Tumgik
#qishylia types
qishylia-adelia · 1 month
Text
pureshadow just randomly appeared in my dash because someone I follow liked a pureshadow post.
I'm immediately in love please tell me more about this ship I beg you cookie run fans.
is it a wlw? mlm? mlw?
42 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 16 days
Text
i wish every children who has been exploited by the entertainment industry a very good life and please for the love of whatever you believe in to confront and apologise for your past mistakes even when you're just a kid surrounded with bad influence when you did them
and whoever decided to make dance moms a "drama" show to smash their head repeatedly against the wall for creating a domino effect of bad behaviours I mean evaluate your mistakes and apologise
8 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 2 months
Text
chongyun and xingqiu randomly appearing in a Monstadt centered fic without any announcement and it being untagged is wild
this is a serious fic.The early chapters sets the tone that this is a thriller-mystery ragbros angst.Why suddenly include a s3x joke about how diluc admirers are thirsty to ride him?
Like one second it's about how kaeya is frantic about diluc's health,then a sentence later it's poking fun at horny diluc admirers in Monstadt.Keep your tone consistent pleaseeeee
13 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 26 days
Text
i rarely watch anime and I sort of come to dislike them in general.But im really vibing with ouran highschool host club.
I like madoka magica,magia record,saiki,spy x family and wtdsik.Should I watch ouran? I don't feel like coming out of my comfort zone because I only watch shows for temporary "saturday morning cartoon" fun,not in depth lore
(there are exceptions,but I don't plan on adding more "deep" shows on my list)
5 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 1 year
Text
HOTTAKE!!!1!!!!111
(a rant about murder drones fans on tiktok)
murder drones tiktok should stop talking about how much they hate nuzi for one second and give attention to my girl V and Doll for once.
I'VE ONLY SEEN LIKE FIVE EDITS OF HER SO FAR.HOW????? SHE'S THE MAIN VILLAIN OF THE EPISODE.
"blushing doesn't mean love 😡"
No shit sherlock.I bet grown adults who worked on glitch know that too.Blushing can implied all kinds of things nitwit,including romance.
NO,I'm not saying you should stop hating on this ship because it may be canon.You should stop hating on this ship because their ages aren't canon.
I understand them acting like siblings may be a very personal comfort thing to you.
But it's not some crazy amazing interpretation like "they're black coded!" "this arc is trans coded!" "they're autistic coded!" or anything.Let people interpreted this lovable funky robot duo differently.
People are not obligated to like the same things as you just because you're uncomfortable when anyone disagrees.
Of course this doesn't apply to everything in life.But this definitely applies to media consumption and fandom interaction.
tldr: suck it up and give doll some attention.Pretty please?
51 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 1 month
Text
fictional birthdays are dumb.but
HAPPY BIRTHDAY NOELLE.THE ONLY CHARACTER THAT MATTERS AND THE ONLY FICTIONAL CHARACTER I WILL WISH DURING THEIR BIRTHDAY
Tumblr media
2 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 2 years
Text
Hear me out,
Non human wizard siblings because deckard can breathe in space.
Also will toast die since she's also in space?
41 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 2 years
Text
Two theories based on puppycat's ring and a small speculation about the space princess's gun
1.His ring belongs to the royal space family but he doesn't know it
The space princess betrayed him because she thought he was a theif and demanded the warlocks to capture puppycat to get her family's ring back.She also demands them to curse him as punishment for being a theif
How did puppycat own the ring in the first place? Idk.
2.Puppycat is a space prince who switch places with the space princes at birth
His mother that he mentioned in his flashback isn't his biological mother.His "mother" actual child is the space princess.
Am I implying puppycat or space princess is trans because no way no one would not notice the gender differences? You'll be the judge of that.
When the switch happens,someone accidentally left the ring in baby puppycat's blanket or something.Puppycat's new mother kept the ring despite not knowing where it came from.
Why did they switched places? Was the switch accidental or not?
Idk,but the space princess somehow knew about this was told that the ring puppycat owns is an evidence that he is a space prince because the ring can only transforms and give magical abilities to a space royal.
This explains puppycat's magical abilities and the prince like outfit he transforms into when he wears the ring.
His magical abilities doesn't go away when he takes of the ring I guess.
Not wanting to lose her royal status,she befriended him to kill him.Puppycat survives the gunshot because the ring has healing powers.
After finding out that he's still alive,the space princess demands the warlocks to curse and capture him.
She wants him to be cursed so him being the space prince is less convincing.She doesn't demand the warlocks to just get the ring because she feared they will blackmail her with it.
And now,the small speculation:
The space princess's gun will curse anyone who gets shot by it.
