#Moral skepticism

[omegaphilosophia]

Aspects of the Philosophy of Doubt

The philosophy of doubt explores the concept of uncertainty and skepticism regarding knowledge, beliefs, and truth claims. It questions the reliability of human cognition and the certainty of our understanding of the world. Doubt can be seen as both a philosophical problem and a methodological approach, influencing epistemology, metaphysics, ethics, and other areas of philosophy.

Some key aspects of the philosophy of doubt include:

Epistemic skepticism: This is the view that knowledge claims are inherently uncertain or even impossible to justify. Epistemic skeptics raise doubts about the reliability of our senses, reasoning, and cognitive faculties to accurately perceive and understand reality.

Methodological doubt: This is a systematic approach to inquiry that involves questioning assumptions, beliefs, and conclusions in order to arrive at more reliable knowledge. Methodological doubt is often associated with the scientific method and critical thinking.

Cartesian skepticism: Named after the philosopher René Descartes, Cartesian skepticism is a form of radical doubt that seeks to doubt everything that can be doubted in order to find indubitable truths. Descartes famously expressed skepticism about the reliability of the senses and the possibility of being deceived by an evil demon.

Existential doubt: This form of doubt concerns questions about the meaning, purpose, and significance of human existence. Existential doubt often arises in response to existential crises or profound experiences that challenge conventional beliefs and values.

Moral skepticism: Moral skepticism is the view that there are no objective moral truths or that moral knowledge is inherently uncertain. Moral skeptics may doubt the existence of moral facts or argue that moral judgments are ultimately subjective or culturally relative.

Overall, the philosophy of doubt encourages critical reflection, open-mindedness, and intellectual humility in the pursuit of truth and understanding. It reminds us to question our assumptions, challenge our beliefs, and remain open to new possibilities, even in the face of uncertainty.

#philosophy #epistemology #knowledge #learning #chatgpt #education #metaphysics #psychology #Philosophy of doubt #Epistemic skepticism #Methodological doubt #Cartesian skepticism #Existential doubt #Moral skepticism #Skeptical inquiry #Critical thinking #Uncertainty #Intellectual humility

[irishskeptic]

“We want more morally grey characters” Buddy. You couldn’t even handle Aiden Pearce.

#aiden pearce #watch dogs #THE morally grey Irishman #he’s underrated too #the whole watch dogs games are underrated #misc skeptic thoughts

[bonebabbles]

Ah, so Mothwing said nothing at the meeting because she realized it wouldn't have helped in that moment. She does believe Frostpaw.

Ehh... still not a fan of how NO ONE spoke up at all. That's ridiculous. I can see Mothwing doing this because she is in a very uniquely bad position here in regards to Clan cat prejudice;

Atheist without connection to StarClan; immediately doubted

Tigerblooded; Might seem biased towards tigerHeartstar

All her picks for leadership backfired; credibility damaged

Mentor of Frostpaw; can be dismissed as personal bias

SOMEONE should have spoken up, but it does check out if Mothwing specifically didn't when she did believe her, with all that in mind... though I will not let this book live down the Sleeptalk Scheming bit.

Instead Mothwing is trying to sew doubt in the Clan and undermine Splashtail.

But... this line is bugging me A LOT;

"I haven't been StarClan's biggest supporter, BUT RiverClan NEEDS a leader who was approved by them"

Mothwing of all people should understand how easy it is to fake a sign. Not being able to tell WHEN a cat is StarClan Approved is not only the reason Hawkfrost was able to blackmail her, but also WHY THE SPLASHTAIL PLOT IS CURRENTLY HAPPENING.

Even real, bona fide StarClan Approved Leaders can be awful. She is the daughter of Tigerstar, she knows this. I know the WRITERS know this, since they namedropped Nightstar earlier in this book. StarClan Approval is not a seal of quality in any way.

What "not the biggest fan" is so cutely downplaying is that Mothwing does not have belief in their wisdom or benevolence. This is character-defining. This is her WHOLE motivation.

