Tumgik
#gangland murder
streetsofdublin · 9 months
Text
A PUB THAT DIED BECAUSE OF A GANGLAND KILLING
This pub was also known as Matt Whelans and I also believe that it may have been known as the Fassaugh House Pub when the gangland killing took place in April 2010.
MATTS CABRA HOUSE PUB I have noticed in old photographs of the building and advertisements that it is spelled ‘Faussagh’ but elswhere it is ‘Fassaugh’ … are there two different spellings? This pub was also known as Matt Whelans and I also believe that it may have been known as the Fassaugh House Pub when the gangland killing took place in April 2010. Matt’s Cabra House Pub, also known as the…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
stairnaheireann · 7 hours
Text
#OTD in Irish History | 27 April:
1652 – Oliver Cromwell published a declaration that Irish Wolf Dogs or Irish Wolfhounds were prohibited to be exported and insisted that locals continue to breed sufficient numbers of the mighty hounds to hunt wolves. 1653 – The last major body of Irish Catholic troops under Phillip O’Reilly surrender to the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland at Cloughoughter in Cavan. End of the Irish Confederate…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
4 notes · View notes
ur-mag · 6 months
Text
Jury shown CCTV of Scots gym owner being shot on his own doorstep as gangland murder trial underway | In Trend Today
Jury shown CCTV of Scots gym owner being shot on his own doorstep as gangland murder trial underway Read Full Text or Full Article on MAG NEWS
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
alpha-mag-media · 7 months
Text
Gardai ramp up probe into mobster Daniel Kinahan and brother Christopher as pair could face charges for gangland murders | In Trend Today
Gardai ramp up probe into mobster Daniel Kinahan and brother Christopher as pair could face charges for gangland murders Read Full Text or Full Article on MAG NEWS
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
PHOENIX WARLOCKS MC STATEMENT THEY’RE NOT INVOLVED IN MURDER **FULL VIDEO**
Is it important? Does it matter? Reguardless of the year, the generation, the situation, an individual putting out accurate “news” is in fact important. In our world putting out accurate news or inaccurate news can cause problems for teams that could have been prevented. It can also ruin images and reputations of clubs that work hard to “be better and do better”. When these “so called” news…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
wikifoxnews · 2 years
Text
Who was Mahmoud Brownie Ahmad ( Sydney gangland who was murder by man, 49 , Suspect arrested ) Wiki, Bio, Age, Crime, Arrest, Incident details, Investigations and More Facts
Tumblr media
Mahmoud Brownie Ahmad Biography                  Mahmoud Brownie Ahmad Wiki
A man has been charged with his alleged role in the murder of Mahmoud "Brownie" Ahmad earlier this year.
Police have charged a 49-year-old man arrested during a police operation on May 2 with aiding and abetting a murder. The man had previously been charged with drug offenses and criminal gang offenses after police seized more than 25kg of methylamphetamine (ice), $200,000 in cash and cloned license plates during of a house search in Wetherill Park. Police indict man for role in murder of crime boss Mahmoud ‘Brownie’ Ahmad https://t.co/SxoDtllVem — 9 Breaking News (@9Breakingnew) June 28, 2022 On Friday, new charges were brought against the man, which is still in court. Ahmad was shot by a hail of bullets in Greenacre around 9.30pm on April 27. The 39-year-old was treated by emergency services but died at the crash site. Police previously said they warned Ahmad that his life could be in danger. "Last week, police were still executing foreign execution warrants warning them not to be associated with 'Brownie' Ahmad, who was in danger and needed to be warned," Homicide Commander Superintendent Danny said in April. Doherty. "He didn't want to hide and wanted to continue his normal criminal activities to deal with the same allies and suffered the consequences." The 49-year-old remains in custody and is due to appear in Fairfield Magistrates Court on Wednesday July 6. The police investigations of the Erebus task force are ongoing. Read the full article
0 notes
if-you-fan-a-fire · 3 years
Photo
Tumblr media
“Viewing Guns That May Have Killed Buckley,” Border Cities Star. January 12, 1931. Page 5 ---- FOLLOWING revelations by County Constable Kelly, Detective Lieut. Earl Stephens, Detroit police ballistics expert, came to Windsor today to examine two revolvers that may have been used in the murder of Gerald Buckley, Detroit radio announcer. The picture above was taken by a Star staff photographer this morning, when Superintendent James R. Wilkinson, of the Windsor police identification bureau (left) and Claude Renaud, inspector of detectives (centre), examined the weapons, together with Detective Stephens, right. In the background is County Constable S. H. Kelly, who made the arrest of Leo Mitchell, notorious desperado. Below is Ted Pizzzino, now held by Detroit police as one of the ‘trigger’ men in the Buckley murder, who may be the victim of mistaken identify.
