#the sun vs depp

[whistle-free]

Why is the UK trial not relevant to the US trial?

It's a misconception that Johnny Depp was suing Amber heard in the UK trial, and that his loss meant he was proven guilty of having abused Amber Heard. It's due to these misconceptions that many don't understand why the UK verdict was considered not relevant to the Virginia case. We'll also be going over why the UK wasn't considered to be a fair trial by the Judge of the Virginia case, Judge Penny Azcarate.

Firstly, the UK case was against The Sun, a tabloid magazine, not Amber Heard. Amber heard was only a witness in the UK case, and in fact couldn't be a party to the case as she was not the writer, editor, or publisher of The Sun's article, which Johnny Depp had alleged to have defamed him.

There was also a significant difference in how each case was heard. In the US the case was heard before a jury who had to come to an unanimous decision after hearing all the evidence. In that trial Amber Heard was a party to the claim and therefore subject to discovery.

In the UK the case was heard before one single judge. In that trial Amber heard was not a party to the claim and therefore not subject to discovery, more on why this is important in a bit.

In the UK case Judge Justice Nicol ruled that The Sun's allegations calling Johnny Depp a "wife beater" were "substantially true." However, there's an unfortunate understanding barrier happening here in the way each court uses language.

The way the phrase "substantially true" was used in the UK verdict was not meant in the way that many would believe it to mean, which would be "this definitely happened. It's actually the equivalent to saying "more likely than not," or the preponderance of the evidence standard in the US, which means that you only need to be 51% sure that it's more likely than not that the party did the things they have been accused of. This is similar in the way the court interprets "actual malice" only to mean a person made a statement which they knew was not true, as opposed to the layperson's understanding of the term to mean a person made a statement in a vindictive manner.

Why is this important? Because "substantially true" is not the same as "true beyond a reasonable doubt." The standard for proof in this ruling is only that the judge had to find that it's more likely than not (again, only needed to be 51% sure) that an event occurred.

Furthermore, this was a libel case, or civil trial, and no one is "found guilty" in a civil case. This means Johnny was not found guilty of having abused Amber Heard. The ruling only meant that this judge was 51% sure that 12 of the 14 acts of domestic violence alleged could have occurred, and therefore The Sun hadn't slandered Johnny Depp.

This ties into why the UK trial was not considered justice in the US, but before we get into that it's worth reiterating that AH was only a witness in the UK case. Because AH was only a witness, she was not subject to the same evidentiary rules as the Sun, the other party in the case. This means that JD's side could not gather any potentially damaging evidence (texts, etc.) against AH's claims from her, but AH could provide whatever evidence and testimony for the Sun's case as she wished as she was their witness. AH also wasn't cross examined regarding her testimony of certain abuse incidents [¶240], which is important in trial as it tests a person's narrative and sees how it holds up to pressure.

In addition to this, there was a lot of evidence that wasn't allowed in, such as expert testimony. No phycologists, no one from Hollywood to explain damages, and no doctors were allowed to be brought in to weigh in on evidence. Certain witness testimony, like that of Depp's former partners, Venessa Paradis and Winona Ryder, also weren't allowed in.

There were also issues of credibility in the UK trial and possibly hypocrisy in judgement. (UK Verdict here. Paragraphs referenced below with "¶")

One such matter involved the Australian preceding about illegally importing dogs into Australia in which AH pled guilty.

A series of emails [¶129-133] showed AH was asking Kevin Murphy to persuade Kate James to make a false statement on the matter of the Australia proceedings.

The judge ruled in this matter that because Kevin Murphy was willing to make a false statement in the Australian preceding [¶139-143] that made him less credible in saying it was AH who pressured him to do so, and therefore his statements didn't have an affect on AH's credibility. [¶147 . iv]

This is despite AH having pled guilty to the offense and the series of emails showing AH was trying to persuade others to make false statements on the matter.

