Left: "You the copsucker?"
Me: "Yeah."
Right: "Good, because we need some service"
Me: "Well stop by, sit back, and I'll service you to completion."
Left: "Sounds good."
The daddies are always in need of servicing and come loaded looking for release.
37 notes
·
View notes
Hey, so do you ever stop to think about how the premise of Lord of the Rings being an in-universe book written by some of the characters who lived through that story means that they decided what parts and perspectives to use to tell that story...?
And when our authors weren't there to experience the events themselves, they have to rely on what they're told about them by the characters who were there, right...?
Okay so stop and think about the Glittering Caves.
We never actually go to the caves in the narrative. Tolkien LOVES describing nature and natural beauty, but we don't actually see the caves described "by him" the way we do other places. Obviously Gimli's words are Tolkien's, yes; but we only see the caves filtered through his words about them, after the fact.
When Gimli and Éomer and the other Rohirrim take refuge there, the narrative doesn't follow them. Obviously from a narrative standpoint this is to keep the focus narrow, and not to interrupt the battle-sequence with a long ode to the beauty of the caves, and to create tension in the reader who doesn't know if these characters are okay or not. Which all makes sense!
But think about it in terms of the book that was written in Middle-earth by the folk living there. Why DON'T we get to have a direct experience of those caves? Gimli obviously related several other parts of the story that none of the Hobbits were there to witness to them, and which were written into the books as Direct Events Happening In The Narrative (think of the Paths of the Dead scene, for one of the more visceral moments!). So why not the Glittering Caves?
Was it because they wanted to keep that narrative focus and tension, and so they didn't include his perspective on that part of the battle? Perhaps, that's certainly a possibility to consider.
But also consider: when we do hear about the Glittering Caves, what we hear is Gimli telling Legolas about the Glittering Caves. THAT is the part of that event that is considered of importance to include in the book: not Gimli's actual experience when he was in them, but rather the part where he relates that experience TO Legolas.
And I kind of just THOUGHT about that today.
And went HUH.
241 notes
·
View notes
The bourgeois or "exploiting class" doesn't inherently include the person who gets their nails done biweekly, or the disabled person who has a carer, or the guy who got a $70 video game for full-price, or the person who relies on medication (yes even the ones you don't think they "need"), or anything else like this. None of these people will, on average, have the ability to exploit workers by means of ownership or whatever.
While you are busy fighting with fellow workers, you are still being exploited by your boss, by capitalism, by (potentially) not having healthcare, by being overworked and underpaid, and so are they.
579 notes
·
View notes
Looking back on it, season 2 was a lot of things. Yes it was sweet and funny and all that, but it was mostly strategically clever.
We know that the plot of the 3rd season was actually meant to be the direct continuation of the story from season 1. Season 2 was mostly the bridge to get us from season 1 to season 3. By having the 2nd season be sweet and romantic and revolving around the ineffables, they practically made sure that the 3rd season would get made, and that its story would be told. Because who wouldn’t want to see to see more, after those sweet moments, that kiss, that ending.
it was a safe bet that we, as fans, would lose our collective minds about it. If you ever wanted to get people talking abt your show, this was definitely the way to do it. Of course we’d demand more, we’d want a (happy) ending for good omens more than anything.
And by orchestrating the 2nd season the way it has been done, the production team ensured that. We know that season 3 will be less sweet and romantic, that it’ll be probably more aligned with the tone of season 1. That’s why i think the fans should prepare bc season 2 has given us high expectations and i’m not too sure it’s all that realistic to assume without doubt that they will be met.
Was season 2 fan service? Maybe so, but it was very wonderful, effective fan service.
24 notes
·
View notes
so like..
is the idea that as a compromise to only having to toggle off tumblr live once a month, you now have this permanent tumblr live icon regardless of ur setting choice stuck to the bottom in the middle of everything in the hopes that i click on it accidentally anyways even though it's clear i don't want it or? where is the NO 100% STOP GIVING ME THIS SHIT I DON'T ACCEPT YOUR POLICIES AND LITERALLY COULD NOT CARE LESS ABOUT TUMBLR LIVE AND WILL NEVER BE INTERESTED IN THIS TYPE OF FEATURE OR FORMAT.
@zingring @photomatt @humans idk how many feedback requests people have to cut tumblr for "no" to just be a valid response here. ppl aren't dumb and see u inching over the line trying to force this on them despite the snooze choice.
what, are there so many ppl snoozing and such a low adoption rate that you know you need to trick users into using it so you can "make number go up" or? 🙄
25 notes
·
View notes