#anthropophagy | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

celestialkiri · 11 months

Text

"Mandrills display their teeth as a greeting or as reassurance – known as a silent bared teeth display."

So he's just greeting you right?... Right?

Would you also believe I got inspired by LEGO Monkey Kid bc of those monkey demons? Yep. I had to draw a monkey creature too-

#monkey #anthropophagy #anthro #monster boyfriend #monster love #monsterfucker #monster lover #my art #furry anthro

221 notes · View notes

bug-god-girl-thing · 5 months

Text

Fact one: Humans have an unusual lack of natural sharp weaponry, with flimsy nails and dull canines, in addition to their low muscle strength.

Fact two: Something such as us has no exploitable weakpoints and can easily shrug off blunt trauma.

Fact three: We are quite heavy.

Conclusion: We can surprise a human in a vulnerable position and simply lie on top of it to subdue it, feeling the screaming and flailing slowly subside while we begin to feast.

#terato #anthropophagy

35 notes · View notes

miracleintheandes · 9 months

Text

The Survivors (Part 1)

In alphabetical order.

The photos and some of the information are from Sociedad de la Nieve

Born on April 19th 1948, “Fito” Strauch used to play for the Old Christians rugby team, but he didn’t at the time of the crash. He was invited on the trip by his cousin Eduardo Strauch.

He was part of the trio known as “the cousins” (Fito, Eduardo and Daniel Fernandez). Fito and Eduardo were double cousins, as their mothers were sisters and their fathers were brothers, whose sister was Daniel’s mother.

The cousins played an essential leadership role in the mountains, as they took the responsibility of cutting the meat off the dead bodies and rationing the portions.

Fito had many brilliant ideas. The boys had a hard time melting snow, as shaking handfuls in a bottle was far too arduous and tiring in the rarefied air of the mountains. Fito figured out that each plane seat had a piece of aluminum that could be folded into a device filled with snow, which was then left in the sun to melt. The resulting water would then be poured into a bottle.

He also came up with the idea of tying seat cushions to their feet so they could walk on snow without sinking to their waist. As if those were not enough, he manufactured sunglasses with pieces of nylon taken from the seats and glass cut from the front windows of the plane (the ones in the cockpit, which were a shade darker than the windows in the cabin)

Born on November 1st 1947, “Pancho” Delgado was a law student. He was invited on the trip by his friend Gaston Costemalle, who played for the Old Christians rugby team.

Due to his eloquence, the other survivors asked him to address the journalists in the press conference held upon their return to Uruguay and explain their decision to eat the bodies of their dead friends.

The book “Alive” by Piers Paul Read paints an unfavorable picture of Pancho, claiming he already had a “lawyer’s mind” and hoarded food behind everyone’s back. In his own book, however, fellow survivor Nando Parrado comes to his defense, saying that all survivors - due to the desperate circumstances they found themselves in - tried to take advantage of the others at some point, but Pancho was resented the most because he got away with it more often.

Pancho had a girlfriend at the time of the crash, Susana Sartori. The couple eventually got married and had four children (María Federica, Alfredo, Joaquín and Agustina).

Born on March 31st 1953, Alvaro wasn’t part of the team nor did he attend the Stella Maris private school as most of the survivors. He knew some of the other passengers on a superficial level, as they lived in the same rich neighborhood in Montevideo. I have yet to find out why he was on the trip at all, but as soon as I do I’ll update you guys.

He broke his left leg when the plane crashed. Fellow survivor Roberto Canessa, a medical student, did his best to put the bones back into their places. Throughout the 72 days, Alvaro remained close to Canessa, who was very protective of him.

Alvaro had a girlfriend at the time of the crash, Margarite Arocena. The couple got married and had four children.

Born on July 24th 1953, “Tintín” played rugby for the Old Christians and stood out for his physical strength. His volatile personality caused some fights, but he never questioned the group’s decisions.

Because of his strength, Tintín was initially enrolled as one of the survivors who were to leave the fuselage in search of help. After three days, however, his fellow expeditionaries (Roberto Canessa and Nando Parrado) realized the trip was gonna be much longer than anticipated and sent Tintín back to the fuselage so they could keep his portions of meat.