In another matter where AH wrote to homeland security claiming Savannah McMillen was not unlawfully working for her, which was alleged to be a lie, AH's former assistant Kate James testified to confirm that the letter was untrue and even included a check written to McMillen as proof that she was employed by AH. [¶109-115]

If one did view this as AH having lied to Homeland Security then this would be a significant concern against her credibility. Also, Kate James would be one to know if McMillen was employed by AH. However, the judge decided that because Kate James had been fired she would not be a credible source to this claim. This goes against the Judge's earlier declaration of approaching evidence on the case where he says that someone giving evidence under oath made them a more reliable witness. * This is related to the matter where the Judge ruled that AH's own admissions to violence [¶171] held no weight as they were heard in an audio tape and not in court under oath [¶175].

In [¶203] the judge accepts that evidence of AH having a quick temper was not evidence that her temper would lead to violence.

However, the judge then later took evidence that JD and AH had an argument on a plane about her role with James Franco [¶239-241] to be evidence that JD would have then kicked AH in the back. Or, stated plainly, as evidence that JD's temper would lead to violence.

AH's claim that JD had kicked her was refuted by Stephen Deuters [¶247, ¶258] and Jerry Judge in their witness statements. However, the judge discounted both their statements saying that because they were employed by JD their loyalties lied with him. [¶265 . iv]

The judge decided to rely on texts [¶257] over witness testimony [¶265], which again went against the Judge's earlier declaration that he considered that witness testimony under oath was more reliable.

Issue was taken with this as the judge took hearsay evidence (the texts) over two witness statements, and seemingly did so only when it was favorable to AH.

In short, AH's actions didn't seem to have an affect on her own credibility. However, other's actions, even when done under pressure of AH, had an affect on their own credibility when testifying to AH's credibility.

In contrast, JD's actions did have an affect on his own credibility, but other's actions, even when shown to be credible witnesses themselves, were determined not to be credible when testifying for JD as their loyalties lied with them.

Otherwise, the judge desired evidence from witnesses speaking under oath, but only seemed to favor said evidence when it was in AH's favor.

It was for these reasons that the UK trial was not considered to be justice by Judge Azcarate, who wrote in an 11 page opinion letter that she was not persuaded by Heard’s argument that Depp “had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the U.K. action.

#if you believe this information to be flawed please submit any additional sources to this blog #so this post may be amended and corrected #amber heard #defamation trial #depp v heard trial #depp vs heard #johnny depp #johnny depp trial #johnny depp vs amber heard #the sun trial #the sun vs depp #sun vs depp #depp v the sun #uk trial #virginia trial

[wherethestoriesare]

Alright so over the last couple of weeks with the Depp vs Heard trial going in i've seen a lot of people reference the 2020 uk verdict on the Sun newspaper labelling Johnny Depp a wife beater.

i just need people to know that the sun newspaper cannot be fucking trusted as far as an ant could throw it. it is an absolute dogshit masquerading as journalism

the sun called the aids epidemic a 'us gay blood plague' & offered to pay for all gay 'poofs' to leave the country. they lied about the hillsborough disaster for 25 years & backed the lying police. they backed margaret thatcher through her whole prime ministership. they were hugely involved in the phone hacking scandal.

the sun newspaper is also incredibly powerful in the uk. it's very difficult to go up against them. that's partly why Elton John's win against them is so famous

also the laws were changed in 2013 & made it easier for newspapers to win libel cases

the Depp case in the uk was against the sun newspaper on the use of the word wife beater. all they had to do was show that any of the information they had received as journalistic sources for the story was 'substantially sufficient' for a civil case to win. they did not need to prove abuse allegations to any criminal degree to win. please read exactly what the judge concluded was 'substantially sufficient' to understand exactly what newspapers are allowed to do in the uk.

so whatever you want to say about the current case, please know that the sun newspaper is a vile piece of shit organisation & no court case will ever change that

#depp vs heard #johnny depp #amber heard #sun newspaper #uk tabloids #please remember that the uk tabloids habe a reputation for being the worst #the sun newspaper is vile rubbish #not journalism

[narcolepticbarbie]

What's the bet they haven't even looked at the judgement and evidence from the trial and just heard from someone "that trial doesn't count because it's the sun!!" and didn't question it 😂

They’re absolutely delusional. They buy into this idea that somehow the entire British justice system was conspiring against Depp. Every single judge, juror, and barrister had it out for Johnny Depp apparently 😂. A lost trial and two lost appeals doesn’t prove anything to them.

