my favourite bit to do on my DnD character sheet is to put exactly one (1) character trait in the personality traits box, and then put that same trait in the flaws box
75 notes
·
View notes
I didn’t sit here for years tryna stay calm and silent while listening to your bad takes on gale (who grew up oppressed, in poverty and then witnessed his entire district getting wiped out then rightly went to fight in the rebellion because it was his inlg chance of tearing down the system the wanted him and his family dead) being a “terrorist war criminal who is single handedly responsible for killing innocent people including prim and who is the REAL villain of the hunger games” just for y’all to turn and start stanning and defending actual facist dictator and child trafficker Coriolanus Snow because you saw a young hot version of him.
208 notes
·
View notes
my very serious writing advice for people who are trying to write more morally complex characters is to stop caring about their morality and focus instead on their individual motivations
it’s hard to articulate exactly what I mean, but the essence of it is basically: when a character does a murder, not only do I not care about whether they’re justified in doing so, it’s straight-up irrelevant. a character’s moral standing from some nebulous universal standard has no bearing on the plot or their interactions with other characters and has no use in the story for me as a writer. what does matter is why the character thought they were justified and then if it comes up to other characters, what they think about it.
you can obviously think about your characters’ morality but it’s not your job as a writer to interpret your stories for your readers and tell them how to judge your characters. your readers can see the evidence for themselves and draw their own conclusions. your job is just to understand why a character is motivated to act in a certain way and have it make sense
focusing on character motivations is a much more versatile framework than trying to give them specific personality traits or moral alignments, and frankly more useful to understand why a character would do a certain thing instead of just what they do. that way when something fucked up happens and your character starts acting differently, there’s an actual logical reason for it that isn’t you forcing characters to do things because it’s what’s required to make the plot go
when you write your characters with the understanding that people are not static and they act differently under different circumstances, complexity in character and morality follows naturally.
910 notes
·
View notes
honestly, though. sometimes when the drakes are discussed it does seem a little "oh, they never would never do <insert terrible fanon trait here>, they just <insert a different trait they....also never really did and is actually kind of contradicted by canon? here>"
26 notes
·
View notes
I thibk its funny when my friends talk abt trying to find happy queer rep while I'm just like "uh huh yah ofc, me too!" While I'm hoarding my evil sad little gays in the basement like a pokemon team whose only collective move is self destruct
48 notes
·
View notes
rewatching LoK, i'm being reminded how much I dislike the.... the brothers, mako and bolin, yanno? they're such underwhelming characters on basically every level. it'd almost be impressive if they weren't in every episode and didn't annoy me so much ugh
21 notes
·
View notes
Also about the Duke holding himself to higher standards thing something about the black boy being unable to afford slacking off in a way is peers are allowed to/are comfortable with? At least to himself? Cmon….
24 notes
·
View notes
Remnants
27 notes
·
View notes
where do you draw the line on "problematic" media? Or is it just "if I like it then its Good and if i dont then You Better Not Like It."? If this sounds like an overdramatic rephrasing then lmk cuz I'd rather talk civilly about this than argue. Same thing if we're coming off hostile. Not our intent but our mistake if so.
idk really! my stance has always just been "if this media is problematic for the sake of being problematic (south park for example) / problematic due to the creators own biases (hazbin hotel for example) then you shouldnt be giving it attention" but generally i think all media is gonna be a bit problematic. like take scp for example, its generally an interesting and well-made community project. HOWEVER, it has its problematic elements (the weird misogynistic comments/ideas in certain scps/tales, the early 2010s nazi jokes, Dr Brights Entire Existence) that tie into it being considered problematic by some. but its still Good. its weird and problematic jokes are awful, but the media itself is good. it's just best to just enjoy things critically, and not to just automatically assume that everything you like is Inherently Good and everything you dislike is Inherently Bad yknow.
