Tumgik
#there are no such things as genitals
left-clitorass · 1 year
Text
I have no genitals!!!!!!
Mom where is my
1 note · View note
thedreadvampy · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Losing my shit about this article in which a transphobic Tory was so busy panicking about existing in the vicinity of a Trans that she almost certainly misheard "jeans" as "penis" and decided that not only was this a problem with the other woman, but also that the world must be informed of this pressing danger.
"a trans woman! I had to stand directly behind her....I thought, 'this is going well', I'm handling The Situation fine'..."
translated: I saw a tall woman with broad shoulders. How would I get out of this alive? I thought. she has a PENIS. PENIS PENIS PENIS. through some force of PENIS I mean will I managed to PENIS behave normally towards her. My hands were PENIS PENIS PENIS shaking as I tried to dry them. summoning up all my PENIS courage I said 'dryer's crap innit'. she turned to me and said " yeah I'm just goiPENIS PENIS PENIS"
It's been a week and I'm still shaking. This proves trans women are the problem and I'm not weird. I'm fine. It's fine. If you think about it I'm the hero hePENIS!!!!!
very this
Tumblr media
#red said#it's just. I'm obsessed.#everyone on Twitter is saying 'never happened' and i think they're wrong#this absolutely did happen and she's been obsessing over how vindicated it made her feel enough to WRITE AN ARTICLE ABOUT IT#because she MISHEARD SOMEONE IN A CASUAL CONVERSATION#i lay out my reasoning thusly: if you were INVENTING a scary trans woman in bathroom story out of nothing. why would it be this?#why would you go with 'we had a banal conversation until she said a sentence that makes no sense and that no human has ever uttered#but which does coincidentally sounds almost exactly like a mishearing of a very NORMAL thing to say in the circumstances#then she left and nothing else occurred'#if you were going to INVENT a story you would probably make it MAKE SENSE or SOUND THREATENING#i truly believe this is a very authentically told account of what she thinks happened#because who would. by means other than mishearing. think 'I'm going to wipe my hands on my penis' makes any sense at all.#a) 'I'm going to dry my hands on my genitals' says the presumably fully clothed woman#b) who then proceeds to leave without doing anything threatening#c) WHO SAYS PENIS THREATENINGLY? sorry it's writing out 'penis' repeatedly that made this jump out to me but like. who says that?#you might hear someone talk casually about their dick or cock but i stg it's only doctors and TERFs who casually use the word penis much#it's so. clinically descriptive. it's a weird use of language. but it IS. something you could plausibly mishear from 'pants' or 'trousers'
9K notes · View notes
what-even-is-thiss · 1 year
Text
I have seen people wonder about Greek men exercising and competing in athletics naked. Specifically about the penis. Was the penis just... flopping about? In public? No. That was rude. They tied it up with a cord called a kynodesme.
Tumblr media
Usually it was tied around the top of the foreskin. Whether you tied your penis to the side from there or up to a belt around the waist was up to personal preference. I won't show a more realistic depiction than this bit of pottery of how that worked because Tumblr would probably nuke me but you can find diagrams if you google kynodesme.
The Romans also used it to an extent but they seemed to prefer using a ring and pin device called a fibula. Some people got their genitals pierced on purpose to use the devices more easily. Jewish people in the Roman empire also used bands and rings like these to hide the fact that they were circumcised when they had to be naked in public.
2K notes · View notes
just-antithings · 2 months
Note
Just anti things: claiming that writing a character having a penis and a vagina is fetishizing intersex people, even if the author is a nonbinary person who specifically said they wrote the character that way to get gender euphoria
.
93 notes · View notes
is-the-owl-video-cute · 9 months
Note
Saw your Neil Gaiman post and as someone that found comfort in Good Omens (and got hyperfixated on it), I'm finally glad that some people are finally talking about how he isn't that great.
