Tumgik
#Develop Ai Image Art Generator App
digiprima · 1 year
Text
lensa's Secrets To Building An Ai-enhanced Image Art Generator App
Tumblr media
An AI Image Art Generator app uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms to transform ordinary photos or images into stylized, artistic interpretations. These apps often offer a range of filters, effects, and editing tools that allow users to apply different styles and techniques to their images, such as watercolor, oil painting, sketching, and more.
Using these apps, users can quickly and easily create visually stunning images that look like hand-drawn or painted artwork without needing any artistic skills or expertise. AI Image Art Generator apps are increasingly popular, particularly among social media users and digital artists who want to enhance and showcase their visual content in a unique and creative way.
Develop An Ai Image Art Generator App Like Lensa:
Developing an AI Image Art Generator app like Lensa involves several steps and requires expertise in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and mobile app development. Here is an overview of the process:
1. Define the Requirements: The first step is to define the requirements and features of the app. You should determine the type of art styles you want to offer and how users will interact with the app.
2. Collect and Prepare the Data: You need a large dataset of images to train your AI model. The dataset should include images of different styles and genres. You will need to preprocess the data to remove noise, normalize the images, and extract features.
3. Train the AI Model: Once you have prepared the data, you need to train your AI model. You can use popular deep learning frameworks like TensorFlow or PyTorch to build and train the model. You should test and validate the model to ensure that it can generate high-quality art.
4. Develop the App: After training the AI model, you need to develop the mobile app. You can use popular mobile app development frameworks like React Native, Flutter, or Xamarin to build the app. You will need to integrate the AI model into the app and develop the user interface and user experience.
5. Test and Launch: Before launching the app, you should test it thoroughly to ensure that it works as expected and is bug-free. Once you have tested the app, you can launch it on app stores like the App Store or Google Play Store.
6. Maintain and Update: After launching the app, you need to maintain and update it regularly. You should fix any bugs and add new features based on user feedback.
How does an AI art generator app work?
An AI art generator app uses machine learning algorithms and neural networks to analyze and transform images into various artistic styles. Here is a general overview of how an AI art generator app works:
1. Preprocessing: The image is first preprocessed to enhance its quality and remove any noise or distortion.
2. Feature Extraction: The app uses convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to extract features from the image. The CNNs detect various patterns and structures in the image, such as edges, shapes, and colors.
3. Artistic Style Transfer: The app uses a technique called neural style transfer to transform the image into an artistic style. This involves using a pre-trained neural network that has learned the characteristics of a particular artistic style, such as Van Gogh's Starry Night or Monet's Water Lilies. The app then transfers these style characteristics onto the original image, resulting in a new image that combines the content of the original image with the style of the chosen artistic style.
4. Post-processing: The final image is then post-processed to refine the artistic style and enhance the overall visual quality.
There are several benefits of using AI image generators, such as:
I. Time-saving: Creating an artistic image from scratch can take hours, if not days, even for experienced artists. AI image generators can create similar images in a matter of seconds or minutes, saving time and effort.
II. Consistency: AI image generators can produce consistent results, unlike human artists who may produce different results even when working on the same image.
III. Accessibility: AI image generators can make the creation of artistic images accessible to a wider audience. People without any formal training or skills in art can use these apps to create beautiful images.
IV. Creativity: AI image generators can inspire creativity by allowing users to experiment with different styles and techniques. Users can explore new styles and push the boundaries of traditional art.
V. Efficiency: AI image generators can help businesses create visually appealing graphics and images for their products and services more efficiently. This can help reduce costs and increase productivity.
0 notes
dotitioo · 9 days
Text
0 notes
intelvueofficial · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
The metaverse is expected to witness a number of noteworthy developments in 2023 that will change people's interactions with digital environments. The rise in popularity of immersive virtual reality (VR) experiences is one notable development. Users can now interact in metaverse situations with a heightened sensation of presence, blurring the boundaries between the real and virtual worlds, as VR technology becomes more widely available and sophisticated. Applications for anything from social events and group workspaces to learning and entertainment platforms have exploded as a result, providing us with a peek into a time when virtual experiences will be effortlessly incorporated into our everyday lives.
Additionally, the metaverse is witnessing a surge in decentralized and blockchain-based applications. NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) have gained traction as a means of establishing ownership and authenticity of digital assets within the metaverse. This has sparked a creative economy, where artists, developers, and content creators can monetize their digital creations. Moreover, blockchain technology is facilitating secure transactions, enabling virtual worlds to have their own economies and ecosystems. This shift towards decentralization not only empowers users but also fosters a sense of community-driven governance within the metaverse, setting the stage for a more inclusive and user-centric digital landscape.