#like nah babes your fave is just a wife-beater #it’s the most honest thing the sun has ever published #depp vs heard #amber heard #anti johnny depp

[lasirenatarot]

Hello my lovelies!❣️ I am back with a new pick-a-card reading my loves❤️/If traditional gender roles aren’t applicable to you, convert to feminine/masculine energy./

❤️‍🔥 🔞 WHAT IS YOUR SEDUCTIVE POWER?🔥

Pick a picture:

—>Pile 1

/in the picture: Adriana Lima at a VS fashion show./

I must say - I did not expect this at all ahahhaha, the picture I chose for pile 1 I thought would portray someone extremely delicate because of the feathers which symbolise things of that nature but NO!😆

cards that fell: chariot;9pentacles;ace of swords; 3pentacles; the strength; 3cups; 9cups;

The seductive powers of people who chose that pile lay in the fact that they are very strong individuals, I think this is mostly related to some sort of « mental strength » but for some may be physical as well.

Your friends and people you encounter may see you as someone very confident & very strong, you may also be very successful in your field. You may be someone who navigates through life fearlessly, someone who stops at nothing to accomplish what they have in mind.

People who choose that pile either utilise ( or if they do not: DO IT!!) their talents & beauty to the maximum, or they are high achievers in higher education, most likely some degrees which are harder to obtain, for example the classics : law&medicine 😄 orrr they are successful in a male-dominated sport or job position.

« Diva is the female version of a hustlerrrr ». 🤌🏻

This pile is giving me Beyonce vibes, I can’t elaborate.

You depend on yourself only and people definitely find that attractive. They like the full package, although you may be harsh with your words from time to time, or your attutude may be considered too much for some. Your bossy attitude, undeniable confidence and ability to have your finances & your life as whole fully in your control is a quality of yours many cherish. You may be the life of the party, the « queen bee » of your group and this is where your charm lies basically - in your leader quality.

Your « regal » presence is sth others find seductive about people who choose this pile as well. ( if someone who is reading this is familiar with female archetypes this pile is giving definitely the « queen » archetype!!))

Astrological placements: LEO!! ; aries major placements; virgo major placements as I get a bit perfectionist/workaholic vibes, more specifically may be venus in virgo; pisces jupiter; mars in capricorn;

—> Pile 2

/In the picture: Salma Hayek in « From dusk till down », dir.Quentin Tarantino /

Part of your charm in the eyes of others comes from the fact that you may be from a different culture/foreign country, they may deem you as ‘exotic’ or if you’re not a foreigner, you could just be very different from the rest /distinct facial features, different or uncommon interests,style../

Cards that fell: the world; 5cups; 4swords; 2swords; 9swords; the hanged man; knight of pentacles;

This pile is giving me major « manic pixie dream girl » vibes. The ultimate ‘sad’ beautiful girl. People might find you alluring because you’re not an open book to them & they cannot figure you out, they may think you’re mysterious in a way. Some may find you dreamy and detached in a way, they may perceive you as someone who’s been through a lot & may love to play a hero/saviour to you. People may find your innocent, but « dangerous » in a way look, interesting, like a damsel in distress.

Astrological placements: moon in libra; gemini mars; scorpio mars; aquarius sun;

—> Pile 3

Penelope Cruz & Johnny Depp in « Blow »

You’re wild. Wild and free, full with passion. That is your seductive power briefly.

« She took my heart, and then she took my soul »

Cards that fell: the tower; knight of swords; judgement; justice; page of swords;9pentacles…

You are a bit chaotic and you have many layers to yourself. You’re able to rebuild a new version of yourself every time someone dissapoints you, or a tough situation has occured in your life. You may be feisty, impulsive and even snappy at times. But that is your charm. I also got that the ‘snappy’ part may be well deserved😄 because we have both the justice and judgement cards. You may be this way when someone tries to put you in a frame and limit your freedom, as this is one of the most important things for you.

