i sent this to that allthisbitchnmoanin blog -
I think most people are not ready to accept your decision to defend taylor's silence regarding Palestine because she is influential. sure, speaking up may endanger a celebrity's life but also they are celebrities which means they get access to better security than normal people. if she can call the paparazzi on herself that means she can afford better security too. the key word is afford here. she is a freaking billionaire. hell, she could even donate to the causes but no, why would she? look, it's obvious that one shouldn't be pressurised into speaking up about politics but if you have such a big platform and a huge influence, the least you can do is speak up about a genocide. you cannot talk about wanting to be on the right side of history while never putting any effort to do so. if your activism is limited to causes which only benefit you then it is not activism, it's selfishness.
Listen, my friend, I am not sure the person you originally sent this to will be at all receptive to your thoughts. The blog "defending ts" or "allthisbitchinandmoaning" or whoever they are by now- seems to be rather dogmatically entrenched in singularly following Taylor Swift's rhetoric. Rhetoric is not so easily dismissed- through pleas and logic. Rhetoric builds entire fantasy worlds wherein people can wholeheartedly follow the ideals of whomever- in this case it's Swift. Swift has proven time and time again that she does not care about anyone except herself.
I will say though- I saw one of their posts in which they essentially got more angry about how the demand for Swift to speak on the genocide is ruining her concerts than they are about the actual genocide that is taking place.
Bizarre take.
How can anyone, in good conscience, believe a stupid concert is more important than trying to stop a genocide?
People are fucking dying, and this person is more angry that chanting "free Palestine" or making signs about "free Palestine" at a concert is "harshing the vibes" of said concert- than they are angry about the actual genocide happening.
Where is the empathy for the humanitarian crisis?
Edit: It’s come to my attention that the link between the blog “defending ts” and the blog name “allthisbitchinandmoaning” is little more than rumor. They are most likely not the same person.
28 notes
·
View notes
ive been having a lot of fun incorporating embroidery onto paper drawings in school recently (inspired by a printmaking teacher i had once who sometimes stitched her prints, it looked really cool!) but one thing that has kind of been bugging me is how my instructors have been talking about the gendered aspect of it. i know using any form of textile practice in contemporary art is gonna get some kind of thoughts about the historical concept of "women's work" and i dont mind that thats chill thats like normal. its not what, i, the artist, is focusing on personally, but death of the author and all that, as an interpretation its an interesting thing to think about and equally as valid as my intention. also a good topic for essays and such
BUT today my instructor tried to convince me that i can embroider directly on printer paper instead of the thicker papers ive been using and i was like ABSOLUTELY NOT maybe YOU can but I have BIG CLUMSY SWEATY HOT MITTEN HANDS and i Destroy printer paper by looking at it funny. the second a photocopy reaches my skin its already wrinkled. gloves dont help my sweat is too powerful. im CLAMMY leave me ALONE hfkjrwefhjegrfe
and there is an unconcious bias ive been noticing of a lot of very progressively minded artists assuming that i can do this shit delicately. listen. embroidery can be a very delicate and masterful skill that people hone over decades. but not everyone who does it is that skilled master. some of us just like to clumsily sew string through stuff so they can feel the texture. and some of us are really sweaty.
4 notes
·
View notes
I am going to beat you UP BOOSTER GOLD!!!
In the future, all of the earth will be conquered. In a pretty easy way. Without wars and similar situations, and while under tyranny, it was actually a good place. A true utopia without heroes, villains, and similar.
+++
In the past,
It had been a normal day in the Justice League as Portal opened and a group of heroes and villains came out:
Just looking around, and all of them tried to jump Booster Gold and Flash.
As the Justice League after stopping them asked why the time traveler wanted to beat them up that badly, all of them wanted to do it. It was funny to see Lex and Superman working together after all.
+
They began to explain.
____
It all began with the introduction of young Dr. Daniel Fenton, a true child prodigy and self-made wealthy boy dedicated to helping others.
Everything was going smoothly until Booster Gold decided to share his unconventional thoughts.
