This is a good interview.
I do, however, still feel that even telegram may not be good enough to be a metric of public sentiment-and still, I am not believing that russians are cohesively against the invasion.
I just know too much about authoritarian regime’s effect and capabilities on anything that they inherently can manipulate and those who are vocal are quite suspicious.
For example, during authoritarian period in Taiwan, vast majority of people were risk averse to leave any trace of their political views due to fear of not just direct danger from the authorities or secret police but also from invisible black listing or become victims of being outcasted by those who are overly fearful of being guilty by association.
What’s more trivial is that Russians must be at least quite apathetic because, well, once upon a time in the ‘90s, they liked putin & bought all of Putin’s bullshit and they are conflicted and in denial that they were entirely supportive of one day that Russia will rise and show the world that they’re no pushovers. They don’t want to be held accountable and admit that they had been yearning for what putin is doing now.
Taiwan right now have significant minority population who are authoritarian nostalgic-they still are hoping that KMT will become stronger to one day rule China over other political rivals and make China imperialistic to show the world that China is much stronger and powerful than the world thinks. They want the power of ccp for themselves and then carry on the very same things in South China Sea and antagonize America.
12 notes
·
View notes
Caught in the act and sparking an ethical debate: Jenna Ortega braved COVID symptoms to film *Wednesday's* iconic scene, but at what cost? Dive into the Jenna Ortega COVID controversy and how it highlights the collision between personal responsibility and public health in Hollywood. Is the show really worth the risk?
0 notes
Watch the American Climate Leadership Awards 2024 now: https://youtu.be/bWiW4Rp8vF0?feature=shared
The American Climate Leadership Awards 2024 broadcast recording is now available on ecoAmerica's YouTube channel for viewers to be inspired by active climate leaders. Watch to find out which finalist received the $50,000 grand prize! Hosted by Vanessa Hauc and featuring Bill McKibben and Katharine Hayhoe!
6K notes
·
View notes
Anyway. Bi and Mspec Lesbians aren't a hotly "debated" topic or even new to queer culture, it's just the newest thing that bullies who REALLY want to be homophobic and even racist use to justify harassing gay people they don't like.
It's the thinnest possible veneer of progressive language wrapped around TERF and reactionary rhetoric so that they can feel righteous for forming an angry mob against vulnerable targets. If you're gullible enough to fall for the newest wave of bigotry within the queer community, and turn on your allies because they're "confusing" or "invading your spaces," the SAME way they turned on bi/pan labels, trans people, xenogenders, neopronouns, and aroace people before this, then get lost.
2K notes
·
View notes
Talked abt this with a friend last night but there is something heartening abt just how few people are buying into the party line abt Palestine compared to say, 2020 and 2016. I’ve noticed a much more coherent distrust of government institutions and widespread ease of recognising propaganda, as well as a general willingness to quickly and effectively shut down people who try and find some vernacular foothold to gently recenter the conversation away from genocide.
It’s not a silver lining, and it comes on the heels of so many back-to-back failures of liberal institutions and colonial brutality that have ground faith in the government to dust, but it is a relief to not spend so much time arguing with comfortable morons, and to instead focus that energy towards uplifting Palestinian voices and listening to some of the most lonely, frightened people in the world rn.
382 notes
·
View notes
It’s genuinely fascinating to me how Taylor’s aoty Grammys are almost always followed by a huge dip in public opinion about her like this is the fourth one it happens every single time and I think we all know why
147 notes
·
View notes
I noticed you've been making more art of Machete and Vasco after they met again as adults - is this canon? Do they get to rekindle their friendship after all, or is it still brief and bittersweet? (I love your characters and art, btw!)
Thank you! I'm glad you like them!
It's canon, I believe. After their confusing and apprehensive friends-to-lovers involvement ended in their early 20's, their paths end up crossing again unexpectedly in their mid 30's and things gradually grow from there.
267 notes
·
View notes
Opinion: I'm an Anti-Specsser and Everyone Else Should Be Too
Why are you wearing glasses?
No, seriously. Why the fuck are you still wearing glasses?
The epidemic is over. I don't know anyone who worries about nearsightedness anymore. Do you hear anyone talking about it? Do you see nearsightedness germs flying around? No, because it's OVER.
Look, I don't know how to break it to you, but a thin piece of glass in front of your eyes isn't going to help protect you from macular degeneration. It's a false sense of security, an illusion; like if you just keep looking through them you can pretend that the world has crisp sharp edges. Well, guess what? The world is blurry. You don't know where empty space ends and your body begins. In fact, it doesn't. Your body is mostly empty space.
