Tumgik
#blue notebook
pxsieszn · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Blue Aesthetic
45 notes · View notes
shirmirart · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
The Notebook x FirstPrince
6K notes · View notes
dailykafka · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
— Franz Kafka, The Blue Octavo Notebooks
14K notes · View notes
jenoutof10 · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
reo's skincare
2K notes · View notes
patiak · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Just listed on Etsy the next cosmic journal. This time it is cosmic blue door. Unique notebook, one of kind, ready to ship. Here more information: 
https://www.etsy.com/listing/167990628/cosmic-door-galaxy-universe-stars?click_key=ffb34ccf47bc204929e34d416bd75da7d92cd57f%3A167990628&click_sum=ebbff640&ref=shop_home_active_28&frs=1&crt=1&sts=1
0 notes
davidcouture · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
♡  ﹕cinnamoroll pfps
4K notes · View notes
metamorphesque · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
― Franz Kafka, Blue Octavo Notebooks
2K notes · View notes
deputamare · 2 years
Video
youtube
0 notes
valtianan · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
“they were young and loud and triumphant, and the kings of henrietta.”
blue sargent | adam parrish | ronan lynch | gansey III | noah czerny
5K notes · View notes
fruitstickerr · 4 months
Text
scanned my 2024 planner ✮⋆˙ punched a hole on the cover so i could put miffy & angel blue charms ପ(๑•ᴗ•๑)ଓ ♡
Tumblr media
973 notes · View notes
zenchii · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Yor & Anya
SPY X FAMILY CHAPTER 87
1K notes · View notes
philosophybits · 7 months
Quote
Your will is free means: it was free when it wanted the desert, it is free since it can choose the path that leads to crossing the desert, it is free since it can choose the pace, but it is also unfree since you must go through the desert, unfree since every path in labyrinthine manner touches every foot of the desert’s surface.
Franz Kafka, The Blue Octavo Notebooks
494 notes · View notes
7carpileup · 1 year
Text
broke: blue sargent is a manic pixie dream girl
woke: gansey is a manic pixie dream girl
2K notes · View notes
dailykafka · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
— November 10, 1917 / The Blue Octavo Notebooks
5K notes · View notes
dollkisses05 · 29 days
Text
The desire to be craved
141 notes · View notes
meraki-yao · 8 months
Text
RWRB Movie Analysis: The Placement of Alex's Speech
Alright I’m really fucking sick of people complaining about the placement of the speech. (I swear, I write half of these essays out of irritation. But I’m happy while doing it so it all checks out)
Two things.
Regarding Henry’s consent
Use context clues people. Henry says, “Your speech was beautiful. Made me very proud to be your boyfriend.” It’s clear that Henry approves of the speech.
Again, what can be shown explicitly is restricted by the format. The point of Henry’s montages during the speech is to show how trapped and helpless he is in the situation. (for more, I wrote about it here.) The scenes need to keep that atmosphere/feeling of isolation and pain. If let’s say, we have a scene where the prime minister asks Henry about admitting and coming out, it would take away the consistent feeling of Henry’s pain. Cinematically, it won’t work. But that doesn’t mean in universe, it didn’t happen.
Also, Alex fucking loves Henry with every inch of his soul. He’s willing to fight for them, but he’s also willing to be patient for him. After getting his feelings sorted out and knowing with 100% clarity that he’s in love with Henry, he is never, ever going to do something that so obviously would hurt Henry. He would rather get hurt himself than hurt Henry. (Corresponding Book Quote: “Alex wants to go to war for this man, wants to get his hands on everything and everyone that ever hurt him.”) He wouldn’t make the speech without knowing Henry is okay with it. He just wouldn’t, that would straight up be out of character. So the fact that he did, means one way or another, he has Henry’s consent. And Henry later approving the speech in the piano scene, proves that. (It’s completely possible that the script itself meant to explain it this way, but if at any point they might have explicitly discussed coming out, my guess would be the Kensington breakfast scene, Prime, I’m coming for your hard drives—)
Regarding the placement of speech
There are two reasons for this.
One irl reason, is again, the format of the medium, and movie story telling. You want the tension to continuously build, increase and move upwards, then get a big but concrete resolution, and then this part is over. Having the speech as a conclusion after the balcony wave will not feel as well resolved as directly having the speech, then ending this part of the story with the big, big protest and balcony wave.  
But there’s a diegetic/ in universe reason as well.  
A lot of people, especially those who complain that Movie Alex is a himbo (also spite writing an essay on that, WIP, stay tuned), forget that Alex is a budding politician, and in fact, is a damn good one.
He, despite being kind of confused about his sexuality (read this essay for more), figures out Miguel’s flirting is mostly trying to get his statements for his articles, and in a fairly polite and classy way, Alex declines. (The state dinner slip was because he was way too entranced by Henry) He was a speaker at the DNC. His Texas campaign ultimately won Ellen the election.
When is comes to these things, he knows what he’s doing, and he’s good at what he does.
Making the speech before the crown can make a statement, was a strategic move.
Henry told Alex about his grandfather’s stance on this during the Paris date. He also told, well, yelled at Alex about the pressures he has from the crown during the Kensington confrontation. Alex knows the King will disapprove of their relationship and attempt to shove Henry into the closet.
So he has to be the one to control the narrative. He needs people to listen to, and believe in his, or rather, their side of the story.
And here’s a bit about human psychology. When receiving a new piece of information, our first impression and subsequent judgement of said information tends to be persistent. If we are provided with a second piece of contradicting information, we will tend to treat the second piece with much more criticism and suspicion. The mindset would be “prove to me the first one is wrong” instead of “Which one of these is right”.
Therefore, for Alex to get more people on his side, he must speak first.
(I almost imagine this is the reason the White House blocked communication with the palace. That bugged me for a while, until I thought, if the White House doesn’t block communication and receive a demand from the palace, they aren’t really on grounds to refuse it without a diplomatic mess. It’s the equivalent of avoiding talking to someone you don’t want to approach with the excuse “Oh my phone was off sorry”)
Imagine it. If the crown does what the King originally proposed and claims all the emails are fabrications and denies that Henry is gay and in a relationship with Alex, then Alex’s speech will be viewed through tinted glasses of “this is a fabrication, this is a lie” and it will take much more persuading for people to believe in Alex, because their first judgement of the issue, would be the crown’s lie of a narrative.
But by making the speech first, people’s first judgement of the issue, would be Alex’s explanation, of it being an invasion of privacy, and of it being true. Even if the crown denies it, with the first judgement being Alex’s narrative, it would make it much easier to see through the lie, because in people’s head, they already assumed that Alex is telling the truth.
By making the speech first, Alex has won both himself and Henry, the pen to write history.
Making the speech first is in no way Alex disrespecting Henry.
By playing politics and strategy, Alex is protecting Henry in the most familiar way he knows.
268 notes · View notes