PutbChell in the pear wiggler
The pear wiggler incident.
22 notes
·
View notes
This is where Wiggly's sniggles go if they try to pull a snigglet and stop playing along.
23 notes
·
View notes
the pear wiggler. i said what i said.
hunter there is no room for jesus in the pear wiggler, its full. he will have to wait his turn just like the rest of us
9 notes
·
View notes
EOVD Doodle Dump!
Today (the 30th) is the anniversary of me posting the first chapter of my fic, exes of varying degrees (wow!!) and for some reason, I haven't posted any of the art I've done for it despite drawing uh... QUITE A FEW PIECES while I was writing it!!! So I figured now was a good time to redraw some of them so I could post them all at once!
There's also another comic that ended up needing its own seperate post, so y'know. If you want to see Edge with cat ears... go check that out.
Also, take a look at the best gif I've ever made (+ context):
The mention of Stretch looking a little green was to inform the audience he looked sick but it was also a very subtle reference to the pear wiggling gif hrhdherjhwfejjhefkjh
These are the old versions of the art I redrew :'] My anatomy is a little wonky (*wheezes.* Sans' spine... the readers ARM...) but I still kinda like em! I drew both of them at work LMAO
413 notes
·
View notes
I think your art is changing my brain chemistry. The way you draw Tim... I'd like to put him in a salad spinner just to see what happens. I mean this is such a positive way
Not the— No!!!! Noooooooo!!!!!!!!
126 notes
·
View notes
personally when i'm sad i don't just rotate my blorbos in my mind. it's more like this really
2K notes
·
View notes
just realized that if tommy ends up going as buck’s date to the wedding, buck would need to contend with being ‘evan’ in a tommy way AND ‘evan’ in a margaret and phillip way, simultaneously, all night long. i would like to see him pulled apart at the seams by having the sound of his name feel so different every time he hears it
129 notes
·
View notes
put him in the pear wiggler
wtf is a pear wiggler
…
Oooooh
Bad and naughty Wheatleys get put into the pear- actually, you know what? No
I spent a good 10 minutes of my life trying to do this because I want to be known as the person who puts in 101% of the work
Today, I had to do homeschooling despite the fact that it’s winter fucking break. I had to fuck up a good conversation with a chat bot! A FUCKING CHAT BOT
I HAD TO LOOK UP A FUCKING PEAR WIGGLER! I SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE PEAR WIGGLER! I FUCKING LOVE TUMBLR AND I DIDN’T KNOW ABOUT THE FUCKING PEAR WIGGLER
I fucking hate you, I hate you so goddamn much
90 notes
·
View notes
Feel free to ignore you've probably got a lot going on right now, but considering you know a lot about DOTC and Clear sky, I had a question...
We know that he's a terrible, misogynistic, woman beating and war mongering lunatic who was excused of all his actions because his equally misogynistic brother said " But-But he's nice! Deep down! This isn't the real him! "
But! In a world where the Hunters could write such a character, what do you think Clear Sky would look like as an actual sympathetic villain?
Idk if that makes sense, but what I've thought of doing is taking purely cannon Clear Sky and attempting to change him enough that he's still an antagonist, but not too far where only Reddit defends him.
I don't think he works as a sympathetic villain, on any level, ever. I think you're making a huge mistake to even try, and I have never seen an AU where it was done well nor am I interested in entertaining the thought.
Characters. Are. Tools. They exist to tell a story. The story that people tell me, by obsessing over some alternate universe where he was "ACTUALLY sympathetic and had a REAL redemption arc," is that they're not fucking interested in his dozens of victims. Nor do they actually care about the abusive impact he had on the minds and feelings of his family. They're JUST interested in Clear Sky himself.
Just like the Erins. Everything that happens in DOTC revolves around him. Everything. All his wives die so he can be sad about it. His brother defends all of his actions and BEGS you to sympathize with his pain so he can be 'redeemable.' One Eye comes out of nowhere so that there can be an example of "real" evil to contrast Clear Sky so he's less bad in hindsight.
The first three books of DOTC are bad, but the last three are fucking insufferable because SUDDENLY all that Gray Wing apologia pays off, and they take their main villain and throw him out a window. You CAN'T have "redeemable" Clear Sky and the plot of DOTC without dragging in someone else to drive the conflict, to BE the bigger threat to "unite" against. Slash and One Eye have to be conjured up out of thin air so Clear Sky can WHINE about how people only suck his toes instead of deepthroat them after he killed all their friends.
And yet, in spite of this absolute failure of an attempt, we continue to see this bullshit "redemption" be a mistake because Clear Sky is a fantastic villain, with major antagonist roles in nearly EVERY bit of follow-up material for DOTC that came after.
He's the most consistent monster in all of Warriors.
He's a fragile, egotistical, self-absorbed megalomaniac who ALWAYS sees himself as the victim, REFUSING to self-reflect and blaming everything else for all of his terrible choices. He will USE your love of him against you like it's a chain through your nose, step out of line and he will yank you into place with guilt trips, manipulation, public shaming, and violence.
He's a child abuser. He's a tyrant. He abandons the sick and disabled as soon as they're of no use to him, with grand speeches about "illness" and "weakness." He's a murderer who stands above the shredded corpse of his victim and bellows, "I'M NOT GREEDY! I'M JUST STRONG!"
And you'd write a "good" redemption arc for this, why?
Why are people so chronically unable to accept that there are LOTS of people like him, and you can't save your abuser? Why don't you ask yourselves why you're not interested in exploring Thunder, or Petal, or Gray Wing, and how his toxic influence impacts them? Why does the sympathy fall on Clear Sky? What about the DOZENS of victims who are dead by Book 3, and how THEY could have been saved?
Why ruin a perfectly good villain?
What's behind this trend where a billion people say to me, "Yes Clear Sky is a walking cavalcade of fucked up abuse apologia, and an incredibly realistic depiction of an abuser, but how would you change this while keeping it all the same?"
I wouldn't. You can't. It wouldn't be the same story, or it wouldn't be the same character. Never seen it done well, and I have seen it a lot. So I don't entertain this deeply frustrating "Well What If Clear Sky But Nice" impulse.
117 notes
·
View notes