novillada à six ganaderias du Sud Est et une corrida de Juan Manuel Criado. Le Dimanche matin, Saint Gilles accueillera la finale du Bolsin de Nîmes Métropole. Les cartels de la Féria de Saint Gilles…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
kaitcreates · 3 months
Text
The Shadohunter Chronicles Character Showdown
First Round, Second Round
Rosemary Herondale vs Arthur Blackthorn, (Feb 23)
Celine Montclaire vs Diego Rocio-Rosales, (Feb 24)
Maureen Brown vs Anna Lightwood, (Feb 25)
Christopher Lightwood vs Ragnor Fell, (Feb 26)
Julian Blackthorn vs Livvy Blackthorn, (Feb 27)
Bridget Daly vs Jon Cartwright, (Feb 28)
Nate Grey vs Sona Carstairs, (Feb 29)
Gabriel Lightwood vs Madeleine Bellefleur, (Mar 1)
Paige Ashdown vs Rupert Blackthorn, (Mar 2)
Valentine Morgenstern vs Kraig, (Mar 3)
Andrew Blackthorn vs Irene, (Mar 4)
Axel Mortmain vs Thais Pedroso, (Mar 5)
Kit Herondale vs Ke Yi Tian, (Mar 6)
The Dark Sisters vs Filomina di Angelo, (Mar 7)
Lucie Herondale vs Simon Lovelace-Lewis, (Mar 8)
Shiyun Jung vs Cameron Ashdown, (Mar 9)
Elias Carstairs vs Tavvy Blackthorn, (Mar 10)
Luke Greymark vs Will Herondale, (Mar 11)
Ash Morgenstern vs Matthew Fairchild, (Mar 12)
Sophie Collins vs Jaime Rocio-Rosales, (Mar 13)
Catarina Loss vs Tessa Grey, (Mar 14)
Jessamine Lovelace vs Woolsey Scott, (Mar 15)
Diana Wrayburn vs Magnus Lightwood-Bane, (Mar 16)
James Herondale vs Jesse Blackthorn, (Mar 17)
Sebastian Morgesnstern vs Ty Blackthorn, (Mar 18)
Julie Beavul vs Tatiana Lightwood, (Mar 19)
Meliorn vs Helen Blackthorn, (Mar 20)
Alexander Lightwood vs Arawn, (Mar 21)
Jace Lightwood-Herondale vs Michael Wayland, (Mar 22)
Raphael Santiago vs Kieran Kingson, (Mar 23)
Marisol Garza vs Hypatia Vex, (Mar 24)
Dru Blackthorn vs Ari Bridgstock, (Mar 25)
Eugenia Lightwood vs Bat Velasquez, (Mar 26)
Eliza Rosewain vs Rafael Lightwood-Bane, (Mar 27)
Anush Joshi vs Seelie Queen, (Mar 28)
Church vs Cecily Herondale, (Mar 29)
Annabel Blackthorn vs Robert Lightwood, (Mar 30)
Beatriz Mendoza vs Malcolm Fade, (Mar 31)
Jocelyn Fairchild vs Max Lightwood-Bane, (Apr 1)
Imogen Whitlaw vs Jem Carstairs, (Apr 2)
Mother Hawthorn vs Chairman Meow, (Apr 3)
Manuel Casales-Villalobos vs Barbra Lightwood, (Apr 4)
Cordelia Carstairs vs Benedict Lightwood, (Apr 5)
Divya Joshi vs Lily Chen, (Apr 6)
Patrick Penhallow vs Alastair Carstairs, (Apr 7)
Isabelle Lightwood vs Mark Blackthorn, (Apr 8)
Amatis Greymark vs George Lovelace, (Apr 9)
Maryse Lightwood vs Elliott, (Apr 10)
Alexei de Quincey vs Elyas the Demon, (Apr 11)
Hodge Starkweather vs Henry Branwell, (Apr 12)
Camille Belcourt vs Auraline, (Apr 13)
Aline Penhallow vs Roland Loss, (Apr 14)
Johny Rook vs Stephen Herondale, (Apr 15)
Rayan Maduabuchi vs Alec Lightwood-Bane, (Apr 16)
Esme Hardcastle vs Jordan Kyle, (Apr 17)
Grace Blackthorn vs Evelyn Highsmith, (Apr 18)
Jia Penhallow vs Charles Fairchild, (Apr 19)
Horace Dearborn vs Max Lightwood, (Apr 20)
Emma Carstairs vs Mina Carstairs, (Apr 21)
Charlotte Fairchild vs Aloysius Starkweather, (Apr 22)
Janus Herondale vs Zachary Carstairs, (Apr 23)
Gwyn ap Nudd vs Clary Fairchild, (Apr 24)
Maia Roberts vs Gideon Lightwood, (Apr 25)
Thomas Lightwood vs Cristina Mendoza-Rosales, (Apr 26)
30 notes · View notes
margareturtle · 4 months
Text
Sacrifices in TWP (we have to prepared)
(I don’t hate (most of) these characters they are just possibilities to be prepared)
Fairchild: Jocelyn (she’s a grandma)
Lightwood: Maryse (the Lightwood curse—only possible lightwood)
Rosales: Diego (look I love him,, but their is the Inquisitor curse and if he is inquisitor…)
Herondale: Janus (ONLY JANUS—tho maybe Thule!Kit also if he exists idk 😭)
Mendoza: Beatriz (she’s simon’s friend — rip george and jordan,, also she lives in New York so she’s closer to him now)
Dearborn: ZARA (SEEYA YOU WON’T BE MISSED—and Julian Blackthorn doesn’t do mercy a second time)
Villalobos: Manuel (also won’t be missed)
The Seelie Queen (this one feels inevitable tbh with Ash and Kit and all)
Nene (she’s not very relevant, but it would still be sad for Mark and Helen— I could see her dying to protect Kit or Ash as well possibly)
Thule!Raphael (I’m sorry, I can just see him being like eww no I would never die for Magnus and then dying for Magnus or Lily a second time 😭)
Catarina Loss (I could also see her dying to protect Kit, bc of his connection to Roland Herondale)
Ashdown: Cameron (if he died for Thule!Livvy for some reason I would actually perish)
Ghost!Livvy: (I don’t think we will lose another Blackthorn—we can’t,, but I don’t think Ghost!Livvy is gonna stick around)
Adaon (idk I feel like he might be assigned to protect Ash or smth and die in a fight or smth)
Thule!Simon (if he’s alive and some super powerful Vampire or smth)
Pedroso: Marina (Thais’ mom,, ngl feels like everyone who still has a mom in TWP won’t by the end of it 😭—but I will stay hopeful for Thais’ mom at least)
31 notes · View notes
sneezilla · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
I drew this at the end of December/beginning of January and debated posting this, but figured fuck it. This is TF related. Thomas is a Roland Juno 106 Synthesizer and Guy-Manuel is a Roland TR 909 Drum Machine. Both were used extensively in their early works. Styled in a blend of G1 and TFA! Long rant about both DP and TF, feel free to skip!:
