ninjago writers: "we're breaking gender norms by having powerful female characters in stem!"
"yeah but they all have the same interests and the same 'snarky mothering character' personality..."
ninjago writers: "THEY ARE STRONG #GIRLBOSSES!!!!!1!!!!"
11 notes
·
View notes
i fucking hate how autism advocacy is so largely populated by late-diagnosed high-functioning autistics that forget that some people can't mask because you get takes like fuckingnfjdjdj "stop using functioning labels they're ableist" (they're not saying you're low/high-functioning is a neutral fucking statement just like saying ur disabled is) or god forbid fucking "well actually autism doesn't inhibit people that much and people like the stereotypes don't really exist" fuuuuuck you i AM the stereotypes, i use diapers as a disability aid and struggle to take care of myself without help, my "job" can barely be considered a job because anything else exhausts me too easily or i fail to understand it, i almost didn't fjcking pass high school, the only thing keeping you from immediately branding me as what i am (severely disabled) is the fact that i can type coherently fuck yoooouuuu. like i get it you all want rights i want rights to!! but the shit that you say in an attempt to get rights for yourself makes it so much less fucking likely for people like ME to get rights too. you're not taking a step forward by ignoring the fact that we exist you're just taking twenty fuckin steps back for god's sake
11 notes
·
View notes
so ive been rewatching atla for the first time in years to finish up my airbending gif series and i keep being struck by two things
1 how much i love this show, and therefore how excited i am about the live action series
and 2 how much i love animation, and therefore how apprehensive i am about the live action series
8 notes
·
View notes
Tbh I don't really mind the "pay to not see ads" business model because to me it is significantly preferable to the more common business model of "never stop seeing ads forever even if you pay us because we are an advertising platform first, anything else is secondary" that a lot of websites and apps seem to employ these days.
11 notes
·
View notes
hi hello! hope you are having a great time! I'm curious about what you said about the bakugo family and how it's viewed, i'd like to hear more if you're up for talking about it☺️
hi hi!! another anon asked me the same thing and honestly idk how to word it / expand on it much
but i think the way a lot of western fans had reacted specifically to the brief scene of mitsuki and how much they continue to have like a very extreme view on her parenting is a clue-in to peoples unfamiliarity with asian familial responsibility in general ig.
like a lot of people were very quick to jump to calling her abusive pointing to her hitting bakugou (in a way that is obviously meant to be read as a gag) and points out her critique of his behavior / calling him weak to be abusive.
but like. horikoshi has no issue showing abusive parenthood in it's entirety. if we as the audience were meant to infer that from any part of bakugous character, we would've seen it very explicitly in the text already. mitsuki just doesn't have a gentle style to parenting bakugou but her parenting style does feel very... asian mom to me in general
then there's this thing that a lot of western fans hyperfocused on when the anime came out which is mitsuki calling bakugou weak and an instance in the hero license arc w todoroki where he mentions being raised roughly (it is clear by the end of this chapter that bakugou means to exhibit his power, not that he was beat at any point or abused at any point.)
for mitsuki calling bakugou weak it needs more clarification i think. but in japan, there is HUGE cultural values of not inconveniencing or imposing upon other people. like it has a whole phrase. hito ni meiwaku wo kakenai. do not take up any attention and always assume you're the least important person in the room.
mitsuki references this manner in the raws esentially. a word that mitsuki uses when calling bakugou weak is miuchi which can mean relative but can also refer to body or extension of ones body. her calling bakugou weak can also be interpreted as her being critical of her inability to parent well. the japanese audience did not have anything even kind of resembling the reaction to this scene as the western audience did and in general i think this jump to calling mitsuki abusive and not acknowledging any of the other nuances of her speech to the teachers felt very indicative of that cultural gap i suppose
because mitsuki also goes on to acknowledge how bakugou was also ultimately effected by the system and gives probably the most straightforward summaries of his character in the entire show that isnt like pure subtext. and bakugou quite obviously isnt scare of her. like he shows no signs of abuse otherwise.
people are free to see their relationship however they want, but i do think the overlooking of these things or this very literal interpertation of their relationship was very telling that people were viewing the story through very western values i guess.
40 notes
·
View notes
okay so. am i the only person who thinks its a little ridiculous to say you cant think a character is attractive because said character is a minor when said character is a) a teenager and b) animated?
like im sorry but i dont think its immoral to look at a drawing of a fictional 14 year old and think theyre hot.
and i also dont think its an immoral act to have them in a tournament of "most attractive X character" because those tournaments almost entirely consist of two pictures of fictional characters and a poll asking which is more attractive.
theyre not real. its a drawing of a person, and that person isnt actually 14 because theyre not real. in the media theyre in, they are canonically 14 but that media itself is entirely fictional.
like this is all just thought crime. its puritanism in the name of "progress". its people flagellating themselves for thinking one of the shadows on the wall is hot.
and i just think thats fucking ridiculous.
3 notes
·
View notes
I sometimes think that like maybe I'm too hard on true crime for being like a thing that appeals to women and thus often a magnet for harsher critism than it perhaps deserves, then I tried to watch a single true crime video from a channel a girl I went on a few dates with last year recommended about an indicdent related to a special interest of mine and thus that I know a lot about. And not only have the first 6 minutes been her shilling perfume that she literally can't even purchase in her country. Then she treats the actually subject matter with not tack what so ever and has to start the video with a god damn "owo please don't harass people" memo that would only exist if thats a problem shes been having.
So basically in conclusion I have never been wrong about anything ever and true crime is just as bad as I always thought 🙃
2 notes
·
View notes
Speaking as a person who frequently deals with sensory overload, public music discourse is so annoying sometimes, like what is it morally wrong to busk? Should it be illegal for stores or restaurants to play music, should we publically shame homeless people for playing their own music, for not having headphones? Should parades festivals and block parties be prohibited from people playing instruments or using speakers. Music is literally baked into the way our brains work as a species, and while I acknowledge that there are definitely times that playing music in public is inappropriate and annoying; context is always key. But I think some of you sound like stuck up conservatives when you try to say no one should ever play music in public, and trying to ban it outright is completely unrealistic and I don't think it would actually solve any of the issues people have with public music.
3 notes
·
View notes
to anyone watching the james somerton situation and going "well how DO you write your own things like this then? everyone's talking about how /not/ to but i dont know where to start, the way highschool taught me essay writing was all about the number of sentences in a paragraph and mla citations :("
you know how james made things up between his """sources""" that sounded just plausible enough that people accepted it? he did it in the wrong order, do that part first THEN research. 100% serious right now, just make some shit up in your head that sounds vaguely right based on what you know now, write it down, and then go check if you're actually right or not. boom, now you have a topic. thats literally all it is, its just you saying "i think (xyz)" and then checking to see if the facts agree with you or not. if you turn out to be right, talk about what lead you to the conclusion initially and anything you learned about that you didn't predict. if you turn out to be wrong, talk about the right answer and examine why you thought differently at first. then either way talk about how things got that way, if you think it should stay like that, and why (e.g. how does it being that way effect people right now). tada suddenly you have an essay that is unplagiarized and entirely your own thoughts, with a plethora of sources on hand to cite because That's What You Used To Check. now be free your beautiful doves
1 note
·
View note