You have a child-like quality about you, a sense of freshness, while still being very mature at the same time and people find this attractive. Whenever you come in someone’s life you are nothing like the others before you, you are the massive change to that person & they will never be the same after you.

Astrological placements: aries mars; aries rising& venus; venus in aquarius; venus in virgo;

-

That was the reading, guys!❤️ Hope you liked it! Like, share & comment if resonated, thank you!

- La Sirena. 🥀

#lasirenatarot #pick a card #tarot #pac #love tarot reading #tarot blog #love tarot free #free tarot readings #pick a pile #pick a photo #free tarot #tarot services #love tarot spread #18+ tarot #tarot reading #daily tarot #tarotblr #tarot business #cartomancy #tarot cards

[knifefightscene]

It’s so fucking stupid when people said recent documents make them change their minds about Depp vs Heard when the old information that has always available is that this man casually jokes about killing her with his friends & he’s bestie with marilyn manson & he already lost the defamation case against the sun who called him a wife beater like whats new really? That he’s a violent misogynistic old fuck? We have already known that

[skiplo-wave]

I’m sorry the UK trial was the Sun vs John Christopher Depp not Amber Laura Heard and the Sun vs John Christopher Depp

Also you forgot his deal with Dior 🤭

What deals has Amanda gotten lol

@sullxo

#Twitter bs #johnny depp #anti amber heard #amber heard is an abuser

[dwarvenhobble]

Explaining why the UK verdict about Johnny Depp is meaningless in the face of the latest US court result

(Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer and this is not legal advice). So I've seen a number of the defenders of Amber Turd (even some big publications) bringing this up and waving it round and yelling about it as some kind of proof against Johnny Depp so I figured I'd break down how some of these big media companies putting out these pieces are wrong and the UK trial means next to nothing.

The first thing to establish are the differences:

The UK was Depp vs The Sun newspaper over a story one of their reporters wrote. The US case was Depp vs Heard over a piece put out in a newspaper with her name on it.

The US courts operate actually under a higher standard of proof for defamation than the UK courts. The US requires proof of damages which is very hard to prove normally while the UK court requires the part being sued prove their work wasn't damaging (which is why normally this isn't a defence tactic in UK courts as it's easier to prove others parts of it).

In the UK court case the result was based on the idea of due diligence and what a reasonable person would know and what could be reasonably be expected for a reporter to know or information a reporter could easily get hold on. In the UK case that meant a lot of Depp's evidence was useless because it was from private therapy recordings and call recordings and all kind of other similar stuff. Thus a reporter couldn't legitimately have been expected to have been aware of said things existing or got hold of them given basically no-one knew until they were brought up as evidence. However Amber Heard should have or would have known what she had said and what had really happened.

The UK court ruling was based on the idea of based on evidence that could have reasonably been obtained or known about that a reasonable person would draw the same conclusions. The thing about reasonable conclusions is they changed based on evidence out there. It would be great to pretend I'm right all the time but I'm not and I doubt many other people are especially as new evidence comes out. It might be reasonable to conclude your parcel may arrive on time as it normally does but it may not and the new evidence may be because there are now roadworks at the end of your road or on a major road to get to you so it will cause a delay.

In essence the UK court case was not based on the evidence Depp brought to court to clear his name. It was based on the evidence available to the journalist who wrote the piece at the time they wrote it.

The UK case is now meaningless because of the US court win which was against Heard herself and the knowledge heard would have had which would have been of the evidence Depp and his team were able to provide. Depp and his team in court proved vs a higher standard than the UK case that Heard had maliciously smeared him knowing that what was said no reasonable person would believe was true in the face of the evidence provided.

So when all these media articles bring up the UK case now. Well now you know it wasn't Depp vs Heard it was Depp vs a reporter who was never in the room or privy to the kind of things Depp was able to provide as evidence so that evidence was pointless and basically not useable.

