#regulator circuit

[alityombano419]

Voltage LDO Regulator, regulator circuit, low dropout regulator

L78M Series 500 mA 5 V Three Terminal Positive Voltage LDO Regulator - TO-252

#Voltage LDO Regulator #regulator circuit #low dropout regulator

[sefexomban85107]

What are Regulators, Regulator circuit, programmable regulator, shunt regulator

IXCY Series 900 V 1 to 100 mA Switchable Current Regulator - TO-252 AA

#What are Regulators #Regulator circuit #programmable regulator #shunt regulator

[amonwiyino4276]

Programmable linear regulators, Adjustable linear regulator, regulator circuit

L78M Series 500 mA 5 V Three Terminal Positive Voltage LDO Regulator - TO-252

#Programmable linear regulators #Adjustable linear regulator #regulator circuit

[captainjonnitkessler]

There's a certain segment of leftists that believe that, without capitalism, everyone would be naturally motivated to build things safely and to code. They believe this because the only reason they can think of for having code officers and regulatory enforcement is to stop evil capitalists from cutting corners to make more money. And while that is a contributing factor some of the time, we don't actually live in an episode of Captain Planet and what actually happens is that the people designing the space go "ooh, this would be so much pretty if we designed it like this instead!" and it turns out that their prettier option is not ADA compliant, not NFPA compliant, and a energy-sucking ventilation nightmare.

I was actually just about to make a post along these lines. Like yes, corporations cutting corners to save money and foremen forcing people to work unsafely to be more productive are huge issues and the primary reason for labor laws. But also . . . have you ever tried getting a construction worker to wear a hard hat if safety isn't right there watching him?

Like, pretty much everyone will cut corners or ignore safety guidelines here and there, and not out of greed or maliciousness. It's just because it's faster and easier and it's really, really easy to think "oh I'll just do it real quick, it'll be fine". Or for over-confident people to think "I don't need to look up how to do this, I know how it works", or for someone to just plain be wrong about how they interpreted something. Or to use the wrong part for something because there's a 99% chance it'll be fine and getting the right part will cost a thousand dollars and won't be here for eight weeks.

Basically any system that just relies on humans always doing everything perfectly by the book just because that's the right way to do it is doomed to failure. THAT'S why we have regulatory agencies and require things like permits and inspections - to disincentivize people from taking those shortcuts. It's my biggest problem with a lot of leftist visions of the perfect society - they rely on people not acting like people anymore, and that's just never going to happen.

#signed: a person who gave themselves a concussion by not wearing a hard hat because they thought it was mildly annoying. TWICE. #there's an apprentice in my class who hasn't worked in a year after he had a heart attack at age 28 #because he decided to work on a live circuit because it would 'only take a second' #it would've taken him five minutes to lock out the circuit. but the temptation to save those five minutes is SO STRONG #because the thing is - it really is fine like 99.99% of the time. but god help that .01% #and preventing people from becoming part of that .01% is THE reason for regulations #construction

[allegedly-human-uwu]

FIA: obviously we cannot possibly let these highly experienced professional race drivers and their giant team of insanely educated engineers and strategists look after tyre management IT IS TOO DANGEREUX

also FIA: lol let them barf in their helmets from overheating not even a third into the race that’s good tv right? Also the tarmac is made of ice good luck racing wheel to wheel lol also it’s 50C and you will pass out from exhaustion & dehydration. a quarter of the grid hs to be medically checked because their bodies have gone all kinds of wacky from the heat but ayyy what can you do

#fia clown shit #seriously what #see also wet races #they could change the regulations so that wet races will be less dangerous #bc its mostly poor visibility due to spray and aero #but instead let’s quit racing at iconic tracks bc sometimes it rains #in favour of corrupt oil states where doing anything physically active is like biologically impossible #also the tracks are shit and boring can we pls get some elevation #and like a racing circuit that is not literally designed to be a death trap #formula 1 #f1 #f1 memes #qatar grand prix #qatar gp 2023

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday once again stepped in to leave in place the federal government's ban on so-called "ghost guns." These are unassembled and unmarked guns that can be bought online and then assembled into fully operative guns.

In August 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives issued regulations that required any such disassembled gun parts to carry serial numbers and required anyone buying them to pass a background check, in the same manner as in-person gun buyers. The gun manufacturers challenged the regulations in court, and Federal Judge Reed O'Connor in Texas issued a nationwide injunction barring the rule from going into effect.

The Supreme Court, however, blocked those decisions from going into effect, whereupon two of the manufacturers returned to Judge O'Connor's court and won an order barring the government from enforcing its regulations. The 5th Circuit upheld that order, too.

