A general tip for students who are sending those dreaded Religious Absence Emails to your professors: Rather than asking permission to take the day(s) off, politely let them know that you will be taking the day(s) off.
In other words, consider not saying this:
"May I miss class on [date] so I can observe [holiday]?"
It's not that there's anything wrong with the above, per se. But because it's phrased as a request, it risks coming across as optional — a favor you hope to be granted. Problem is, favors are not owed, and so unfortunately asking permission opens the door for the professor to respond "Thanks for asking. No, you may not. :)"
Instead, try something along the lines of:
"I will need to miss class on [date] because I will be observing [holiday]. I wanted to let you know of this conflict now, and to ask your assistance in making arrangements for making up whatever material I may miss as a result of this absence."
This is pretty formal language (naturally, you can and should tweak it to sound more like your voice). But the important piece is that, while still being respectful, it shifts the focus of the discussion so that the question becomes not "Is it okay for me to observe my religion?", but rather, "How can we best accommodate my observance?"
Because the first question should not be up for debate: freedom of religion is a right, not a favor. And the second question is the subject you need to discuss.
(Ideally, do this after you've looked up your school's policy on religious absences, so you know what you're working within and that religious discrimination is illegal. Just in case your professor forgot.)
17K notes
·
View notes
All of us after hearing that Rhys Darby is sad about losing the role he's said he was born to play
1K notes
·
View notes
okay just because I'm losing my mind over Major Anthony Havers and the very horrible, bad, not good day:
I'm still kinda glad that he was there witnessing Cap's death. And not solely for the Captain's sake.
I mean Cap was not really subtle about his affection and yet when he said "I say, Havers!" my boy almost gave himself whiplash (I made a long as post about what follows before but let me just summarise). Havers looks at him expectantly and when Cap doesn't bring up the courage to tell him how he feels (two times in a row at that), Havers looks dissapointed and crestfallen but manages to keep a stiff upper lip.
In short he suspected and reciprocated but from what we have seen he never really got a real confirmation about Cap's feelings for him.
(Tbh I still think he would have been so so tempted to stay if Cap had said anything)
So now skip forward a few years. The war is over, Havers got wounded at the front line, he has to attend an event and then he sees Cap.
The man who corrected his "I shall miss you, Havers" , who tried to confess something but didn't, Mr. 17 points on the agenda, his stickler for rules and authorities Captain broke into an event, stole some medals and is clearly there looking for and trying to talk to Havers. Years after they have last seen each other.
And I think in that moment Havers got the confirmation he wanted. So when Cap tries to finally vocalise it, he stops him because 1.) The man should really not waste breath right now 2.) They are in danger because of where they are and whom they surrounded by and 3.) He doesn't need to say it. Havers finally knows what he kinda knew all along. What Cap just did to get to him speaks louder than words and it's finally a clear confirmation on how Cap feels.
And then to go even further Cap adresses him by his first name. Not his rank, or his last name. He adresses the man behind the uniform as an equal. And Havers does the same. No Captain, no Sir, just the name of the man he loves who is now dying in front of him.
And it's heartwrenching and horrible to think about but we all said that at least Cap died knowing that he was loved.
And that's why I'm a bit glad about it happening that way because now Havers has some closure as well. He can now live his life after all the horrors at least knowing that yes he was loved through all of it.
196 notes
·
View notes
this comment had me thinking more about qfoolishs fobo retirement arc and an end to his character and that in relation to the possible end of qsmp and it made me wonder that maybe, in universe, qfoolish knew it was all coming to an end. He's an immortal and totem of undying, he's far more in touch with life and death than most others and so perhaps even after just the reset he knew this world was dying. Even a god would have a hard time keeping together a shattered planet let alone the federation holding reality together with glue and tape. Nothing can truly be reset, no slate can be fully wiped clean. Life leaves its marks as does death.
It would be quite the distraction from building hearing it on the wind, feeling it in the earth, tasting it in the water. Their world is dying, and maybe he couldn't find anything within himself beyond the will to sit back and wait for whatever comes next.
26 notes
·
View notes
i think the usage of "AI" as a synonym for ML models is deeply misleading because it lends itself to thinking about those models as if they were almost-people which do things themselves, rather than tools which people use to do things
this is a consequence of the broader fact that AI is a theatrical term with no technical meaning, but it's especially prominent wrt neural networks because their PR has focused heavily on playing up purported similarities with human minds ("neural network", "machine learning", etc)
up until the last couple years, you could say a piece of art was "made with AI" and mean "genetic algorithm plus perlin noise and particles", or your phone's predictive text, or a Tracery generative text grammar. having a wide variety of technical methods in mind when you say "AI" makes it easier to see through the hype on any one method, and gives more basis to think through what's actually going on in the theatrical performance of AI. even then the illusion is powerful
522 notes
·
View notes
Arlecchino's whole deal is unbelievable
Arlecchino: Huh I wonder what's causing my weird powers? I can't really worry about that right now tho, I've gotta become King and then kill my "Mother".
*Kills Clervie and "Mother"*
Arlecchino: Huh I wonder why I was able to defeat a Fatui Harbinger when I'm like 17 or so? I can't really worry about that right now tho, I've gotta be in jail and become a Harbinger.
*Is in jail for a while and becomes a Harbinger*
Arlecchino: Huh I wonder why I am-
Pierro: Hey what's up hello, anyways you're descended from the Crimson Moon Dynasty of Khaenri'ah. I'm sure that this is a lot for you to take in so-
Arlecchino: Ok.
Pierro: ...You're just cool with that?
Arlecchino: IDK maybe? I can't really worry about that at the moment, I'm a father now. This orphanage full of children I love (who also are child soldiers and are not allowed to leave or else I'll execute them except maybe now I'm just gonna wipe their memories IDK I'm morally complex) isn't gonna run itself.
*Runs the orphanage/spy recruitment initiative*
Me, the fucking player: WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU ARE KHAENRI'AN? WHY WASN'T THIS BROUGHT UP IN YOUR FUCKING QUEST?? OR ANYTHING ELSE????
Arlecchino, talking to me through my phone: I honestly don't know why you care, I'm too busy to give a shit. Anyways, I'm gonna go fight fate itself I guess. I'm sure that I don't share any thematic parallels with any other Khaenri'an characters (particularly as it relates to acting and family angst) and that I haven't made the idea of 'curses' on Khaenri'ans and what they entail even more complicated than they already were. See ya.
40 notes
·
View notes
tomshiv presents the notion of love being "giving someone the power to hurt you" while tomgreg allows the more complete version of this idea: "and also, having been given this power, choosing not to use it"
143 notes
·
View notes