Everything happens for a reason, anyway; so if you get into an accident because you can't drive without your glasses? Tough cajones; take your punishment like God intended. It's your fault for having bad genes, which you got because of... original sin, or something. I don't know, I didn't actually read the Bible. I just believe vehemently in every word of it, except the words you use to disagree with me. Because that's wrong.
I don't think I'm doing anything wrong by yelling at glasses-wearers on the street. It just fills me with such visceral, incandescent rage when I see a pair of pince-nez balancing on someone's nose. It's like they're sending a direct fuck-you to people like me, who choose not to wear glasses. So of course I have to yell at them; it's just simple self-preservation - if I don't, pretty soon everyone will be wearing glasses, and ganging up on those of us that don't, because we're "jeopardizing public safety" or "a danger to the common good." I don't need to listen to that.
When you declare you're on the opposite side from me with that flag you wear right on your face, you shouldn't be surprised when I treat you like an enemy. "What sides?" you ask? "There's no 'sides' here; everyone is just choosing-" oh, shut up. You're so naive. Of course there are sides. There's sides to everything. What about a circle? you say. Inside and outside. There. Now don't you feel stupid.
And those circles you wear on your face mark you as being on the inside. I don't like that. Nobody likes being left on the outside. So stop wearing them. That way I can find something else to be angry about, like freckles. I think I'll take on freckles next. If you have them, stop having them. You're being too different from me and I don't like it.
434 notes
·
View notes
tbh it’s really weird like the vibe last year was that it really sucked how it all went down for daniel and it would great if he could have a happy ending to his career and now he’s actively making that happy ending for himself and people are like “no not like that”
I think people had emotionally said their goodbyes and accepted his retirement, and now him chasing his happy ending is at the expense of other promising juniors being pushed aside made them sour on him. esp when -- according to the arguments I've seen online, to them -- daniel hasn't earned his seat, he got it handed cause he has a better relationship with redbull management, and the promising junior has been relegated back to a reserve driver for a second year while the 35 year old gets a seat in the junior team. esp now that he's out of commission it feels like an unearned redemption. maybe if he out drives the car and his teammate and scores points next year, people will be back on board.
ultimately it's a sport where you're only as good as your last race, so a choice between guy who underperformed for 2 years vs a rookie who got in a car and scored points and the former being chosen over the latter, you can see why online sentiment is more divisive now than it was when he retired.
ofc this isn't Everyone, daniel is still hugely popular and beloved, and even that factored in redbull's decision to keep him cause he's definitely got a bigger PR and marketing pull than lawson
69 notes
·
View notes
accidentally turned my adblock off and saw some ads. tbh they're mostly way better than they used to be, but uh. im still getting eating disorder content
@staff bbgirl please get rid of the "flat tummy" stuff you're actively killing people <3
23 notes
·
View notes
dip 🤝 bill
both liking their hair pulled/played with
👍
87 notes
·
View notes
The peace of anonymity vs the joy of being known
37 notes
·
View notes
Watch the American Climate Leadership Awards 2024 now: https://youtu.be/bWiW4Rp8vF0?feature=shared
The American Climate Leadership Awards 2024 broadcast recording is now available on ecoAmerica's YouTube channel for viewers to be inspired by active climate leaders. Watch to find out which finalist received the $50,000 grand prize! Hosted by Vanessa Hauc and featuring Bill McKibben and Katharine Hayhoe!
6K notes
·
View notes
cis people stop buying into the "trans people are the real aggressors" rhetoric whenever we try to defend outselves or bring attention to something challenge (APPARENTLY IMPOSSIBLE)
82 notes
·
View notes
the terror has me itching to fall into another rabbit hole about victorian racism because they absolutely nail the despair james would feel at "not being even English" but I need the details of what the Victorians were thinking about the Brazilians specifically.
It's already pretty wild that James ends up embodying the English fear of miscegenation of all things, which right now I can't remember if it's openly addressed when it comes to Francis and Sophia or it's only implied (I am aware about the essays on how the Irish are an inferior race of "white gorillas", I don't believe for a second Sir John wasn't) but the ties to a different colonial empire...they had a caste system too, to add to the mindfuckery.