METAVERSE TRENDS
0 notes
lindwurmkai · 6 months
Text
hey, have you heard that pillowfort has ✨ drafts ✨ now? (as in, the ability to save your posts as drafts.) they're still working on the queue feature (update: it's done!), but drafts are a big step forward!
in case you missed it so far, pillowfort is like a cross between tumblr and dreamwidth/livejournal, with a simplified dashboard reminiscent of old school tumblr and some classic livejournal features such as communities, threaded comments, and the ability to make individual posts followers-only or mutuals-only.
what are communities? basically, central hubs for posts about any subject you want that, unlike hashtags, can be moderated. they may have rules, such as "[subject matter] must be tagged" for example. you can post directly to a community or reblog existing posts to it!
since the site is currently experiencing some financial trouble, i thought i'd help out by spreading the word once again.
edit: the fundraiser was a success! crisis averted! i knew we could do it :D
why you should give pillowfort a chance:
no ads
no venture capitalist funding
no spying on the users
completely free to use except for optional premium features
nsfw is allowed except for sexual depictions of minors. if you're unsure what exactly that means, their tos may help
communities and the privacy controls mentioned above are excellent features
great community, low drama compared to other websites (so far)
the site's features themselves encourage genuine connection and good-faith conversation over endless "discourse"
every blog can automatically be filtered by original posts only or reblogs only
reasons not to join:
if you enjoy algorithmic social media. there is no algorithm at all
if you want to post or look at machine-generated art. they're still finalising the wording and personally i hope some exception will be made for models trained on ethically sourced images, but basically an anti-AI rule is in the works (update: finished!)
if you cannot live without reblog additions (reblogging with comment). all discussions on a pillowfort post take place in the comments section, and only your own followers see your tags. this has its pros and cons for sure! a similar feature to scratch that itch may be implemented in the future, but it will never be exactly like on tumblr.
if you need everything to be an app. the website works fine in a mobile browser and a progressive web app will hopefully be released soon (basically it's like an app in your browser and on mobile these can be added to the homescreen like real apps i think? they have push notifications!), but there's not going to be a native app available through official app stores due to the restrictions of those stores.
other factors to consider:
yes, the userbase is still small. depending on your interests, activity may be very slow. but we can change that! and on the plus side, reblogging your post to a community is a good way to easily get more eyes on it; way more effective than simply adding tags imo
the site culture is a bit different than on tumblr. many people read everything that's been posted since the last time they were online and don't follow more users/communities than they can keep up with. it's still somewhat lacking in shitposts and heavy on "essays" but don't be afraid to post whatever 😅
there are no blog themes like we have them on tumblr as yet, but you can customise your blog's colours and use html/insert links and images in your blog description
likes literally do nothing except to let OP know you enjoyed their post. you can't look at a list of all your likes. beware!
the staff is small and development is slow. some highly anticipated planned features other than the aforementioned queue include: - multi-account management - dashboard filters/reading lists - post bookmarking (since likes don't work that way) but we don't know how soon any of those will be implemented.
there is a user-developed browser extension (well, a userscript) called tassel available that adds additional features much like tumblr's beloved xkit :)
✨ okay, so how do i sign up? ✨
if you're interested but confused by the sign-up process or still under the impression that you need to pay to sign up (false), i'll put some clarifications and invite codes under the read more below. plus a note on donating, premium features, the paypal issue etc.
in a nutshell:
it's free
signing up without an invite code is possible, but you may have to wait a short while - supposedly less than an hour atm. just submit your email to the waitlist
if you don't feel like waiting, you can either use an invite code from an existing user or pay $5 to sign up instantly
every user gets plenty of invite codes and we're all willing to hand them out at the drop of a hat. they're really not hard to come by
some invites to get you started (just click the link):
invite 1 ▪ invite 2 ▪ invite 3 ▪ invite 4 ▪ invite 5
invite 6 ▪ invite 7 ▪ invite 8 ▪ invite 9 ▪ invite 10
invite 11 ▪ invite 12 ▪ invite 13 ▪ invite 14 ▪ invite 15
invite 16 ▪ invite 17 ▪ invite 18 ▪ invite 19 ▪ invite 20
i'll try to periodically check if any have been used and cross those out.
...paypal issue?
ok so paypal doesn't like working with sites that allow nsfw. as a result, you need a credit card in order to donate to pillowfort, buy one of those insta-registration keys, or subscribe to premium features*. i personally happen to have a credit card and would be willing to help out anyone who trusts me enough to send the money to me via paypal, but i realise chances are only my friends will do this.
some users are currently organising various activities for the purpose of letting people who only have paypal contribute to the site's survival. it's not super relevant for new users and won't get you access to premium features, but i thought i'd mention it anyway in case someone loves the concept of the site so much they want to support it immediately. a fundraising community has been created to collect posts of that nature!
*premium features are strictly limited to two categories of things:
fun little extras that no one truly needs
higher image upload limits, because obviously big images take up bandwidth and are therefore a reason for increased costs
you will never need to pay for vital accessibility features or anything of the sort. :)
243 notes · View notes
what-eats-owls · 1 year
Text
I had some thoughts about paying to feed your face into a generator built on unpaid work used without consent. Transcript and links under the cut.
So let’s talk about AI art, and how incredibly unsafe y’all are being with it.