2023, for me, was the year of the robot. Early last year I listened to DP's entire discography, and while in the middle of listening to HAA their 10 year remaster of RAM released. Since then, the entirety of this year has been dedicated to house music. They've always had a special place in my heart, as I was familiar with their standout hits (Get Lucky, Harder Better Faster Stronger, Robot Rock, etc.) but I never took the time to delve in deep. I finally had the time while on a trip with some friends. It's surprising how enjoyable it is to listen to Around the World while stuck in a van with others for hours at a time. Now, whenever people think about me, they think of that song. An earworm that entire week for sure. I remember in June when they released Infinity Repeating. A friend sent me the article of it, and I remember bawling my eyes out while listening to it. Several times, in fact. They were my number one listened to artist last year. I had almost 60k minutes listened, and out of that, I spent 7.7k of those on DP alone. Discovery was my number one album, 196 plays. While not my number one song (just missing the mark by one play), I listened to Face to Face 142 times. All of that is on apple music alone.
When I came back from that trip, I was reminded of Transformers. I, as many youngish people at the time, grew up with the Bay films. I also had the TFA game on my DS, and watched G1 a few times thanks to my little brother, but I definitely wouldn't say it was a core piece of my childhood. I binge watched the Bayverse movies, watched TFA, then TFP, then Earthspark, then G1, then intermittently read the comics (still ongoing with that one), tried watching RID 2015 (couldn't get through it, sorry) and then Cyberverse. All in the span of a few months. It's another thing people know me for, now. Not just in real life, but my online presence here is attached to it. In just this half a year interacting online I've met some amazing people. There's definitely other things to say, like how I know more about Transformers than my dad that grew up watching G1, or how I fondly recall painting my best friends nails while watching the 86 movie (his brother hates when men paint their nails, we wanted to prove a point). There's so many things I could say about this year, how incredibly humbling but exciting it was, how much I've grown and learned this year. But I want to say thank you. To both everyone I've met and everyone that's read this far. Here's to another!
11 notes · View notes
lepartidelamort · 2 months
Text
Comprendre la contre-insurrection des démocraties juives en vue de la guerre contre la Russie
 La présence des forces de l’#OTAN en Ukraine n’est pas impensable. J’apprécie l’initiative du président Emmanuel Macron, car il s’agit que Poutine ait peur, et non que nous ayons peur de Poutine.
Tumblr media
La nouvelle majorité homo-féministe au pouvoir en Pologne à trois priorités : intensifier l’immigration non-blanche, imposer l’anal à l’école et déclarer la guerre à la Russie. Bref, faire ce que font les démocraties juives occidentales en général.
Ce Sikorski est le nouveau ministre des Affaires étrangères polonais et, comme vous le voyez, il se consume d’impatience à l’idée de voir la Pologne débitée en morceaux par la Russie.
C’est certainement un penchant BDSM qu’ont les Polonais.
Tumblr media
Sikorski avait déjà été ministre des Affaires étrangères entre 2007 et 2014. À ce poste, il avait participé au putsch de 2014 à Kiev aux côtés de la CIA.
La seule chose qu’il y a à savoir sur Sikorski, c’est l’identité de sa femme : la juive Ann Applebaum. Elle est notamment membre de l’Atlantic Council, la vitrine politique de l’OTAN chargée de coordonner les gouvernements fantoches des démocraties.
L’Atlantic Council est dirigé par 7 ex-directeurs de la CIA.
Tumblr media
Anne Applebaum
On l’a retrouvée dans diverses initiatives secrètes de la CIA et de son bras militaire qu’est l’OTAN via le MI6 britannique. Notamment une, depuis Londres, qui consistait à déployer la censure militaire sous un vernis civil pour contenir toute opposition, l’Integrity Initiative.
En 2018, les agents des cellules de ce réseau britannique chargée de la guerre psychologique ont été identifiés.
Voici les agents de la zone France :
Francoise Thom
Jusin Vaisse (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Thomas Bertin (Secrétariat général de la défense et de la sécurité nationale)
Caroline Gondaud (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Guillaume Schlumberger (ministère de la Défense)
Raphael de Lagarde (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Roland Galharague (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Martin Briens (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Jean-Christophe Noel (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Laurent Rucker (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Alexandre Escorcia (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Nikola Guljevatej (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
David Behar (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Claire le Flecher (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Remy Bouallegue (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Paul Zajac (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Nicolas Roche [email protected] (commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives)
Manuel Lafont Rapnouil (European Council on Foreign Relations)
Laurent Rucker (ministère de la Défense)
Patrick Hardouin
Etienne de Durand (ministère de la Défense)
Janaina Herrera (ministère des Affaires étrangères)
Ces cellules étaient activées pour déclencher des campagnes médiatiques contre des cibles politiques réputées « pro-russes », catégorie très flexible où tout opposant aux menées des juifs était classé.