The government asked the high court to void, rather than just pause, the lower court rulings to send a message that lower courts should not "countermand" the high court's "authoritative determination."

Now the Supreme Court has once again repudiated the lower courts, voiding the lower court orders and allowing the ATF regulations to go into effect pending further litigation.

There were no noted dissents.

#us politics #news #npr #2023 #us supreme court #Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives #atf #Judge Reed O'Connor #texas #5th Circuit court of appeals #biden administration #gun reform #gun rights #gun regulation #gun laws #2nd amendment #ghost guns #background checks #disassembled gun parts #serial numbers

[nightmareinfloral]

Oh new au? Guess I have to know everything that ever happened in 80s F1 in order to write this.

#bruh the rabbit holes I’ve been going down #and not just F1 I’ve had to look at the minor circuits for #roy and try and find a realistic path for him to have taken #and the rules and regulations of the time #this is why I never write anything I’m just constantly researching

[your-spiritual-journey]

#Nepal trekking #Solo trekking #Trekking regulations #Remote regions #Himalayan trekking #Nepal tourism #Safety regulations #Trekking permits #Travel restrictions #Adventure tourism #Trekking guides #Solo travel #Outdoor adventure #Annapurna circuit #Everest base camp #Langtang trek #Manaslu trek #Mustang trek #your spiritual journey

[5mind]

📂 x for each one.

Send “📂“ for a random yet completely useless headcanon I have

(( oh, like for each unit right?

Red One used to have a little scarf on them but it kept getting in between their neck seams so they don't wear it anymore (they still carry it around though)

Ig this isn't really a useless headcanon but Blue Two has the highest visual acuity out of the five.

Since all of them are just extensions of the same being, they're p much all the same "age" but Yellow Three is internally considered the youngest by Fivemind just cuz a lot of yellow rangers in sentai tend to be the younger/youngest ones (altho ig this mostly applies for female yellow rangers???)

Pink Four was initially designed to be sent out to colder regions so heat dispersal and cooling wasn't that high of a priority when designing her. Overheats the easiest during the hot n dry season.

Green Five ,on the other hand, has a better cooling system. Technically the newest model out of the bunch, so its a tad more complex than the others.

#[ out of circuits ] #[ data : red one ] #[ data : blue two ] #[ data : yellow three ] #[ data : pink four ] #[ data : green five ] #moonglittering #(( for reference wherever tf im putting em is somewhere in the tropics #because im actually just too lazy to look into temperature regulation and insulation in other climates lmaooo #winter? never heard of er

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

The Supreme Court agreed Monday to consider overturning a nearly 40-year precedent by taking up a challenge to a regulation affecting fishing vessels in a case that is the latest conservative-led attack on federal bureaucracy.

The court will weigh whether to overturn a much-cited 1984 ruling, Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which said courts should defer to federal agencies in interpreting the law when the language of a statute is ambiguous.

Attempts to overturn the ruling, which the court has rarely invoked in recent years, is just one avenue of attack by conservative groups and business interests as part of what has been dubbed “the war on the administrative state.”

"The Supreme Court has an opportunity to correct one of the most consequential judicial errors in a generation," said Ryan Mulvey, a lawyer at the Cause of Action Institute, a conservative group that represents the challengers. The Chevron ruling "has proven corrosive to the American system of checks and balances and directly contributed to an unaccountable executive branch."

The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, is skeptical of broad assertions of federal agency power.

The case itself is a challenge to a government regulation that requires fishing vessels to help fund the collection of scientific data to assist with fishery conservation and management. The court could still rule in favor of the challengers by limiting the scope of the Chevron decision without overturning it entirely.

The court took up an appeal brought by Loper Bright Enterprises and several other operators of fishing vessels that are active in the herring fishery off the Atlantic coast, which challenged the 2020 rule applying to New England fisheries.

The challengers say the National Marine Fisheries Service, the federal body that oversees ocean resources, did not have authority to issue the regulation under the relevant law, the 1976 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

The rule implements a monitoring program that vessel operators are required to fund. As the challengers put it, operators have to pay up to $710 a day at certain times for independent observers to board their vessels and monitor their operations. The cost is a significant burden on small owner-operators, the challengers say.

The case, backed by conservative groups, is the latest attempt to undermine the power of federal agencies. Lawyers for the fishing vessel operators say a lower court that upheld the rule gave too much deference to the federal agency in interpreting the 1976 law.

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia rejected the vessel operators' claims in a decision in August, upholding a similar ruling a federal district judge issued the previous year.