16 notes
·
View notes
public domain is good especially from disney but strangely enough all i can think about is this
mickey is vulnerable now, and under no protection whatsoever, he wonders if he'll be well taken care of
13 notes
·
View notes
The US Sun's commitment to accurate reporting is breathtaking
29 notes
·
View notes
mmm somethings been rattling around inside my brain about queerness in xenofiction (warrior cats centric cause that's obviously mostly what people are talking about in my internet circles) and I know around here I am preaching to the choir but w/e. I feel like i may have made this post before but i’ll do it again until i feel like i’ve crafted all of my thoughts correctly
everyone knows there’s always like. some shmuck on twitter or youtube comment sections, complaining about how gay cats just don’t make sense ~realistically~
and the common argument back is always something along the lines of “these cats have complex society and religion and talk to ghosts and sometimes have magic powers, and being gay is where you draw the line? it doesn’t have to be realistic”
and something just rubs me the wrong way about that argument, not that it’s WRONG, it’s not wrong, xenofiction by definition is all super super unrealistic. I think it’s more like, it oversimplifies it. because honestly when I make critiques about the warriors world building not making sense, I don’t tend to like the argument beginning and ending at “well it doesn’t have to be realistic” because no it doesn’t but it’s still supposed to feel believable.
i think i don’t like that the argument seems to imply that gay animal characters are at all on par with other fantasy things like talking to ghosts and having powers or complex religion. I also don’t like it when people who are being fake-supportive can condescendingly say “well the gay couple may be completely absurd and unrealistic but I guess it’s ok because its just a silly fantasy :) ” cause like. Like its not unrealistic tho. i don’t like the implication that it’s uniquely unrealistic, if this was a grounded story with no magic or religion and the cat social groups were more inspired by real feral cats, it would still be illogical for some queer cats not to exist.
I feel like it is a more effective argument to point out that straight cats are just as unrealistic, in fact more unrealistic and silly
“cats lovingly and monogamously married-for-life and raising kids together” is the absurdity it should be compared to, rather then the magic elements. Because then the complainers have to contend with the fact that they aren’t bothered by unrealistic relationships between cat characters, they are just uniquely bothered by gay ones.
I mean...not to get tmi but it seems obvious to me this knee jerk reaction people have to rolling their eyes and scoffing when “gay” and “animal character” are placed in the same sentence is based on their insistence on equating the breeding behavior of animals to the romantic relationships of humans. Y'know, they're assuming that when people talk about romantic couples between anthro characters, that that is the sort of thing they are drawing from. When, certainly when it comes to cats, that is a very very poor equivalent. Cat mating behaviors are not affectionate or long lasting--they actually seem quite stressful, and then the father runs off to find more girls and probably never calls his one-night-stand again.
this is why I am really not fond of “mate” being used at the go-to replacement for husband/wife in xenofiction. Consider just coming up with a brand new word for your animal character’s version of romance! maybe they have types of relationships and words for them that humans don’t even have! but “mate” feels like. an action, nothing more. It doesn’t inherently imply love. frankly I think more people should be anthropomorphizing mates as simply Business Partnerships where the business is in desiring offspring, as opposed to husband/wife.
Just like....ok if you’re going to use the real behavior of animals as at least the loose inspiration for your anthropomorphic character’s behavior, surely pair bonding would be a smoother translation to what we view as a romantic couple?? not mating?? because pair bonded animals are the ones having consistent pleasant interactions, and being physically affectionate, and working together in life, sometimes even raising each others kids together.
And keeping that in mind, frankly you could argue that gay-coded cats should be the norm. (not that I think pair bonded creatures should always be interpreted as a romantic coded relationship, you could interpret some as platonic or familial or simply allies needing to survive. The point is no matter what route you go, you are projecting some human experience onto animals who’s minds and feelings we cannot ever actually understand. So to make it coded as a gay romance is just as reasonable as making it an adopted found-family sort of affection. You can go any route and be the same amount of unrealistic.)
If these losers actually want reasonable cat fiction, no one should have romantic affection for anyone! and if two cats have kittens together, it should be treated more like a short-lived antagonistic business partnership where you part ways immediately after. If you only criticize one type of romance for being “unbelievable and silly because these are CATS for crying out loud 🙄” but you don't feel “distracted” or “taken out of the story” about the other type of romance, then this aint about realism my guy, sounds like you just have some baggage to unpack.
I am beating people over the head with a very big sign that reads “Whether you’re writing about cats or birds or aliens or fantasy people or whatever, you cannot grant any creature the ability to love without all the variety and complexity that **naturally** goes hand in hand with those messy emotions. If the creatures can fall in love at all, then there must exist the possibility for some of them to be queer about it. And if you view queerness as unnatural, then we don’t have a writing disagreement, we have a fundamental moral disagreement about life. And I can’t help you there, that’s your problem! But I refuse to let people benignly hide behind a “simple desire for more realistic-feeling fiction uwu” as a defense!! (gay people are real. It’s true! I checked!!)”
81 notes
·
View notes