Si un membre d’une cellule apprenait qu’une cible devait mener une action, il alertait les autres membres de la cellule. Ceux-ci informaient les médias, tous sous contrôle gouvernemental, puis lançaient une campagne sur Twitter, à l’époque sous le contrôle de la CIA.
Un exemple en Espagne :
Tumblr media
C’est comme ça que l’information – la désinformation donc – fonctionne vraiment dans les démocraties. Récemment, c’est Dominique de Villepin qui en a été la victime.
Tumblr media
Cette opération particulière s’inscrivait dans le déploiement dans l’ensemble des pays de l’OTAN d’un système militaire clandestin de contrôle politique des masses par l’usage combiné des réseaux sociaux, des médias conventionnels, de divers agents d’influence, d’organisations, de structures gouvernementales.
Avec la victoire de Trump en 2016, le gouvernement américain, et les juifs qui le contrôlent, ne s’attendait pas à affronter une réelle révolution non-violente, par la voie électorale. Le principal problème que pose Trump à l’oligarchie en place est son opposition, sinon active au moins passive aux guerres que veut ce système.
Toute victoire populaire selon les règles du jeu en vigueur est désormais qualifiée de « populiste », c’est-à-dire d’illégitime. La CIA a donc mis au point la technique de la contre-révolution de couleur. Elle consiste à accuser le vainqueur légitime d’une élection d’avoir perdu l’élection tout en truquant le suffrage. Il faut préventivement censurer la contestation avant la tenue des élections et mobiliser l’appareil médiatique pour l’écraser.
En 2019, en préparation des élections américaines de 2020, la CIA et l’armée américaine ont mis en place la censure verticale de toutes les plateformes occidentales. C’est pourquoi à l’époque, subitement et de manière coordonnée, des tas de personnes ont été censurées sur Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, etc., y compris en France.
Même Trump en a été la cible. LCI, la chaîne de l’OTAN, comme tous les médias sous contrôle, justifiait cette opération de contre-insurrection clandestine.
Tumblr media
Après la victoire de Trump en 2016, le gouvernement américain, largement dominé par les juifs, a en fait déployé sur le territoire des USA le système des « révolutions de couleur » que la CIA n’employait alors qu’à l’étranger, comme à Kiev en 2014.
Tumblr media
Ils ont perfectionné le système en créant des techniques de « contre-révolution de couleur ».
Une révolution de couleur est une fausse révolution populaire organisée par la CIA via l’internet, des ONGs, les médias occidentaux, des agents infiltrés, etc., pour renverser un gouvernement jugé hostile par le gouvernement US.
La CIA accuse un gouvernement ennemi de truquer l’élection du moment, d’organiser parallèlement des rassemblements de masse, souvent au prétexte de concerts, de générer des violences de rue et de faire tomber le gouvernement avec l’aide des partis et figures présélectionnées.
Le dernier exemple a eu lieu en Biélorussie. Parmi les techniques employées, l’usage extensif des femmes et des réseaux sociaux, le tout amplement relayé par la machine de guerre médiatique occidentale.
Tumblr media
Une contre-révolution de couleur utilise les mêmes méthodes, mais pour défendre un gouvernement au lieu de le détruire.
Cette technique a été employée par la CIA, le Pentagone, la NSA, le FBI, les ministères de la Justice, de la Sécurité Intérieure, des Affaires étrangères en 2020 pour empêcher Trump d’être reconduit à la Maison Blanche.
Il ne suffisait pas de truquer les élections, il fallait empêcher que l’opposition puisse s’organiser. Pour cela, il fallait étroitement contrôler les réseaux sociaux où ils s’organisent.
C’est pourquoi Obama, lors de son dernier déplacement en Grèce en novembre 2016, alors qu’il était encore président, avait déclaré que la raison de l’élection de Donald Trump était à rechercher dans les « fake news ».
Ce terme, jamais entendu auparavant, était une fabrication de la CIA pour délégitimer l’élection de Trump, l’accuser d’être un agent russe et paralyser son action politique, ainsi que toute opposition.
Tumblr media
Dans le cadre de cette opération de contre-insurrection globale, des « fact checkers » astrosurfés par les GAFAM ont été sélectionnés par la CIA et ses différents états vassaux pour mener le travail de désinformation et de censure sur les réseaux sociaux.
Soudainement, tous les médias français se sont alors dotés de « fact checkers ». Ce n’est pas une « incroyable convergence des esprits », mais le résultat d’une opération de guerre psychologique dirigée depuis Washington.
Qui se souvient des « décodeurs du Monde » et de tous leurs équivalents déployés dans chaque média ?
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Nous retrouvons les juifs Mendès et Reichstadt dans ce travail de censure sous couvert de lutte contre la « désinformation ». Peu importe l’agenda du système – élections US, Covid, guerre en Ukraine – ils sont déployés pour organiser la censure des réseaux sociaux. Avec l’arrivée de Musk, l’accès de la CIA à Twitter a cependant été largement réduit et leur capacité de nuisance largement diminuée.
Là où en 2022, Mendès pouvait désigner un compte à supprimer, il ne peut plus que s’en lamenter au pied de son mur aujourd’hui.
Tumblr media
Le Covid et les mensonges d’état qui l’ont accompagnés ont largement discrédité ces « fact checkers » sous-traitant pour l’OTAN.
Tumblr media
À l’époque, nous avons également vu surgir à l’extrême-droite des gens se revendiquant de « l’anti-conspirationnisme » et adopter automatiquement des positions pro Pfizer, pro Ukraine. Ne cherchez pas trop loin qui les prend en mains.
Le parlement américain a publié un rapport sénatorial sur ce dispositif contre-insurrectionnel mis en place par la CIA pour truquer les résultats d’une élection nationale américaine.