First, most of these apps, including the avatar makers, are developed using a generator called Stable Diffusion that was trained on LAION 5B, a database containing 5 billion pictures scraped off the internet, including illustrations from deviantart and pinterest. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable_Diffusion#Training_data
It also contains thousands of images of patients scraped from private medical records. And the database creators have refused to remove them or take any responsibility. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/09/artist-finds-private-medical-record-photos-in-popular-ai-training-data-set/ 
Many artists have spoken up about how unethical it is to use their work without their consent to make an art generator that is now being used for paid products. These generators wouldn’t exist without the work of thousands of artists around the world, but they never gave permission for their images to be used this way, they can’t opt out, and they are not getting paid even for apps that charge *you* to use them.
Maybe that’s enough to change your mind about the “magic avatars” and “time travelling portraits.” But I get that they’re fun, and frankly, people will overlook a lot of harm when they’re having fun. Which brings us to the “find out” part of this video.
When you are giving these apps 10-20 pictures of YOUR FACE, where in the terms of service does it say they won’t sell those pictures to police surveillance companies? https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/18/technology/clearview-privacy-facial-recognition.html
When you are giving them your face, where in the TOS does it say they’re responsible if their databases get hacked? If their data is used to impersonate or stalk you? https://thenextweb.com/news/people-using-facial-recognition-app-stalk-adult-actresses 
Where in the TOS does it say your face can’t be used by companies training AI to help genocide? https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-55634388 
Where in the TOS does it say your face will not be sold to a service that will splice you into porn? https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/09/13/1035449/ai-deepfake-app-face-swaps-women-into-porn/ 
That will create an on-demand version of you for strangers to assault? https://vocal.media/viva/why-are-men-creating-ai-girlfriends-only-to-abuse-them-and-brag-about-it-on-reddit 
And you are giving some of them your payment info? You are giving all of them 10-20 pictures of your face? 
They don’t care about the people whose work makes their generators possible. Why do you think they’re going to care about you?
262 notes · View notes
realcleverscience · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
Can't believe this was the state of the art for AI generated images from text prompts in 2016, just 7 years ago. (x)
Now we can easily make images like this:
Tumblr media
Similarly, AI video and AI music have been pretty terrible but are starting to get pretty dang good. (I would particularly recommend trying out the Suno app, which at this point can create some pretty decent music at the click of a button. I was having a blast playing with it last night.)
And most importantly, the pace of AI advancements are speeding up. Part of that is that our tech is getting better (e.g. advanced Nvidia chips). Part of it is that research into AI is growing rapidly. e.g.
Tumblr media
And part of it is that AI is helping to develop both better chips and more research, creating a positive feedback loop.
Lastly, I often hear people mocking AI and its shortcomings but it seems pretty dumb to me. Sure, AI has limitations, but it is improving exponentially. To quote the first law of papers: "Do not look at where we are, look at where we will be two more papers down the line".
17 notes · View notes
gramophoneturtle · 26 days
Text
Update/Pinned Post
Welcome to my art archive. I've posted a lot about my OCs, TWEWY, Persona 5, Xenoblade X and in other fandoms.
Unfortunately due to recent-ish changes on Tumblr I no longer feel comfortable posting here much or at all. I'll keep my blog up for the foreseeable future or maybe even forever because of how Tumblr stores data. I'd rather have the link back to the source.
Or if the other sites explode in the meantime.
This has nothing to do with the date sadly. I'm just at my limit.
Here's where you can find me:
Pillowfort: gramophoneturtle. The most artist respected place and a decent long form blogging place.
Neocities: I'm currently developing an art archive on neocities over here. This will be THE archive place, one day! With RSS, one day!
Bluesky: gramophoneturtle. Twitter replacement. I don't trust it but it's meshing with me more than mastodon. Stream announcements are here b/c I ran out of energy for crossposting.
cohost: gramophoneturtle. I don't trust it'll stay but it has both a draft system & can save alt text on draft edits. Wild stuff to praise but when porting art out of Tumblr, it's helpful to have new drafts.
Twitch & YouTube: I stream weekly on Twitch and store VODs on both. Twitch has all my VODs and YouTube has VODs from Fall 2023 and onwards.
More details, pros and cons about each site below for those who are curious. Thanks for sticking around and reading.
Pillowfort
It's user funded and transparent about the breakdown of funds
They're against generative AI. Their reinforcement came out around the time Tumblr's not-really-against-it stance came out. This is huge to me.
They're working on a PWA of the site so it will have a way to function like a smartphone app
Image post options aren't great but you aren't limited to 4 (unlike cohost - kinda, and Bluesky)
Alt text gets eaten if you edit a post currently which is awful. (Tumblr used to do this.) Alt text isn't an option for picture type posts but is for text posts with pictures. But hey at least you can include alt text!
Communities are nice for fandoms and stuff. You can search by tags but you don't follow tags, you join/watch communities.