#justice for johnny depp #Justice for Johnny #Justice for Depp #Amber Turd #amber heard is a liar #i stand with johnny depp #johnny depp vs amber heard #Johnny Depp

[bebx]

Here's the thing. AH didn't have to donate the 7 million dollars, she also didn't have to donate it in one go, it was HER money after all but you know what is the important point here? The fact she said that she donated it multiple times. When she was accused of missing JD's money in an Instagram post, she said the money is in the hands of sick children. Donating the money (which is the action of GIVING the money away, not just saying it) played a role in Sun vs Depp case.

Exactly. The problem isn’t “she didn’t donate” it was her money and she could do whatever she wanted with it and people wouldn’t care. The problem is that she claimed she “donated it all” and that she “wanted nothing”

Like, if she wanted to pocket the money (which she did) then fine. The money was already hers. It’s the fact she went around and told the world she donated all of it to sick children and the fact she used those sick children to make herself look good, that’s the problem.

Especially when her having claimed to “have already donated it all” played a big role in the UK trial, hence she literally committed perjury.

Some people seem to misunderstand the situation and think the public’s calling her out because she didn’t donate, when she’s in fact being called out because she lied. Under oath, too.

#my inbox is open #ACLU #justice for johnny depp

[roamwithahungryheart]

you're right, the truth matters. & calling johnny depp a "wife beater" is still "substantially true" according to johnny's case vs. the sun :)

The truth matters, and calling Amber Heard an abuser and The Scum a piece of shit rag not worth putting down for the dogs will always be true as decided in a court of law, the court of public opinion and all major media outlets :)

#Johnny Depp #Amber Heard #Depp vs Heard #Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard #Depp v Heard #Johnny Depp v Amber Heard

[valkyriesexual]

So, my question is, and I think we all may know the answer here, but, if the op-ed defamed Depp, why is he not suing the publication, the Washington Post, and the ACLU, who was the co-author (I believe)?

Is it because he previously lost with Dan Wootton and The Sun?

Yeah, easier to prove a person lied intentionally vs proving that a media publication acted with actual malice which would b required in a def case.

#depp v. heard #answered #lawblr

[whistle-free]

Helloooo, just curious as to whether the most recent verdict proves Depp wasn’t abusive? He won the defamatory case, so the op ed was proven false I think? But what does this mean when Depp was seen as guilty of 12 out of 14 counts of DV by the U.K. courts? This the defamation verdict cancel out the guilty of DV verdict?

Similarly, does the verdict mean Heard was the abuser? She lost the defamation case, but she wasn’t proven guilty of abuse. But then why are people convinced she was the abuser, and why didn’t Depp take Heard into court for DV?

Hi! These are great questions!

(Going to try this again because Tumblr ate it the first time I tried to answer.)

The answer to your first (and fifth) question is likely going to be slightly unsatisfying, because this was a civil defamation case, and therefore the verdict neither proves or disproves that either Johnny or Amber were abusive to the other as that wasn't what was being ruled on.

However, you are correct in believing that since the jury found in favor that the three statements were defamatory that the statements Amber made in the op-ed were determined to be false.

As far as the UK case I'm currently drafting a post on that now that will go into more detail, and I encourage you to stick around for that as it will answer your question better than I could sum it up here, but in short; The Virginia verdict technically doesn't 'cancel out' the UK trial verdict, but it does potentially open some doors to appeal that ruling. There was a reason the judge in the Virginia case said JD did not get a fair trial in the UK case, and I'll explain that more in the upcoming post.

To reiterate the above for your next question, the Virginia case was a civil defamation suit, and you'd be correct in saying that AH wasn't proven guilty of abuse because no one is 'found guilty' in civil cases, they are only found to be liable. The reason many are convinced AH was the abuser despite no former ruling for or against the matter is due to watching the trial and coming to that conclusion after weighing the evidence presented, namely the audio tapes where AH admits to striking JD and to starting physical fights.

