Tumgik
#snow white live action
dommnics · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Here's a design I did of what Gal Gadot's Evil Queen might look like, to go with my Snow White drawing. I had little to go off, just based on what people described from the D23 footage: dark makeup, dark lips, and a smaller crown, but pretty accurate to her original design. I just had fun with it!
🍎👑
--
Check out more of my work on other platforms!
https://www.instagram.com/dommnics
https://twitter.com/Dommnics
554 notes · View notes
Text
I fucking hate how ppl look at stories like cinderella and snow white and think that it's not feminist or it puts women down. Like what brain gymnastics did you do to get to that dumb opinion?
109 notes · View notes
love-geeky-fangirl · 9 months
Text
Enough with the woke remakes of old Disney classics where every princess is a raging girlboss and a feminist. We don't need it. Are they aware that other versions of those princesses already exist? Take the East German/Czechoslovak version of Cinderella. There Cinderella is a sassy badass who actually stands up for herself and shoots a crossbow better than the prince without it being obnoxious or too in your face with *the message*. And guess what in the end, despite being a strong female character, she marries her prince and lives happily ever after, because love doesn't make a woman weak.
There is also a Norwegian Cinderella and German versions of all the old Grimm fairy tales (including Snow White), and I bet many more. So why do we need a new Disney version that is "updated for modern audiences"? No one asked for it and I bet no one needs it. Enough with the remakes.
105 notes · View notes
Text
“Bad outfit” ain’t even a thing in her vocabulary. GIRL IS SHOWING UP IN THE MOST JAW DROPPING, STUNNING DRESSES THAT HUMAN KIND HAS EVER SEEN. RACHEL IS A GODDESS.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
20 notes · View notes
blackaleycatt · 8 months
Text
White women get more angry over a live action remake than literally anything important 💀
51 notes · View notes
hahahax30 · 9 months
Text
Rachel zegler has me wanting to bang my head repeatedly against a wall until I start bleeding to death
45 notes · View notes
disneycritical · 8 months
Text
youtube
be for real, this is not about snow white| Yhara zayd
39 notes · View notes
ballad-of-birdy-lamb · 8 months
Text
How are some of y’all gonna hate Rachel Zegler for speaking her mind and then be fans of Barbie, a movie about how little women can speak their mind?
46 notes · View notes
emaswanned · 1 year
Text
Seriously, Disney, why would you make a live action adaptation of Snow White when ONCE UPON A TIME EXISTS.
If it ain't Lana Parrilla, I'm out.
(Ginnifer as Snow slays too tho lbr.)
57 notes · View notes
teyamsatan · 9 months
Text
i need new disney to get their grubby little hands away from the original disney princess movies bc i'm so sick and tired of these horrible little distasteful half assed attempts they call "live action remakes"
32 notes · View notes
adarkrainbow · 7 months
Note
what exactly is 'the bad “woke movement'. you mean Disney's attempts at political correctness in their casting choice? describing it as "woke" is a serious misuse of black slang.
I was a bit confused at first since I have switched the subject out of the Disney Snow White controversy some times ago.
I am sorry to inform you that the use of "woke" as a deragoratory term to designate the people we once called ironically "Social-Justice Warriors" is actually not a "black slang" anymore. In fact I didn't even know it was supposed to be a "black slang" originally, my perception of it was that it was originally a term that was created on the Internet in a positive way, to designate people that were actually fighting against all sorts of discriminations and social problems, and opening their eyes to the wrongness of societies and modern age... Only to then be switched, by the Internet itself at first, and then by the media who took the word back, to be used as a designation of extreme social-justice warriors, or people who'se extreme self-righteousness, mixed with either hypocrisy or just ignorance, resulted in them coming of as a more mad or harmful than helpful.
If you do not like me using the term, unfortunately for you you'll have to go after pretty much every American media, then after after European media - and I am not even counting the politics of both America and Europe! The term "woke" has left its Internet-exclusivity a long time ago, and now is used even in non-English speaking countries (such as France) to designate the extremes to which some people or groups carry on the "social war". Now the thing to be careful of is that many extreme-right or very hateful people will use "woke" as a way to degrade or humiliate rightful defenders of things such as feminism, transgender rights, homosexuality, etc, etc... So I want to insist: I am not susbscribing to any extreme-right ideology, and I know very well they are using this term for their own negative agenda.
But I am not of the extreme-left either, and as someone who saw very well the dangers of any kind of extremes, I have to recognize that there is indeed a bad, extreme "woke" movement, that ranges from the ridiculous to the hateful. It exists. To imagine that all fights for the right reasons are done with the right means is to be too naive.