They have funding for the next 6 months past any month that was fully funded. So as of April 1, 2024, funding should last until (the end?) of October if they were to not get any more donations/subscriptions from now on. Basically, they have a 6 month buffer and so far for 2024 they've been keeping it and maintaining their monthly funding goals
Neocities
Home page URL should not change but artwork URLs might
The artwork section is inspired by Tumblr's archive page/system. I don't think I want it to be exactly like it (might be a limitation of static pages re: tag filtering) but I want to try and partially make it
Artwork on there have been nightshaded and glazed. I would like to reglaze some pieces that are too glazed for my liking, now that I have a better computer for it (so it doesn't take forever). That's why not a lot of art is on there yet
I might go into detail about how I automated some of the web dev stuff to make my life easier on my my main blog. In summary: I'm using 11ty (eleventy), generating pages from data and templates, using github for version control and github actions for updating the site automatically
Bluesky:
Feeds are cool. I've found and made (through SkyFeed) a lot of Feeds. Feeds can look for text in posts and alt text, and/or specific tags. Can filter out reblogs or replies. Can work off of user lists. Can include/exclude specific posts - like Twitter Moments. There's a lot of flexibility and filtering.
Feeds can lookback anywhere from 25 hours to 1 week when not looking at one user. So when pulling from many users, you could just get the latest updates. For one user (say your own gallery of whatever) you're allowed to go back to the beginning, it can be your art gallery. And then people can just follow that feed so you don't have to worry about your art getting buried if people just want to follow your art
There's a setting you can turn on to warn and prevent you from posting until you add alt text. I love this. Especially since, like Twitter, you can't go back and edit a post
Forcing ALT text has the added bonus of leaving it last so I can double check tags and text in case I accidentally hit the post button before I'm ready
Twitch
There is art. And VTuber stuff. And life updates. Art/project updates. Lots of OC talk. Like I wish I could post more about Null considering how much stuff I've spoken about them on stream but freaking time! And energy.
YouTube
Used to do more Timelapses but stopped because laptop was not having fun with it. Now that I have a new computer it might be better!
Also has Twitch VODs because I want another place to back up VODs since local recordings take up a lot of space. And I can mark Chapters(/Moments?) timestamps to find stuff again.
Special thank you to those that made it all the way down here!
So what is the blog for now? Archiving, mainly, as I said at the beginning. I might link to my neocities page in maybe art updates or to pillowfort. And I might need a place to fall back to if the other sites don't last. I know bluesky and cohost are not much better/probably not better in other ways so I know that posting on them probably won't be good long term.
But that's why I'm working on the art archive site on the side. I'll always have a safe and controlled place where I can have all my art and details and stuff. It's gonna take a while and it's challenging but it's what I feel like I gotta do now.
I'm just so tired.
8 notes · View notes
benetnvsch · 8 months
Text
ADDRESSING TWITTER'S TOS/POLICY IN REGARDS TO ARTISTS AND AI
Hi !! if you're an artist and have been on twitter, you've most likely seen these screen shots of twitters terms of service and privacy policy regarding AI and how twitter can use your content
I want to break down the information that's been going around as I noticed a lot of it is unintentionally misinformation/fearmongering that may be causing artists more harm than good by causing them to panic and leave the platform early
As someone who is an artist and makes a good amount of my income off of art, I understand the threat of AI art and know how scary it is and I hope to dispel some of this fear regarding twitter's TOS/Privacy policy at least. At a surface level yes, what's going on seems scary but there's far more to it and I'd like to explain it in more detail so people can properly make decisions!
This is a long post just as a warning and all screenshots should have an alt - ID with the text and general summary of the image
Terms of Service
Firstly, lets look at the viral post regarding twitter's terms of service and are shown below
Tumblr media Tumblr media
I have seen these spread a lot and have seen so many people leave twitter/delete all their art/deactivate there when this is just industry standard to include in TOS
Below are other sites TOS I found real quick with the same/similar clauses! From instagram, tiktok, and even Tumblr itself respectively, with the bit worded similar highlighted
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Even Bluesky, a sight viewed as a safe haven from AI content has this section
Tumblr media
As you can see, all of them say essentially the same thing, as it is industry standard and it's necessary for sites that allow you to publish and others to interact with your content to prevent companies from getting into legal trouble.
Let me break down some of the most common terms and how these app do these things with your art/content:
storing data - > allowing you to keep content uploaded/stored on their servers (Ex. comments, info about user like pfp)
publishing -> allowing you to post content
redistributing -> allowing others to share content, sharing on other sites (Ex. a Tumblr post on twitter)
modifying -> automatic cropping, in app editing, dropping quality in order to post, etc.
creating derivative works -> reblogs with comments, quote retweets where people add stuff to your work, tiktok stitches/duets
While these terms may seems intimidating, they are basically just tech jargon for the specific terms we know used for legal purposes, once more, simply industry standard :)
Saying that Twitter "published stored modified and then created a derivative work of my data without compensating me" sounds way more horrible than saying "I posted my art to twitter which killed the quality and cropped it funny and my friend quote-tweeted it with 'haha L' " and yet they're the same !
