How did Sun and Moon become separate bots? Or were they always separate in your AU?
After the events of the main game and Fazbear gave the order to have the pizzaplex demolished, there was some attempt to salvage what remained in there, including the still intact robots like the daycare attendant.
Sun (and Moon) would have been in a bit of a hazy daze after the virus lifted, not really all there. After having spent so long with a foreign code in their system treating them like a puppet it was almost surreal to be yourselves again.
So when Sun got the ping to come down to parts and service he just simply followed the order. He was numb and didn't really think or care much what became of them.
Until they took Moon out.
For whatever reason, whether they wanted to scrap Moon and keep Sun or simply were pulling them out individually for decommission didn't matter - they took Moon and Sun fought back viciously to get him back again.
With the staff fled or killed Sun is left with Moon's chip. He can't put Moon back into his own head because the p&s machine requires a separate person to operate the computer, so he goes and does a lot of digging around and finds a backup endo for their model that is still intact. He places it in the cylinder, operates the computer and Boom Moon got a new body.
Needless to say when Moon wakes up he is very confused and initially panicky because he can't sense Sun in his head. They don't let go of each other for a long time after.
Eventually they both head back to the daycare area and stay there, not really knowing what to do (until a certain dragon shows up sometime later)
29 notes
·
View notes
@wip Can you please please please implement "press down on the image to display the alt text/image description (in copy-pastable format)" in the mobile apps, thereby making said text accessible to sighted people?
I'm writing a longer explanation of why this is important below, but TL;DR, when sighted people don't see image descriptions, they don't use them.
Some things that an app-readable alt-text option would achieve:
Make text in media with difficult-to-read coloring accessible both to colorblind people and people using devices with poor color rendering
Make text in deep-fried/artifact-heavy/poorly-formatted/animated media accessible to everyone, including those with seizure disorders or sensory processing issues
Allow users who don't speak the language used in a piece of media to copy-paste it into a machine translator (VITAL to the international meme economy (and also, y'know, screenshots of news articles and stuff))
Improve accessibility when media fails to correctly download or display (important for people with unreliable/slow/data-limited internet access)
Allows sighted people to see alt-text-related glitches and report them to Tumblr support. This is unfortunately-frequently the only way that a bug in an accessibility feature can be reported at all - after all, what if the bug has made the bug-report platform itself inaccessible? What if a separate bug broke the accessible captcha seven months ago and no one noticed? Not exactly the sort of problem that test suites usually prioritize.
Prevent confused people from repeatedly re-describing/complaining about "undescribed images" endlessly for months or years because they can't see the alt text that's been there since day one (thereby also lowering rates of user-on-user violence)
Again: When sighted people don't see image descriptions, they don't use them. There is absolutely no better way to encourage adoption of a disability feature than to make it available to everyone. Yes, some people do misuse alt text by using it as an alternative to the post body/space for jokes/lies/"secret messages"/SEO/etc - but that will always be a lesser problem than undescribed images. (Besides, people use tags that way, too.)
Wider use of image descriptions means better searchability and filtering.
I feel like some developers misunderstand the purpose of alt/aria attributes as "text to be read by screen readers, which should otherwise be inaccessible." This is not how these properties are meant to be used - they're intended to improve accessibility across the board, for people with non-sight-related disabilities, with outdated tech or bad internet connections, and even for abled people with perfectly-functioning new iPads. Disability advocates overwhelmingly agree that hiding accessibility options from "people who don't need them" is harmful to those who do.
62 notes
·
View notes
tbh my problem is some dubs are just bad, but theyre the only option bc of my short attention span. another example is the damn yellow subtitles some subs use (looking at you promare) - my cousin tried to get me and my mum (me with sensory issues and my mum with nystagmis) to watch promare subbed and we could not do it :(
Yeah. Like both have flaws that make them inaccessible to certain people, sometimes they're both just. Bad (i am not denying that terrible voice direction is a thing!)
that's why instead of wasting time arguing which is superior we should just. I don't know, make both good.
4 notes
·
View notes