Even as a Fan, GOmens fandom is so...weird. See, in other fandoms people won't give much of a flying f/ck about the authors besides some mild respect or praise, but GOmens praise Neil SO HARD, despite giving off some iffy vibes (that now I understand why, after that big post) Never liked how almost every single POC character in GO has such a minimal role, same with women characters, the fact he's been caught (and that can be easily checked) lying about his ideas surrounding GOmens, the way he went from "Is not a romance, but it can be if you want to" -> "i always wrote it as a love story" also how he went from "There won't be another season because of Terry and because the ideas for the next book were incorporated in the show" -> "It was in 2019 when I finished writing S2 with the ideas I discussed with Terry before he died" and like seriously no one never noticed how much of a clown he his lying and backpedalling all over again again? Then there's how bad rep for fat people Sandman was and instead of accepting criticism he just keeps giving some "vague intelligent answer" and sits and waits for his legion of fans with a parasocial relationship to defend him. But somehow he's treated as a world treasure and a genius with a big brain. And this is less problematic and more petty but I'll be honest. He isn't that much of a good writer anyway? The prose is okay is good, but the worldbuilding and lore and characters is mostly edgy and lacks deepness. His fans seriously want to make a sea out of muddle puddles,,, and that's fair! Is such a big part of fan culture to dig into the smallests of things and make an universe out of a cardbox background character, but please, don't give Neil the credit that he doesn't deserve. And what proves more to me that he isn't that good of a writer, is just...take a look at that mess of a S2 of Good Omens, it was so bad that some people had to THEORIZE that it was bad on purpose. I have such a beef with S2, characters like Muriel, Saraqael and Michael and Maggie and Nina were so heavily promoted and of course everyone was hyped, finally more POC, more disabled characters, and yay, women! And they're lesbians! And and...and hold on, how it is that Muriel didn't do that much at all? How it is that Saraqael after being so hyped BARELY had almost nothing to do, is really that all the disabled rep we got? How is it that Michael and Uriel barely had anything to do and were just background characters again? It just angers me with how with so many fem-presenting characters, and POC and disabled persons cast, they literally add nothing to the series, AND NO ONE EVER TALKS ABOUT IT. Is just this endless praise for Neil and his oh big brain. All praise Neil Gaiman, our lord and saviour of queer people. HOW IT IS, THAT THE TWO LESBIANS HYPED ROMANCE WAS ALL RELATED TO AZIRAPHALE MEDDLING WITH THEM TRYING TO SHIP THEM? And it also was bad, very badly done, is really this the women representation we got, seriously??? Talking about misleading advertising.
S2 was such such a mess, it just shows how much Good Omens needed Terry to be, well, Good Omens. I really suspect Neil stole ideas from the fandom because S2 was just a trainwreck of all the fanfic tropes you could find in GO fandom and is almost disrespectful to Terry's work in Good Omens, and I don't care for how much Neil makes his friendship with Terry as a pity party and as a "it gives me so much joy, Terry would be so happy", because seriously it's almost manipulative. Talking about Manipulative. His meddling with fandom is starting to feel unprofessional, but this ask is already long... Sorry lmao, something on me snapped after getting finally the solid evidence that Neil .Is. Not. Great
Oh he’s always been completely unprofessional but since he types in a mixture of corporate-speak and “cool dad” talk his fanbase doesn’t notice.
Here’s the thing about Neil, he’s both petty and extremely insincere. People criticized lolicon sin his presence and he was so offended on the behalf of weirdos who pleasure themselves to Hentai depicting child molestation that he wrote a several paragraph long response dismissing simulated child pornography as simply being “icky speech” that should be protected by the sacred American constitution despite, you know, the fact he’s not even American so his weird obsession with the first amendment and only ever really bringing it up to defend simulated child porn is and always has been suspicious.
As for his backpedalling, the man sees $$$$ and just goes for anything he can find to make more. People love to say “oh but he donates tens of thousands to charity!” yeah, usually to HIS charity for bailing out pedophiles. With funds typically out of the wallets of his fans due to fundraising it rather than coming out of his own checkbook so it’s not exactly a charitable action as much as it’s an empty gesture. And frankly he almost certainly just does it for tax benefits if we’re going to be honest here. He continued good omens because it would make money and generate more attention towards him and he’d be the brave hero who brought back show that did well. That’s it.
He’s just discount, off-brand Elon. Rich white man who thinks he’s gods gift to man despite bumbling through even the most basic concepts because his fans would walk into traffic blindfolded to defend him from even the mildest of criticism.
People on here just like him because they’re starstruck that a creator of a popular IP is active on this site and because he produces media that’s adapted with white middle aged twinks who are dubiously romantically affiliated.