As for why Depp didn't take Heard into court for DV, only he can really answer that. However, one could speculate many things, like maybe he thought no one would take him seriously as a man claiming to be a victim, or perhaps he, like many victims, didn't want to press charges against his abuser for any various reasons not limited to fear, love, or even just not wanting to relive any abuse any more than he had to. There's also the matter of the alleged abuse having taken place in different countries and states, all with their own statutes of limitations which could make pressing charges tricky.

Hope this answers your questions! If I misunderstood something you asked, or I wasn't clear on something, feel free to let me know!

#If you believe any of this information to be flawed please submit any additional sources to this blog #so this post may be amended and corrected #defamation trial #depp v heard trial #depp vs heard #johnny depp #amber heard #johnny depp trial #the sun trial #uk trial #virginia trial #depp v the sun #sun vs depp

[anthroxlove]

all 14 allegations of abuse + the evidence and the findings from the Depp UK libel trial explained

It took me a long time to make this video because I actually did read all of the testimony and the entire 129-page judgment. I'm explaining the verdict and the evidence Justice Nicol considered in the UK libel claim Johnny Depp lodged against The Sun newspaper. The claim was ultimately dismissed because Justice Nicol found that 12 of 14 allegations of abuse were proven.

#amber heard #johnny depp #uk trial #depp vs the sun #depp vs heard #johnny depp vs the sun #johnny depp vs amber heard #[ for those who dont want to or have time to read the 129-page judgment ]

[ariminiria]

Omg now Hollywood is trying to come up with stupid lies as to why Henry Cavill left The Witcher such as "The truth is that Henry Cavill was toxic to the women on the production of The Witcher." Really??? Can't Hollywood leave the poor guy alone??? He already suffered enough from both Netflix AND WB!

and I've heard the article was already proven to be false, and the supposed source was someone who like wasn't even involved with the production at all or something like that. honestly, libel and defamation laws need to be stricter. the fact that tabloid rags can get away with saying the most horrific shit and then say "oh but we thought it was true based on what the source told us, so it's not defamation if we believed it!!!"

-see Johnny Depp vs the Sun- they got away with it because "🥺🥺🥺 there was just no way we could've known what Amber said was a lie!!"

it's called validating your sources, you morons, and if you can't prove it, don't print it. if anyone at that "news" place cared about integrity, the article about Cavill never would've been written because they would've have found the source to be false before they even sat down at their computer to type it up. but they don't care about that. they want to take any bit of scandal and run with it, no matter what. I'm sick of it.

#hollywood hate

[witch-without-gender]

I'm not trying to attack you and you can delete without replying if this makes you uncomfortable. But the Depp vs Heard and the Depp vs The Sun trial are two very different things. One is against a person and the other is against a tabloid. The Sun has been capable of getting away with murder in the UK. They supported Margaret Thatcher and still are best known for being super racist and anti LGBT. It is enough for a tabloid to believe a piece of evidence is true for it to be considered sustainable. It has nothing to do whether it was actually true or not like people who are pro Amber seem to think it is. Tabloid laws in the UK are just super messed up, so please don't reblog posts glorifying any victory for The Sun.

I’m far from being the most informed person on this whole topic so thank you so much for taking the time to teach me!! I definitely don’t want to be promoting shit like that

#asks #amber heard #johnny depp #depp vs heard

[someonefantastic]

Just finished 1x03 and can safely say I'm hooked! This show is so weird in the best possible way. The guest characters in this ep, that I'm guessing came from btvs, did annoy me a little (was kinda hoping Angel would kill that weaselly vamp with the weird hair but oh well) but still very much loved the whole ep. Cordy used a crossbow! And her and Doyle being so concerned over Angel, as well as him wanting to keep them out of it so they'd be safe... found family is the BEST trope ever. Legit got emotional when Angel was walking on the beach, feeling the sun and watching the families hanging out. And loved the discussion with Doyle about why he had to get rid of the ring. I'm gonna binge watch a few more eps tonight since I don't have to work tomorrow.

(Quick question though. They haven't actually explained Angel's powers, but from what I gathered he has super strength and healing, and his kryptonite is apparently sunlight and wood? Just tryna get a better understanding of the show's lore.)