9 notes
·
View notes
bg3 fans showing their da leanings in how allergic they are to nuance 😔
23 notes
·
View notes
most people who are aroace struggle with feeling broken but alastor is the opposite he doesnt struggle with that because he has internalized allophobia he thinks everything intimate is gross forever and actually everyone ELSE is broke, and is therefore unable to accept that intimacy isnt bad and isnt always romantic and thats why he gaslit himself into thinking he hates vox
9 notes
·
View notes
He was just being a silly little guy!
[First] Prev <–-> Next
1K notes
·
View notes
🤭
aethelred and eardwulf were abusive assholes who treated aethelflaed and eadith horribly. eardwulf had no guilt or regret for forcing eadith to flirt and keep aethelred "satisfied", even when you could clearly see she was uncomfortable. not to mention eardwulf threatened stiorra with a knife and hit her in 4x09 to "put her in her place". and if sigtryggr hadn't shown up, God knows what else would have happened. as for aethelred he roughly pinned aethelflaed's head to the table to force her to comply in S2. and from memory, he had rough sex with her, which i'm pretty sure was her first time too. and then he accused her of being unfaithful and didn't care if he embarrassed or humiliated her.
like/love toxic characters all you want. but choosing to ignore, or worse, still ship them with the women they treated terribly is gross. you can't claim to be all for tlk female characters and then not acknowledge the harm and screwed-up things aethelred and eardwulf did towards two of the main female characters.
send a 👀 + a tlk opinion and i'll say whether i agree or not. or send a ��� for my own tlk opinion
12 notes
·
View notes
Xiao Li personality traits:
Willing to bend the rules if he thinks it's for the greater good. Believing the time trio over what happened with lu guang's stabbing and actively getting him moved to the unopened hospital and cxs and ql's suspect status delayed. Involving them in the investigation at all honestly.
Emotions blind him to objective reality. See: how he thought Qian Jin was an amazing officer and upstanding citizen until his wife died despite us now knowing QJ's moral slippage was occurring long before then. Thinking that Qian Jin must have changed because the Qian Jin he "knew" wouldn't have done these things.
Optimistic to a fault. Added to the previous point. Asked Qian Jin if he wanted to get his injuries checked out at the station when Qian Jin wanted nothing less. Trying the photo shop in the first place based off internet rumours on the off chance they could help with his case.
Sense of "justice" more a sense of guilt. Most of his s2 actions are fuelled by his need to fix things. He even admits that he was never the one who was an amazingly motivated police officer and he always saw that as Qian Jin's role. The difference here is that Xiao Li suddenly has personal stakes. The broad concept of justice is very different from seeing people's individual stories. An operation he ran resulted in someone getting stabbed so he tried to get Lu Guang safe and ran precautions that verged on paranoid (such as not informing his fellow officers about the powers). Chen Bin dies, so he insists he'll make it up for him and then resign. Wang Juan's fate is up in the air but is another instance where he screwed up because he was impulsive and chose to chase down Li Tianchen. And yet he keeps going regardless. He thinks that he can fix this if he just keeps going without necessarily learning the lessons he needs to succeed at that.
He's a shiguang mirror in one character. His Cheng Xiaoshi traits are much more obvious, of course. He's almost a bad end Cheng Xiaoshi in many ways. A Cheng Xiaoshi who never learnt. But his failure to properly communicate things to the people he's meant to be working alongside in case they screw it up is such a ridiculously Lu Guang trait it can't be ignored.
23 notes
·
View notes
I hope in the future there will be no female character that gets a great deal of resentment as much as Misa ever again.
Mhm. She def got a rather outsized amount back in the day, though I feel the fandom has come back to a bit of a more chill and accepting and appreciative POV of Misa over time at least
13 notes
·
View notes
live action avatar taking away sokka’s initial sexism as if it wasn’t absolutely integral to his character arc as he learns and grows as a person. it’s a FUNDAMENTAL aspect to the character did they even watch the original show!!! did they see him say “girls bad at things” and then completely ignore everything that came after that!!! what the fuck!!!
11 notes
·
View notes