Her novella leaves her on the conclusion that StarClan is no different than mortal cats, and that she only sees its value in the comfort it gives to her Clanmates. This is a terrible line to give her as a character, it focuses on the wrong things.

Better sentiments for her to express are,

"If he gets the blessings of a leader, we'll have to deal with a murderer for nine lifetimes."

"I resent having to leverage it, but the useful fact he's not going to the Moonpool is suspicious in the eyes of our Clanmates"

"What does he think he'll see if he goes to the Moonpool? Why would he be turning down 8 more lives?"

#Atheists and other skeptics do not all believe the same thing. Our beliefs are as broad as religions are #Broader even because we're defined by NOT having a particular *set* of beliefs to label. #The only thing Atheists share by definition is being 'without god' #And Mothwing's beliefs and morals were VERY well defined by her novella #We might call her a Mistheist. She believes in a god but also that the god is not benevolent. #asc spoilers

[shoezuki]

natasha has been like. the first character other than sampo or gepard to ever be mentioned in this fic from the first ch and im happy shes finally here. cuz the relationship she n sampo got going on is So Interesting to me. i mean in game sampo is very intriguing to me like theres obviously some level of trust there and a mutual respect considering nat trusts sampo to do jobs for her and sampo goes to her when the trailblazers are in trouble. and him bringing natasha medicine is kinda huge considering his 'selfish' character. like. i dig them having a major mutual understanding and trust towards one another that goes into being protective of each other. i love their situationship

but also i just now realized that. all the other characters in this fic besides sampard will be women and every woman introduced so far has yelled at or at least argued w gepard at some point. lets go girls

#in the bones #also im so intrigued by natasha as like #shes the leader of wildfire and is caring both as a doctor and as the leader #but also has shown distrust and skepticism towards the silvermanes. and she works w sampo #i want to dig into her sense of morality. #maybe im projecting but i feel anarchist vibes from her. like. neutral good #........ ashit. all the other characters in this fic will be women. like #maybe captain dunn will be mentioned or pop in but its all ladies. i have no plans for like. luka or anyone else

[captainjonnitkessler]

People will dismiss the importance of interpreting the Constitution because “maybe we shouldn’t care what a bunch of racist sexist slaveowners would have thought 200 years ago”

But bring up one passage from a holy book that hasn’t aged well and people will trip all over themselves to say “well, actually, in this translation, and if you use this interpretation, and if you listen to this crackpot theory that no theologian takes seriously but that I’m going to present as established and widely accepted, then -” instead of just following through on “maybe we shouldn’t care what a bunch of racist sexist slaveowners would have thought 2000 years ago”

#i'm so sick of hearing religious people explain to me why actually leviticus doesn't ban gay people y'all #it DOESN'T MATTER. it literally does not matter if it does or doesn't #i am not going to respect the moral authority of a 2000 year old book regardless of how well you justify its slavery #and people don't make moral choices based on bible interpretations. they choose bible interpretations #based on moral choices they've already made #atheism #skepticism umbrella

[ananimice]

Thinking about something set in the 1920-1940ish range, Ryan finding an obscure corner club and becoming enraptured by the tall sultry woman that sings most nights. She has a more angular face than he's seen on a woman, and her hair is carefully styled into a curled pixie cut, a fascinator ever present and ever changing depending on the dress she wears. Her wardrobe seems endless, as Ryan never sees her in the same dress twice.

One day, he finally gets the courage to wait out back of the club for her to come out, but she never does. Instead, out comes an equally tall man with the same sloping facial features. His hair is unstyled, hanging shaggy around his ears and neck. Ryan's stomach flips, though, as those deep brown eyes connect with his and he immediately knows it's Her.

Shane moonlights as a female impersonator named Shae, singing beautiful melodies and wearing outfits he'd never allowed himself to enjoy before. The club was made for people like him, though, those that shattered social norms. It was his home away from home, away from the fiancée his parents had lined him up with, away from inheriting the family business and all it's problems. Being Shae allowed him to escape, even if it was just at night.