Cette méthode sera à nouveau utilisée en 2024 par le gouvernement américain pour tenter d’empêcher Trump d’être élu, mais sans le contrôle de la CIA sur Twitter, l’opposition pourra s’organiser. La riposte de la CIA devra être beaucoup plus directe, donc beaucoup plus brutale et surtout, visible.
Le putsch est déjà en cours.
John Brennan, ex-directeur de la CIA, ancien membre du Parti Communiste des USA, explique que les services de renseignements américains (CIA, NSA, FBI, etc..) ne coopéreront pas avec Trump, que ce soit légal ou non.
Irréel ! L’ancien directeur de la CIA, John Brennan, déclare à MSNBC que la communauté du renseignement cachera des informations clés à Trump après qu’il aura accepté l’investiture républicaine cet été. Nous devons mettre la communauté du renseignement au pas. Il s’agit d’un canular russe 2.0, écrit en toutes lettres.
Tumblr media
La guerre civile est ouverte aux USA et elle deviendra inévitablement violente à la faveur des élections de novembre 2024 quand le gouvernement fédéral interviendra pour empêcher la réélection de Donald Trump.
Anne Applebaum et Radek Sikorski sont au coeur de cette machine qui fait la guerre, tant intérieurement qu’extérieurement, à toutes les forces qui constituent un obstacle, que ce soit volontairement ou non. Face au blocage du soutien à l’Ukraine au Congrès par les Républicains, Macron, comme fantoche de cette machine juive globale, est mandaté pour prendre le relais jusqu’en novembre 2024, le temps que Trump soit écarté de la Maison Blanche et que le Congrès soit neutralisé.
Cela implique une mobilisation autoritaire et verticale de l’opinion française contre la Russie par les agents d’influence usuels et la délégitimation de l’opposition à la guerre comme une « cinquième colonne » aux ordres de Moscou. Typiquement, l’accusation de « trahison » avec l’habituel usage du patriotisme de comptoir pour clore la discussion.
Le système dispose à cet effet d’agents bellicistes, tant à droite qu’à gauche, pour attaquer l’opposition (non-juive) à la guerre.
La situation est effectivement révolutionnaire, avec une jonction de plus en plus forte entre l’effort de guerre des démocraties juives contre les adversaires systémiques extérieurs et celui qu’elles poursuivent contre ceux de l’intérieur. Du point de vue du système, il n’y a pas de différence qualitative. Si le système perd la guerre en Ukraine, il anticipe un affaiblissement systémique qui renforcera les forces d’opposition intérieure qu’il qualifie de « populiste ». Pour cette raison structurelle, plus le temps passe, plus il devient impossible, de son point de vue, de distinguer entre la Russie, l’Iran et, par exemple, un électeur RN ou LFI.
Il faut se préparer à une possible, sinon probable, censure de guerre des moyens de communication à partir de 2024.
Nous appelons nos lecteurs à participer à l’agitation révolutionnaire en désignant l’ennemi aux masses par voie de tractage. 
6 notes · View notes
Note
Did Robespierre supported the September massacres?
In a speech to the Convention held on November 5 1792, Robespierre said the following regarding his part in the massacres that had taken place two months earlier:
Those who have said that I had the smallest part in [the September massacres], are either excessively credulous or excessively perverse; as for [Louvet] who, counting on the success of the defamation of which he had arranged the whole plan in advance, thought he could then claim with impunity that I directed them, I would content myself with abandoning him to remorse, if remorse did not suppose a soul. I will say, for those whom the imposture could have led astray, that before the massacres began, I had ceased to frequent the general council of the commune, since the electoral assembly of which I was a member had begun its sessions. I learned what was going on in the prisons only through general rumours and later, no doubt, than did most citizens; for I was either at home, or else in those places to which my public duties called me.
It can however he established that he’s wrong when claiming he ceased to frequent the Paris commune before the massacres began — he is proven to have been present and intervened in debates there already on the evening session of September 1, the day right before the start of them. He was also there on the morning session of September 3, and was then, together with Deltroit and Manuel, tasked with going to the Temple to ”ensure tranquility,” making you wonder if his claim to only have been informed of the massacres through ”general rumours” it too is a post construction. Finally, Robespierre was also present at the commune during the evening session of September 2, when the following is recorded to have happened:
MM. Billaud-Varenne and Robespierre, developing their civic feelings, paint the deep pain they feel over the current state of France. They denounce to the General Council a plot in favor of the Duke of Brunswick, whom a powerful party wants to bring to the throne of the French.
The ”powerful party” here is obviously the Girondins. Exactly which of them the denounciation was aimed at is hard to know, but the next day Brissot could nevertheless report the following:
Yesterday, Sunday, I, as well as parts of the deputies of the Gironde, and other equally virtuous men, was denounced at the Paris Commune. We were accused of wishing to hand over France to the Duke of Brunswick, of having received millions from them, and of having concerted ourselves to go to England to save ourselves. Citizens, I was denounced at ten o'clock in the evening, and at this time they were slaughtering in the prisons... This morning, around seven o'clock, three commissioners of the Commune came to my house... for three hours, they examined, with all possible care, all my papers.
Both Prudhomme and Pétion claimed Danton saved Roland from an arrest warrant issued against him during the massacres, which undoubtly sounds like it could be related to Billaud and Robespierre’s denounciation. On September 25, Vergniaud did in his turn accuse Robespierre ”of implicating him, Brissot, Guadet, Lasource etc. in the complot denounced at the commune on September 2.” Robespierre did however deny this to have been the case both then and on November 5:
They have dared, by an atrocious comparison, to insinuate that I had wished to compromise the safety of some deputies, by denouncing them to the commune during the executions of the conspirators. I have already responded to this infamy, recalling that I had ceased to go to the commune before these events, that it was no more given to me to foresee the sudden and extraordinary circumstances which brought them about. Must I tell you that several of my colleagues before me had already denounced the persecution plotted against the commune by the two or three people we are talking about, and this plan to slander the defenders of freedom and to divide the citizens at the moment when it was necessary to unite their efforts to stifle the conspiracies of the interior and to push back the foreign enemies? But what is this dreadful doctrine that denouncing a man and killing him are the same thing! In what republic do we live, if the magistrate who, in a municipal assembly, explains freely about the authors of a dangerous plot, is no longer regarded as anything but a provocateur to murder!