The brief Supreme Court order noted that liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is not participating in the case. She was originally part of the appeals court panel that decided the case before President Joe Biden appointed her to the high court. She heard oral arguments but was not involved in the ruling itself.

#us politics #news #nbc news #2023 #us supreme court #federal agencies #Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council #Cause of Action Institute #government regulation #deregulation #deregulate deez nutz #fishery conservation and management #Loper Bright Enterprises #National Marine Fisheries Service #Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act #U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia #justice ketanji brown jackson #biden administration

[robe3ales]

https://www.futureelectronics.com/p/semiconductors--analog--regulators-reference--linear-regulators/lm317d2t-tr-stmicroelectronics-3412715

Adjustable voltage regulator circuit, Fixed voltage regulator,

LM317 Series 1.2 V 1.5 A Positive Adjustable Voltage Regulator - D2PAK

#Regulators & References #Linear Regulators #LM317D2T-TR #STMicroelectronics #Adjustable voltage regulator circuit #Fixed voltage regulator #circuit #low dropout linear regulator #Linear voltage regulator types #AC voltage regulator

[grldw2wis]

https://www.futureelectronics.com/p/semiconductors--analog--regulators-reference--linear-regulators/lm317d2t-tr-stmicroelectronics-8253809

STMicroelectronics, LM317D2T-TR, Regulators & References, Linear Regulators

LM317 Series 1.2 V 1.5 A Positive Adjustable Voltage Regulator - D2PAK

#STMicroelectronics #LM317D2T-TR #Regulators & References #Linear Regulators #What is voltage regulator #high voltage #output voltages #circuit #Low-Noise LDO Regulator #voltage divider network #constant voltage regardless

[crispyeagleenthusiast]

Samsung DG92-01084A Range Pcb-Main | HnK Parts

#DG92-01084A #Samsung #Range #PcbMain #HnKParts #KitchenAppliance #HomeAppliance #Manufacturer Name:Samsung #Product Number:DG92-01084A #OEM Part Number:DG92-01084A #The Samsung DG92-01084A is a vital component for Samsung ranges #functioning as the main printed circuit board. Consider it as your range's intellect #which includes critical electronic parts which regulate multiple operations. A properly working PCB makes sure your range works smoothly #including regulating temperature settings to offering quick buttons and a comprehensive power supply. #https://www.hnkparts.com/dg92-01084a-smg-pcb-main

[abrarkhanam548]

Voltage regulator, circuit, input voltage, low dropout, circuit, 12v

LM317 Series 100 mA 1.2 to 37 V Adjustable Positive Voltage Regulator - SOIC-8

#Voltage regulator #circuit #input voltage #low dropout #12v

[takmiblog]

(http://www.op316.com/tubes/tips/tips14.htm)

　電源の波形は時代とともにどんどんいびつになってきている気がします。画像は上が我が家の通常のAC100V電源の波形で、下が歪みのない正弦波形ですが、ずいぶんと違いますね。正弦波の頭がすぱっと切れるのは整流回路のコンデンサの仕業です。整流回路の直後、最初にくる平滑コンデンサの容量がでかいと、整流電流が波形の頭の部分の時に集中してしまうためこのようなことになります。整流回路に巨大コンデンサを入れる馬鹿野郎が多いとこんなことになるわけです。強力な電源にしたつもりがAC100Vの波形をぶっこわす、天に唾吐く行為でございます。

　私が設計するアンプの電源回路で、整流ダイオードの直後で平滑コンデンサの手前に一定の抵抗を入れることが多いのは、装置の機能を損なわない範囲でこの種の悪影響を少しでも減らしたいという思いがあるからです。なお、整流回路および電源回路のレギュレーションの低下は音に良くないのではないか、とおっしゃるオーディオファンが多いようですが、はっきり申し上げますがそれは「根拠のないイメージ」「妄想」です。もし、それが本当なら私が作った回路など、とっくの昔にネット上から葬り去られています。

私のアンプ設計マニュアル / 雑学編 １４．電源

by Tetsu Kimura

#tetsu kimura #木村哲 #ぺるけ #diy audio #power circuit #regulation

[jmy2lsaps]

https://www.futureelectronics.com/p/semiconductors--analog--regulators-reference--linear-regulators/lm317d2t-tr-stmicroelectronics-3412715

Low dropout linear regulator, linear voltage regulator, AC voltage regulator,

LM317 Series 1.2 V 1.5 A Positive Adjustable Voltage Regulator - D2PAK

#Regulators & References #Linear Regulators #LM317D2T-TR #STMicroelectronics #Adjustable Voltage Regulator #circuit #Low dropout linear regulator #AC voltage regulator #Voltage divider network #High voltage regulators #Linear regulators power