Privacy Policy
This part is more messy than the first and may be more of a cause for concern for artists. It is in regards to this screenshot I've seen going around
Tumblr media
Firstly, I want to say that that is the only section in twitter's privacy policy where AI /machine learning is mentioned and the section it is is regarding how twitter uses user information.
Secondly, I do want to want to acknowledge that Elon Musk does have an AI development company, xAI. This company works in the development of AI, however, they want to make a good AGI which stands for artificial general intelligence (chatgpt, for example, is another AGI) in order to "understand the universe" with a scientific focus. Elon has mentioned wanting it to be able to solve complex mathematics and technical problems. He also, ofc, wants it to be marketable. You can read more about that here: xAI's website
Elon Musk has claimed that xAI will use tweets to help train it/improve it. As far as I'm aware, this isn't happening yet. xAI also, despite the name, does NOT belong/isn't a service of Xcorp (aka twitter). Therefore, xAI is not an official X product or service like the privacy policy is covering. I believe that the TOS/the privacy policies would need to expand to disclaim that your information will be shared specifically with affiliates in the context of training artificial intelligence models for xAI to be able to use it but I'm no lawyer. (also,,,Elon Musk has said cis/cisgender is a slur and said he was going to remove the block feature which he legally couldn't do. I'd be weary about anything he says)
Anyway, back to the screenshot provided, I know at a glance the red underlined text where it says it uses information collected to train AI but let's look at that in context. Firstly, it starts by saying it uses data it collects to provide and operate X products and services and also uses this data to help improve products to improve user's experiences on X and that AI may be used for "the purposes outlined in this policy". This means essentially just that is uses data it collects on you not only as a basis for X products and services (ex. targeting ads) but also as a way for them to improve (ex. AI algorithms to improve targeting ads). Other services it lists are recommending topics, recommending people to follow, offering third-party services, allowing affiliates etc. I believe this is all the policy allows AI to be used for atm.
An example of this is if I were to post an image of a dog, an AI may see and recognize the dog in my image and then suggest me more dog content! It may also use this picture of a dog to add to its database of dogs, specific breeds, animals with fur, etc. to improve this recommendation feature.
This type of AI image, once more, is common in a lot of media sites such as Tumblr, insta, and tiktok, and is often used for content moderation as shown below once more
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Again, as far as I'm aware, this type of machine learning is to improve/streamline twitter's recommendation algorithm and not to produce generative content as that would need to be disclaimed!!
Claiming that twitter is now using your art to train AI models therefore is somewhat misleading as yes, it is technically doing that, as it does scan the images you post including art. However, it is NOT doing it to learn how to draw/generate new content but to scan and recognize objects/settings/etc better so it can do what social media does best, push more products to you and earn more money.
(also as a small tangent/personal opinion, AI art cannot be copywritten and therefore selling it would be a very messy area, so I do not think a company driven by profit and greed would invest so much in such a legally grey area)
Machine learning is a vast field , encompassing WAY More than just art. Please don't jump to assume just because AI is mentioned in a privacy policy that that means twitter is training a generative AI when everything else points to it being used for content moderation and profit like every other site uses it
Given how untrustworthy and just plain horrible Elon Musk is, it is VERY likely that one day twitter and xAI will use user's content to develop/train a generative AI that may have an art aspect aside from the science focus but for now it is just scanning your images- all of them- art or not- for recognizable content to sell for you and to improve that algorithm to better recognize stuff, the same way Tumblr does that but to detect if there's any nsfw elements in images.
WHAT TO DO AS AN ARTIST?
Everyone has a right to their own opinion of course ! Even just knowing websites collect and store this type of data on you is a valid reason to leave and everyone has their own right to leave any website should they get uncomfortable !
However, when people lie about what the TOS/privacy policy actually says and means and actively spread fear and discourage artists from using twitter, they're unintentionally only making things worse for artists with no where to go.
Yes twitter sucks but the sad reality is that it's the only option a lot of artists have and forcing them away from that for something that isn't even happening yet can be incredibly harmful, especially since there's not really a good replacement site for it yet that isn't also using AI / has that same TOS clause (despite it being harmless)
I do believe that one day xAI will being using your data and while I don't think it'll ever focus solely on art generation as it's largely science based, it is still something to be weary of and it's very valid if artists leave twitter because of that! Yet it should be up to artists to decide when they want to leave/deactivate and I think they should know as much information as possibly before making that decision.
There's also many ways you can protect your art from AI such as glazing it, heavily watermarking it, posting links to external sites, etc. Elon has also stated he'll only be using public tweets which means privating your account/anything sent in DMS should be fine!!
Overall, I just think if we as artists want any chance of fighting back against AI we have to stay vocal and actively fight against those who are pushing it and abandon and scatter at the first sign of ANY machine learning on websites we use, whether it's producing generative art content or not.