A very recent case - which is not woke, because it isn't about social justice or social blights, but about ecology, however it illustrates VERY well the stupidity and hypocrisy of some of these modern extreme groups. In France there is an extreme ecological group that has been making a lot of noise and some extreme actions to alert people and authorities about climate change and asking for something to be done. Interesting, right? Good, right? Except that their actions are VERY dubious in effect. For example some times ago they did protests related to, I think it was the droughts and water supply handlings? I can't recall exactly the why of the protest - but they did so by destroying entire fields and putting several farmers in difficult position because they had their entire crops gone. It wasn't some big mass-industrial farming, it wasn't genetically modified stuff, it was just your regular farmer with his fields, and he had his whole crops destroyed by the group's protect - which wasn't even aimed at him (if I recall there was something about them mistaking his field for another nearby, or something). Now my memory of this case is very blurry as you can see - but one other case popped up just two days ago so I can clearly tell you the problem this time: a few days ago, the group protested against the instalation of a toxic waste disposal site near a city and precisely near a river that passed by the water's city. To protest that and alert the city's citizens, they poured tons of products in the river's water that turned it bright, glowing green - to show them the fear of toxic products reaching them by the water.
But what's the twist of the story? To make the water bright green, they poured ACTUAL toxic chemicals and colorants in the water, which resulted in killing numerous fishes of the river. It went viral on the Internet, the whole "ecologists kill fishes" thing, but it shows how by ignorance (here ignorance of the toxicity of the products you use), those who fight against pollution become the pollution-makers themselves.
Now, that was not related to social things so "woke" isn't to be applied to them - but it is a good illustration of how fighting one extreme can lead to another. But if you want a case of "bad woke" actions I have a perfect one for you - which is from before the term "woke" was taken back by the media. It was something that happened in the French part of Canada (and in general when you want some misguided and extreme woke behavior, you can go to Canada, they are very talented here at misguided good actions). It was a gesture done by Christian (Catholic) religious groups, related to the whole dreadful rediscovery of the horrors of the special so-called "schools" they had prepared for First Nations kids. You know, the ones with mass graves and such. To show that they wanted to bury the past behind them and reject the discrimination of Native-Americans, they decided to collect all sorts of old classics of French childhood literature that had depictions of First Nations people deemed offensive (for example Lucky Luke and Asterix comic books)... and they burned it in a huge bonfire.
Of course, thats CERTAINLY the best way to prove you want to help the people you have persecuted and killed for so long: do not give them money, do not change the laws, do not actually do something for them, just become book-burners! That's CERTAINLY going to help and that's CERTAINLY going to make you the "good guys".
You see what I mean by the "bad woke" movement? It isn't a movement in itself, but just the extremes these attempts at "good" and fighting against discrimination can lead to. Sometimes to the point of just coming off as a new form of discrimination. Another case, that was in France, and done in Paris. I personally think that it was a dubious idea, and maybe someone will disagree with me, but it was a project brought forward - to handle the help provided to rape victims. The whole idea was that man should be banned of all groups, organizations and help systems brought to rape victims, because in the politician's words, women had to stay between themselves, and rape victims had to cut all ties with men to get better. Another similar dubious "woke" incident (it happened, just like the one above, in Paris, because Paris recently went through a wave of bad-woke incidents and propositions thanks to the local government in power), was when a "set of safe space" was created, from which men were banned - all men - and which only welcomed... "Women and transgenders". The phrasing and formula might seem weird, and that's literaly how it was said, and it took not a long time to understand the problem: it welcomed all transgenders, and all women, but banned all men. Aka: transgender men either had to be banned from it, because they were men (so they lied upon saying they welcomed all transgenders) ; either they were allowed in, but thus not recognized as actual "men" and still considered women.
You see how there's some good intentions buried down there, but in effect it is twisted and warped in another form of discrimination?
When it comes to my worries about the new Snow-White movie, it isn't about an active, harmful, reverse-discrimination type of "bad woke". But I do fear about the "accidentally harmful" and "plain ridiculous" bad-woke. To handle the idea that a character named "Snow-White" is black is something that needs carefulness and intelligence - and Disney's had the bluntness and grace of a hammer wielded by an angry bear recently. I have one precise fear for example that I keep repeating around: if they choose to still refer to Snow-White's name as a reference to the fact she has a lighter skin and thus is beautiful because of it, and given they have chosen an actress with a light skin tone - it can result in a scenario enacting "colorism" fully. Aka, a practice and set of worldviews put in place in the slavery and discrimination-era America, about how the lighter the Black person's skin, the "better" and more "beautiful" they were. This resulted in practices such as putting "lighter" Blacks above "darker" ones, for example choosing Black people with light skin to oversee "darker" slaves and the "lighter" ones being given a less harsh treatment than the others.
