current Star Wars has this interesting problem of feeling both overly connected (everything has to be intertwined, you need to know all the things that have ever happened) and extremely disconnected (we have never heard of major [character/event/institution] in our lives), which gets even weirder when it’s happening in the same book/show/movie/comic. like Mando relying so heavily on cameos but also essentially pretending 99% of the events and characters of TCW and Rebels don’t exist, even when they’re relevant. and especially with past retcons (*cough* Caleb and Depa in TBB *cough*) it makes it hard to take a good faith read on anything: like, are you not acknowledging previous media because you’re about to retcon it? is it just not actually relevant to the story you’re telling? are the creators unaware of previous thing? oh wait but you’ve made the plot of this episode dependent viewer knowing something absolutely critical about previous thing --
it’s just REALLY disorienting.
current Marvel has a similar but not identical problem, and I do genuinely think Marvel’s better at handling it than Star Wars, having been in both fandoms. (if nothing else, I respect that MCU writers/directors will just flat out say they haven’t seen previous installments or that they decided not to go XYZ route that was set up six movies back. obviously that is not ideal, but hey, at least they’re honest about it.) Marvel is conceptually smaller than Star Wars, which I think really, really helps; they’re working on a smaller scale, where Star Wars is very, very spread out. (except when it’s not, which takes us back to the original problem.) the MCU also has the benefit of not working over multiple media; yes, there are the prequel comics to a lot of the films, but they don’t actually expect most viewers to read them; every time the MCU relies on viewers having read the comics (not the tie-in comics, the actual Marvel comics) it does some weird stuff to the film/show. I know people talk about the MCUification of Star Wars and I disagree with that pretty strongly, but I’m not quite sure how to articulate it.
16 notes
·
View notes
I'm bad at math, but is Bruce theoretically 38 years old when he goes into the time stream?
Hear me out (and canon likes to fluncate their ages, so this is my best guess without trying to account for birthdays):
Bruce becomes the legal guardian of 9 year old Dick when he's 23. That's a 14 year difference.
Jason becomes Robin when Dick leaves at 18. Jason is 13. That's a five year difference.
Jason dies at 15, and Tim becomes Robin at 13. That's a two year difference.
The age difference between Tim and Bruce would thus be 21 years.
Tim becomes Red Robin to find Bruce at 17.
That means that Bruce had to be 38, right? Why was I imagining him closer to 50?
Adopting so many kids must have aged him
471 notes
·
View notes
*clears throat* The Watcher is a really good protagonist character.
Like honestly, when you think about it, it's really astounding that this series has the same blank slate character throughout the series and yet you can flesh them out thoroughly and give them an arc that effectively and dynamically arches over multiple installments. There aren't a lot of game series' out there that manage to pull this off this well
60 notes
·
View notes
Originally I wrote a whole thing about a comment someone left on a repost of my art that I found while reporting another repost, but like, getting angry will only make more pissed at the end, so on the quickest shortest way I can resume it: some people are like really comfortable just saying shit about my art or me on those pinterest reposts, being an asshole because why not ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Anyways saying that, PLEASE do let me know if you happen to see my art being reposted because a lot of the time I don't allow it, and most people that repost don't even ask for permission to repost, or worse, don't even credit me at the vare minimum.
(Two things I can quickly think of that I absolutely do not want reposts of are my sona/oc art and my iz fanart, those two are just NOT allowed to be reposted (that includes YouTube/video stuff, etc.))
Edit: tumblr reblogs are fine BTW!!!
31 notes
·
View notes
Adam Taurus was an inadvertent and *deeply* involuntary ally for three consecutive volumes, yes. I still love his VA's 'only allergic to Blake & Yang's love for each other' tweet.
So I initially made that post for the express purpose of seeing what would happen if I kicked a hornet's nest (not much, sadly), but it actually wasn't 100% a shitpost because Adam genuinely takes Blake and Yang's relationship extremely seriously. Like, yeah, he absolutely hates it, but he never really comments on the fact that Yang is a woman instead of a man. Instead, the core of his opposition to the Bees comes from the fact that he no longer "owns" or controls Blake (because Adam absolutely thinks of relationships in terms of of possession and control. Blake and Yang cannot be equal partners who genuinely love and respect each other, one of them has to be dominant over the other, and in his head it can't be Blake because he's too contemptuous of her and too used to dominating and terrorizing her to consider the possibility) and that Yang has superseded him as both the person who controls Blake and the object of her regard. He identifies Blake's feelings for Yang as early as Volume 3, specifically targets her instead of Sun to hurt Blake, and otherwise treats her as seriously as characters of this nature treat male rivals in other media. He certainly gives Blake and Yang's relationship more credit than the chucklefucks who still insist to this day that both the Bees are straight somehow.
84 notes
·
View notes
i keep thinking about how olive green's whole murder plan is also a kind of test.
because she didn't know her fiance was murdered. she didn't really consider the possibility of murder until she heard soseki talking about his gas leak. perhaps she suspected something beforehand- "i'm going to buy strychnine" is a pretty big jump to make from "my fiance died in an accident"- but if she hadn't overheard soseki, she probably would have accepted the explanation that duncan's death was an accident, and left it at that.
she wasn't sure. she was setting up a plan to murder a man and she still wasn't sure if duncan's death was an accident or not.
like, she sends the letter to william shamspeare, but the letter specifically says, "i have information regarding duncan ross's death." if shamspeare hadn't been involved, he might not have heeded the letter- he might have brought it to the police, or the landlord, or just ignored it. he might not have left his apartment at all.
he does, though. and when she goes to briar road, his flat is empty. but that's not confirmation- maybe he was scared he'd be hurt if he didn't follow the instructions, or maybe he didn't know what else to do. she doesn't know for sure.
so she executes a murder plan that will only kill him if she's right.
she wanted the truth. but she wanted revenge, too, for her and for duncan, and the two are inextricably linked- the crime committed against her, and the crime she committed in order to know what had happened. she set it up so that her revenge would give her the truth- if shamspeare died, then she knew she was right.
but then she fails. she loses both: shamspeare survives, and she now knows the truth but she's made it unusable. she can't come forward with the knowledge that her fiance was killed, because the only way she can prove she knows that is to admit to her own attempted murder- and who will believe her then?
(and she and duncan are poor. she's not wealthy enough for the police to care- what are the chances that they would have discovered her murder, thrown her in prison, and stopped there? her murder was a lot more clear-cut than shamspeare's, so it's likely that her crime would be discovered first, and no one is going to bother investigating the claims of a poor woman already arrested for murder.)
we've seen people commit murder in the name of vengeance before. ashley graydon does it in 1-5, and we'll see it again with enoch drebber in 2-3. but i think olive green is the first person we see to tie truth and vengeance together- to make "getting revenge for the loss of a loved one" and "finding the truth behind the loss of her loved one" one and the same. and it backfires on her, in the end- but it was the only way she could see forward, to actually find closure for what she'd lost.
(hey, kazuma. remind you of anyone?)
31 notes
·
View notes