Finally, want to end this by saying that this is all just what I've researched by myself and in some cases conclusions I've made based on what makes the most sense to me. In other words, A Lot Could Be Wrong ! so please take this with a grain of salt, especially that second part ! Im not at all any AI/twitter expert but I know that a lot of what people were saying wasn't entirely correct either and wanted to speak up ! If you have anything to add or correct please feel free !!
28 notes · View notes
chipped-chimera · 2 months
Text
youtube
Stumbled on this - so for anyone out of the loop part of Reddit blowing up last year was because it was making use of it's API prohibitively expensive for the average person to use, killing off a lot of (superior) third party apps used to both browse and moderate the platform on mobile.
I don't know if it was stated explicitly at the time, but for me the writing was on the wall - this was purely to fence off Reddit's data from being trawled by web scraping bots - exactly the same thing Elon Musk did when he took over Twitter so he could wall off that data for his own AI development.
So it comes as absolutely zero surprise to me that with Reddit's IPO filing, AI and LLM (Large Language Models) are mentioned SEVERAL times. This is all to tempt a public buyer.
What they do acknowledge though, which is why this video is titled 'Reddit's Trojan Horse' is the fact that while initially this might work and be worth a lot - as the use of AI grows, so will the likelihood that AI generated content being passed off as 'human generated' on the platform will grow - essentially nulling the value of having a user-generated dataset, if not actively MAKING IT WORSE.
As stated in the video - it's widely known that feeding AI content into an AI causes 'model collapse', or complete degeneration into gibberish and 'hallucinations'. This goes for both LLM's and Image Generation AI.
Now given current estimates that 90% of the internet's content will be AI generated by 2026 that means most of the internet is going to turn into a potential minefield for web-scraping content to shove into a training dataset, because now you have to really start paying attention what your bot is sucking up - because lets face it, no one is really going to look at what is in that dataset because it's simply too huge (unless you're one of those poor people in Kenya being paid jack shit to basically weed out the most disgusting and likely traumatizing content from a massive dataset).
What I know about current web-scraping, is OpenAI at least has built it's bot to recognize AI generated image content and exclude it from the scrape. An early version of image protection on the side of Artists was something like this - it basically injected a little bit of data to make the bot think it was AI generated and leave it alone. Now of course we have Nightshade and Glaze, which actively work against training the model and 'poison' the dataset, making Model Collapse worse.
So right now, the best way to protect your images (and I mean all images you post online publicly, not just art) from being scraped is to Glaze/Nightshade them, because either these bots will likely be programmed to avoid them - but if not, good news! You poisoned the dataset.
What I was kind of stumped on is Language Models. While feeding AI LLM's their own data also causes Model Collapse, it's harder to understand why. With an image it makes sense - it's all 1's and 0's to a machine, and there is some underlying pattern within that data which gets further reinforced and contributes to the Model Collapse. But with text?
You can't really Nightshade/Glaze text.
Or can you?
Much like with images, there is clearly something about the way a LLM chooses words and letters that has a similar pattern that when reinforced contributes to this Model Collapse. It may read perfectly fine to us, but in a way that text is poisoned for the AI. There's talk of trying to figure out a way to 'watermark' generated text, but probably won't figure that one out any time soon given they're not really sure how it's happening in the first place. But AI has turned into a global arms race of development, they need data and they need it yesterday.
For those who want to disrupt LLM's, I have a proposal - get your AI to reword your shit. Just a bit. Just enough, that it's got this pattern injected.
These companies have basically opened Pandora's Box to the internet before even knowing this would be a problem - they were too focused on getting money (surprise! It's capitalism again). And well, Karma's about to be a massive bitch to them for rushing it out the door and stealing a metric fucktonne of data without permission.
If they want good data? They will have to come to the people who hold the good data, in it's untarnished, pure form.
I don't know how accurate this language poisoning method could be, I'm just spitballing hypotheticals here based on the stuff I know and current commentary in AI tech spaces. Either way, the tables are gonna turn soon.
So hang in there. Don't let corpos convince you that you don't have control here - you soon will have a lot of control. Trap the absolute fuck out of everything you post online, let it become a literal minefield for them.
Let them get desperate. And if they want good data? Well they're just going to have to pay for it like they should have done in the first place.
Fuck corpos. Poison the machine. Give them nothing for free.
5 notes · View notes
dimdiamond · 1 year
Text
During website and app developer seminar the teacher: ... there's also AI *points at me, graduated from art school* this applies for you, that make generated images, excellent, EXCELLENT artworks...