Its a whole another cesspool of discrimination born of the horror that was America in this era - but it is still something that Afro-American people fight against and dislike today, and something many media have been accused of doing by putting "lighter skinned" Black characters in the position of "prettier" or "better" characters than "darker skinned" ones.
No need to tell you the whole dwarf issue is also a big "bad woke movement" move on the part of Disney. To answer to a loud minority that thinks the dwarfs roles in Snow-White is backward and insulting, they simply decide to erase them from the story... Despite the role of the seven dwarfs being something that many actors with dwarfism enjoy and defend because it was often their first entry into the acting world, and despite the fact that the original Disney seven dwarfs were positive and complex characters that were far more compelling and powerful than many other Snow-White adaptations (in fact, that's the problem, the reason the dwarfs are seen as "backwards" today is because so many post-Disney adaptations reduced them to goofy, joke secondary characters as flat as a cardboard cut-out). There are tons of ways of making the dwarfs strong and badass and cool and powerful characters - and it has been done before. (Just remember how the dwarfs in the original Disney movie are the only ones who stand up to the evil queen, and the only ones who make her VISIBLY AFRAID as they hunt her down to kill her in revenge).
So we come with the mixed and complicated result we have: Because a role is deemed "problematic", it is erased and replaced - but as a result, erasing an opportunity for actors with dwarfism to become famous and appear in a big blockbuster seen by millions is perceived as discrimination against said actors with dwarfism, as they are replaced by so-called "normal" people. They could have simply worked on making the dwarfs' characters a badass role the actors could have had no shame of playing, and they could have just gone wth what the original movie did - make the dwarfs the true heroes and protagonist of the tale. But they rather decided to close the door and make actors with dwarfism even less visible on screen.
I hope it clarifies my whole position on the subject.
22 notes · View notes
dommnics · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Watching the animated Snow White was what started me off drawing when I was little, so I'm highly anticipating this live action adaptation to see how they'll re-invision her story. Rachel Zegler, please take care of her! 🍎
--
Check out more of my work on other platforms!
https://instagram.com/dommnics
https://twitter.com/Dommnics
119 notes · View notes
romancedream · 9 months
Text
Snow white is not a leader...
and that's perfectly fine ...🤍
Hello everyone, how are you all doing?
when i heard that a new snow white film is coming i was so happy and i wanted to see it...
Untill i saw the pictures down below 🤦‍♀️
Hollywood has done it for the thousand's time: Suggesting that the only woman who deserves to exist is :" the girl irritating boss " that no one relates to and very few women want to see...
Also suggesting that women who want love, marriage and babies are all stupid and weak ( that's more than 90% women on the planet)
These people are so Smart and so progressive😃
They find themselves entitled to tell all women how they should live their lives...
Snow white is known for her motherly instincts... for her innocence and pure heart... for her care and compassion towards others...
And for being positive and optimistic in extreamly difficult times...
She is a very feminine woman and that's why Disney doesn't want her as a role model for young girls 😀
Because Girls should be more manly...
Because women can only be strong and powerfull if they are more manly😀
That's not offensive, sexist or stupid at all 😀
And also the dwarves do not exist in this movie...
Because 7 dwarves working hard in mines, making their own living and saving a poor innocent girl is offensive apparently...😀
I just can't believe what is happening 🤦‍♀️
This stupidity is unbelievable..
Tumblr media
33 notes · View notes
princess-ibri · 1 year
Note
I lowkey live in fear of the live action Snow White giving the prince a name that isn't Florian
Right?? Sadly from what I've heard it sounds like they might noy even have the prince or have him not end up with Snow White in the live action :/
Honestly very tired of Live Action Disney/Disney in general talking crap about the og films, like, you all know you wouldnt be where you are without that legacy right? Yeah maybe Snow White isnt a modern feminist masterpiece (whatever that even means) but its a good little film with a ton of charm and heart, and they should be leaning into that while also giving some more depth to the story, not trying to twist it into some sort of subversion.
That's why imo the only good Live Action has been Cinderella. It knew how to keep the charm and heart of the animated movie without turing the story on its head ala Maleficent or talking down about the og like they did BatB and Aladdin, while also not being afraid to be it's own thing and make changes. It was the best blend of old and new and honestly really wish they'd kept with that model :/
54 notes · View notes
Text
I am so unbelievably proud and happy for this wonderful, strong, talented and beautiful young woman. As a teenager (well.. 19) with hopes and dreams, emotions and passions - her realness is beyond comforting with honest words that makes me feel less alone in the dark shadows of my mind. Speaking directly to Rachel, thank you for making me PROUD of being a former (*cough* still) theatre kid. Thank you for bringing light to life’s highs and lows. Thanks for being three apples tall just like me and oh, grateful for your defending of the raisinets 💞
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
17 notes · View notes
ziggyplayedguitar96 · 8 months
Text
19 notes · View notes