This explains why puppycat did not die when he got shot
27 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 2 years
Text
Putting a readmore for those people who get tired of seeing negative posts about fan's behaviour in the fandom (aka for people like me)
(This post is written from someone who enjoys the idea of lunter but is generally neutral about it.Unrelated but honestly,goldlight is a better ship name tbh)
Yes,this post is directed to someone but I'm making a post for this just in case someone with the same mindset agrees with that certain someone.
Don't get me wrong,I like lunter but it's seems pretty damn clear the writers don't have any intend to write romance between the two.
"luz has two hands!"
"here's an idea on how to make lunter canon :) 1.break up lumity but in a good writing way"
Yeah I get it,I made that "two hands" joke a lot too.But making it canon? I think you should acknowledge the fact that THERE'S LITERALLY TWO EPISODES LEFT.WHY THE HELL YOU'RE SUGGESTING WE SHOULD FOCUS ON MAKING A STRAIGHT SHIP CANON?????
Atleast huntlow is on life support on their huntlow crumbs,that one dana stream,hunter blushing,parallels,hunter and willow caring and protecting eachother (even when most of the time it's pretty obvious that they would react the same way with any of their friends too)
But lunter? No offense but we don't have any official romantic crumbs that we could hold onto.
The idea of lumity breaking up is already dumb regardless if you have a way to justify it.Let lesbians (or any wlw person in general) have a healthy and well thought out representation in a mainstream disney show.
"ok,so what about making luz in a polyamarous relationship with amity and hunter?"
"we will have polyamarous relationship representation and tell people not everyone in a polyamarous relationship has to be romantically in love eachother"
It still suffer from the fact that there's only two episodes left.
What's so wrong about shipping a non canon ship? Nothing.
If people harassed you for shipping it with "they're siblings coded so that makes you problematic" comments,
they are in the wrong,not you.
And no,I don't think shipping a sibling coded ship counts as pr0sh!pp!ng.It's just weird but a harmless kind of weird.
13 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 2 years
Text
Tails went to earth just to warn sonic right? That means he never intended to live there right?
Does that mean he never really got adopted by the wachoskis?
Or does that mean tails previous lifestyle was so insignificant he just immediately moved there?
If the second one is true,that implies that his guardian,friends and teachers doesn't care about him or he doesn't care about them or he has none of them.
And idk which one I prefer to be true.
36 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 1 year
Text
Most comic series on Tumblr are more enjoyable than most webtoon originals
14 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 1 year
Text
Before I watched the series,I never thought N is going to be one of those " intentionally commits multiple murders" blorbos.
I just thought he was just another one of those nice robot characters that got infected with the evil virus or something judging from the contents I've seen about him
11 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 2 years
Text
I think people were crushing on jack frost way too much to appreciate the other guardians.
THE COLLECTING TOOTH PART WAS SO FUN AND WHIMSICAL.
Too bad that fun happened the same night sandy died.
All guardians in that universe were once human before right? I WANNA KNOW THEIR BACKSTORIES.
I love that bunnymund is so aggressive and gentle at the same time.
I like past jack more than I thought I would.
How did jack even got and wear the blue hoodie?
Imagine the film but jack stays in his past clothes.
I don't even celebrate Christmas but North is the best interpretation of santa.Like,hell yeah give that old man sword fighting skills.
29 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 2 years
Text
Just found out father figure shadow is a thing.Didn't expect that from him but I encourage it
44 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 1 year
Text
I'm still baffled at seeing people asking "IS HUNTLOW CANON???"
Why didn't you considered it canon the moment willow blushed back at him?Or the iconic "dana huntlow stream" moment?
2 notes · View notes
qishylia-adelia · 1 year
Text
Ok I know this seems so random but I managed to copy the full article of "Writers:leave our children classic alone" without logging in.
I'm posting this article here just in case anyone's curious about it.
Tumblr media
You can read the full article below readmore.DM me if you wanna know how I managed to copy this
Writers: leave our favourite children's classics alone
By
Kat Brown
20 August 2015 • 1:17pm
Susan Coolidge's What Katy Did, with Nick Sharratt's new illustration, and Jacqueline Wilson's Katy
When food writer Ella Risbridger tweeted the cover of Jacqueline Wilson’s new book, Katy, an adaption of Susan Coolidge’s much-loved 1872 novel What Katy Did, it sparked a discussion on children’s literature that went far beyond the illustration.
Katy is a reimagining of Coolidge’s book, in which a young tomboy – who longs to be good but can never quite manage it – has a life-altering accident and becomes a beacon of grace over the course of her four-year recovery.