Me: *internally screaming* ʘ⁠‿⁠ʘ
34 notes · View notes
oatbugs · 1 year
Text
i want to be a machine learning engineer but some of u guys r making it embarrassing actually. long but IMO important explanation below. We have bigger issues to deal w and better things to focus on.
like our planet is dying and the commercialisation of massive AI models and training the models themselves releases like hundreds of thousands of tonnes of carbon emissions. and this includes very "nonessential" models that don't tend to contribute much to society (re: new fancy image generation toy). but u have decided your new career path is "AI artist" (glorified prompt-writer?) .
and just as bad, some of you have decided the biggest issue w AI is those people, the glorified prompt writers!! you draw more attention to it instead of focusing on the real problems behind AI and the ethics of training models! about the harm it causes to the planet, about web-scraping limitations basically not existing (stolen art falls under this domain), copyright laws to do with AI, the way facial recognition deals with race, about the boundaries between letting AI learn and develop in an "unbiased" way vs preventing sociopolitical damage at the cost of (potentially) further progress.
conversely, there is nowhere NEAR enough focus about how AI can help us overcome some of our fundamental problems. i love machine learning bc i find it - specifically the maths behind it - fascinating and i believe one day it could help us make very cool advancements, as it already has. i think the mathematical architectures and processes behind creating new deep learning models are beautiful. i also know the damage capitalists will inevitably do - they always wield powerful, beautiful new tools as weapons.
AND HERE YOU ARE FALLING FOR IT! it's very frustrating to watch!! if you're angry on behalf of artists, i'm begging you to protect the rights of artists and be mad at greedy companies instead of villanising a tool that can help us immensely! learn about AI ethics, learn about how it is present in our lives, what we should try to stop, what we should promote.
if you "boycott AI" as a whole with no desire to gain more literacy on the topic other than "steals art therefore bad", you will have to be against your translate app, your search engine, your email spam filter, almost everything on your phone that categorises anything (i.e. pretty much all of your search functions), NPC enemies in games, your medical diagnostic tools, your phone's face unlock, your maps app, online banking, accessibility tools that help blind and deaf people, new advancements in genetic sequencing and protein folding and treating cancer and modelling new solutions in physics and so on and so on.
the issue isn't all AI as a whole. the issue is A) how companies are using it and B) how a lot of you guys are getting mad at the concept of AI instead of responding to A.
18 notes · View notes
thecorvidforest · 2 months
Text
hey all! given that tumblr has decided to fuck over artists, we’ve joined Cara. it’s sort of a cross between twitter and deviantart, and they have a very strong stance against unethical generative AI, with an AI image detector built into the app and the option to use Glaze if your computer can’t run it. it’s still in development so we’ll see what happens, but i’m hopeful about it!
we’ll still post non-art things here, but our art will probably mostly be on Cara (here) going forward. fuck you tumblr
2 notes · View notes
imagine-sterek · 5 months
Note
I would like to share my quick opinion on ai if you don't mind, cuz let's actively discuss it. I myself am against ai, specifically in terms of usage in creative spaces such as art and writing. I understand that there is ai in programs and apps such as grammarly and canva and such, but just something is made use of in a place doesn't necessarily mean that it should be there if I'm making sense with that outlook. I can completely understand your desire to use it to make things easier, but I also see the other side especially since I'm and artist and writer myself. I for am not keen for the usage of ai in fandom spaces like this, and please correct me if I'm wrong or have a completely skewed idea of it here, I do have an opinion but I don't have 100% knowledge to back it up. I feel like it's not right because of the theft aspect in regards to the art or writing side of it as ai is trained to create those things specifically by feeding it already existing art and writing. But there is still leeway and places for it to be used. I'm not trying to force my opinion you here, please don't think that, I just want to bring up areas to talk through since I feel like you are willing to do that in an open and polite way if the intent isn't to be rude. I feel like ai could be applied in a lot of ways and although there's controversy in this regard, this isn't the be all and end all of it. I don't know if my rambling made any sense but yeah:)
- Tae
Hi Tae,
Absolutely! I have friends who know a lot about technology and computers, some are game devs, some are artists and writers, and I myself am a writer, so I’ve had discussions about AI from all sorts of different angles and I’m happy to listen to others opinions and points of view.
I agree, the way in which it was trained is, frankly, criminal. It was trained off of stolen art and writing that the developers had no right to and the implementing of AI in everything we use is an attempt to force compliance and sweep their transgressions under the rug. But just because it’s there doesn’t mean we have to use it, and if we do use it, it doesn’t necessarily have to be a bad thing or used in a bad way.
I also agree with you about the leeway. This is going to seem controversial, but hear me out: when people photoshop edits for fandoms, they have no legal right to those photos—the photographer does. In the art world, these edits and photoshopping is called transformative art or adaptation, where changing roughly 80% or more of a work is seen as transformative and not infringing on copyright. Like Andy Warhol using Marilyn Monroe’s picture to make the famous pop art piece or the photo of Obama becoming the famous Obama HOPE poster (and several meme versions that followed).
So what’s the difference between someone photoshopping a ship together and using AI to create the same image?
The only difference is the lack of the human element, but both are arguably transformative works and both are legally allowed under the fair use laws.
There are other ways that you could use AI in a positive way: you could use ChatGPT to give you prompts for writing or and AI image generator to put together inspiration or reference material that you then work off.
The problem is when people use the AI that was trained off of material they had no right to to then create something they aim to pass off as their own. When people use ChatGPT to write a story and then publish it (either fanfiction or actual stories they could earn money from publishing), or art works that they didn’t put any effort into, then it’s a bigger problem than just a program trained off of stolen material; it’s people stealing that stolen material.