Historians on Robespierre’s side have suggested he might not have heard of the massacres yet (Ward, Maximilien Robespierre: a study in deterioration) or even that the denounciation was made before they had begun (McPhee, Robespierre: a revolutionary life). I’m however having a hard time believing the second theory could be true if Robespierre and Billaud made their statement late in the evening. The question of what exactly Robespierre was trying to do here has already been analyzed in this old post, so you can check that out for further discussion.
Looking over the interventions Robespierre is confirmed to have made before and during the massacres, it can be observed that there’s nothing suggesting he encouraged or supported them nor anything implying he condemned or tried to stop them. According to Pétion, Robespierre did however still contribute to things turning out the way they did through his own influencial attitude, and in his Discours de Jérôme Pétion sur l’accusation intentée contre Maximilien Robespierre, released two months after the massacres, he described the following encounter the two had had during it:
The surveillance Committee launched an arrest warrant against Minister Roland; it was the 4th (September), and the massacres were still going on. Danton was informed of it, he came to town hall, he was with Robespierre; […] I had an explanation with Robespierre, it was very lively. I tell him: “Robespierre, you are doing a lot of harm; your denunciations, your alarms, your hatreds, your suspicions, they agitate the people; explain yourself; do you have any facts? Do you have any proof? I fight with you; I only love the truth; I only want freedom.” [the two then launch into a long argument over Robespierre’s suspicions regarding Brissot that Danton at last has to break up].
In her memoirs, Charlotte Robespierre too talks of a meeting between her brother and Pétion regarding the massacres, but in her version it is instead is the former who accuses the latter of doing a lot of harm. Some have suggested this meeting is the same Pétion is describing above, though if that’s the case I wonder why he doesn’t mention Charlotte anywhere in his account (as well as why Robespierre would even bring his sister with him when going to discuss political matters in a city where a prison massacre is currently taking place…)
A few days after the events of 2 and 3 September, Pétion came to see my brother. Maximilien had disapproved of the prison massacres, and would have wanted each prisoner to be sent before judges elected by the people. Pétion and Robespierre conversed on these latest events. I was present at their interview, and I heard my brother reproach Pétion for not having interposed his authority to stop the deplorable excesses of the 2nd and 3rd. Pétion seemed piqued by this reproach, and replied dryly enough: All I can tell you is that no human power could have stopped them. He rose some moments later, left, and did not return. Any kind of relations ceased, from this day, between him and my brother. They did not see each other again until the Convention, where Pétion sat with the Girondins and my brother with the Mountain.
An article written in 1960 by Gabriel Pioro and Pierre Labracherie wanted to dismiss Charlotte’s story as they could see no reason for her to be in Paris in early September 1792, almost a whole month before her younger brother was elected to the National Convention and the two went to the capital for that reason. Though I suppose it’s not impossible for Charlotte to have gone to visit Maximilien beforehand, or that she’s simply very generous with what she describes as ”a few days.”
Charlotte’s description of her brother as horrified by the massacres nevertheless seems rather well confirmed by what Louis Blanc in his Histoire de la Révolution française (1869) reports Robespierre’s doctor Joseph Souberbielle to have told him decades after the fact:
When he had recovered from his emotion a little, Doctor Souberbielle told us, among other particulars which will find their place in this book, that Robespierre had never spoken to him of the September days but with horror, and that one day he exclaimed before him, apropos of Ronsin's barbarism: Blood! Always blood! Ah! They will end up drowning the Revolution in it, the unfortunates!
But regardless of what his private feelings might have been, the public Robespierre never once denounced the massacres, instead accepting them as regrettable but necessary. November 5 was the day he spoke the most about them, arguing that they had been the inevitable sequel to the Insurrection of August 10, and that to condemn one would therefore be to condemn the other. He also argued that, if it was self-evident that what had happened had been awful, the sympathy felt for the thousand something killed in the prisons was better given to the millions of people who had perished under the Ancien Régime:
To form a just idea of ​​these events, one must seek the truth, not in the writings or in the slanderous speeches which distorted them, but in the history of the last revolution. If you thought that the movement imprinted on people's minds by the insurrection of the month of August had entirely expired at the beginning of September, you were mistaken; and those who have sought to persuade you that there was no analogy between one and the other of these two epochs have pretended to know neither the facts nor the human heart. 
The day of August 10 had been marked by a great combat, of which many patriots, and many Swiss soldiers, had been the victims. The greatest conspirators were saved from the wrath of the victorious people, who had consented to place them in the hands of a new tribunal, but the people were determined to exact their punishment. However, after convicting three or four lesser culprits, the criminal tribunal lazed off. Montmorin had been absolved, Depoix and several conspirators of this importance had been fraudulently released. Great claims of this kind had transpired; and new proofs of the tribunal conspiracy grew every day; almost all the patriots who had been wounded at the Tuileries died in the arms of their Parisian brothers; bullets taken from the bodies of several Marseillois and several other Federals were placed in the office of the Commune; indignation was in all hearts. 
However, a new and much more important cause brought the fermentation to its height. A great number of citizens had thought that the day of the 10th had broken the threads of royal conspiracies, and regarded the war as ended, when suddenly the news spread through Paris that Longwi had been taken, that Verdun had been taken, and that at the head of an army of a hundred thousand men, Brunswick advances towards Paris. No stronghold separates us from the enemies. Our divided army, almost destroyed by the betrayals of Lafayette, lacked everything; it was necessary to think at the same time of finding arms, camp effects, provisions, and men. The executive council concealed neither its fears nor its embarrassment. The danger was great; it seemed greater still. 