Instead of running away, Ryan stays, fascinated. Shane fears him at first, thinking he'll tell his secret to the world or worse. But Ryan gives him a gentle smile. He reaches a hand out, introduces himself properly. Shane shakes it, offering his name in return.

And that's the beginning of a love story for the ages.

#i got. 1 hour of sleep last night. so idk if this is even legible. #but i am picturing Scenarios #inspired by Moral of the Story by Ashe #inspo #shyan #skeptic believer #otp: we took an oath

[possiblybranchobsessed]

I’m still in love with Trolls 3, however, I do think Viva’s storyline was compelling enough for its own movie

#trolls tbt #trolls 3 #trolls viva #honestly it would be cool to see a storyline challenging trolls 1 #like #viva being super skeptical about the pop trolls forgiving the bergens so quickly #and making them question their friendship with them #actual really interesting morals

[raayllum]

Callum + being a lil bitch boi (affectionately), otherwise known as Callum having an Edge™

#tdp callum #snake boi callum #arc 1 #arc 2 #multi #can u tell i love callum's ruthless / skeptic / morally dubious streak yet #i could've added more examples and could write an entire essay Just on 2x07 for him but #like him on the roof with soren in 4x01 #this is the big ones #callum's tendency to destroy rare magical objects on purpose being acknowledged was so good #man went 'am i gonna ruin this thing' in 4x02 and then did not wait for an answer #LIKE THEY MUST HAVE PENCILS BUT NO. NOT EVEN CHARCOAL. FULL ON INK

[oorevitcejda]

There has to be some subsection of students at Visions that firmly believe the school is 100% Haunted.

like their science project is a huge year long ordeal documenting the bathroom doors that open randomly and the weird sound of footsteps on the ceiling or the windows getting opened and shut or things sometimes being swiped from the langauge class desks only to be found on the floor outside the cafeteria

Ganke joins the 'Visions is haunted' [name pending] club after school bc he genuinely was interested in ghosts but after one session he realizes its just Miles when he casually [its not casual! hes careful and makes sure no one actually sees *him*] goes invisible to get to classes/ spider-man business faster caused these kids to think the school is haunted. ganke is a little disappointed there's no actual ghost but he stays to make sure they stay off of Miles trail [and sometimes he gets Miles to do something specific for funsies]

#ti talks #one kid was so skeptically ruining the main kids belief that he asked miles to knock on the door when they tried a 'spirit session' #i do believe in ghosts tbh i just think that its funny to be someone who does but also your best friend turns invisible #like cmon #across the spider verse #watching him go through the school like someone HAS to think the schools haunted before 'oh my classmate is s-m!' #he can be heard when he climbs hes invisible not soundproof #and like yeah crowds of kids are loud but there has to be someone who notices its not from the ground #anyway #visions is haunted club au #miles morales #ganke lee #ganke: they have all these theories and ideas and tech and cameras and stuff but our 'ghost' is you! #miles: *stuck between dying of laughter and being concerned that they'll find out that he is Spider-Man* #they scream at each other for like 10 minutes before they start planning

[blueheartbooks]

The Brothers Karamazov: A Masterpiece of Moral Inquiry and Psychological Depth

Fyodor Dostoevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov" stands as one of the most profound and influential works in the canon of world literature. Published in 1880, this epic novel delves into the complexities of human nature, morality, faith, and existential angst, weaving together a rich tapestry of philosophical inquiry and psychological insight.

At the heart of "The Brothers Karamazov" are the three titular brothers: Dmitri, Ivan, and Alyosha, each representing different facets of the human psyche and grappling with their own existential dilemmas. Dmitri, the passionate and impulsive eldest brother, struggles with his desires and impulses, torn between his love for two women and his sense of honor. Ivan, the intellectual and skeptical middle brother, grapples with the problem of evil and the existence of God in a world filled with suffering. Alyosha, the youngest and most devout brother, seeks spiritual redemption and strives to embody the teachings of his mentor, the elder Zosima.