The biggest problem is that the people who trained the AI won’t own up to using the material they had no right to or make any attempts at restitution.
AI is the Frankenstein’s monster of our culture: it didn’t ask to be made and it didn’t ask to be made mosnerous, the fault lies with those who made it and those who push it to do bad things.
AI can be used in ways that benefit writers and artists, but the biggest problem we face - as I see it - is people trying to pass the AI generated material (which is based off of stolen material) as their own.
5 notes · View notes
shivamthakrejr · 7 months
Text
Users will have to opt-in to both Labs and the SGE feature to use it, however.
Back in the olden days of last December, we had to go to specialized websites to have our natural language prompts transformed into generated AI art, but no longer! Google announced Thursday that users who have opted-in for its Search Generative Experience (SGE) will be able to create AI images directly from the standard Search bar.
SGE is Google’s vision for our web searching future. Rather than picking websites from a returned list, the system will synthesize a (reasonably) coherent response to the user’s natural language prompt using the same data that the list’s links led to. Thursday’s updates are a natural expansion of that experience, simply returning generated images (using the company’s Imagen text-to-picture AI) instead of generated text. Users type in a description of what they’re looking for (a Capybara cooking breakfast, in Google’s example) and, within moments, the engine will create four alternatives to pick from and refine further. Users will also be able to export their generated images to Drive or download them.
What’s more, users will be able to generate images directly in Google Images. So, if you’re looking for (again, Google’s example) “minimalist halloween table settings” or “spooky dog house ideas,” you’ll be able to type that into the search bar and have Google generate an image based on it. What’s really cool is that you can then turn Google Lens on that generated image to search for actual, real-world products that most closely resemble what the computer hallucinated for you.
There are, of course, a number of limitations built into the new features. You’ll have to be signed up for Google Labs and have opted-in to the SGE program to use any of this. Additionally, the new image generation functions will be available only within the US, in English-language applications and for users over the age of 18. That last requirement is a just bit odd given that Google did just go out of its way to make the program accessible to teens.
The company is also expanding its efforts to rein in the misuse of generative AI technology. Users will be blocked from creating photorealistic images of human faces. You want a photorealistic capybara cooking bacon, that’s no problem. You want a photorealistic Colonel Sanders cooking bacon, you’re going to run into issues and not just in terms of advertising canon. You’ll also be prevented from generating images of “notable” people, so I guess Colonel Sanders is out either way.
Finally, Google is implementing the SynthID system developed by DeepMind announced last month. SythID is a visually undetectable metadata watermark that denotes a generated image as such, as well as provides information on who, or what, created it and when. The new features will be available through the Labs tab (click the flask icon) in the Google app on iOS and Android, and on Chrome desktop to select users today and expanding to more in the coming weeks.
2 notes · View notes
ttranarts102-06 · 8 months
Text
Reflection 1
Starting this class has been super interesting for me. I've never really done graphic design or focused on the graphic design aspect of art until now; which frankly is a shame.
I feel like I missed out on some of the foundational skills before just jumping into this class, but so far it's been very manageable, enjoyable even.
Before this class, I had never touched an Adobe program. Navigating the different applications and slowly learning how to use them intuitively has been a bit of a challenge. Why is it that there are several programs that achieve the same products? Why use one software over the other?
Not to mention the reading too, at first I thought it wouldn't be something that I enjoyed but seeing the different perspectives was pretty cool. The variety provided by the designers and how each one has their own process made me realize the scope of graphic design. Being able to work with clients whilst staying true to your own style is so impressive.
To touch on being able to work with clients, just as in any other career, communication is very important. Not only if you're working in a studio on a team, even in freelancing, having solid communication skills counts for a lot.
Moving past that point however, we did also talk about AI and using AI to formulate ideas and support parts of the design process. Unfortunately we didn't get to go deep into the ethics of AI in design and art, but hopefully one day we can. The images attached were created using Adobe Photoshop and AI generated artwork to convey a story of our lives in six words. A six word memoir if you will.
I am excited to continue to develop my skills using Adobe apps and gain a better eye for graphic design overall.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
2 notes · View notes
kp777 · 1 year
Text
Vox
March 6, 2023
From the article:
It’s going to be the “greatest force for economic empowerment” society has ever seen. It’s going to take away our jobs. It’s going to “generate a new form of human consciousness.” It’s going to kill us all.
Generative AI — or the new artificial intelligence that can create original content, including essays, fine art, and software code — is the talk of the town in Silicon Valley.
If you’re one of the over 100 million people who have used ChatGPT, or created a pop art-style illustrated portrait of yourself using Lensa, the popular image-generating app, you know what the latest version of this technology looks like in action.
Apps like ChatGPT, created by the Microsoft-backed startup OpenAI, are just the beginning of generative AI’s full range of capabilities, according to its boosters. Many believe it’s a once-in-a-lifetime technological breakthrough that could impact virtually every aspect of society and disrupt industries from medicine to law.
Read more.
5 notes · View notes