Danton presents himself to the Legislative Assembly, vividly shows them the dangers and the resources, urges them to take some vigorous measures, and gives a great impulse to public opinion. He goes to city hall and invites the council-general to ring the tocsin. The council-general of the commune feels that the fatherland can be saved only by the prodigies which enthusiasm for liberty alone can give birth to, and that all of Paris must be set in motion to run to meet the Prussians. It rings the tocsin to tell all citizens to pick up arms; it obtains it for them through all its means of power; the alarm cannon thundered at the same time; in an instant, 40 000 men are armed, equipped, assembled, and marching towards Châlons... In the midst of this universal movement, the approach of foreign enemies awakens the feeling of indignation and revenge which smolders hearts against the traitors who had called them. Before abandoning their hearths, their wives and their children, the citizens, the conquerors of the Tuileries want the punishment of the conspirators that they have been promised so many times; one runs to the prisons... Could the magistrates arrest the people? For it was a popular movement, and not the partial sedition of a few scoundrels paid to assassinate their fellows, as has been ridiculously supposed. If it had not been so, how could the people not have prevented it? How could the National Guard, how could the Federals have made no movement to oppose it? The Federals themselves were there in large numbers. We know the vain requisitions of the Commander of the National Guard; we know the vain efforts of the commissioners of the Legislative Assembly, who were sent to prison. 
I heard some people tell me coldly that the municipality should proclaim martial law. Martial law, approaching enemies! The military law, after the day of the 10! Martial law, for the accomplices of the dethroned tyrant, against the people! What could the magistrates do against the determined will of an indignant people, who opposed to their speeches the memory of its victory, the development with which it was about to rush to meet the Prussians, and who blamed the laws themselves for the long impunity of the traitors who would destroy the bosom of their fatherland. Unable to induce them to rely on the tribunals for the care of their punishment, the municipal officers urged them to follow the necessary forms, the object of which was not to confuse the culprits whom they wished to punish with the detained citizens foreign to the August 10 conspiracy; and it is the municipal officers who exercised this ministry, the only service that circumstances allow of rendering to humanity, who have been presented to you as bloodthirsty brigands! The most ardent zeal for the execution of the laws can justify neither exaggeration nor calumny; I could cite here, against the declamations of M. Louvet, a non-suspicious testimony; it is that of the Minister of the Interior, who, while blaming popular executions in general, did not hesitate to speak of the spirit of prudence and justice which the people (that was his expression) had shown in this occasion. What did I say ? I could quote, in favor of the council-general of the commune, M. Louvet himself, who began one of his posters with these words: "Honor to the council-general of the commune, it rang the tocsin bell, it saved the fatherland.” This was at the time of the elections.
It is said that an innocent person perished; the number has been exaggerated; but one alone is doubtless one too many. Citizens, let us mourn this cruel mistake. We have mourned him for a long time; he was a good citizen, they say, so he was one of our friends. Let us mourn even the guilty victims, reserved for the revenge of the laws, who fell under the sword of popular justice; but let your pain have an end, like all human things. 
Let us save a few tears for more touching calamities. Weep for a hundred thousand patriots immolated by tyranny; mourn our fellow citizens expiring under their burning roofs, and the sons of citizens massacred in the cradle, or in the arms of their mothers. Have you not also brothers, children, wives to avenge? The family of French legislators is the fatherland; it is the entire human race, minus the tyrants and their accomplices. Weep then, weep for the humanity beaten down under their odious yoke; but console yourself if, imposing silence on all vile passions, you want to ensure the happiness of your country and that of the world; console yourself if you wish to recall exiled equality and justice to earth, and get rid, by just laws, of the source of the crimes and misfortunes of your fellows.
The sensibility that groans almost exclusively for the enemies of liberty is suspect to me. Stop waving before my eyes the bloody robe of the tyrant, or I will believe you want to put Rome back in chains. Seeing the pathetic depictions of the catastrophe of the Lamballes, of the Montmorins, of the consternation of bad citizens, and these furious declamations against men known in the completely opposite way, did you not think you were reading a manifesto of Brunswick or of Condé? Eternal slanderers, do you want to avenge despotism? Do you want to brand the cradle of the republic? Do you want to dishonor in the eyes of Europe the revolution which gave birth to it, and supply arms to all the enemies of liberty? Truly admirable love of humanity, which tends to cement the misery and servitude of peoples, and which hides the barbarous desire to bathe in the blood of patriots!
Finally, on January 20 and February 4 1793, Robespierre also opposed a suggestion to pursue ”the provocateurs, authors, accomplices and adherents of the murders and banditry of September 2 and 3 1792.”
19 notes · View notes
all-my-worlds-a-stage · 8 months
Text
Song Tag
rules: pick a song for each letter of your url and tag that many people.
thanks for tagging me @fallingforfandoms oh boy, this took me a while. 17 is a lot of songs (as you might have noticed 😅)
A - Air - Till Brönner
L - Love of my Life - Queen
L - Let them Talk - Hugh Laurie
M - Mackie Messer - Hildegard Knef
Y - Yesterday - The Beatles
W - Would You Be So Kind - dodie
O - One-Trick Pony - Nelly Furtado
R - River - Joni Mitchell
L - Leichter - Madsen
D - Dear Theodosia - Lin-Manuel Miranda
S - Stairway to Heaven - Led Zeppelin
A - Achterbahn - Bläck Fööss (aus gegebenem Anlass 😅)
S - Space Oddity - David Bowie
T - Time Warp - Richard O'Brien
A - American Idiot - Green Day
G - Gute Nacht Freunde - Reinhard Mey
E - Egoist - Roland Kaiser/Roman König (zu guter Letzt for funsies und für meine fellow Wilhelmine Klemm enthusiasts 😌)
tagging (probably not 17 people and, as always, feel free to ignore <3) @shutyoureyes7 @somevaliantdust @kathastrophen @cricrithings @anotherobsessedfangirl @gleamingsilence @khalaris @bluespring864 @cornchrunchie @carlomenzinger @iiiflow and I can't think of any more people just now 😅
10 notes · View notes
the-lighthouse-lit · 10 months
Text
Nine people tag
Thank you for tagging me, @aether-wasteland-s!!
