pleaseee explain the difference between positive reinforcement/negative reinforcement/positive punishment/negative punishment to me!!! if u want to. if not i can just google it i guess. but if ur in the mood to talk about it i’d be interested in hearing your explanation
I am always in the mood to talk about operant conditioning <3 All u gotta do is get rid of the moral implications of the words! think of it more like a math problem. Positive/negative are about what the trainer does; reinforcement/punishment are about what the trainee does
Positive means you're adding something
Negative means your taking something away
Reinforcement means a behavior is more likely to occur in the future
Punishment means a behavior is less likely to occur in the future
so, examples:
Positive reinforcement: Giving a dog a treat for doing the right trick; praising someone for doing good work
Negative reinforcement: Using a choke chain/prong collar on a dog- when they stop pulling, the pain/pressure goes away; your car stops ding-ing at you when you buckle your seatbelt
Positive punishment: Hitting a dog for barking; grounding a kid because they broke the rules
Negative punishment: stop playing if your puppy nips you; putting money in a swear jar
i do think the main issue people have with this is that they get hung up on the words negative and punishment. those sound bad! they don't want to punish anyone! but in this context the words have a different meaning. you can make a case for or against the morality of most of these, but none of these are inherently evil- context is very important. this is super obvious with my positive punishment examples. hitting a dog for barking is bad. don't do that! grounding a kid for breaking the rules (esp if they're rules that keep them safe, like don't sneak out at night) is justified. negative reinforcement is a BIG sliding scale that depends on how bad the aversive (bad stimulus, like pain/pressure in the dog example down to the annoying car sound) is, but it does require an aversive stimulus being ongoing until they do the right thing.
and the other trouble is they can seem like they're kinda blended together. with the example of grounding: grounding a kid for doing something bad is positive punishment. lifting the grounding for doing something good is negative reinforcement. when you're trying to figure out which it is, it's not about what the actual consequence IS (grounding), it's about 1) what you're doing with it and 2) what it makes the subject do (implementing it to stop bad behavior vs lifting it to encourage good behavior)
anyways thank you for coming to my tedtalk
9 notes
·
View notes
thinking about cricket sherwood AGAIN and how his view of iterative personhood shapes everything he does!! because it doesn't matter until it DOES — before cicada, he's happy to lie about the fact he knows he isn't the "real" cricket, that that version of themself is probably long-dead and he doesn't care in the slightest — and after, it matters in a way he doesn't even know how to explain out loud.
they iterate a version of themself with an accent reminiscent of the red dirt in their youth, give back a name he buried a long time ago, and send them back to the valley to move on from cicada (even though they both know it's impossible) and it's at that moment i think they finally acknowledge the space between themselves now and a dozen years ago and who-knows-how-long into the future are less than they pretend to be, that every version past and present still wears a threadbare friendship bracelet and ignore the weight that carries. etc etc.
6 notes
·
View notes
Lily may have brushed over it but now I’m curious, why is Sirius so familiar with the Slytherin common room? Is it just stories he’s heard from his family and their friends, or has he actually been to their common room?
hehehe anon have i mentioned i absolutely adore when people pick up on the tiniest details i leave in fics? makes my heart swell.
but! my hc is that him and james have sneaked into the common room. for all houses, really, and just because they could. slytherin was a personal challenge just bc so many people they didn’t like were housed there but they did it to prove to themselves they could. it’s a feat of sneakiness, ingenuity, and audacity ykno?
i also think,,,pre-hogwarts, he would’ve seen pictures of the common room from his parents/relatives/reg constantly asking for stories bc he’s enamored by the place but being familiar enough w it to describe it only came with experience.
12 notes
·
View notes