Through the interconnected stories of the Karamazov family and the residents of their provincial Russian town, Dostoevsky explores a wide range of philosophical and ethical questions, from the nature of morality and free will to the existence of God and the meaning of life. Drawing on his own experiences of poverty, suffering, and spiritual crisis, Dostoevsky imbues his characters with a depth and authenticity that resonate with readers on a profound emotional and intellectual level.

One of the most compelling aspects of "The Brothers Karamazov" is Dostoevsky's exploration of the human condition and the existential struggles that define the human experience. Through the trials and tribulations of the Karamazov brothers, Dostoevsky grapples with the fundamental questions of human existence: What is the nature of good and evil? Is there a higher purpose or meaning to life? How do we reconcile the existence of suffering and injustice with our belief in a just and compassionate God?

Moreover, "The Brothers Karamazov" is celebrated for its richly drawn characters, vividly depicted landscapes, and masterful storytelling. Dostoevsky's prose is by turns lyrical, philosophical, and profoundly moving, capturing the complexities of human emotion and the inner struggles of his characters with a rare depth and insight. From the dark and brooding Dmitri to the idealistic and compassionate Alyosha, each character is rendered with such psychological nuance and complexity that they feel like living, breathing individuals, grappling with their own hopes, fears, and desires.

In conclusion, "The Brothers Karamazov" by Fyodor Dostoevsky is a towering achievement of world literature that continues to captivate readers with its profound insights, moral complexity, and psychological depth. Through its exploration of timeless themes and universal truths, "The Brothers Karamazov" speaks to the enduring mysteries of the human condition and the eternal quest for meaning, redemption, and spiritual fulfillment. With its richly drawn characters, intricate plot, and philosophical depth, "The Brothers Karamazov" remains a timeless masterpiece that rewards readers with new insights and revelations with each reading.

Fyodor Dostoevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov" is available in Amazon in paperback 24.99$ and hardcover 30.99$ editions.

Number of pages: 515

Language: English

Rating: 9/10                                           

Link of the book!

Review By: King's Cat

#The Brothers Karamazov #Fyodor Dostoyevsky #Russian literature #Existentialism #Morality #Free will #God #Faith #Doubt #Family dynamics #Psychological depth #Philosophical inquiry #Guilt #Redemption #Sin #Crime and punishment #Russian society #Existential angst #Fatherhood #Sibling rivalry #Religious faith #Atheism #Mysticism #Love #Justice #Conscience #Philosophy of suffering #Inner conflict #Religious skepticism #Mystical experiences

[blueheartbookclub]

The Brothers Karamazov: A Masterpiece of Moral Inquiry and Psychological Depth

Fyodor Dostoevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov" stands as one of the most profound and influential works in the canon of world literature. Published in 1880, this epic novel delves into the complexities of human nature, morality, faith, and existential angst, weaving together a rich tapestry of philosophical inquiry and psychological insight.

At the heart of "The Brothers Karamazov" are the three titular brothers: Dmitri, Ivan, and Alyosha, each representing different facets of the human psyche and grappling with their own existential dilemmas. Dmitri, the passionate and impulsive eldest brother, struggles with his desires and impulses, torn between his love for two women and his sense of honor. Ivan, the intellectual and skeptical middle brother, grapples with the problem of evil and the existence of God in a world filled with suffering. Alyosha, the youngest and most devout brother, seeks spiritual redemption and strives to embody the teachings of his mentor, the elder Zosima.

Through the interconnected stories of the Karamazov family and the residents of their provincial Russian town, Dostoevsky explores a wide range of philosophical and ethical questions, from the nature of morality and free will to the existence of God and the meaning of life. Drawing on his own experiences of poverty, suffering, and spiritual crisis, Dostoevsky imbues his characters with a depth and authenticity that resonate with readers on a profound emotional and intellectual level.