I'm tagging: @murieltheawful @badbunny139 @wond-las @paladin-of-nerd-fandom65 @lilytimbers @callmeartistofthesea @clownpri @shellshader and @blushroomx! But no pressure!
Last song: Save me by Mamamoo+ (dropped a few hours ago and already melted into my soul ❤️)
Last movie: I lost my body. 10/10 I’d recommend, with the warning that it gets gory at times.
Currently watching: Kajillionaire, I’m loving it so far! It hurts a lot! Also Ōoku: The Inner Chambers, which is excellent👌
Currently reading: Whoa, okay. Great Expectations by Charles Dickens, A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again (the one essay, not the book of essays of the same name) by David Foster Wallace, Bomarzo by Manuel Mujica Láinez, Foundation by Isaac Asimov, Camera Lucida by Roland Barthes, and History of Color Photography by Joseph Solomon Friedman. (by ‘currently reading’ please understand it’s only in the way one can be said to ‘be reading’ a dictionary)
Currently craving: honestly I had birthday cake yesterday and I’m having ravioli today, so nothing. Maybe ice cream, because it’s too cold for it and I miss it
Last thing searched: how to correctly write all those ^ author names because I’m too lazy to get up and double-check with the actual books in my room
11 notes · View notes
stateofsport211 · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
📸 🎥 France TV Sport
…Medjedovic turned the tide again thanks to patiently absorbing Juanma’s pace from the baseline, driving him further off the balance. Interestingly, the third set started with the overpowering contest, with Juanma visibly standing further back from the baseline. This might be paid off at the start, where Juanma rushed Hamad’s forehand to break early 1-0, only to be broken back 1-1 right after.
Juanma then had his chances by equalizing the point to Medjedovic’s serve to 2-2* first deuce. However, Medjedovic’s double fault was seen fumbled another game point, as well as the mis-utilization of the empty space (with a forehand down-the-line error) before he held to 3-2. Unfortunately, after holding his service game, he had to take a medical timeout.
In the subsequent game, Medjedovic had some break points, where he finally broke at the expense of Juanma’s backhand error. Holding his service game to 5-2 after, it took two consecutive holds for him to win the match, serving it out almost smoothly (by holding to 15), hence he took the third set 6-3 and won the match altogether, securing him the third qualifying round spot.
0 notes
linkles-art-blog · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
Just as with the artwork made for his brother’s birthday, although Chuuya’s birthday on April 29th has long passed us by, I still wanted to finish the original WIP artwork that I had posted to celebrate the occasion — and here it is: the next installment of finished artwork in this Chibi Cherish artwork series.
I really do love making these cute little arts, and I hope that y’all enjoy them a whole lot, too. ^-^
Do not repost this artwork anywhere without my explicit permission or claim it as your own. See F.A.Q.s for details. ��
Songs I listened to while drawing this:
My Cherish Playlist (the public and currently only partial version of which you can listen to here.)
Other songs mostly unrelated to the vibe that I also listened to:
Angel Eyes by Christine Baranski, Julie Walters and Amanda Seyfried
7 years by Lukas Graham
Why Did It Have To Be Me? by Josh Dylan, Lily James, and Hugh Skinner
Knowing Me, Knowing You by Jeremy Irvine, Lily James, Pierce Brosnan, and Amanda Seyfried
Knowing Me, Knowing You by ABBA
Arms by Christina Perri
In the Bedroom Down the Hall by Rachel Bay Jones and Jennifer Laura Thompson
Good for You by Rachel Bay Jones, Kristolyn Lloyd, Will Roland, and Ben Platt
Words Fail by Ben Platt
Grow As We Go by Ben Platt
I wanna love you but I don’t by Ben Platt
Older by Ben Platt
Run Away by Ben Platt
Ease My Mind by Ben Platt
Airplane Mode by Hayd
What Did I Do? by Hayd
“a Hayd playlist because they’re underrated” playlist by AethericTwine.