Born on November 23rd 1951, Bobby was a Stella Maris alumnus and played for Old Christians. He had a very passive attitude towards the whole ordeal, as if he didn’t care whether he lived or died. As soon as the fuselage stopped its descent down the mountainside, Bobby exited the wreckage, sat on the snow and lit a cigarette.

He melted snow when the others forced him to, but didn’t do much else. When the cousins threatened to cut off his supply of meat, Bobby shrugged and said “That seems fair”.

Bobby had six children (Roberto, Federico, Sofía, Josefina, Milagros and Diego) and now lives a quiet life as a farmer.

Born on October 31st 1953, Carlitos was the son of a famous Uruguayan painter, Carlos Páez Villaró, who searched non-stop for the wreckage of the plane and did not rest until his son was found.

Carlitos was a very spoiled boy (he had a nanny!), but the experience in the Andes built his character and soon enough he was in charge of important tasks such as building a wall made of chairs and suitcases to protect the severed fuselage from the cold and praying the rosary every night with his companions. He also knew how to sew, which came in handy when the survivors decided to make a sleeping bag for the expeditionaries.

Several years after the accident, Carlitos struggled with addiction, but he fortunately bounced back. He has two children, Maria Elena de los Andes and Carlos Diego (named after his deceased friends Gustavo Diego Nicholich and Diego Storm).

Born on February 12th 1946, Daniel is the second oldest survivor. He was unharmed in the crash.

As previously mentioned, Daniel and his cousins played a key leadership role after the death of team captain Marcelo Perez. Daniel’s serenity, in particular, calmed the others down when fights erupted.

Born on August 13th 1947, Eduardo was a Stella Maris alumnus and confounder of the Old Christians, as well as a former player. Nicknamed “the German” due to his ancestry, he was an Architecture student and the most worldly of the group, as he had previously traveled to Europe.

Eduardo invited his cousins Adolfo Strauch and Daniel Fernandez on the trip.

Stay tuned for PART 2!

56 notes · View notes

croziers-compass · 2 months

Text

Friends will eat you. Cannibalize you. Make it so homoerotically sexual in ways beyond your imagination. You'll be made a saint. Apotheosis of your hot thrumming flesh and meat. Best friends do this too. Only they also eat you off of uranium glass plates.

#anthropophagy

14 notes · View notes

wesgraham-craveshim · 5 months

Text

obligatory heads-up for cannibalism mention take a meme if you can't stay for the cannibalpost ily tumblrinas <3

okay chat im very much in love and i can see the appeal of cannibalism as a romantic gesture rn. i wanna bite her so everyone knows she's mine and lap up any bleeding from the bite. rlly wanna take care of her after gnawing on her arm like a bone.

you made it thru that helluva post erm take more posts ig

(i am now following them dw)

#will graham #fictive #nbc hannibal #did system #anthropophagus #anthropophagy #cannibalposting #canibalism #cannibalistic #cannibalism as a metaphor for love #cannibalism posting #cannibalism tw #cannibalism kink #actually bpd #bpd fp #bpd love

14 notes · View notes

akilah12902 · 15 days

Link

Chapters: 1/1 Fandom: Baldur's Gate (Video Games) Rating: Mature Warnings: Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings Relationships: The Dark Urge/Invoker of Bhaal Horriss (Baldur's Gate) Characters: The Dark Urge (Baldur's Gate), Invoker of Bhaal Horriss (Baldur's Gate) Additional Tags: Cannibalism, or rather, anthropophagy, First Time, Hand Feeding, they/them Durge, unidentified Durge, eroticism Summary:

"You have returned... Do you remember? You were the one who first fed me flesh."

#Durge #bg3 #The Dark Urge #Baldur's Gate 3 #cannibalism #anthropophagy #fanfic #short fic #i'm pleased with this

3 notes · View notes

k-i-l-l-e-r-b-e-e-6-9 · 2 years

Photo

#anthropophagy #art #artwork #vintage art #cannibal #sketch art #human #tribal #tribe #barbecue #human barbecue #brutal death metal aesthetic #Illustration

99 notes · View notes

cannibalswimmingpool · 8 months

Text

so this blog is going to be a mode for me to present my assignment for a college class. I'm gonna talk about seven sources that I looked at for research into the discourse ( or topic, group, community etc.) of famous instances of cannibalism. Might keep it to stay in touch with said discourse, might delete later :p