There was a very real dismay among readers who grew up with the original who believe that Wilson’s readers are being spoon-fed and denied the chance to discover both a wonderful book, and a different type of writing. As Risbridger succinctly put it, “What the f--- is this?”
“We have six-year-old kids that can operate iPads, but God forbid they encounter a new idea or word,” says Sarah Perry, author of After Me Comes The Flood. “If kids can cope with invented languages in Harry Potter they can cope with, I dunno, a 'carriage'.”
Wilson’s book comes during a plum period of classic novels being reinvented, updated or given sequels. Big name authors are reinterpreting Shakespeare for the 400th anniversary of his death next year, the James Bond and Agatha Christie estates keep rolling out new books, and there’s barely a genre author left to “adapt” Jane Austen: the day after my wedding, I received a congratulatory copy of Pride and Prejudice and Kitties.
And why not be weaned on to a terrific story? Films, TV, and abridged literary classics for children have been doing the rounds for decades.
“I think it's at least in part out of a desire to make them more accessible, but I can't help but suspect it's mercenary as well – that tacking on an already well-loved story to your book will help it sell, which it will,” says Janina Matthewson, author of Of Things Gone Astray. “And the thing is, I don't think the original books themselves are all that inaccessible. There's an elitism about older books, which serves as a barrier, I think, and that needs to be addressed, but I don't think rewriting them is the answer.”
The What Katy Did books have been interpreted in many different ways, from screen to print
The What Katy Did books have been interpreted in many different ways, from screen to print
In the case of Katy, Wilson has said that she didn’t just want to overhaul the book, but its message. Classic children’s literature such as Heidi and The Secret Garden has long fed us the ridiculous myth that you can be healed from anything as long as you are good, kind and hang out in gardens.
"As a child I thought, ‘oh this is wonderful and inspiring’,” Wilson said at the Hay Festival in May. “As an adult I felt more uncomfortable. Because mostly, if you're unlucky enough to have a spinal injury and you can't walk, you are not going to be able to walk again.
"And I thought how irritating for a child if this happened to them. They know full well that if they're very good or very patient or breathe in lots of fresh air, they are still not going to be able to walk again."
The question raised by some Coolidge fans has been, well, why not just write about that? And having read the book last night, I may well ask the same thing. The passages that are most similar to What Katy Did feel frustrating and constrained – Dr Carr is still the most unpleasantly passive-aggressive father in storytelling – but when Wilson breaks away into original story, it jumps into something quite extraordinary. A chapter detailing the immediate aftermath of Katy’s accident is sickeningly graphic. There are brilliant passages about the knock-on effect that life-changing injuries have on families and friends, and some keenly-written information about schools’ legal requirements when working with disabled students.
“Personally, I would love a book about a girl who's in an accident and reads What Katy Did and it helps her get through it, you know?” says Matthewson. “One that points to a classic, and deals directly with the weird miraculous recovery thing.”
There are exceptions, she acknowledges, such as Bridget Jones’s Diary and Clueless: both brilliant, and both reimaginings of Austen. “I think there's a line to be drawn between inspiration and mimicry, and to be honest, I'm not sure where that is.”
With Katy, it’s not clear who is piggybacking on to whose success. Coolidge’s book has been released with new cover art by Wilson’s long-time collaborator Nick Sharratt. Making the link clear between the books is a generous move, and Katy is packed with references to Dickens, Blyton and other authors that Wilson’s readers might not otherwise encounter, and who they will now hopefully be encouraged to try.
Before reading Katy I was very much in favour of reimagining the story for readers who might otherwise never hear of Coolidge. Afterwards, not so much. If you don’t start reading outside your comfort zone when you’re young and adaptable, when will you?
As Perry says, “This is how you end up with a generation of people that can only read books with 'characters they can totally relate to'.”
Some of Wilson’s Katy readers have written that they have gone on to try What Katy Did, but gave up because it was too hard – or perhaps just too different. This narrowing of a cultural field is not only depressing but it can mean you miss out on some great books. I put off reading Hanya Yanagihara’s Booker Prize long-listed novel A Little Life for a month because nearly every review I read described it as relentlessly harrowing, and why would I want to do that to myself? I read it expecting a misery memoir, and yes, some passages were difficult. But it was also enchanting, brilliantly characterised and frequently hilarious, and I left that world feeling changed, in the way that a really great story does.
“The point of reading, especially fiction, is not to have confirmed what you already think or feel, but to make you think anew about what you already think or feel,” Yanagihara said in a recent interview.
Should we let go of our favourites so a new generation can enjoy them in their own way? Yes and no. Let’s encourage children to reach into the past and discover those delights for themselves.
3 notes · View notes