it’s 5am, today I get to do something that happens only once every two years in my household, I am currently craving poke but haven’t had one in 8 months, never had boba in my life, I’m eating crackers wishing it was something else, and I look like this:
seems like the perfect time to write 💅🏻
4 notes
·
View notes
this is just going to be a stream of consciousness ramble but the idea of being a "good person" is so strange to me. or, not strange, because the aim to be one is understandable, but just fundamentally flawed. like i'm listening to this podcast and the lautner's are reaffirming what everyone who has met taylor says (that she's incredibly kind, generous, humble, funny, sweet, etc.) and i think in the person-to-person interaction sense she is a "good person." but then it's like. how can you say someone hoarding that much wealth or contributing a tangible amount to climate change is good? what is "good"? it's impossible to go through life without hurting others and she has obviously done that on an individual level in her own life too, but anyone in her income bracket is going to leave their time on the earth with a wake of destruction. the game of pitting celebrities against each other to find the "least problematic" one just doesn't make sense. the least problematic version of the ultra wealthy fundamentally can't exist. idk what my specific point is but the way people spend lifetimes picking apart the smallest minutiae of the ethics of these people's lives on an individual level just feels like time wasted and an excuse not to think about real problems, frankly.
8 notes
·
View notes
Khare doesn't laugh like a normal person. On very rare occasions when something humorous has happened, she may lose control and let slip a very quick, quiet 'Hah!' but it's so quick and quiet you may not actually hear it or mistake it for a completely different sound. The reason for this is because Khare was told she had an obnoxious laugh as a child and subsequently decided she would never laugh again.
14 notes
·
View notes
My unpopular PNW opinion is that it's ridiculous that people consider it weak to use an umbrella around here instead of just relying on a rain jacket, for several reasons.
First, the rain in these parts, on average, is not actually that bad, and half the time I don't need an umbrella or a rain jacket, so why would I not keep a compact umbrella in my bag instead of lugging around a bulky jacket all the time.
Second, a rain jacket does not cover my backpack, and I have books and a laptop in there, which I do not want to get wet, for obvious reasons. And if I do not have at least three methods of entertaining myself with me at all times, I will keel over and die. Like a shark.
And third, and most importantly, rain jackets are the fucking ugliest item of clothing on the planet, and they do not go with anything except athletic gear, and I have a very carefully curated aesthetic to maintain here that I will not be compromising on because God decided to spit upon me today. I will not be sacrificing my cozy, chic outerwear for a little bit of goddamn rain.
In conclusion, what is in fact weak is letting the weather ruin your style and wreck your shit instead of carrying a fucking umbrella.
47 notes
·
View notes
I'm a teacher and this summer I'm working afternoon summer school at a building that's known for not having enough parking. People will park along the side of the driveway or in other non-spots that aren't in the way when the proper parking spots fill up. There's also ample street parking behind the school.
There are 3 disabled spots and I believe a total 2 loading zones between the spots. For the past two weeks someone has either parked in the loading zone, or 2 of the 3 spots have been taken by someone without a placard or disabled plates. We have at least 3 people working in the building who are disabled and have parking placards but we don't get to park in those spots because they're constantly taken.
I get that you might not want to park farther away or whatever. But that spot is reserved for people who need it. And yes I know not everyone can get a placard or plates and these people might be disabled. I only recently was able to get mine despite being disabled for years. But never once did I park in the disabled spots that I didn't have a placard for. Never did I dream of parking in the loading zone that might be necessary for someone to get in or out of their car.
Today I drove in and saw that once again the three spots were taken, and I recognized two of the cars as the repeat offenders who don't have placards. I stopped in front of the spots to reevaluate where to park, when an older Black man got out of his truck in the third spot and came over to ask if I wanted his spot. When he recognized that I'm the person with the cane he immediately was like "I'll move it's no problem" even though he did have a parking placard. I'm so grateful that he did that. And I hope I see him again today so I can properly express that to him. But he shouldn't have had to do that. We should have both been able to park in the accessible spots. This isn't an instance of lack of accessibility but of (almost certainly) ablebodied people being inconsiderate and ableist and taking up a limited resource set aside to help disabled people.
Don't park in the disabled spots if you don't have a parking placard/plates (or whatever it is outside the US). DONT park in the loading zones! If I had brought my wheelchair to work and someone was parked in the loading zone I wouldn't have been able to get it out of my car. I don't care if no one ever parks there and they're always empty and you think you aren't harming anyone. I don't care if you don't understand why we need them or need so many or need loading zones or whatever. Its common fucking courtesy to not be an ableist asshole.
7 notes
·
View notes