Dear Theodosia by Leslie Odom Jr. and Lin-Manuel Miranda
Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Tells Your Story by Original Broadway Cast of Hamilton
It's Quiet Uptown by Renée Elise Goldsberry, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Phillipa Soo, and Original Broadway Cast of Hamilton
Your Obedient Servant by Leslie Odom Jr. and Lin-Manuel Miranda
Wait for It by Leslie Odom Jr. and Original Broadway Cast of Hamilton
18 notes · View notes
arvonoon · 9 months
Text
I like you, have this unorganised list of character names I’ve accumulated
Moxxi
Crash
Warden
Fawn
Samuel
Mack
Lacey
Georgia
Clarissa
Fredrick
Bonnie
Chime
Florence
Gregory
Kyler
Quincy
Paula
Emmet
Jack
Larry
Victor
Liam
Henry
Kich
Tambre
Eurypterid
Blithe
Jubilant/Jubilee
Barchan
Argent
Billow
Zephyr
Axel
Lyle
Leif
Ace
Grey
Alizarin
Arylide
Bleu
Sienna
Umber
Carmine
Carnelian
Celeste
Celadon
Cordovan
Crimson
Fuchsia
Cairo
Otto
Briggs
Colby
Rocco
Rory
Brielle
Emery
Oaklee
Vienna
Frankie
Aubriella
Clementine
Charli
Piper
Saffron
Cleo
Luz
Clover
Delphinium
Dogwood
Filbert
Hollyhock
Hyacinth
Magnolia
Mimosas
Mugwort
Mallow
Nosegay
Orchid
Cattleya
Osmunda
Ophir
Phlox
Rhododendron
Wisteria
Zinnia
Agate
Malachite
Topaz
Onyx
January
April
May
June
August
Jasper
Rosaline
Tourmaline
Lotte
Camibeth
Lillian
Parsley
Belliana
Moonbow
Bush
Zippy
Wyrd
Amaranth
Amberjack
Oribi
Joyce
Wilby
Leto
Jett
Dahlia
Harriet
Hilda
Loretta
Maude
Molly
Phoebe
Rook
Mallard
Auk
Kagu
Cashew
Yale
Yara
Sunny
Yvonne
Yoland
Yonder
Zora
Zaire
Zuri
Nifty
Breezy
Finicky
Gaud
Ampersand
Yogh
Wynn
Ethel
Hoosier
Jamie
Kaira
Fox
Hale
Orla
Rielle
Raine
Sabrina
Indigo
Axton
North
Augury
Alchemy
Sanguine
Florid
Chroma
Saffron
Ochre
Sepia
Tawny
Henna
Ecru
Lichen
Plumose
Beryl
Fir
Conifer
Creek
Rivulet
Bourn
Rill
Spate
Monsoon
Sleet
Sirocco
Graupel
Morass
Jovian
Presley
Clint
Helge
Reggie
Rosine
Cyrus
Bowie
Atlas
Phoebe
Hannah
Aster
Sirius
Leo
Jupiter
Neptune
Kara
Prima
Freyr
Freyja
Vili
Ymir
Ananke
Erebus
Gaea/Gaia
Theia
Arete
Bia
Corus
Zelos
Angelos
Charon
Hecate
Arke
Addax
Alk
Hemlock
Belladonna
Agave
Chervil
Laurelf
Verbena
Gazania
Amaranth
Holly
Snapdragon
Alyssum
Dicentra
Clarkia
Clematis
Bob
Rome
Chester
Arien
Granger
Yarrow
Eranthus
Aconite
Snowgum
Josephine
Aria
Adele
Agatha
Juno
Livvy
Marissa
Nerida
Noelle
Pandora
Simone
Wren
Verity
Georgina
Roxanne
Camille
Addison
Vince
Kei
Erin
Drew
Dakota
Morgan
Marley
Kingsley
Salem
Parker
Darrian
Vireo
Ocelot
Maxton
Raleigh
Zyrille
Pangea
Narah
Enzo
Aubade
Aureate
Kalon
Paralian
Serein
Mycelium
Reishi
Agarikon
Godfrey
Hughes
Rolfe
Keld
Howe
Mell
Liard
Lockram
Nacre
Nim
Nisus
Nivial
Nyala
Ingle
Inkhorn
Iridal
Iroko
Ixora
Rach
Rorulent
Russet
Genevieve
Urushiol
Cullet
Herman
Regent
Towser
Joyce
Gail
Dale
Goldie
Mildred
Irene
Leroy
Marian
Alvin
Milton
Leona
Roland
Leslie
Loretta
Hattie
Lottie
Vivian
Vera
Vance
Sloane
Elkhorn
Caligo
Achlys
Cecilia
Mila
Rufus
Cassia
Marius
Canigula
Lutrine
Astaroth
Arcturus
Cygnus
Cetus
Baxter
Correa
Marianna
Daphne
Ciar
Myra
Reuben
Rhoda
Manuel
Lori
Beverly
Colby
Elias
Brody
Colton
Mulberry
Myrrh
Myrtle
Holm
Valonia
Aleppo
Corsican
Leuke
Rhodon
Karya
Datura
Petra
Enoch
Ada
Adelaide
Edith
Argent
Iain
Maskrey
Alston
Bingley
5 notes · View notes
byneddiedingo · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Michèle Morgan and Jean Gabin in Remorques (Jean Grémillon, 1941) Cast: Jean Gabin, Madeleine Renaud, Michèle Morgan, Charles Blavette, Jean Marchat, Nane Germon, Jean Dasté, René Bergeron, Henri Poupon, Anne Laurens, Marcel Pérès, Marcel Duhamel. Screenplay: Jacques Prévert, André Cayatte, based on a novel by Roger Vercel. Cinematography: Armand Thirard. Production design: Alexandre Trauner. Film editing: Yvonne Martin. Music: Roland Manuel. Remorques features Jean Gabin at his most effortlessly rugged and romantic, playing André Laurent, the captain of a tugboat that rescues distressed ships and is paid a percentage of the assessed value of their salvaged cargo. He's happily married to the delicate Yvonne (Madeleine Renaud), who longs for him to give up the hazardous work and retire to a less stormy port. Still, André is also devoted to his longtime crew and is reluctant to leave them to the mercies of the company's management. One stormy night they go out to rescue a ship whose captain, Marc (Jean Marchat), is a nasty piece of work. Among other things, he has a very unhappy wife, Catherine (Michèle Morgan), who manages to escape from the ship in a lifeboat that is picked up by André and his crew. When the storm begins to subside, Marc breaks the towline that is pulling his ship to shore and heads to the port of destination under his own steam, thereby depriving André's tug of its share of the rescue money. But André has salvaged something else from the rescue: Catherine, to whom he is attracted at the peril of his marriage. As their relationship heats up, however, Yvonne becomes seriously ill. Director Jean Grémillon makes the most of this blend of action and romance, keeping it from sinking into mush by leavening things with solid supporting performances and providing a piquant, bittersweet outcome. Remorques was made under difficult circumstances as France fell to the Germans, and was not released until after its stars, Gabin and Michèle Morgan, had left the country for Hollywood.
3 notes · View notes