162 notes · View notes
spitblaze · 16 days
Text
im so used to seeing vaginas with a bush. every time i see a full body pic with a shaved pubic area im like 'where the fuck is their pussy'
45 notes · View notes
genderkoolaid · 1 year
Text
i think "nonbinary" can be useful but a lot of times the way it is being used isn't helpful to actually discussing nonbinary people, especially since it is a HUGE umbrella term with very few boundaries. like there are nonbinary men & women, so positioning "nonbinary" as something intrinsically separate from man/woman isn't accurate. or there are times where it would be more useful to name the specific group (like multigender people, androgynes, abinary/aphorians) rather than a much vaguer term
in general the problem is that our language to describe nonbinary existence is basically some scraps held together with duct tape. there's sooo many ways in which nonbinary people are erased or binaried through language. not just through the lack of gender neutral options but the la of blatantly genderqueer ones.
i kinda feel like as of right now, nonbinary-ness is pretty slapdash & all over the place and it would be helpful to have a large-scale discussion on what terminology would be best for discussing things like exorsexism and it's various aspects, and how to talk about nonbinary people without homogenizing us, while ALSO acknowledging the need for umbrella terms that can cover a range of individual identities, even if people don't personally identify with the umbrella term itself. & on that note we should also probably discuss the issue of. like. perfectionism wrt nonbinary language & the way that potentially useful terms get lost bc of it. I don't think nonbinary people can really achieve meaningful equality and inclusion on the same level until we are able to have equally diverse and useful ways of describing ourselves, and a stronger understanding of how we relate to each other as a community.
335 notes · View notes
mimixmunson · 3 months
Text
Eddie Munson with a Prince Albert piercing has me in a chokehold.
48 notes · View notes
exmojoe · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
62 notes · View notes
1hellofacookie · 7 months
Text
I keep seeing people characterise Barbie like she's never seen anything before, like she doesn't know anything. But thats not true!! The experiences are new to her, yes, but that doesn't mean she's unaware of entire concepts!! For example,, she knows what snow and rain are,, but she doesn't know what exactly they feel like. She probably has an idea, an expectation, but the novelty lies in her discovering the actual experience.
Barbie is smart, all the Barbies are smart, they write books and study physics and have discussions about law. Their love language is probably infodumping at girls night and analysing books together. We know they're aware of the real world and that they talk about it,, and we know that Mattel is so greedy that they made a Barbie for nearly every human experience,, so its safe to assume that Barbie does know about most concepts.
98 notes · View notes
Text
I was going to say that I’m lucky that I don’t get much bottom dysphoria considering I’m too squeamish about medical procedures to even read descriptions of how bottom surgery works, but now that I think about it I don’t know if it’s that I’m not dysphoric or if it’s just that I’ve accepted things how they are. Probably a little of both
27 notes · View notes
what-even-is-thiss · 1 year
Text
There’s a lot of versions of the death of Maui but the most often referenced one is where he tries to achieve immortality by climbing into death’s vagina and out through her mouth because that’s the opposite of being born I guess. So he turned himself into a worm and went to climb in while she was sleeping but turns out she’s got obsidian teeth in her private parts. Who knew? Now he’s dead. Shredded by the vagina teeth.
228 notes · View notes
just-antithings · 5 months
Note
Whenever I see antis making a fuss about teen characters being "sexualized" by other teens and "people under 18 should never see or interact with anything nsfw" I think back on sex ed class when I was 14, when the school provided condoms and fake penises to the class for all of us to practice how to use protection properly, because they knew teens get curious and they'd rather we just be safe if we were to experiment
Not every country is as uptight around sexuality as the US and I think a lot of people antis call creeps in fandom are just... from a different culture that's a little more normal about puberty and sex
.
42 notes · View notes
schadenfreudich · 3 months
Text
I don't trust people who say things like "afab experience" because in most cases they actually mean "white, perfectly perisex afab experience" and even then, it's too specific.
Because I'm not white, so I never got the "weak little girl" thing. I wasn't white feminine enough, even though I was quite feminine as a child.
And while I don't consider myself intersex, my body has produced more testosterone than would be the normal range for someone going through a "female" puberty ever since I was going through puberty. Definitely not enough for it to have strong masculinizing effects, it's just also quite androgynous in an additive way.
I do not feel represented by most things that people are talking about like it's "universal" for "afab" individuals, while both being "afab" and having gone through "female" puberty.
25 notes · View notes
pansyfemme · 7 months
Note
words have meaning. sex is sex. sex involves genitals. i'm all for kink and sexual liberation and freaking out the cishets but you can't just make shit up
sex is whatever i want it to be
30 notes · View notes
byler-alarmist · 8 months
Text
Ah.....they really had Steve (and Eddie) get attacked by dick monsters, huh
Kinda graphic screenshots under the cut:
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
42 notes · View notes