One of the most compelling aspects of "The Brothers Karamazov" is Dostoevsky's exploration of the human condition and the existential struggles that define the human experience. Through the trials and tribulations of the Karamazov brothers, Dostoevsky grapples with the fundamental questions of human existence: What is the nature of good and evil? Is there a higher purpose or meaning to life? How do we reconcile the existence of suffering and injustice with our belief in a just and compassionate God?

Moreover, "The Brothers Karamazov" is celebrated for its richly drawn characters, vividly depicted landscapes, and masterful storytelling. Dostoevsky's prose is by turns lyrical, philosophical, and profoundly moving, capturing the complexities of human emotion and the inner struggles of his characters with a rare depth and insight. From the dark and brooding Dmitri to the idealistic and compassionate Alyosha, each character is rendered with such psychological nuance and complexity that they feel like living, breathing individuals, grappling with their own hopes, fears, and desires.

In conclusion, "The Brothers Karamazov" by Fyodor Dostoevsky is a towering achievement of world literature that continues to captivate readers with its profound insights, moral complexity, and psychological depth. Through its exploration of timeless themes and universal truths, "The Brothers Karamazov" speaks to the enduring mysteries of the human condition and the eternal quest for meaning, redemption, and spiritual fulfillment. With its richly drawn characters, intricate plot, and philosophical depth, "The Brothers Karamazov" remains a timeless masterpiece that rewards readers with new insights and revelations with each reading.

Fyodor Dostoevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov" is available in Amazon in paperback 24.99$ and hardcover 30.99$ editions.

Number of pages: 515

Language: English

Rating: 9/10                                           

Link of the book!

Review By: King's Cat

#The Brothers Karamazov #Fyodor Dostoyevsky #Russian literature #Existentialism #Morality #Free will #God #Faith #Doubt #Family dynamics #Psychological depth #Philosophical inquiry #Guilt #Redemption #Sin #Crime and punishment #Russian society #Existential angst #Fatherhood #Sibling rivalry #Religious faith #Atheism #Mysticism #Love #Justice #Conscience #Philosophy of suffering #Inner conflict #Religious skepticism #Mystical experiences

[sgkjd]

ppl sometimes say to me "u think you're always right" and i sit there confused because yes? i usually AM right. because i have researched the topic more than you, and i have thought through both arguments and counterarguments before speaking up. moreover, my anxiety and fear of being misunderstood simply doesn't let me speak anything out loud which i haven't thought 150% through. so technically yes, i am more right? i don't understand what's the problem? i'm not talking about my personal opinion though? i'm just stating the facts? and the facts tend to be something that's "right"? don't they?

#like please #just engage in a proper discussion w me if u want to share what u know and what u have researched #i also don't understand how i talk about history facts or political ideas and ppl are like 'these are just your beliefs' #and i have to explain how there actually exists a sort of objective reality #and that political views and moral values are not really equal to 'personal beliefs' that are the sort of 'oh i think pineapple on pizza #is the most delicious food' #how are these the same #ppl who don't like pineapple on pizza aren't oppressed #and it makes me so genuinely frustrated #i realize each person sees the world differently but that's why we have science and the sort – bc humanity is trying to reach some more #objective pov #that's why we have 'big words' that mean some specific thing and we define those words via dictionaries #while our explanations of 'objective reality' are still flawed (bc everything is mostly just plausible guesses) i still think it's better t #try and define it #and try and come to agreements on things of what certain things mean #idk even if the 'objective reality' can't exist isn't it still better to pretend to have one? bc if u only think how #'everyone has their own reality' and that's the answer/explanation u say to anything happening in society that u don't understand #or that u think is wrong #i feel like such skepticism makes ppl prone to not having hope in a better world #and i think that hope is soso important to have bc it's what drives the activism #just a big rant....i have many feelings ... #i don't understand how some ppl don't have such sense of justice like it's literally a separate feeling #; words generated by me #actually autistic