THAT WEASELLY VAMP WITH THE WEIRD HAIR KSJDFKSDFDJF that is literally the funniest description of Spike I have ever heard I'm dying akjfdadf He actually becomes one of the series regulars on btvs (and later a love interest of Buffy's) and is one of the more fan favorites on the show so unfortunately, Angle couldn't kill him. But yeah, the btvs crossover eps in s1 are a little weird especially if you don't already know the characters but I'm glad you still enjoyed the ep!! It's such a fun one! The Angel Investigations team is literally such a family and you're only on ep three! It gets even better! Also Angel in the sun always makes me 🥺 And YES Cordy with a crossbow!!!!!!!! It's Such a good scene and her haiiiir (also you'll get this but the Johnny Depp reference makes me think of that one joke in Shawn vs the Red Phantom). It makes me so happy that you're hooked and I hope you enjoy your binge!! Feel free to keep up these asks! I love getting them!!

Yeah, Angel's powers are weird because they're never like specifically detailed, like he'll go and do something and I'm like oh??? he can do that??? But from what I gather being a vampire on btvs/ats comes with enhanced abilities and senses so he's super strong and fast and can smell and hear things really well and heals much faster than a human would and he can withstand more injuries. And then the only ways to kill him (and other vampires) are a stake (or just wood) through the heart, fire (hence the sunlight thing which will set him on fire), or decapitation, everything else he survives even if it's really damaging. (There's actually an episode in s2 of btvs where Spike gets squashed and would've basically died if he were human but instead he winds up temporarily paralyzed.) Holy water and crosses also burn him but they don't kill him. There's also the whole immortality thing and also I think I should add that since Angel is a vampire with a soul, there's a clause in his curse that he can't find perfect happiness or else he'll lose his soul and turn back into the psychotic killer he was pre-soul so he’s really just doing his best

#i have no clue if i created more questions than i answered or what but please feel free to ask me more questions for context or lore or #anything in general because i do not mind at all and would love to answer any and all of them #but yeah i'm so pumped that you're enjoying this show!!! #ats #sci fi pony #skipps speaks #asks

[itseattherich]

Introductory post, yay

🐝 Lisa, she/they

🐝 23yrs old

🐝 Quite Queer

🐝 Diagnosed GAD and major depression, yay

🐝 Other mental illnesses not entirely specified, suspected AVPD

🐝 Mixed interests blog! Including, but not limited to: Weird Shit, Hannibal, Twin Peaks, Buffy, Buzzfeed Unsolved

🐝 NOT A DISCOURSE BLOG but I follow discourse accounts - I don't necessarily agree with all of them

🐝 Occasional rant or vent about being mentally ill

🐝 Occasional 18+

🐝 Be polite and decent, thank u

🐝 If my content makes you uncomfy in any way, please block me

PSA!!

Again - I follow a wide variety of people, with different opinions. I don't engage in discourse directly, but might rb content from people who are. That doesn't mean I agree with their collection of opinions.

✨ Fun facts ✨

Hogwarts house: Hufflepuff (or Slytherin)

Ilvermony house: Pukwudgie (or Horned Serpent)

Myers-Briggs: INFP

Enneageam: 5w4, 9w1, 4w5 sx/so 

Astrology: Pisces sun, pisces moon, gemini rising

Temperament: Melancholic

Favorite book: The Secret History by Donna Tartt

OCEAN test: high open, mid conscientious, mid extraversion (disagree), high agreeable, mid neurotic

Favorite colors: darker greens, autumn yellow, orange and dark/muted red

Concerning comfort series: Chernobyl, Hannibal

Concerning comfort characters: Hannibal, Silco

Normal comfort characters: Uncle Iroh, Sergio Marquina, Aragorn, Agent Cooper, Lucy from Twin Peaks (are my daddy issues showing?), Giles from BTVS, Willow from BTVS

A selection of former hyperfixations: American football, women's artistic gymnastics, plane disasters, cults, go (the board game), Van Gogh, Christian theology and organisation, tarot cards, psychiatric diagnoses, body language, Depp vs Heard trial, Jesus Christ Superstar