He Suggested! That the child could potentially conquer the world using the current setting. And then told him a range of bizarre ideas, including a communications jamming system, missiles, traps, self-activating lasers, and even an indoor lagoon filled with piranhas.
Danny: "Piranha. Why ever would I want… piranha?"
Booster Gold: To eat the heroes And also think about a secret underground grotto with a speed boat for escape purposes. And-and-and gigantic Moving Weapons of doom, they'd be huge and destroy anything in their path!"
The Flash intervened, urging Booster Gold to leave, and Danny bid them farewell, expressing gratitude.
The Flash: Come on, Gold, we should leave.
+
As they departed.
Danny pondered the peculiar suggestions, acknowledging his abundant wealth and free time and contemplating the need for a new and interesting hobby.
++
Danny had come to this world to be a hero. But he never tried to pull a Vlad. And when he is done, he can show that he is better at it than him!
All he needed was to plan to not fail.
++
So after 5 years of planning, at the age of 19, he started his Conquest of the World, which was pretty successful in his victory speech. He thanked Booster Gold and the Flash for telling him he could change much more and much better if he were a villain and just took over the world! And he did!
++
While in the Justice League and Legion of Doom, who were in hidding, all at once slowly turned their heads to the duo. Like in a Horror Movie.
++++
Back to the present/Past
Both groups are happy that Flash and Booster Gold didn't meet the child prodigy; it turns out he was still at least 10 or 9 years old at the moment. A few years before he became famous, he was just living alone somewhere on Earth.
But that means a new plan!
Lex, like Veronica Cale, was pissed that the boy was able to take over their company, but then again, the boy was able to take over all the companies in America at the same time.
But now, in the past, they can think of plans—good plans! With their Guiding they can do so much!
Same with Heroes.
630 notes
·
View notes
I watched the new Percy Jackson show and then I reread The Lightning Thief, and my takeaway is…Rick Riordan did some sort of bizarre reversal of the usual adaptation devil’s deal on this one, wherein the key themes of the book are maintained—hell, key themes of the book are amped up and forefronted! The books slowly escalate, not just in the original PJO books but from series to series through Heroes of Olympus and the Apollo books, the idea that this mythological family is fucked up, the parents are doing badly and they need to fix their shit instead of just putting it on the kids. Whereas the show is saying this from day 1! The show also captures the true friendship, the uncomfortable justification of Luke’s choices, the heroes’ sense of otherness from humanity…
But at the cost of so much of the zing of the books? The humor, the absurdist snaps between fantasy and reality like the Minotaur wearing Fruit-of-the-Looms, or the unending quips from Percy that aren’t just rebellious snark, they’re funny. (“…I am the Mother of Monsters, Echidna!” “You mean the thing from Australia??”) And the drama, the fantasy, the mythological stakes—in addition to the total lack of nighttime lighting, I spent half the show thinking everything should be 20% more color-saturated, at least when they’re in Camp Half-Blood or actively fighting monsters, and rereading the book tells me that I was right. Throughout the books, there’s a mounting thunderstorm all across the country, as warning and ambiance of the coming war! Percy only has 1 dream that’s just darkness and a voice; the others include him watching a golden eagle and a giant white horse fighting viciously on a beach! And every god stands out vividly, whereas in the show they mostly come off as Some Guy. In the book, Hades, Zeus and Poseidon are all 10 feet tall (until Poseidon shrinks to tall to Percy), and even Ares is,
vs this? This was the best they could do??
He’s not even throwing fireballs at cops and innocent bystanders in order to make them back the fuck off from his fight with this 12yo. SMH. This is bargain-brand. It’s like they didn’t have the budget for special effects and they didn’t even try.
I guess, as devil’s deals go, I would rather have the themes intact. But damn I wish they’d at least upped the color saturation, and maybe the speed of dialogue. These kids SHOULD spend half their conversations snarking like it’s Avengers (2012) actually. The perfect adaptation remains elusive, until we get both the crushing weight of familial trauma AND epic heroes and villains being fun.
351 notes
·
View notes