[thefiresofpompeii]

can't believe we're about to reach disclosure and i'm here preparing for a job interview at lidl. you guys will find me an invaluable asset as a customer assistant when the little green men come in on a mission to sample Terran foods sorry i MEANT i will seek to fulfil any customer's request to the best of my ability. yeah no absolutely no aliens only maintaining quality in the fruit aisle

#autistic about this. normal about this. SKEPTICAL about this. giddy and squealing. reasonable and rational. this is a political agenda to #detract from rising fascism. this is true. this is false. this is a hoax. this is foul play this is honest this is a man with the strongest #moral compass? this is confirmed this is denied? this is deranged ufologists this is legitimate journalistic sources?? #'get a job' you say. see. i'm already doing that #jamie.txt

[iisthepopeoffools]

I am against nostalgic Luddism and against techno-optimism. I am against reaction, against conservatism, and against progress. I am against vitalism and against alienation. I am against civilization and against primitivism. I am against moralism and against nihilism. I am against asceticism and against hedonism. I am against reformism, against escapism, and against annihilationism. I am against slave morality and against master morality. I am against egalitarianism and against stratification. I am against universalism and against atomization. I am against humanism and against humanity as something to be overcome. All of these may hopefully find their syntheses in salvagepunk philosophy.

#salvagepunk #anti-reactionary #anti-conservatism #anti-progressivism #anti-civ #post-civ #anti-primitivism #anti-moralism #anti-nihilism #anti-asceticism #anti-hedonism #anti-reformism #anti-escapism #techno-skepticism #anti-annihilationism #slave morality #master morality #nietzsche #nietzschean #nietzscheanism #anti-egalitarianism #anti-stratification #communalism #assemblage #anti-humanism #posthumanism #post-humanism #humanity #salvage communism #philosophy

[unagrancantidaddepanes]

if yall arent careful ill end up writing the most banger essay about rose quartz/pink diamond ever ASKHHJAHGSJKJ

#JUST TO BE CLEAR #I THINK SEEING HER AS A BAD OR EVEN TERRIBLE PERSON IS A VALID PERSPECTIVE TO HAVE #IT JUST NOT ENTIRELY MY PERSPECTIVE AJHASGHKJLK #I THINK SHE WAS A BAD PERSON I THINK SHE DID PICK UP THE BEHAVIOUR OF HER ABUSERS AND CARELESSLY LASHED OUT AT OTHER PEOPLE #BUT I ALSO THINK THAT SHE ACKNOLOGDED THAT AND GREW FROM THAT AND ACTIVLEY TRIED TO CHANGE HER BEHAVIOUR INTO SOMETHING POSITIVE #TO ME SHE HAD A CLEAR CHANGE IN MORALS AND ACTIVE CHANGE IN BEHAVIOUR #but seriously as someone with abusive parents i NEVER like abuser characters HOWEVER pink diamonds development is just so realistic to how #some children process parental abuse and how that effects and changes them and LIKE IM JUST SO SKEPTICAL OF ABUSE CHARACTER REDEMPTIONS #NORMALLY #BECAUSE NORMALLY THEY R SO RUSHED AND LAZILY DONE #BUT PINK DIAMONDS HAD SO MUCH CARE AND THOUGHT PUT INTO IT AND IT ACTUALLY MAKES SENSE WHY SHE STARTED TO ACKLODEGDE WHAT SHE WAS DOING AS #WRONG AND WHY SHE CHANGED HER BEHAVIOUR #myposts

[pixxyofice]

tomorrow... i will Write More of the next korsimint fic hehe

#i want to post more about korsica but what can i say? #lady pretty? she has a bit of a confidence issue even after growing a bit more into it with the gang? #she is the right head of security and there's a reason both she and macaron were rehired? #like she's the right amount of skeptical and... uh... if we ignore how she was acting when her morals and her job were contradicting... #she was actually kinda cool. you know. other than blowing up the elevator #but she DID catch chai compared to the other bosses! like 1/4 but that's wayyy better than the others kale jesus christ #kale the fuckin manipulator liar #.... i should make these posts actually. tomorrow