#anthropophagy #cannibalposting #college #donner party #jamestown #jeffery dahmer #greek mythology #the essex #tarrare #eat the rich #capitalism #atlantic salmon

9 notes · View notes

celestialkiri · 11 months

Text

Have a WIP of a monkey lad that I made today

#my art #monkey #anthropophagy #anthro #monster boyfriend #I mean he could be #he's single lol

115 notes · View notes

croziers-compass · 4 months

Note

georgey boy eating his cannibalism meal with a fork and knife and then acting like going to mass is the same as eating another person —> delusional survival

He may not be as delusional as we think. Perhaps. If you'll care to entertain my thoughts on this... Here is where I think George Hodgson and I have a strange and distinct similarity. Ritual Cannibalism is most prominently observed in the dialects of Christian Religion.

Now. One may be a bit more literal (eating Gibson or Dr. Goodsir), yes. But in a Sacrament, the point is that you're recreating the imbibement of the Body of Christ. Taking someone else's body and making it Holy and putting it into your mouth, chewing it, swallowing it, digesting it. Intimately. You can be saved if you eat of the body. I do possess the largest collection of books on Anthropophagy and Theophagy in my area, I think. However, the distance between Symbolic Theophagic Anthropophagy to straight Anthropophagy is as far as you can open your mouth.

How wide can your mouth open? Or will your jaws stay shut?

I suppose it depends on how hungry you are, doesn't it?

#anthropophagy #theophagy #george hodgson #changelinq you're onto something but I think my brain is too wired into cannibalism #I love this ask #I love this ask tenderly #you could not have known I have a broad knowledge on these subjects but if it's a subject you enjoy as well please read:#Divine Hunger #by #Peggy Reeves Sanday #Funny to think that the largest example we have of Ritual Cannibalism comes from Christianity #Millions of people performing Ritual Cannibalism on a regular weekly basis

3 notes · View notes

publicdeathadvocate · 6 months

Text

Manifesto

My beliefs are reasonably simple, namely that organ donation should be mandatory (not opt out, mandatory) and the subsequent surplus of meat should be sold comercially.

Aditionally, murder should be legal, however have an extensive licensing process.

in this manifesto, I will explain and justify my views in more depth, and also explain the process by which the ideal world I describe could come to be.

Firstly, it must be addressed the current justice system does not work. I argue that it does not work for one very specific reason: law and morality are equated. Simply put, law and morality are two different tools for two different purposes. Morality serves as an enforcer and lubricant of social cohesion, a method by which members of an ingroup can relate to one another. If two members of an ingroup agree to something being moral or immoral, the outgroup that disagrees is immoral, which makes the ingroup just and therefore ingroup members safe to be around.

Law however, is a tool used to create an ideal society based on what the lawmakers consider is an ideal society. Which, in undemocratic countries or countries without diversity of ideas in politics, is inevitably based on the lawmaker's system of morality. In democratic countries with diversity of opinion, law tends to be based on common denominations between the moral systems of the ingroups in charge, and thus can be equated to the search of univeral laws of morality. Universal moral laws do not exist, and that is a good thing, because if morality wasn't subjective it would defeat the point of it existing as a concept in the first place.

Lets look at some examples. Prohibition and the war on drugs: the moral systems that led to both the prohibition AND the war on drugs are almost identical, namely that the lawmakers identified substance abuse as a threat to public health, and thus concluded that all substance use is immoral, and thus addicts are immoral. There were of course different factors at play such as racism, classism and political maneuvering in both of these, but that was the moral logic that the populace accepted so that is what I will use for my point. the reason that both of these movements failed is they both failed to account for one very simple fact: people seek what they want and need. If they cannot find it within the law, they will find it outside it.

The Bloody Code: The Bloody Code was a system of law and punishment in 18th and early 19th century Britian where even minor crimes such as petty theft would result in the death penalty. The reasoning that justified this practice was quite simple: if simple crimes had a risk of death attached, there would be a high deterrant. Some pocket change is not worth your life. And if people steal and die anyway, oh well. Their eternal soul will pass on to the afterlife. However, this reasoning failed to account for human desperation. If you cannot afford to eat, a chance of death for stealing is better than certain death by starvation. If you are caught, oh well, hanging is faster and less painful than starvation.