0 notes
dragonflavoredcake · 1 year
Text
Etho: In your professional opinion, how do you think I would die? Cleo: Murder. Gangland-style execution. They'd never find your head. Scar: *silently raises finger in question* Cleo: You slip in a tub.
222 notes · View notes
chaifootsteps · 2 months
Note
Moxxie and Blitz meeting in a prison doesn’t work no matter how Viv or the writing team twist it. I originally thought that yeah, rich demons would have a prison but then I realised that, no, it doesn’t make sense.
If I was Mammon and someone tried to rob me, would I keep the person alive so they can do it again later or dead so they can’t? Even if I did keep them alive, why prison? Why not a slave camp? Something that Mammon would benefit greatly from.
In a place where murder is more common than the cold, a prison would not matter nor exist.
Blitz and Moxxie could’ve had a ton more ways to meet. Like Moxxie tired of the life he has, runs away leaving everyone behind (which could be written into sending Chaz into a downward spiral from being abandon and giving Moxxie a more shown character flaw of hurting his lovers unintentionally) and Moxxie can’t find a job due to either not skilled enough for it or not charismatic enough until he finds a poster or something similar about a job for I.M.P. Moxxie and Blitz meet during the interview and bam, Moxxie now works for I.M.P.
If nothing else, the idea of a prison in Hell flat out executes the whole "WHAT DO YOU EXPECT, THEY'RE IN HELL" excuse the fandom loves so much gangland style.
50 notes · View notes
paganminiskirt · 4 months
Text
There are a lot of parts of GTA 5 where the creators display storytelling capabilities that one wouldn't expect from a game like this, but I think the scene where Franklin goes to Michael's house after Ending A is one of the most memorable. It's not particularly flashy, it’s not even a cutscene, but the feeling it creates in the player is unpleasant on several different levels.
Because it's tragic to see the main character and his mentor fall out over a choice you, the player, made, but it's also… cringe inducing, upsetting in a way I couldn't identify at first glance. And not necessarily on Trevor's behalf! You don't have to like him or regret killing him to squirm during that scene.
Even when you measure Michael against the twisted, honor-among-thieves system of morality favored by Trevor and his ilk - people who are so entrenched in their lifestyle that they can't imagine rehabilitation, and compensate by trying to inject some morality into the amoral criminal underworld - he doesn't emerge as some gloating, greedy backstabber à la Benny in the deleted content for FNV. He's not really a coward, and he's certainly not a monster. The game never gives any indication that Michael is lying when he says that he was worried about his young family, that he never meant for Trevor to find out about Brad's death the way he did, that Ludendorff was a difficult decision to make, but he ultimately had altruistic reasons for making it.
The first thing Michael does after the heist goes wrong is tell Trevor to run away; a choice he makes on impulse, but still out of good will. By the time he starts actively concealing the truth about Brad, the FIB have already been exchanging heartfelt messages with Trevor as his dead friend for a solid decade, rendering the time bomb effect of the whole lie that much more foreboding when it was already a likelihood that Trevor would do something atrocious if he found out.
Much of the horror surrounding Trevor's crimes is fridge horror, where what happens is implied but never outright shown, leaving the player's imagination to fill in the gaps. For the first two thirds of the game, the prospect of what Trevor will do when the truth about Brad comes out maintains the same aura of gruesome, unseen violence as what he did to Debra, Leon, Wade's friends, and god knows how many others. You can't expect Trevor himself to be happy about it, but you also can't judge Michael for lying to him. Who wouldn't lie to him. You wouldn't want to end up in the stew.
But by the time you get to Michael killing Trevor, all that grandiose reasoning has collapsed in on itself. The FIB just openly crumbled into gangland style infighting, they're not a coherent threat. If Trevor was still sore about Brad, he could've done something already - something like not going out of his way to save Michael from the government agency he ends up killing him on behalf of, an act which renders Michael's willingness to take him out particularly ironic and shameful.
The only reason Michael is alive to kill Trevor for the FIB is because earlier, Trevor stopped the FIB from killing Michael! Trevor's desire to protect his loved ones, one of his only redeeming qualities, is retroactively transformed into humiliating self-sabotage! And Michael goes through with the most overtly cruel & unusual murder we ever see him commit for the sake of corrupt, incompetent bureaucrats who strung him along and tried to kill him. People who he knows aren't worth working for, if you aren't spineless and paranoid. The whole situation is laughable.
