Tumgik
#sasha.txt
erinlindsayy · 2 years
Text
Girls are like “I’m fine!” and then consume thousands of words of fanfiction to cope with their exhausting modern lives
36K notes · View notes
googledocsdyke · 9 months
Text
the THING is that when aziraphale says “i forgive you” he means “having been utterly re-brainwashed by the supreme and intoxicating force of Approval from a Higher Heavenly Authority to validate my prior life as Good and Righteous and True, i, wracked with newly-reborn self-loathing about ever having turned my back on heaven, forgive you, whom i love and must therefore surely be good and worthy of forgiveness, for rebuking the chance to ascend righteously into heaven with me” and when crowley hears “i forgive you” he hears “crowley i forgive you for the crime and moral lapse of desiring me, of wanting, of kissing me, of giving me love that i cannot possibly respond to nor reciprocate, of being who you are which is someone who is not only a demon but, much worse, wants me.” If you even care. (And for the record you shouldn’t)
1K notes · View notes
Text
i like how you can go on this website and every single day without fail see someone confidently proclaim an opinion that they believe is revolutionary and new, but is, like, held by 90% of the fucking planet and encouraged by the establishment
shoutouts to 'it's okay to like men'
2K notes · View notes
nihongoseito · 2 months
Text
does anyone have any recs for native websites/apps (=not made for learners) that are fun to read? i’m not interested in the news....i’m considering getting a magazine subscription from honto but i figured i’d ask what ppl are reading before i decide for sure 🤔
311 notes · View notes
wordscholar · 8 months
Text
hello linguists of tumblr: chants of sennaar
119 notes · View notes
lanayrusea · 17 days
Text
metroid dread is a cozy game. to me
22 notes · View notes
bloodybutch · 2 years
Text
who wants to pound me in a gender-affirming manner
521 notes · View notes
magnoliae · 1 year
Text
sending psionic blasts to whomever donates to ao3
94 notes · View notes
echidnana · 27 days
Text
ok hello I'm a sort of new split and need to figure out a name bc I've been signing off all of my journal entries as "new split" so. does anyone have name recommendations that are like. brown? not sure how to describe it, but names that are the color brown
8 notes · View notes
prettiest-poison · 2 months
Text
@mollyhale thank you so much for tagging me (as always 💕)
what song(s) are you currently hyper fixating on? "Hostage" by Maggie Lindemann, "Concrete Jungle" by Bad Omens, "Kool Aid" by Bring Me The Horizon, "Fake As Hell" by All Time Low ft. Avril Lavigne
7 notes · View notes
erinlindsayy · 2 years
Text
You’re telling me that there are other people on here that I could’ve been sharing try guys theories with all along???
35 notes · View notes
googledocsdyke · 9 months
Text
being fifteen like the Only person eho understands me is the song gasoline by halsey
645 notes · View notes
i think the reason bl discourse is so unproductive and never reaches even half a point of compromise (though it shouldn't) is that the arguments from either side wre being made in, about, a completely different framework
(i agree with the lesbian one, by the way. not the bi lesbian one.)
when we say 'bi lesbian shouldn't exist as a term' we mean, that- as a term. but bl supporters take this as an attack on, a restrictor of literal human experience. they take it to mean- the experience of someone who describes themselves as bi lesbian is not real.
but it obviously is real! physically, that can't be denied - every experience is real. the experience proposed - 'sapphic attracted to men who mostly identifies with the sapphic attraction' (or variations thereof) are, of course, extant experiences. they are experiences that might even warrant a term of their own. but the term they have been given, proposed, is 'bi lesbian'. a variation of a different term- a term currently, for decades now, understood as 'sapphic not attracted yo men'
both of these descriptions i gave are simplifications, by the way. but this is a tumblr post on the tumblr website. I'm not writing a sociological essay here. the idea of sapphic as 'nonman attracted to nonmen' is not wrong, and people arguing that it is are simply again the same people im complaining about here
this is the problem. the argument is about language not extant experience. i don't think any bl supporter- i hope, rather- believes that 'sapphic not attracted to men' is not a real experience
(who am i kidding. I've had people proudly tell me it in fact isn't.)
it is an extant experience. it's one, in the current world, described by the word lesbian
'bi lesbian' thus proposes that this experience is actually related enough to atrraction to men that it should share terms. not just 'sapphic' - every term. there have been posts made to the end of 'why don't lesbians just make a new unrelated term!' but they're silly- we already have one, and there already is a unifying term- sapphic
instead, what bl supporters' posts propose most often is- that the widespread, commonplace existence of a term for 'sapphic not attracted to men' is restrictive to the attraction to men of some people, because they are arguing in a framework of 'if you deny me certain language, you deny me experience' - and this is both patently not true, and also the actual effect of their own support of the merging of the term lesbian to include attraction to men
terms can't just mean anything. some definitions are contradictory with each other. the experiences? no, of course not. and of course, definitions can change, and i am not saying lesbian literally HAS to mean unattracted to men- no term on this planet has to mean one or another thing. 'apple' could mean 'orange'. it's just a word.
but to fans of apples who aren't crazy about oranges, for 'apple' to mean both 'orange' and 'apple', it would be a bit useless, wouldn't it? 'i like apples' would need to always be appended with 'and i mean only apples. not oranges. just apples, without the oranges part'. and that's just a bit stupid, and telling apple-likers to invent a new term for apples that are only apples- when a unifying term, fruits, already exists-
i think, perhaps, it's all just rabid hatred of the idea some people aren't and can't be and don't want to be attracted to men
100 notes · View notes
nihongoseito · 10 months
Text
here’s an interesting internet word i just learned:
垢作る(あかつくる) = to make an account (on a website)
the use of 垢 is as an ateji from アカウントを作る! 💻🖱
466 notes · View notes
wordscholar · 10 months
Text
on today’s episode of “linguistic wisdom or sex advice?”: anything you can do with your mouth, you can do with your hands
70 notes · View notes
lanayrusea · 8 months
Text
constantly thinking about how if you tell kim you learned about the pale in spite of what he said he just admits he was being “overprotective”
20 notes · View notes