My point is, for an ideal world for as many as possible regardless of moral system to exist, LAW MUST BE AMORAL.

Instead of considering what is "right", law must consider how rules will effect the population as a whole, all groups, and all individuals. If it has a net positive effect on health, lifespan and happiness, it should be applied. if it has a net negative, it should be discarded.

But anyway, on to the actual subject of this manifesto.

Why organ donation should be mandatory: Simply put, any human life is worth more than any human value. People die, and thus lives, livelihoods, genetic diversity and economic circulation are lost because individuals would rather have their lifesaving organs be discarded rather than used after a point where bodily autonomy has no sway.

I personally am pro-choice in terms of abortion rights, however after death, recievers of organs gain everything, and the dead have nothing to lose or gain.

while there might be a short term public outcry, in the long term this would save and extend countless lives and greatly increase public hapiness as a result.

Why human meat should be sold comercially: two reasons: one, there is a market for it, the only reason it is not being already sold is the stigma and pointless moral panic around it. The risks of prion diseases are far smaller than people would have you believe, and even then are only really a risk if you're consuming the nervous tissue of someone who died of a prion disease. In a world where everyone gets regular health checkups, and all corpses are autopsied before they are butchered, the chances of getting sick with a spontaneous human prion disease are lower than getting an existing animal prion disease such as mad cow.

Secondly, it it is the most efficient and eco friendly method of recycling human protiens and calories. Cremation wastes fuel, and produces excesses of carbon monoxide and dioxide. Burial wastes land, resources and labour (seriously, modern coffins are stupidly ostentatious for no reason) and embalming fluid leaches toxins into the soil. Not to mention that most modern burials are so deep that the nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium that was in the body are out of circulation fo hundreds of years. Direct consumption of human flesh beats out even human composting by a mile, given that even taking into account pure trophic level, human ==> human is exponentially more efficient than human ==> bacteria ==> plants ==> human. not to mention that those nutrients will be re-entering the ecosystem anyway, since human waste is already used to make compost.

Why murder should be legal: The fact of the matter is, murder happens, and retributive justice is not only innefective, it is damaging to society as a whole. Murder happens, and is going to keep happening because we are human, and humans kill each other. However, there are different reasons humans kill. I will explore how I believe different types of murder should be dealt with.

Murder of passion: The most common form of murder, and the most wasteful. the only real way to prevent this as much as possible is widespread implimentation of conflict resolution and de-escalation experts throughout society.

Murder of desperation: should not be illegal, full stop. A deep investigation into the issues that led to the act of desperation should be conducted, and how similar issues throught society can be addressed and avoided.

Murder for personal gain: the only way to really avoid this kind of murder would be to make the risks not worth the reward. I.e, an investigation into suspicious deaths where individuals able and willing to have done it would have something to gain, and all rewards they would have gained be conviscated and professional reprimands issued (lawyers disbarred, doctors have their medical liscence revoked, etc) if they are found to be responsible.

consensual murder: murder where both parties agree to it should be fully legal, however there should be a (at least) two month waiting list after both agree, that either of them can pull out at any time. Any murders that are seemingly consensual but do not go through the waiting list should be treated as extremely suspicious.

Murder to satisfy a deep seated need: should be allowed, with an extensive licensing process, and an exaustive evaluation to determine whether a murder license is the only way to satisfy this need.

As previously mentioned, people will seek what they want and need, and if they cannot find it legally they will find it illegally. People who want and need to kill not only exist but will always exist. Only through legalisation and licensing can you control how many they kill in a year, and not muddy the waters in terms of the other kinds of murder.

Through extensive and mandatory documentation of their kills, a review board can also ensure that the people killed are not anyone the killer knows, so it is not another type of murder disguised, and that no demographics are overrepresented in their killings.

Getting these things enshrined in law will be difficult. But the first step in getting your voice heard is ensuring that you have a voice TO be heard. Share this manifesto, even if ironically. Make your own blogs with your own ideas relating to this topic, with details of how this ideal world could work and become a reality. Make this vision a recognised worldview, even if it takes years.

Then, when we have a voice, we can demand change.

#cannibalism #socialism #climate change #public health #liberation #justice system #amorality #anthropophagy

3 notes · View notes

anthropophagus · 1 year

Text