From there, after Trevor is dead, it's no wonder Michael leans into the barebones, social-darwinist cynicism of it all. He's already forsaken what is right for what is easy in the most miserably inglorious way possible; what else is there to do but commit to the bit, just like he did when he first started lying about Brad?
So Michael just burned his oldest friend alive in front of his twenty five year old protege. He mocks him afterwards to mask his own obvious discomfort, and when Franklin reacts negatively, he tells him that he "doesn't understand," as if Frank isn't the one who presented him with this solution in the first place. Michael reminds Franklin of Trevor's nastier habits, as if the two of them haven't been actively utilizing his brutality to give themselves a leg up this whole time, rendering them directly complicit. And he spins a whole yarn about survival and the willingness to make unpleasant choices, promises (in so many words) that he'll stay in Franklin's life, then reinforces it later.
Because Michael was the one who put a gun to Franklin's head and got him involved in all of this at the beginning, all the while padding out their professional relationship with a paternalistic attitude that was reinforced by Michael's disappointment with his biological son and the absence of Franklin's biological father. Whether the two of them were codependent or w/e is anyone's guess, but their relationship certainly wasn't balanced.
And after you've slogged through all of this ugliness, after Michael's done all this talking and made these broad sweeping statements, the man just... pussies out. He stops taking Franklin's calls without explanation. He takes the easy way out again. You have to go find him to ask what's up, and when you do, you don't get a big cinematic cutscene: you get bitched at by an old man with a three day beard in his driveway, an experience which feels like being gaslit, even if that isn't necessarily what Mike's trying to do. The sequence is defined by this blunt sense of anticlimax and disappointment, like you should've seen this coming but didn't, and are now left to feel stupid for it.
There are so many things Michael's doing here. He's dodging responsibility for killing Trevor in an especially brutal way, yeah, but he's doing so by shifting the blame onto Franklin of all people. Franklin who handled that situation with infinitely more decency than he did, despite not knowing Trevor half as well - despite being two decades younger than both of them and a surrogate son figure. Michael pulled the trigger, he ranted and raved about how Trevor deserved it, he told us we did the right thing when we could've just as easily killed his stupid ass, and now he's pissy about it. He's wearing black. He's saying with complete sincerity that you need to shoulder the guilt of what he did for him. Burning a man alive. To a twenty five year old.
And we, the audience, know that this whole series of events started with a decision we made through Franklin. Extratextually, we did choose to kill Trevor. So the immediate response is to say that the scene is sad, for the reason that the narrative presents you with directly - that being that Michael is right, that Frank did do something wrong, and he should be allowed to hate him for it. But when you think about it within the universe itself, it becomes this awful new moral low for Michael. One character emerges looking freshly terrible, and it's him.
And it's not just a random act of cruelty; it's a bad end to the arc Michael had been in for the entire game, as a father, a partner, and a man. Trevor was right in a way that he never would've wanted to be right. It takes his death to fully actualize Michael as the kind of person Trevor spent the entire narrative accusing him of being already: a liar and a coward.
And the moment where that becomes clear is... infinitely crueler and harder to watch than it would’ve been if Michael had never cared to begin with. Imo.
29 notes · View notes
Text
Jane: Mischa, in your professional opinion. How do I die?
Mischa: Murder. Gangland execution style. We never find your head.
Jane: That’s a shame
Ocean: *quietly raises hand in question*
Mischa: You slip in a tub.
210 notes · View notes
ur-mag · 7 months
Text
Gardai ramp up probe into mobster Daniel Kinahan and brother Christopher as pair could face charges for gangland murders | In Trend Today
Gardai ramp up probe into mobster Daniel Kinahan and brother Christopher as pair could face charges for gangland murders Read Full Text or Full Article on MAG NEWS
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
alpha-mag-media · 7 months
Text
Gardai ramp up probe into mobster Daniel Kinahan and brother Christopher as pair could face charges for gangland murders | In Trend Today
Gardai ramp up probe into mobster Daniel Kinahan and brother Christopher as pair could face charges for gangland murders Read Full Text or Full Article on MAG NEWS
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
liquidpaperfoundation · 7 months
Text
Alan: Cesare, in your professional opinion, how would I die?
Cesare: Murder. Gangland-style execution. We never find your head.
Alan: A shame.
Franzis, raising his finger in silent question:
Cesare: You slip in a tub
44 notes · View notes
callmemrskenway · 2 years
Text
You: Hey, Altaïr, in your professional opinion, how would I die?
Altaïr, cleaning his hidden blade: Murder. Gangland style execution. We'd never find your head.
Jacob: *opens his mouth*
Altaïr: You slip in a tub.
428 notes · View notes