I don't understand why everyone is getting their panties in a twist over Shoko reviving Gojo suddenly. She couldn't regrow Hana or Inumaki's arms. Why would she suddenly be able to bring people back to life?? And even if we go with stuff like "Utahime strengthened her RCT", then why didn't they do that before to heal the people around them? Reviving Gojo is fine, but they couldn't be bothered to give Hana back her arm and wings because that would make Angel too op for the story or smth?
50 notes
·
View notes
I was looking for moments where bebe and kemny interact and i was reminded that SHE KILLED HIM TWICE!!!!!!!! 😭
17 notes
·
View notes
hpapy sergey sautrdsybdauy it';s Ego day i think maybe. sergey telepole. i dont have a reasoning for this, actually.
someone made a comment about him being invincible wielding mimicry but i think he would not be able to handle the texture of Evil Skin. it did inspire me to draw him in other aleph ego though. hence the theme of the post
reinhardt cameo. both of them can handle their respective ego just fine but if you swapped it bad things would happen (even if it's not apparent with reinhardt. will leave explanation in tags)
i love drawing him in things he looks good in everything (debatably) my. favorite lc agent
he was canonically a christmas guy btw i found screenshots. thats why its the only not aleph ego in here
8 notes
·
View notes
"i read the wiki and i saw the pages/panels already, why do i need to read the comics?"
because a) some those comics fuck with awing dexterity and stamina b) there's a good chance shit is out of context or simply misrepresented (innocently, humorously, ignorantly or maliciously) and c) you know the beats/endings of tons of shit, but it doesn't impede your enjoyment of it, now does it? sure it's nice to go in spoiler free, but if the gimmick of spoiling material is all a piece of media has, then that piece of media is meritless. you knew who luke skywalker's father was before you saw the movie. is it still worth watching? you knew romeo and juliet died before you read the play. is it still worth reading? do you not want to go on a journey? do you not want to feel something? do you not want to commiserate about the human experience through art? a wiki will never be comprehensive enough to cover everything you would have read or seen yourself--it can't be, not without being the thing itself. even then, you still miss the things not on the page/screen, the things that are only implied, the things that go unstated, or else conspicuously omitted. don't talk to me about shit haunting the narrative if the only haunting you've ever been apart of was your passing despite your dogshit analysis skills haunting the conscience of your eng 101 adjunct professor in perpetual fear of losing their contract and being relocated from their car to under a bridge by demanding college students demonstrate basic reading comprehension, critical thinking, and coherent argumentative skills. boast about killing the author? my friend, you are cain advancing in the fields, skulking, stepping in abel's footprints, filled with murderous intent, with nothing but the chinese telephone-equivalent of a description of a weapon cutting into your soft palms.
3 notes
·
View notes
Giulio Cesare (1724), Haendel [ 2022 creation by Damiano Michieletto at the Théâtre des Champs-Élysées ]
Julius Caesar (1599), William Shakespeare
The Death of Julius Caesar (1806), Vincenzo Camuccini
William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar (1953), Joseph L. Mankiewicz
‘Life of Augustus’, The Twelve Caesars, Suetonius (translation from the Loeb Classical Library, 1913)
Cleopatra (1963), Joseph L. Mankiewicz
‘Life of Augustus’, The Twelve Caesars, Suetonius (translation from the Loeb Classical Library, 1913)
12 notes
·
View notes
like, okay, context for prev reblog and also my post abt ~paranoid reading~ from this morning is that i was reading a thing [by a tradpub author of fannish origin, ftr] recently that described a corpse as "male-presenting" and an AI's self-projection as "genderless, inhuman" and i was just like. god i'm trying not 2 get my back up abt this bc i do think being a prickly reader is not, like, the best way to open yrself to art, cf isabel fall etc, but—!
10 notes
·
View notes